Is the Fastest and Deepest Tech Stock Sell-off in History Nearing Its End?

marsbit发布于2026-07-19更新于2026-07-19

文章摘要

The article discusses whether the historically rapid and severe sell-off in tech momentum stocks is nearing its end. Citing analysis from Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, it notes that the TMT momentum factor has plunged 40% from its peak in just 17 trading days, marking the fastest and deepest such decline on record. Key experts, including Goldman's Mark Wilson, attribute the crash primarily to extreme crowding, high leverage, and structural factors rather than a fundamental deterioration in the economy or corporate earnings. They point to strong underlying data, such as robust bank lending and raised guidance from companies like TSMC, which contrast sharply with the market's price action. While Wilson suggests the momentum unwinding process is likely "approaching its end," he cautions that immediate catalysts for a sharp reversal are lacking. The report highlights extreme internal market stress, with single-stock volatility far exceeding index volatility, and warns that despite the sell-off, positioning in momentum factors remains elevated. It concludes that the core market矛盾 (contradiction) lies in this disconnect between solid fundamentals and violent price corrections driven by positioning and leverage.

Source: Wall Street Insights

Tech momentum trading is experiencing its most severe unwinding in history. In just 17 trading days, the U.S. stock technology momentum factor (TMT MoMo) has plunged 40% from its peak, setting a record for the fastest and deepest drawdown on record, with contagion spreading comprehensively from semiconductors to hedge funds and credit markets.

Mark Wilson, partner and head of EMEA hedge fund business at Goldman Sachs, provided a systematic review of this "brutal rotation" this week. He noted that this sell-off is historically rare in both speed and depth, but its root cause stems more from non-fundamental factors such as crowded positioning and concentrated leverage, rather than a substantial deterioration in the economy or corporate earnings. He stated that the unwinding process for the momentum factor is "nearing its end," but lacks an immediate catalyst for reversal in the short term.

It is noteworthy that this momentum breakdown occurred against a backdrop of overall robust macro and corporate fundamentals—U.S. banks reported a 17% year-on-year increase in corporate lending, TSMC raised its 2026 revenue growth guidance to over 40%, and inflation data also came in moderately below expectations. This divergence between fundamentals and market price action is the core contradiction in the current market.

Tech Momentum Factor Suffers Historic Sell-off, Drawdown Speed and Depth Exceed Historical Median

According to data from Morgan Stanley's Quantitative and Derivatives Strategy team (MS QDS), this momentum factor drawdown has lasted 17 trading days, with a peak-to-trough decline of 28%. In comparison, the median momentum factor drawdown since 1999 has been 22%, lasting an average of 33 trading days.

This means the current decline has exceeded the historical median in both speed and depth, marking the most severe episode since the 29% drawdown from December 2022 to February 2023.

The situation is even more extreme in the tech sector. The TMT momentum factor (TMT MoMo) has fallen 40% from its peak. According to MS QDS data, this represents the fastest and deepest sell-off ever for the tech momentum factor.

Looking across various subsectors, South Korea's Kospi index is down 27% from its peak, U.S. AI tech beneficiaries are down 25%, global memory chip stocks are down 36%, and European semiconductors are down 23%. Among these, memory chip stocks account for about two-thirds of the overall decline, while the broader AI beneficiaries are down about 24% from their highs.

Low Surface Volatility Masks High Internal Intensity, Market Risk Structure is Unraveling

Price declines are only the surface manifestation of this turmoil; changes in the market's internal risk structure are equally noteworthy.

According to Goldman Sachs' volatility trading desk data, the current volatility of Goldman Sachs' High Beta Momentum portfolio (GSPRHIMO) is approximately 10 times that of the S&P 500's volatility. In the historical backtest over the past 20 years, such a stark volatility ratio has only been comparable to the situation during the pandemic shock in November 2020.

Simultaneously, the gap between single-stock volatility and index volatility has widened to historical extremes. Goldman Sachs data shows that the three-month average implied correlation among S&P 500 constituents fell to a record low of 0.14 this week, causing the S&P 500 index volatility to remain low, while the average implied volatility for single stocks is as high as 40%, 2.8 times that of the index's implied volatility, also setting a historical record.

