What Wall Street Really Wants After the Crypto Story Recedes

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-06-17Востаннє оновлено о 2026-06-17

Анотація

The tide of speculative crypto narratives has receded, revealing Wall Street's true objective: building a controlled, yield-generating, and compliant financial pipeline on distributed ledgers. They are migrating core functions onto blockchains, not for decentralization, but for efficiency and new revenue streams. Key developments include BlackRock's BUIDL fund, a tokenized treasury fund acting as a foundational reserve asset, and the rise of Securitize, which is going public and partnering with the NYSE to build a 24/7 digital securities trading and settlement system. This signals a major shift of securities clearing to blockchain technology. To make volatile assets like Bitcoin palatable for institutional investors, firms like BlackRock and Goldman Sachs are creating "covered call" ETFs (e.g., BITA). These products systematically sell options on Bitcoin holdings, transforming price volatility into stable monthly income, effectively repackaging crypto as a yield-bearing asset. Stablecoins are being positioned not as speculative tools but as efficient payment rails. Companies like Stripe and Mastercard are integrating them for instant, low-cost merchant settlements and cross-border card payments, respectively. Critically, new legislation like the GENIUS Act shapes them as non-interest-bearing, heavily regulated extensions of the US dollar system. In summary, Wall Street is quietly constructing a parallel, blockchain-based financial infrastructure featuring tokenized tradit...

Author: Vernacular Blockchain

In the fall of 2008, on the weekend when Lehman Brothers collapsed, Wall Street traders were packing boxes in their offices. Months later, a person using the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto inscribed the genesis block into the Bitcoin network, attaching a taunt: "The Chancellor is on the brink of a second bailout for banks."

That was a declaration of war on Wall Street. Seventeen years later, the tide has turned.

Most of those who declared war have dispersed, while Wall Street has instead walked the path they paved into the on-chain world. However, this time, they bring not speculative narratives, but treasury bonds, option contracts, and banking settlement systems.

Between 2025 and 2026, the global scale of tokenized assets surged over 220%. The BUIDL fund managed by BlackRock has stabilized its assets under management between $25 billion and $28 billion, becoming the anchor of the on-chain short-term U.S. Treasury market. Securitize is about to list on the NYSE with a valuation of $1.25 billion, while the NYSE itself has signed a memorandum of understanding to build a 24/7 stock clearing system on-chain.

Wall Street no longer wants the "decentralization" story. What they want is a set of compliant financial pipelines they can control, that generate yield, but this time, these pipelines are built on distributed ledgers.

01 Moving Treasury Bonds On-Chain: BlackRock and Securitize's Tokenization Empire

The design of the BUIDL fund is purely in the taste of traditional buy-side institutions.

Minimum investment of $5 million, open only to "Accredited Investors" as defined by U.S. law. Underlying assets are 100% allocated to cash, short-term U.S. Treasuries, and overnight reverse repurchase agreements, with Bank of New York Mellon as the custodian. No exposure to crypto assets whatsoever, as clean as a money market fund.

But it runs on-chain. Through Securitize's transfer agent infrastructure, BUIDL achieves daily dividend auto-reinvestment and 24/7 instant transfers. This has quickly made it the safest underlying reserve asset in the eyes of large on-chain protocols, derivatives clearinghouses, and synthetic dollar issuers.

More noteworthy is Securitize's own path to capitalization. In June 2026, the SEC announced that its merger registration statement with a SPAC affiliated with Cantor Fitzgerald had become effective. The pre-merger valuation was $1.25 billion, accompanied by $225 million in PIPE financing. The new company will list on the NYSE under the name "Securitize Corp." with the ticker symbol SECZ.

Simultaneously, the NYSE signed an MOU with Securitize in March, designating the latter as the first official transfer agent for its planned digital trading platform. This platform has grand ambitions: using the NYSE's existing matching engine plus a private blockchain to enable 24/7 trading, on-chain instant settlement, and stablecoin funding channels for U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs.

Nasdaq, across the street, has taken another path, choosing to overlay a tokenized trading layer on top of the traditional clearing system. The NYSE is building a brand-new on-chain trading and transfer system from scratch.

The technical routes of the two exchanges are diverging. This in itself speaks to one thing: Wall Street's core securities clearing function is migrating towards distributed ledger technology.

Meanwhile, the synthetic dollar protocol Ethena invested $250 million in the STAC fund issued by Securitize. This fund invests in AAA-rated collateralized loan obligations, deployed on the Solana chain.

