# Пов'язані статті щодо Oracle

Центр новин HTX надає останні статті та поглиблений аналіз на тему "Oracle", що охоплює ринкові тренди, оновлення проєктів, технологічні розробки та регуляторну політику в криптоіндустрії.

Прогноз цены Chainlink на 2026-2032 годы:tronнастроения в пользу покупки LINK?

Chainlink (LINK) price forecast for 2026-2032 suggests a long-term bullish outlook despite recent consolidation. Currently trading around $8.77, technical analysis on daily and 4-hour charts indicates buyers remain in control, with key support at $8.30-$8.50. While the RSI nears overbought territory, signaling potential short-term pullbacks, the overall trend is upward, with a break above $8.97 potentially targeting $9.20. The article provides detailed price projections: For 2026, LINK is forecasted to reach a high of $17.00, with an average of $11.38. Predictions extend through 2032, with a potential high of $52.95 and an average of $35.45 that year. These forecasts are based on Chainlink's expanding utility as a leading decentralized oracle network, its recent integration with platforms like Robinhood for stock tokens, and its role in the growing DeFi and blockchain ecosystem. Despite periods of market pressure in 2026, where LINK dropped to ~$7.40, the fundamental case remains strong due to strategic partnerships and increased adoption. Analysts from firms like CoinCodex are also bullish, projecting prices of $12.31 for 2026 and $24.84 for 2027. The long-term sentiment is positive, positioning LINK as a promising investment with significant growth potential through 2032.

cryptonews.ruВчора 11:05

Прогноз цены Chainlink на 2026-2032 годы:tronнастроения в пользу покупки LINK?

cryptonews.ruВчора 11:05

Losses from Hacks of Crypto Projects Exceed $1.3 Billion

According to a report by Onchain Lens, crypto project losses from hacks have exceeded $1.3 billion this year. The primary cause of damage was the compromise of access control mechanisms, where attackers obtained privileged rights or critical credentials. The biggest losers were Kelp DAO ($292M), Drift Protocol ($280M), Humanity Protocol ($31M), Step Finance ($30M), and Truebit ($26.5M). The second largest cause of loss was phishing and social engineering attacks, accounting for approximately $282 million. Attacks on oracles—services that feed external data into blockchains—also caused significant damage, with Ostium losing $24M, Blend Protocol $10.86M, and Bonzo $9M. The data indicates that the total damage stems from a limited number of highly effective attacks, rather than hundreds of small incidents. A shift in threat patterns is noted, with multi-million dollar losses increasingly resulting from compromised keys and access permissions rather than smart contract bugs. Security experts emphasize that the human factor remains a major industry risk, as phishing and social engineering remain as profitable as technical attacks. In a related incident, Blockaid reported a $24.15 million hack of the AFX Trade decentralized exchange's cross-chain bridge.

cryptonews.ruВчора 09:18

Losses from Hacks of Crypto Projects Exceed $1.3 Billion

cryptonews.ruВчора 09:18

Augur Issues Final Call for Mandatory REP Migration as Historic Fork Nears Completion

Augur, a decentralized prediction-market project, has issued a final call for REP token holders to complete a mandatory 1:1 migration by August 1, 2026. This concludes the "Moon Fork," a live test of its dispute-resolution mechanism. The fork was triggered by an escalated dispute over the Artemis II mission's successful launch, splitting the protocol into outcome-specific universes. Migration is one-way and irreversible via the official portal. Unmigrated tokens will lose functionality and value. Centralized exchange users must confirm their exchange's support or withdraw to a self-custody wallet. The fork demonstrates Augur's security model, where economic incentives and a mandatory migration force attackers to bear unsustainable costs to defend a false outcome. Future development by the Lituus Foundation will continue only on the universe representing the truthful outcome.

TheNewsCrypto07/24 07:57

Augur Issues Final Call for Mandatory REP Migration as Historic Fork Nears Completion

TheNewsCrypto07/24 07:57

United Stables Crosses $1B As Chainlink Data Feeds Secure U Token Collateral

United Stables' U token has surpassed $1 billion in market capitalization, with Chainlink Data Feeds providing the critical pricing and collateral data infrastructure across its deployment chains. This milestone highlights that robust oracle infrastructure is essential for stablecoin credibility, as DeFi protocols require reliable data for integration. Chainlink's role is foundational, enabling automated collateral auditing and pricing verification, which helps make the U token safer for the broader market to evaluate and use. While this strengthens Chainlink's position in the stablecoin infrastructure narrative, it does not directly guarantee increased fees or value for LINK token holders. The growth of U indicates both widening competition in the stablecoin sector and the increasing dependence of scalable stablecoins on dependable external data services.

bitcoinist07/21 22:46

United Stables Crosses $1B As Chainlink Data Feeds Secure U Token Collateral

bitcoinist07/21 22:46

Hyperliquid's "Stock Price" for ChangXin Memory Tech Hits $8.64: How Was This Price Determined Before the IPO?

