[Key interpretation] BTC and ETH completed the downtrend signal synchronously, and three favorable conditions stimulated QNT to soar by 50%

HuobiPublished on 2022-09-28Last updated on 2022-09-29

Abstract

The slump signal continued, BTC prices shot up and fell back in the short term, and ETH selling pressure increased significantly

1. BTC kills in a large amount

The BTC price rose and fell again in the short term. The price retreated from more than 20000 US dollars to around 18700 US dollars, and the trading volume in the same period was obviously recovering. This shows that the 4-hour BTC selling is relatively intuitive and clear, and continues to push the BTC price back down. Judging from the pressure level, BTC's selling pressure of $20000 is heavy, which means that the rapid price drop on September 13 still has an effective impact on the trend. BTC's clear rebound space has been extremely compressed, and the break may be completed in the short term.

2. Long term investors sell BTC

Although the selling of long-term investors was stable, the CDD indicator of continuous pulse recovery showed that the number of BTC currency destroyed per day remained active, and the rebound again suggested that the selling pressure increased. At the same time, BTC showed clear signs of adjustment around 18000 dollars. This shows that the early low support of $17600 is no longer effective. The BTC may open downward in a short time.

3. ETH confirms reverse configuration

The ETH daily K line chart shows that the price will rise and fall in the short term. Although the price did not touch the corresponding USD 1470 of the middle track of the Bollinger Line, the ETH reverse trend will be confirmed soon. This shows that after nearly a week of sideways adjustment, the selling pressure of ETH has risen rapidly, and further downward space has been confirmed.

At present, the offline price of ETH's Brin line is at the low level of $1104, so the effective price range for short-term pullback is high. Once the price retreats to $1104, and the ETH price is close to the support level of $1106 corresponding to 78.6% of Fibonacci, it is difficult to confirm the support effect.

4. ETH was sold in large quantities

The selling pressure of ETH increased, and the top ten transactions of the exchange selling pressure rebounded significantly, reaching 11841 ETHs on September 27, worth 15 million dollars. According to this judgment, the ETH price retreat may be realized in the short term. In addition to the 3% drop in the daily K line level, further pullback may touch the lower support of $1100.

5. QNT price signs soar

Quant (QNT) is an interoperability focused agreement whose price has soared to a record high. This project aims to help enterprises integrate and operate distributed ledger technology (DLT).

The three reasons for the price increase of QNT include its recent agreement upgrade to Overledger 2.0.5, the launch of the Quant developer program, and increased access to its supply after the listing of the largest crypto exchange.

Interoperability expansion

In the message hour on September 7, Overloader 2.0.5 was released as a DLT gateway for enterprises, providing universal interoperability between various protocols and allowing users to connect any system to any network or DLT.

To connect the ecosystem with stable currency, DeFi, NFT and the popular ERC20/ERC721 digital assets for clearing and settlement.

QNT provides rewards for developers

The second reason for Quant's growing strength is the launch of the Quant Developer Program, which aims to attract new developers to the ecosystem.

An active community is the symbol of a successful blockchain ecosystem. Developers play a vital role by creating on-demand applications and protocols that attract users and encourage activities on the chain.

The launch of QNT in major exchanges has promoted the increase of trading volume

In the past few months, QNT launched two major exchanges, which made the average daily trading volume of 24 hours jump from 9 million dollars to more than 740 million dollars on September 6.

Soaring Export Data for Memory Chips, Market Is Redefining the Valuation Anchor for Memory Stocks

Korean storage export data for the first 20 days of June shows substantial year-on-year increases in both value and price-per-kilogram for categories like DRAM, NAND, and SSDs. This signals a potential shift beyond simple demand recovery, indicating rising prices and a product mix shift towards higher-value items, possibly influenced by AI infrastructure needs. A key point is that the surge in price-per-kilogram is not simply a uniform chip price hike. It reflects a combination of actual price increases and, more importantly, an export structure increasingly dominated by high-value-density products like HBM (High-Bandwidth Memory) and advanced DRAM, which are critical for AI servers. This suggests AI-driven demand may be spilling over from just HBM into broader memory markets. SK Hynix stands to benefit directly due to its leading HBM position. For Samsung and Micron, the implication is potential for greater margin elasticity if the tightness in high-end memory spreads to enterprise SSD and NAND prices. However, the storage sector remains cyclical. Risks include supply expansion, inventory changes, and potential slowdowns in broader AI capital expenditure. Ultimately, while the strong export data supports upward revisions for storage company earnings and fuels discussion of an "AI infrastructure bottleneck premium," a definitive valuation shift from a cyclical to a structural story depends on upcoming quarterly reports. Investors need confirmation from SK Hynix, Samsung, and Micron that improvements in average selling prices, product mix, and, crucially,毛利率 are sustained over multiple quarters.

marsbit32m ago

Soaring Export Data for Memory Chips, Market Is Redefining the Valuation Anchor for Memory Stocks

marsbit32m ago

Why Does SpaceX Have Such a High Valuation Ceiling? The Answer Lies in Musk's Business Blueprint