Ethena's reason for doing this is straightforward: Its synthetic dollar USDe previously heavily relied on crypto derivatives arbitrage to maintain its peg. Once the market cooled and funding rates turned negative, yields would dry up. Now, floating rates from the traditional credit market provide its safety net.

The global CLO market exceeds $1.3 trillion. This capital is flowing into the reservoir of on-chain finance through the programmability of public chains.

02 Making Money Even if Bitcoin Doesn't Rise: BITA's Covered Call Magic

Bitcoin pays no interest and is highly volatile, which has kept pension funds and sovereign wealth funds away. Wall Street's solution: turn volatility itself into yield.

BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Premium Income ETF (ticker BITA) is expected to list around June 19, 2026. Its mechanism is not complex but quite ingenious.

The fund holds physical Bitcoin and BlackRock's own IBIT spot ETF as its underlying positions. IBIT has over $50 billion in assets under management, with excellent secondary market liquidity. On this foundation, the fund manager systematically sells short-term call options on IBIT, collects premiums, and after deducting the 0.65% management fee, distributes the proceeds to investors monthly in the form of cash dividends.

In essence, it trades the potential for Bitcoin's explosive growth for stable monthly income.

If Bitcoin trades sideways or dips slightly, BITA's performance will far exceed simply holding the spot asset, as the option premiums provide downside cushion and stable income. However, if Bitcoin surges sharply in the short term, exceeding the option strike price, the excess gains go entirely to the option buyer, and BITA holders only receive the capped return.

This resembles the fixed annuity products traditional financial advisors sell to retirees. Wall Street has stripped away Bitcoin's chaotic volatility and repackaged it into a standardized, income-generating asset that pays interest monthly.

Existing similar products like BTCI and YBTC offer coupon dividend rates as high as 27% to 41%, but suffer from shallow liquidity and significant basis risk, with their principal severely eroded during the past year's bull market. BlackRock's advantage lies in the $50 billion liquidity pool of its IBIT underlying asset, something other issuers simply cannot match.

Goldman Sachs isn't sitting idle either, planning to launch its own Premium Income product in early July. The fact that established investment banks are now in direct competition on the same track indicates this is no longer a pilot but a consensus direction.

03 Stablecoins Aren't Trading Tools, They're Cash Registers

Credit card payment experiences are smooth, but for a cross-border transaction from swipe to the merchant actually receiving funds, it often takes several days. The process passes through correspondent banks, clearing agents, and settlement cycles layer by layer, with fees being siphoned off at each step.

Stablecoins are changing this.

Stripe now accepts merchants in over 70 countries globally to receive payments directly via stablecoins. Consumers pay by scanning a wallet QR code, Stripe confirms instantly on Solana, Ethereum, or Polygon, and the backend handles forex and compliance checks through Bridge.xyz, which it acquired for $1.1 billion. Merchants can choose to receive USD or keep USDC. The entire process requires almost zero development cost for the merchant.

Mastercard has gone even further. The upgraded settlement architecture launched in June 2026 supports financial institutions using compliant stablecoins like USDC, PYUSD, RLUSD, etc., to execute card clearing intraday, on weekends, and on holidays across multiple mainstream public chains. Banks no longer have to wait for weekdays to settle.

Even SWIFT can't sit still anymore. The giant controlling global cross-border payment messaging released a roadmap for its Minimum Viable Product of a distributed "Shared Ledger" in March 2026, aiming to allow global commercial banks to directly manage tokenized deposits via a consortium blockchain, enabling 24/7 cross-border clearing.

This isn't about eliminating correspondent banks, but about solving a real pain point: To prevent settlement failures due to time zones and holidays, small and medium-sized banks globally have long frozen over $10 trillion in reserves at large correspondent banks.

The key enabler for all this happening is legislation. The GENIUS Act, signed into law in 2025, excludes compliant stablecoins from the definitions of securities and commodities, while making two key designs.

First, it prohibits stablecoins from distributing dividends to holders, firmly restricting them to the category of "pure payment instruments" to prevent the siphoning of bank deposits. Second, it mandates stablecoin issuers be brought under anti-money laundering regulatory systems, making dollar stablecoins an extension tool for the U.S. to expand the effectiveness of global financial sanctions.

No dividends, strong regulation, programmable. This is the stablecoin Wall Street wants.

04 Summary

Wall Street hasn't slowed down. They've just changed their path.