Positions Remain Crowded, Risks Not Yet Cleared

Despite the recent historic drawdown in the momentum factor, hedge funds' net exposure to it remains high from a long-term perspective. J.P. Morgan data indicates that the combination of current positioning levels and the magnitude of the drawdown continues to make the momentum factor one of the core risks most deserving of caution in the market.

Meanwhile, the Goldman Sachs High Beta Momentum factor has fallen 33% since its June high, with its year-to-date gain plummeting from 60% to just 12%, a development also noted by Mark Wilson.

He cited signs of deleveraging in the Korean market as evidence: reports indicate that approximately one in every 30 South Korean adults had their stock margin accounts forcibly liquidated this week, showing that the deleveraging process has unfolded to a considerable extent.

Fundamentals Remain Sound, Risks Lie in Positioning and Structure

The peculiar aspect of this momentum breakdown is that it occurred against a backdrop of generally positive corporate fundamentals and macroeconomic data.

Mark Wilson pointed out that U.S. bank earnings this week presented an "unmistakably positive reading" of economic conditions: corporate lending grew 17% year-on-year, a record high, covering all economic sectors; U.S. consumer spending tracker growth is in the mid-single digits, with credit card spending up 6%; investment banking-related business lines collectively grew over 40%; large banks' tangible common equity return reached 19%, a post-financial crisis high.

On the tech capital expenditure front, TSMC raised its 2026 revenue growth guidance to over 40% (based on a revenue base exceeding $150 billion), while ASML's earnings report sparked market expectations for a 15% to 30% upward revision in its EPS over the next one to three years.

However, both companies' share prices fell following their earnings announcements, displaying a classic "sell the news" pattern. In contrast, IBM's stock price suffered its largest single-day drop in over 20 years due to large contract delays and underperformance in its consulting business.

Mark Wilson emphasized that this sell-off is "difficult to pinpoint to a clear signal at the fundamental level," reflecting more the influence of structural factors such as positioning, leverage, crowding, and concentration.

Rotation Nearing End, But Reversal Catalyst Still Awaited

Mark Wilson stated that he is inclined to believe the unwinding process for the momentum factor is nearing its end, but he also noted that there is a lack of immediate summer catalysts to drive a market reversal in the short term.

He also suggested that as efficiency and commercial viability improve, new market leadership will gradually emerge, and market breadth will expand accordingly—the Dow Jones Transportation Average breaking to new highs again this week serves as one example.

However, he also warned that the second derivative of earnings growth (i.e., the slowdown in the growth rate) will become increasingly important as the market digests Q2 earnings and enters the summer, while current valuation metrics across the board indicate that tech sector valuations remain elevated.

Furthermore, abnormal breakdowns in correlations are occurring both between traditional asset classes and within them; for example, the three-month correlation between gold and crude oil has fallen to an extreme inverse level in its 35-year history, further increasing the difficulty of risk management and portfolio construction.

相关问答

QWhat is the historical context of the current tech momentum factor sell-off in terms of speed and depth?

AAccording to the article, the current tech momentum factor (TMT MoMo) sell-off is the fastest and deepest on record, having fallen 40% from its peak in just 17 trading days. Historically, momentum factor drawdowns have a median decline of 22% over an average of 33 trading days.

QAccording to Mark Wilson of Goldman Sachs, what is the primary cause of this momentum factor sell-off?

AMark Wilson of Goldman Sachs attributes the sell-off primarily to structural factors like crowded positioning, concentrated leverage, and high congestion, rather than a deterioration in economic or corporate earnings fundamentals.

QDespite the market sell-off, what positive signals are mentioned regarding the underlying economic and corporate fundamentals?

AThe article highlights robust fundamentals: U.S. bank corporate loan growth at 17%, TSMC raising its 2026 revenue growth guidance to over 40%, and inflation data coming in softer than expected. Bank earnings also showed strong consumer spending and high returns on tangible equity.

QWhat does the data say about the current volatility and risk structure within the market during this event?

