XDC Network’s long game – Should traders brace for a deeper pullback soon?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-08Last updated on 2026-02-08

Abstract

XDC Network's token (XDC) declined slightly by 0.76% in 24 hours but remains up 6.13% weekly, outperforming Bitcoin. Despite a significant 84% drop in daily active users since 2021 and concerns about low on-chain utility, recent data suggests a potential easing in selling pressure. The network completed a successful hardfork to strengthen its real-world asset (RWA) tokenization infrastructure. A partnership with Liqi Digital Assets has led to $100 million in tokenized RWAs, with a target of $500 million by 2026. Another collaboration aims to tokenize $1 billion in debt and receivables. While the RWA narrative counters "ghost chain" fears, the price may still test the $0.022 support level before potentially consolidating. A price bottom could be weeks or months away.

XDC Network [XDC] token shed 0.76% of its value over the last 24 hours. However, on the weekly charts, it was still up 6.13%. This compared favorably to the 12% loss Bitcoin [BTC] recorded over the past week, hinting at hidden XDC strength.

There seemed to be no clear coin-specific catalysts at work. In fact, the network has not been stellar lately. A recent AMBCrypto report even highlighted that the Layer 1 network may be one of the chains with a high market cap but low active users.

With a respectable $706 million in market cap, the chain’s daily active users plunged by 84% from 2021 to just 45k. This signaled low demand due to on-chain utility.

CryptoQuant data showed that the spot volume bubble map was in a cooling phase, signaling a decline in trading volume. It was the opposite of overheated conditions that tend to accompany market tops. However, this does not mean that an XDC bottom may be in.

Additionally, the spot taker cumulative volume delta shifted to neutral over the past three weeks, after being in a taker-sell-dominant phase since October. This could be another sign that the selling pressure might be easing.

Infrastructure upgrade and RWA issuance milestone highlight XDC’s growth

On the other hand, the network announced a successful hardfork on 30 January. The upgrade strengthens XDC’s core infrastructure, which focuses on real-world asset tokenization.

Brazilian fintech Liqi Digital Assets and XDC Network announced a strategic partnership in April 2025. Aimed at bringing RWAs, DeFi, international payments, and trade finance, they recently reached the milestone of $100 million in tokenized RWAs on the XDC network.

In 2026, they target $500 million in issuances, further reinforcing the ease of tokenization as a way to manage debt and credit.

The partnership with Brazil’s VERT Capital is a sign of how XDC Network focuses on enterprise and institutional utility and is not a retail-centric chain. This deal’s aim is to tokenize $1 billion in debt and receivables on the XDC Network.

On the price front, the XDC token was valued at $0.037. The prevailing bearish trend would likely see the $0.022-support level tested in a few weeks. This demand zone has been respected since June 2022.

A retest of $0.0227 is likely to be followed by a consolidation phase where the price could form a range below $0.03. Once such a range is established, long-term investors can look to buy and hold XDC once more.


Final Thoughts

  • Ghost chain fears due to daily active addresses have been diluted by the strong RWA narrative being established around XDC Network.
  • On-chain metrics revealed that selling pressure might be easing, but a price bottom could be weeks or months away.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the recent price performance of XDC Network's token compared to Bitcoin?

AOver the last 24 hours, the XDC token shed 0.76% of its value. However, on the weekly charts, it was still up 6.13%, which compared favorably to Bitcoin's 12% loss over the same period.

QWhat does the significant drop in daily active users on the XDC Network signal?

AThe plunge of 84% in daily active users from 2021 to just 45k signals low demand for the chain due to a lack of on-chain utility.

QWhat recent infrastructure development did the XDC Network announce?

AThe network announced a successful hardfork on 30 January, which strengthened its core infrastructure with a focus on real-world asset (RWA) tokenization.

QWhat major milestone was achieved in the partnership between Liqi Digital Assets and XDC Network?

AThe strategic partnership recently reached the milestone of $100 million in tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) on the XDC network.

QAccording to the article, what is the likely price scenario for the XDC token in the coming weeks?

AThe prevailing bearish trend would likely see the $0.022-support level tested in a few weeks. A retest of $0.0227 is likely to be followed by a consolidation phase where the price could form a range below $0.03.

Related Reads

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

Vitalik Buterin's recent algorithmic stablecoin proposal envisions using an option-like mechanism to create a stablecoin without the liquidation risks inherent in traditional collateralized debt position (CDP) models. The design splits one unit of ETH into two components: a 'stable' leg (P) that maintains value up to a certain strike price, and an 'upside' leg (N) that captures any appreciation above that price. Together, they always sum to one ETH, eliminating the need for debt or liquidation mechanisms. From an options perspective, the stable leg essentially functions as a synthetic, covered call position. However, significant challenges exist. For the stable asset to maintain its peg, it must continuously roll deep in-the-money call options, leading to potential rollover slippage, predictable trading paths vulnerable to front-running, and liquidity issues. Crucially, the system's scalability depends on a constant demand for the upside leg—a form of leveraged ETH long position without funding rates or liquidation risk. It's unclear if such persistent, specific demand will materialize from speculators or market makers who have simpler alternatives like perpetual swaps. The author, drawing from experience with Rysk, argues that DeFi options have struggled as standalone trading products due to complexity and fragmented liquidity. Their potential lies instead as foundational infrastructure underpinning more complex financial primitives like stablecoins, structured yields, or index products—transforming from a direct product into a core pricing and risk distribution engine for the next generation of on-chain finance.

marsbit1h ago

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

marsbit1h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit3h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit3h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit4h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片