No more coin speculation, no more grand narratives of decentralization. On-chain, they are replicating an entire set of things they are familiar with: treasury bond funds, covered call options, card clearing networks, compliant transfer systems. Each product comes with hard yield, each pipeline is embedded with U.S. sovereign credit.

Blockchain fundamentalists once dreamed of replacing Wall Street with code. In the end, Wall Street learned to write code.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the core shift in Wall Street's approach to blockchain technology, as described in the article?

AThe core shift is that Wall Street is no longer pursuing speculative 'decentralization' narratives or crypto trading. Instead, they are focusing on building a compliant, yield-generating financial infrastructure on distributed ledgers that they can control, such as tokenized treasury funds, covered call strategies, and new payment/clearing systems.

QExplain the purpose and significance of BlackRock's BUIDL fund in the context of tokenized assets.

ABlackRock's BUIDL fund is a tokenized short-term U.S. Treasury fund that serves as a foundational reserve asset in the on-chain world. Its significance lies in bringing traditional, highly secure financial assets (cash, treasuries, repos) onto the blockchain with features like daily dividend reinvestment and 24/7 instant transfers, attracting large protocols and institutions seeking safe, regulated on-chain yield.

QHow does the iShares Bitcoin Premium Income ETF (BITA) transform Bitcoin into a product appealing to traditional investors?

AThe BITA ETF transforms Bitcoin by systematically selling covered call options against its Bitcoin holdings. This strategy converts Bitcoin's price volatility into stable monthly cash income for investors, effectively repackaging it as a standardized, income-generating asset. It appeals to traditional investors by offering downside buffering and predictable yields, similar to fixed-income products, while capping exposure to extreme upside price movements.

QAccording to the article, what key regulatory design under the GENIUS Act shapes the role of stablecoins in finance?

AThe GENIUS Act shapes the role of stablecoins by: 1) Prohibiting them from distributing dividends to holders, firmly defining them as 'pure payment tools' to prevent bank deposit drainage. 2) Mandating that issuers comply with anti-money laundering regulations, making USD stablecoins an extension tool for U.S. global financial sanctions. This creates a framework for stablecoins that are non-interest-bearing, heavily regulated, and programmable.

QWhat fundamental challenge in the traditional financial system are institutions like SWIFT and Mastercard aiming to address with their new blockchain initiatives?

AThey aim to address the inefficiency and cost of cross-border and interbank settlement. A key pain point is the trillions of dollars in reserves that smaller banks are forced to park at larger correspondent banks to guard against settlement failures due to time zones and holidays. Their blockchain initiatives (like SWIFT's shared ledger and Mastercard's upgraded settlement) seek to enable 24/7, near-instant, and direct settlement, thereby freeing up this trapped capital and reducing intermediary fees.

Пов'язані матеріали

Wintermute Market Weekly: Iran War Ends, Inflation Meets Expectations, BTC Rebounds to Lower 60ks But Don’t Rush to Buy the Dip

**Wintermute Market Weekly: BTC Rebounds to $60K Lows, But Caution Advised** This week saw a broad market rebound, primarily driven by two converging factors: a US CPI inflation reading that met expectations (4.2% YoY) and former President Trump's announcement of a deal to end the Iran conflict. The latter triggered a sharp drop in oil prices, reducing geopolitical risk premiums and easing inflation fears. Consequently, risk assets like equities and cryptocurrencies rallied, with Bitcoin recovering from lows around $60,000 to close the week up 1.9%, while altcoins gained 3.1%. Despite the price bounce, the underlying liquidity picture for crypto remains weak. Key funding channels—stablecoin flows, ETF inflows, and Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) activity—show no signs of structural improvement. ETF outflows recently hit a record streak, and DAT assets have declined significantly. The rally from $60K to $83K earlier is now viewed as a bear-market rally that has failed. The current environment is characterized by low directional conviction and choppy, range-bound trading, likely persisting into summer. The report advises caution against aggressively buying the dip. While the $60K area offers attractive long-term risk/reward, a sustained bull run requires a visible turnaround in capital inflows, which hasn't materialized. The upcoming FOMC meeting and Powell's commentary, alongside the formal Iran deal signing, are noted as near-term catalysts. The core takeaway is to watch fund flows rather than price action and avoid being whipsawed by volatility before clear signs of institutional or retail capital returning emerge.

marsbit13 хв тому

Wintermute Market Weekly: Iran War Ends, Inflation Meets Expectations, BTC Rebounds to Lower 60ks But Don’t Rush to Buy the Dip

marsbit13 хв тому

Cursor, Why Boarded Musk's Starship?

