[Key interpretation] Whale's scramble for LUNC soared by 67%, and the strength of BTC bulls soared

HuobiPublished on 2022-09-27Last updated on 2022-09-28

Abstract

BTC's short-term volume rose sharply, and the bulls entered the market.

1. BTC turnover shows signs of shrinking

The BTC price obviously did not fall back after the drop in volatility, but continued to rebound in large quantities. Although there is little room for growth, it is indeed a rare bullish signal in the near future. In terms of pressure level, BTC rose by more than 20000 US dollars, which is just below the closing price of the previous 4-hour K-line decline. Before the closing of BTC on September 13, a decline of 7% appeared in the 4-hour chart, indicating that the pressure level was sold strongly. The short-term strength of BTC this time can be said to be a technical rebound in low price areas. Whether we can further expand the growth space depends on the confirmation of indicators.

2. The position of BTC contract transaction rebounded

In contract trading, BTC investors' long and short currency holdings rebounded significantly. On September 27, the value reached around 1.162, a new high in more than a year. This shows that in the process of short-term price rise, the strength of bulls and shorts has changed significantly, and the influence of bulls on the market has increased rapidly.

In terms of position, BTC's total contract position rebounded to USD 9.26 billion on the 27th of the 9th page, an increase of USD 870 million compared with USD 8.39 billion the previous day. The position rebounded rapidly, and BTC entered an active trading state.

3. ETH horizontal arrangement

The K line chart of ETH day shows that the price has rebounded obviously, but it is still fluctuating in the neighborhood. The small change in trading volume means that the rebound strength of ETH brewing is not high. At present, the performance of the overall mainstream currency is consistent with that of ETH. Although it has experienced a full callback, the reversal intensity is weak, and further attention should be paid to the trend of bulls.

4. The number of ETH receiving addresses is abnormally low

The number of ETH out of the exchange rebounded, especially in the performance of the top ten transactions out of the exchange, which indicates that the main short-term protection has achieved good results. On September 27, the first 10 transactions out of the exchange reached 3297 ETHs, which means that the selling pressure has dropped and the strength of bulls is rising rapidly, which is synchronized with the rebound of 8% of the ETH price in 24 hours.

5. LUNC is strongly lifted

The 4-hour K-line chart shows that LUNC's short-term growth has reached 67%, and the synchronous volume shows that the main force is driving up LUNC's price. From the perspective of the volume and price performance after the increase, LUNC has significantly reduced its volume and collated sideways, which means that the energy of high selling is not high, forming a significant support for the price.

The number of coins held by the top 10, top 20, top 50 and top 100 also rebounded significantly, with the proportion rebounding to 11.38%, 15.92%, 25.43% and 34.36%. From the data on September 27, the growth rate reached 4, 4 and 3 percentage points respectively compared with that on September 21. Considering the short-term stability of LUNC's main currency, the price may remain strong.

Related Reads

Soaring Export Data for Memory Chips, Market Is Redefining the Valuation Anchor for Memory Stocks

Korean storage export data for the first 20 days of June shows substantial year-on-year increases in both value and price-per-kilogram for categories like DRAM, NAND, and SSDs. This signals a potential shift beyond simple demand recovery, indicating rising prices and a product mix shift towards higher-value items, possibly influenced by AI infrastructure needs. A key point is that the surge in price-per-kilogram is not simply a uniform chip price hike. It reflects a combination of actual price increases and, more importantly, an export structure increasingly dominated by high-value-density products like HBM (High-Bandwidth Memory) and advanced DRAM, which are critical for AI servers. This suggests AI-driven demand may be spilling over from just HBM into broader memory markets. SK Hynix stands to benefit directly due to its leading HBM position. For Samsung and Micron, the implication is potential for greater margin elasticity if the tightness in high-end memory spreads to enterprise SSD and NAND prices. However, the storage sector remains cyclical. Risks include supply expansion, inventory changes, and potential slowdowns in broader AI capital expenditure. Ultimately, while the strong export data supports upward revisions for storage company earnings and fuels discussion of an "AI infrastructure bottleneck premium," a definitive valuation shift from a cyclical to a structural story depends on upcoming quarterly reports. Investors need confirmation from SK Hynix, Samsung, and Micron that improvements in average selling prices, product mix, and, crucially,毛利率 are sustained over multiple quarters.

marsbit32m ago

Soaring Export Data for Memory Chips, Market Is Redefining the Valuation Anchor for Memory Stocks

marsbit32m ago

Why Does SpaceX Have Such a High Valuation Ceiling? The Answer Lies in Musk's Business Blueprint