SpaceX achieved a record-breaking IPO on June 12, 2026, with its market cap surging past $2.1 trillion. This valuation reflects its central role within Elon Musk's expansive, interconnected technological ecosystem. The article details how four core components form a synergistic closed-loop system: 1) **The "Brain" (xAI & Orbital Compute):** xAI provides AI models and massive ground/space-based supercomputing for simulation and decision-making across the system. 2) **The "Neural Logistics Core" (Starlink & Starship):** Starlink's low-latency satellite network enables global data transmission, while Starship's low-cost, reusable launch capacity aims to make large-scale space deployment economically viable. 3) **The "Physical Body" (Tesla & Optimus):** Tesla's manufacturing prowess and energy products support hardware production and power, pivoting toward mass-producing the Optimus humanoid robot for terrestrial and potential space-based labor. 4) **The "Human Interface" (Neuralink & X):** Neuralink seeks direct brain-computer communication, and the X platform provides real-time societal data. Together, these elements create three reinforcing "flywheels": manufacturing/logistics, data-driven iteration, and energy/compute/network synergy. This integrated approach promises lower costs, faster innovation cycles, and potential infrastructure-as-a-service offerings. However, it also concentrates technical, regulatory, and corporate governance risks. Ultimately, SpaceX's high valuation stems from its position as the indispensable infrastructural backbone—handling space transport, global communications, and future orbital computing—tying together Musk's entire vision for a self-reinforcing technological empire.

marsbit37m ago

Why Does SpaceX Have Such a High Valuation Ceiling? The Answer Lies in Musk's Business Blueprint

marsbit37m ago

Snap, Unprofitable for Nine Years, and a Decade-Long AR Obsession Without Return

Snap's AR Obsession: A Decade of Betting Against the Odds On June 16, Snap CEO Evan Spiegel unveiled the new AR glasses, Specs, priced at $2,195, causing the company's stock (SNAP) to plummet nearly 10%. The launch was met with intense criticism online, with investors questioning why a consistently unprofitable company would stake its future on an expensive product its core young user base can't afford. Snapchat, known for pioneering features like ephemeral Stories and popular AR lenses (like the iconic dog filter), has a history of innovation often copied by rivals like Instagram and Meta. Despite this, it has struggled to translate first-mover advantage into commercial success. Since its 2017 IPO, Snap has reported annual net losses, with a Q1 2026 loss of $89 million. Its stock is down 94% from its 2021 peak, hampered by iOS privacy changes, competition, and a young demographic less attractive to major advertisers. In this challenging context, Spiegel is doubling down on AR. He calls 2026 a "crucible moment," having recently laid off 16% of staff while reportedly investing over $3.5 billion cumulatively in its AR glasses line over nearly a decade. The new Specs represent a significant leap from the 2016 camera-focused Spectacles, offering true AR overlays, gesture control, and standalone operation. However, at $2,195, it faces tough comparisons. While more advanced than Meta's $799 Ray-Ban smart glasses, critics point to its heavier weight, short battery life, and features largely replicable by a smartphone. Facing pressure from investors to cut losses on the Specs project, Spiegel has refused, framing it as essential to Snap's long-term vision. The company finds itself in a paradoxical position: cutting costs while heavily funding a decade-long, unproven bet. Some see Specs as an awkward but necessary step in AR's evolution, akin to early mobile phones. Whether Spiegel is a visionary outlier or a gambler destined to fail remains an open question, highlighting the tension between long-term ambition and short-term market demands.

marsbit59m ago

Snap, Unprofitable for Nine Years, and a Decade-Long AR Obsession Without Return

marsbit59m ago

Annualized Revenue Exceeds $20 Billion, Kalshi Aims to Become the First Prediction Platform IPO?

Kalshi, a leading U.S. prediction markets platform, is reportedly in early, informal discussions for an Initial Public Offering (IPO). The company's annualized revenue now exceeds $2 billion, fueled by its dominance of over 90% of the domestic prediction market activity. This growth stems from a surge in trading volume—reaching a total of $52.7 billion—and an increase in fee rates, largely driven by sports event contracts like the NBA playoffs and the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Monthly active users are approximately 2 million. Kalshi recently raised $1 billion in a funding round led by Coatue Management, valuing the company at $22 billion. It has also expanded its offerings to include Bitcoin perpetual contracts and plans to launch a dedicated trading platform, Kalshi Pro. However, Kalshi's path to an IPO faces significant regulatory hurdles. The core risk involves jurisdictional conflicts, as multiple U.S. states are challenging its operations under local gambling laws. For instance, Arizona has filed criminal charges against the platform, while states like Kentucky have filed lawsuits. Kalshi and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) argue that its event contracts fall under exclusive federal jurisdiction as "swaps." The outcomes of these ongoing legal battles could critically impact Kalshi's core revenue and its IPO timeline. Analysts suggest that while an IPO could theoretically occur by late 2026, a more likely timeframe is late 2027 or 2028, contingent on resolving legal issues and favorable market conditions. If successful, its fundraising could significantly exceed $1 billion, given its current valuation and revenue multiple.

Foresight News1h ago

Annualized Revenue Exceeds $20 Billion, Kalshi Aims to Become the First Prediction Platform IPO?

Foresight News1h ago

Don't Care if You Know Football or Not, Buying the Draw Is the Best Strategy for This World Cup?

The article analyzes the 2026 FIFA World Cup group stage and argues that betting on a draw has been a surprisingly profitable strategy. Based on data from the prediction market Polymarket, a strategy of betting $1000 on a draw for each of the first 40 matches would have yielded a return of over 100%, despite only 13 matches ending in a draw. The core of the strategy is not the frequency of wins, but the high payout when low-probability draws occur, such as Spain's 0-0 draw with Cape Verde, where pre-match odds for a draw were only 5.5%. The article identifies common draw scores, like 1-1, which provide stability, and high-value 0-0 stalemates, where favorites fail to break down resilient defenses. It highlights Group G as an example, where 3 of the first 4 matches ended in draws, illustrating that draws are a tactical part of group stage calculus as teams often prioritize not losing. In conclusion, while strong teams remain favorites on the pitch, the article claims that for traders, betting on draws has so far produced the most significant profits.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Don't Care if You Know Football or Not, Buying the Draw Is the Best Strategy for This World Cup?

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Trading

Spot

Futures