Title: Hyperliquid's "Stock Price" for CXMT Hits $8.64: How is This Pre-IPO Price Determined? Summary: On Hyperliquid, a derivative contract tracking the pre-IPO value of Chinese chipmaker Changxin Xinqiao (CXMT) has been trading, with its price reaching $8.64. This price is not a real stock price or a direct IPO valuation, but the result of a specific market mechanism. Trade.xyz deployed this "Pre-IPO Perpetual" (IPOP) contract via Hyperliquid's HIP-3 framework. It tracks the expected USD value of one Changxin A-share post-listing. The contract started with an artificial "discretionary reference price" of $5 set by Trade.xyz. Subsequent trading prices are primarily determined by supply and demand on Hyperliquid's on-chain order book. Since there's no tradable现货 before the IPO, the contract price isn't forced to align with the official IPO price of 8.66 RMB (~$1.28). Key mechanics shape the price: 1. **Order Book-Driven**: The actual成交价 comes from limit orders matched on-chain. 2. **Internal Oracle & Smoothing**: An internal oracle, run by Trade.xyz, calculates a smoothed price based on the order book's "impact price" using a 30-minute exponential moving average (EWMA). This oracle price influences funding rates. 3. **Mark Price for Risk**: A separate Mark Price, derived from the median of the internal oracle and other inputs, is used for calculating profit/loss and liquidation. 4. **Discovery Bound (Price护栏)**: A 20% "Discovery Bound" limits how far the price can move from the current reference point. However, if the price hits the bound, the reference price can be re-anchored upward (or downward) up to 7 times. This explains the阶梯状 jumps to $6, $7.2, and $8.64. 5. **Low Funding Rate**: A minimal funding rate (0.005 multiplier) allows positions to be held with low cost before the IPO, but it provides a weak anchor. Post-IPO, the contract is expected to convert to a standard stock perpetual, with its oracle switching to the actual A-share price converted to USD. This transition could cause price jumps and potential liquidations if there's a significant gap between the pre-IPO contract price and the real market price. In essence, the $8.64 price is a composite of: a人为设定的起点 + on-chain order book supply/demand +内部 oracle 平滑 + low funding rate damping + a moving price护栏. It represents a collective bet by specific market participants on the future public market valuation, not the company's current or official IPO price.

marsbit07/17 05:55

Hyperliquid's "Stock Price" for ChangXin Memory Tech Hits $8.64: How Was This Price Determined Before the IPO?

marsbit07/17 05:55

Prices From the Future Fool the Oracle, Ostium Drained of $24 Million in Five Minutes

Ostium, a perpetual trading platform, suffered a security incident on July 15, resulting in significant losses from its public liquidity vault. Initial analyses from Blockaid, Cyvers, and PeckShield estimate losses of up to $24 million. The exploit occurred over a five-minute window. According to security firms, the core issue was not a missing signature, but a data integrity failure: a registered price oracle (PriceUpKeep) submitted authorized price reports with manipulated future timestamps, creating false trading profits. The protocol’s verification process confirmed the signatures as authorized but did not enforce price sanity checks or timestamp boundaries, allowing the manipulated data to be accepted for settlement. This caused the liquidity vault to pay out on these fraudulent profits. Ostium’s co-founder confirmed the team paused trading within an hour and is collaborating with law enforcement and security experts. The extracted funds were reportedly swapped for ETH, with a portion moved to Tornado Cash. The incident highlights risks in DeFi oracle designs where cryptographic signature verification is insufficient without additional safeguards for data validity, timestamp freshness, and price reasonableness. Ostium's response and planned fixes—including stricter timestamp validation, independent price checks, and circuit breakers—will be critical to preventing similar exploits.

marsbit07/17 05:33

Prices From the Future Fool the Oracle, Ostium Drained of $24 Million in Five Minutes

marsbit07/17 05:33

Blockchain.com Integrates Polymarket Oracle Feeds Supporting Election Speculation