AThe volatility of Goldman Sachs's high-beta momentum basket is about 10 times that of the S&P 500, a disparity only seen during the November 2020 pandemic shock. Additionally, the correlation among S&P 500 stocks is at a record low, causing single-stock implied volatility to be 2.8 times higher than index volatility.

QWhat is Mark Wilson's outlook on the momentum factor sell-off and the potential for a market reversal?

AMark Wilson believes the momentum factor unwinding process is 'nearing its end.' However, he notes a lack of immediate catalysts for a sharp reversal in the near term (summer), and warns that valuations remain elevated and that the second derivative of earnings growth (a slowdown in growth acceleration) will become more important.

你可能也喜欢

谁在 Web 2.5 中获取价值?

本文探讨了在传统金融与加密金融融合的“Web 2.5”时代,价值如何积累以及被谁获取。核心观点认为,加密货币的真正潜力并非取代传统银行系统,而是作为高效、隐形的底层结算基础设施,与传统金融的合规性、用户界面和信任体系相结合。 文章指出,过去加密货币推广的障碍在于要求用户完全放弃熟悉的银行账户和支付系统。而“Web 2.5”模式则避免了这种摩擦,将区块链技术隐藏于后台,专注于更快、更便宜地在现有账户体系内转移资金。此时,最大的价值并非由底层区块链本身或终端金融机构获取,而是积累在连接两者的“中间层”或“翻译层”。 这个中间层负责将传统金融指令(如ISO 20022)转换为链上交易并进行原子结算。文中以Chainlink与多家大型银行合作的Pangea项目、美国存托信托与结算公司(DTCC)的应用链、SWIFT正在构建的共享账本,以及国际清算银行(BIS)的Agorá项目为例,说明传统机构与加密协议正在激烈争夺这一关键层的主导权。 这一协调层之所以价值巨大,源于其可能形成的强大网络效应和两个核心盈利点:**许可权**(决定交易是否及如何进行)和**浮存金收益**(资金在结算过程中暂存产生的利息)。历史类比如Visa和SWIFT,它们作为连接网络,其市值和影响力甚至超过了其所服务的多数金融机构。 最终,文章预测Web 2.5模式将使区块链技术本身趋于商品化和隐形,而真正的商业价值和权力将归属于那个成功连接新旧世界、决定万亿美元资金流动规则的中间协调层。

链捕手3小时前

谁在 Web 2.5 中获取价值?

链捕手3小时前

以太坊价格预测 – ETF资金流入恢复,ETH能否重回2000美元?

以太坊(ETH)近期交易价格约为1,865美元,在6月低点反弹后进入盘整。整个7月,ETH持续形成更高的高点和低点,市场关注其能否重新站上2,000美元关键心理关口。 支撑此次反弹的是,美国现货以太坊ETF连续第二周实现资金净流入。截至7月17日当周,净流入1.0544亿美元,前一周为8442万美元。这标志着自5月中旬至6月下旬连续五周净流出后的显著转变。目前ETF累计净流入达110.8亿美元,总资产接近100亿美元里程碑。其中,贝莱德的ETHA贡献了主要流入,单日流入3168万美元,其净资产占整个美国现货以太坊ETF市场一半以上。 从技术面看,ETH周线图显示其正从6月跌势中复苏,买家已成功收复1,800美元区域,但整体趋势尚未完全转为看涨。日线图结构更为积极,相对强弱指数(RSI)升至58附近,显示买盘动力增强且未进入超买区间。价格在7月持续形成更高的高点和低点,表明买家正逐步重掌控制权。 当前直接阻力位在1,900美元区域,若果断突破,则可能打开通往2,000美元的道路。下行方面,已收复的1,800美元成为首要关键支撑位。若在此上方企稳,将巩固其短期改善的结构。反之,若在1,900美元下方遇阻,可能引发新一轮盘整。随着机构资金回流和技术动能增强,以太坊的复苏势头正在积聚。能否最终突破2,000美元,将取决于未来几个交易日买盘能否维持压力。

ambcrypto3小时前

以太坊价格预测 – ETF资金流入恢复,ETH能否重回2000美元?

ambcrypto3小时前

交易

现货
活动图片