SpaceX announced its acquisition of AI programming startup Cursor's parent company, Anysphere, for $60 billion in an all-stock deal, just days after its record-breaking IPO. The move sent SpaceX's stock soaring, briefly making it the most valuable U.S. company. Cursor, founded in 2022 by MIT graduate Michael Truell and his classmates, is a popular AI coding assistant that allows developers to switch between models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and others. It saw explosive revenue growth, reaching a $4 billion annualized run rate in early 2026. However, its market share was eroded by the launch of competitor Claude Code from its key AI supplier, Anthropic. This dependence prompted Cursor to develop its own AI model, Composer, in early 2026. To scale Composer, Cursor needed immense computing power. In April 2026, it struck a deal with SpaceX, granting the latter an option to acquire it post-IPO. SpaceX exercised this option, offering Cursor access to its Colossus supercomputer, powered by hundreds of thousands of top-tier Nvidia AI chips. For SpaceX, the acquisition is a strategic move to bolster its AI capabilities, particularly for its xAI division, and advance its broader ambition of building orbital, solar-powered data centers. While the deal surprised some employees and investors given Truell's earlier stance on independence, it represents a high-stakes partnership. SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has projected the company could reach $1 trillion in revenue by 2030. For Truell, joining forces with SpaceX is a monumental gamble on an unprecedented scale in the race for AI dominance.

链捕手15 хв тому

Cursor, Why Boarded Musk's Starship?

链捕手15 хв тому

The More It Rises, the More Dangerous? The Systemic Risks Behind SpaceX's Soaring Valuation

Summary: The article raises concerns about the systemic risks posed by SpaceX's skyrocketing valuation, arguing that modern market mechanics, rather than fundamentals, are driving its price discovery. Following SpaceX's market capitalization surpassing $3 trillion in after-hours trading, the author contends that the market is no longer functioning properly. The core issue is not SpaceX's business prospects but the unhealthy market structure surrounding it. With limited float and the imminent launch of options trading, the stage is set for a potential "gamma squeeze"—a feedback loop where market makers hedging call options are forced to buy shares, pushing the price higher and attracting more speculative momentum traders. This mechanism, seen previously with Tesla and meme stocks, can decouple valuation from financial reality. The danger escalates as extreme valuations force passive funds, ETFs, pensions, and major indices to hold the stock. If SpaceX grows large enough—hypothetically reaching $5 or even $10 trillion—its performance would increasingly dictate broader market indices, embedding systemic risk. The author warns that when price appreciation itself becomes the primary bullish thesis, the market transforms from a capital allocation mechanism into a self-reinforcing speculative machine, endangering the retirement savings of ordinary investors tied to passive strategies. The piece questions whether such a system can still perform its fundamental role of price discovery.

marsbit20 хв тому

The More It Rises, the More Dangerous? The Systemic Risks Behind SpaceX's Soaring Valuation

marsbit20 хв тому

How Much of the Subscription Fee You Pay to Claude Can Optical Module Companies Get?

How much of your $20 Claude Pro subscription actually goes to AI model companies like Anthropic? A viral breakdown image highlights the fundamental valuation challenge for AI applications versus traditional SaaS. Unlike SaaS with high software margins, AI subscriptions face variable "inference costs": every user query consumes GPU time, power, and cloud resources. This creates a tension between fixed subscription fees and usage-driven expenses. While the specific dollar splits are illustrative, the core question is whether AI revenue can achieve SaaS-like margins as usage scales. Currently, infrastructure providers (cloud platforms, GPU makers like Nvidia, HBM suppliers, power/data centers) capture more certain revenue from growing AI usage. Their financials reflect pricing power and faster earnings validation. The bullish case hinges on efficiency improvements: model optimization, caching, smaller models, and custom chips could lower per-token costs over time. The key debate is whether cost declines can outpace increases in user workload complexity and volume. Ultimately, for AI companies to command high SaaS-like valuations, they must demonstrate not just user growth but also improving gross margins after accounting for inference costs. Investors will scrutinize not just subscriber numbers, but usage patterns, enterprise pricing tiers, and real efficiency gains.

marsbit30 хв тому

How Much of the Subscription Fee You Pay to Claude Can Optical Module Companies Get?

marsbit30 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片