Blockchain.com has integrated oracle data feeds from prediction market platform Polymarket, providing users with direct access to real-time information for election speculation markets. This move allows traders to view and engage with election prediction pools directly within the Blockchain.com interface, bypassing traditional clearing agents and enhancing accessibility. The announcement, distributed via Chainwire, is framed as a concrete infrastructure development rather than a speculative market catalyst. Analysts caution against overstating its immediate impact, noting it should be viewed as a reliable data point in a fast-moving market rather than a definitive signal for price action or broad adoption. The update's value lies in its specific technical integration, which offers clearer insight into crypto's evolving themes around market structure and infrastructure, particularly amid sensitivity to regulatory and macro headlines. The report emphasizes grounding conclusions in the actual project details, avoiding sweeping narratives, and monitoring follow-up data to confirm any longer-term trends.

bitcoinist07/15 22:37

Blockchain.com Integrates Polymarket Oracle Feeds Supporting Election Speculation

bitcoinist07/15 22:37

Bonzo Lend Incident Review: How Did a Zero-Signature Vulnerability Cause the Protocol to Lose $9.05 Million?

The lending protocol Bonzo Lend on Hedera was exploited for $9.05 million due to a zero-signature vulnerability in an oracle verifier. An attacker deposited $250 worth of SAUCE tokens and submitted a manipulated price feed with a zero-valued signature and public key point. The oracle verifier, operated by Supra, incorrectly accepted this invalid cryptographic proof as legitimate because the pairing equation mathematically evaluated to true for these zero/identity inputs. This allowed the attacker to artificially inflate the collateral's value by roughly 12 orders of magnitude and borrow $6.63 million in USDC and 34.5 million wrapped HBAR. A second wallet borrowed ~$1 million during the incident but has since contacted Bonzo, identifying as a whitehat with intent to return funds. Bonzo has paused all operations and withdrawals. Supra has reportedly patched the verifier flaw. The protocol remains in maintenance mode while determining recovery plans, compensation, and withdrawal terms for liquidity providers.

marsbit07/14 02:53

Bonzo Lend Incident Review: How Did a Zero-Signature Vulnerability Cause the Protocol to Lose $9.05 Million?

marsbit07/14 02:53

Inside Bonzo Lend’s $9M exploit – Why secure smart contracts couldn’t stop it

Bonzo Lend, a lending protocol on the Hedera network, suffered a $9.05 million exploit due to a flaw in the external Supra oracle system. The attacker manipulated SAUCE token price feeds, enabling them to borrow assets far exceeding their collateral. Audits confirmed the protocol's own smart contracts and the Hedera core network were secure; the failure originated in the trusted oracle infrastructure. This incident highlights a recurring DeFi risk where correct protocol logic can still be weaponized via compromised external data. The attack impacted market sentiment, causing a drop in HBAR's price and Hedera's DeFi TVL, underscoring the need for stronger oracle safeguards and verification standards.

ambcrypto07/12 11:04

Inside Bonzo Lend’s $9M exploit – Why secure smart contracts couldn’t stop it

ambcrypto07/12 11:04

Not Betting on Goals but on 'Tears': Polymarket Users Argue Over Ronaldo's Final World Cup Match

Title: Beyond Goals, Betting on Tears: Polymarket Users Clash Over Ronaldo's Emotional World Cup Exit On July 6, Portugal's 0-1 loss to Spain in the World Cup round of 16 marked the final tournament for Cristiano Ronaldo. The 41-year-old star's emotional reaction—red eyes, wiping his face, fighting back tears—was captured globally. Concurrently, a fierce debate erupted on the crypto prediction platform Polymarket over a specific market: "Will Ronaldo cry during the 2026 FIFA World Cup?" The market, with over $23 million in volume, saw its "YES" probability surge to 99% after the match, but the result was disputed and entered a final review phase. The core conflict centered on the market's precise rules: it required "clearly visible tears streaming down [Ronaldo's] face" in photos/videos taken on the field or bench area during Portugal's matches. While major media outlets described Ronaldo as "in tears" and footage showed him emotional, "NO" bettors argued visible tear tracks were not conclusively evident, only red eyes and dampness. Polymarket's official clarification on July 8 stated that eligible evidence existed showing Ronaldo crying with visible tears on his face post-match. The dispute now goes to a UMA oracle community vote for resolution. This incident highlights a recurring challenge for prediction markets: they excel with quantifiable events but can spark major controversies over subjective, visual, or emotional interpretations. It also serves as a reminder for participants to scrutinize rule wording meticulously, not rely on general perception. Ultimately, such high-profile disputes drive significant trading volume and attention for the platform.

Foresight News07/08 02:11

Not Betting on Goals but on 'Tears': Polymarket Users Argue Over Ronaldo's Final World Cup Match

Foresight News07/08 02:11

活动图片

Ethereumright-arrow

Indepth Researchright-arrow