SpaceX achieved a record-breaking IPO on June 12, 2026, with its market cap surging past $2.1 trillion. This valuation reflects its central role within Elon Musk's expansive, interconnected technological ecosystem. The article details how four core components form a synergistic closed-loop system: 1) **The "Brain" (xAI & Orbital Compute):** xAI provides AI models and massive ground/space-based supercomputing for simulation and decision-making across the system. 2) **The "Neural Logistics Core" (Starlink & Starship):** Starlink's low-latency satellite network enables global data transmission, while Starship's low-cost, reusable launch capacity aims to make large-scale space deployment economically viable. 3) **The "Physical Body" (Tesla & Optimus):** Tesla's manufacturing prowess and energy products support hardware production and power, pivoting toward mass-producing the Optimus humanoid robot for terrestrial and potential space-based labor. 4) **The "Human Interface" (Neuralink & X):** Neuralink seeks direct brain-computer communication, and the X platform provides real-time societal data. Together, these elements create three reinforcing "flywheels": manufacturing/logistics, data-driven iteration, and energy/compute/network synergy. This integrated approach promises lower costs, faster innovation cycles, and potential infrastructure-as-a-service offerings. However, it also concentrates technical, regulatory, and corporate governance risks. Ultimately, SpaceX's high valuation stems from its position as the indispensable infrastructural backbone—handling space transport, global communications, and future orbital computing—tying together Musk's entire vision for a self-reinforcing technological empire.

marsbit37m ago

Why Does SpaceX Have Such a High Valuation Ceiling? The Answer Lies in Musk's Business Blueprint

marsbit37m ago

Snap, Unprofitable for Nine Years, and a Decade-Long AR Obsession Without Return

Snap's AR Obsession: A Decade of Betting Against the Odds On June 16, Snap CEO Evan Spiegel unveiled the new AR glasses, Specs, priced at $2,195, causing the company's stock (SNAP) to plummet nearly 10%. The launch was met with intense criticism online, with investors questioning why a consistently unprofitable company would stake its future on an expensive product its core young user base can't afford. Snapchat, known for pioneering features like ephemeral Stories and popular AR lenses (like the iconic dog filter), has a history of innovation often copied by rivals like Instagram and Meta. Despite this, it has struggled to translate first-mover advantage into commercial success. Since its 2017 IPO, Snap has reported annual net losses, with a Q1 2026 loss of $89 million. Its stock is down 94% from its 2021 peak, hampered by iOS privacy changes, competition, and a young demographic less attractive to major advertisers. In this challenging context, Spiegel is doubling down on AR. He calls 2026 a "crucible moment," having recently laid off 16% of staff while reportedly investing over $3.5 billion cumulatively in its AR glasses line over nearly a decade. The new Specs represent a significant leap from the 2016 camera-focused Spectacles, offering true AR overlays, gesture control, and standalone operation. However, at $2,195, it faces tough comparisons. While more advanced than Meta's $799 Ray-Ban smart glasses, critics point to its heavier weight, short battery life, and features largely replicable by a smartphone. Facing pressure from investors to cut losses on the Specs project, Spiegel has refused, framing it as essential to Snap's long-term vision. The company finds itself in a paradoxical position: cutting costs while heavily funding a decade-long, unproven bet. Some see Specs as an awkward but necessary step in AR's evolution, akin to early mobile phones. Whether Spiegel is a visionary outlier or a gambler destined to fail remains an open question, highlighting the tension between long-term ambition and short-term market demands.

marsbit59m ago

Snap, Unprofitable for Nine Years, and a Decade-Long AR Obsession Without Return

marsbit59m ago

Annualized Revenue Exceeds $20 Billion, Kalshi Aims to Become the First Prediction Platform IPO?

Kalshi, a leading U.S. prediction markets platform, is reportedly in early, informal discussions for an Initial Public Offering (IPO). The company's annualized revenue now exceeds $2 billion, fueled by its dominance of over 90% of the domestic prediction market activity. This growth stems from a surge in trading volume—reaching a total of $52.7 billion—and an increase in fee rates, largely driven by sports event contracts like the NBA playoffs and the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Monthly active users are approximately 2 million. Kalshi recently raised $1 billion in a funding round led by Coatue Management, valuing the company at $22 billion. It has also expanded its offerings to include Bitcoin perpetual contracts and plans to launch a dedicated trading platform, Kalshi Pro. However, Kalshi's path to an IPO faces significant regulatory hurdles. The core risk involves jurisdictional conflicts, as multiple U.S. states are challenging its operations under local gambling laws. For instance, Arizona has filed criminal charges against the platform, while states like Kentucky have filed lawsuits. Kalshi and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) argue that its event contracts fall under exclusive federal jurisdiction as "swaps." The outcomes of these ongoing legal battles could critically impact Kalshi's core revenue and its IPO timeline. Analysts suggest that while an IPO could theoretically occur by late 2026, a more likely timeframe is late 2027 or 2028, contingent on resolving legal issues and favorable market conditions. If successful, its fundraising could significantly exceed $1 billion, given its current valuation and revenue multiple.

Foresight News1h ago

Annualized Revenue Exceeds $20 Billion, Kalshi Aims to Become the First Prediction Platform IPO?

Foresight News1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片