# Пов'язані статті щодо Compliance

Центр новин HTX надає останні статті та поглиблений аналіз на тему "Compliance", що охоплює ринкові тренди, оновлення проєктів, технологічні розробки та регуляторну політику в криптоіндустрії.

Global Crypto Regulation "Closing the Net": Hong Kong, EU, US Simultaneously Take Action, Is the Compliance Window Closing?

Global Crypto Regulation Tightens: Hong Kong, EU, and US Simultaneously Enforce Rules, Closing the Compliance Window? The global virtual asset regulatory landscape is shifting from rule-making to enforcement. Recent moves by Hong Kong, the EU, and the US signal a coordinated push towards market restructuring based on licensing, product classification, custody, and client segmentation. **Hong Kong**'s SFC issued a circular on "Relevant Stablecoins" on May 27, formally establishing a two-tier regulatory architecture where the HKMA oversees issuance and the SFC oversees trading and distribution. This creates differentiated, often lighter-touch, rules for compliant, licensed stablecoins compared to other virtual assets, fitting into a broader strategy to develop stablecoins as settlement infrastructure, tokenized securities as investment products, and licensed VATP platforms as distribution channels. The **European Union** is approaching a critical deadline, with the MiCA transition period ending on July 1. After this date, unlicensed Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs) must cease serving EU clients. With only about 210 authorized CASPs across 23 member states so far, a significant market consolidation is expected, as the application process now takes 6-9 months. In the **United States**, the CLARITY Act passed a key Senate committee vote on May 14. This landmark bill aims to clarify jurisdiction between the SEC and CFTC, establish registration rules for trading platforms and custodians, and create a federal framework for stablecoin regulation. A key compromise prohibits "passive yield" on stablecoin balances but allows "activity rewards" tied to specific functions like payments. The convergence of these regulatory actions highlights a fundamental shift: stablecoins, with a payment volume rivaling major card networks, are being treated as critical financial infrastructure rather than unregulated digital assets. The core message is clear: compliance is transitioning from an operational cost to a mandatory license for market access, determining which players will participate in the next phase of the digital asset economy.

marsbitВчора 13:51

Global Crypto Regulation "Closing the Net": Hong Kong, EU, US Simultaneously Take Action, Is the Compliance Window Closing?

marsbitВчора 13:51

Cross-Chain Bridges Actively Adapt, LI.FI Leverages Intent Architecture to Become the Liquidity Hub for TradFi Institutions

Cross-Chain Bridge LI.FI Transforms with Intents Architecture to Serve as Liquidity Hub for TradFi Institutions Facing declining cross-chain transaction volumes and overall crypto market liquidity, cross-chain bridge protocol LI.FI is proactively shifting its strategy. Moving beyond its role as a "liquidity transfer protocol," LI.FI is targeting new assets, clients, and operational systems. Key to this transformation is the launch of LI.FI Intents, an intent-based execution architecture. This product positions itself as a foundational layer for stablecoin payments, Real World Assets (RWA), and compliant on-chain liquidity, catering specifically to fintech companies, neobanks, wallets, and regulated financial institutions. LI.FI Intents simplifies user experience by offering a turnkey solution. It leverages a solver network for market-maker level execution, enabling precise cross-chain swaps (e.g., between USDC and USDT) without users managing gas tokens or complex blockchain steps. It lowers barriers to entry by integrating with applications like Jumper and Rabby, allowing enterprise users to bypass direct wallet interactions for transactions like payments and asset transfers. The architecture emphasizes compliance. Its network consists of verified legal entities, and enterprises can review and approve orders within their compliance frameworks before processing. All interacting wallets undergo OFAC screening. For ecosystem coverage, LI.FI Intents supports major networks including EVM chains, Solana, and Tron, mitigating risks associated with single-chain dependency. In essence, as tokenized assets like RWAs gain traction, LI.FI Intents focuses on efficiently integrating stablecoin payments and compliant liquidity into enterprise ecosystems. By automating complex execution steps—allowing users to simply declare their intent (the "destination")—it aims to enhance operational efficiency and capital utilization for institutional clients.

Odaily星球日报Вчора 06:07

Cross-Chain Bridges Actively Adapt, LI.FI Leverages Intent Architecture to Become the Liquidity Hub for TradFi Institutions

Odaily星球日报Вчора 06:07

Global Card Issuance Enters a Compliance-Driven Era: WasabiCard is Building the Next-Generation Payment Infrastructure

Global card issuance is entering a compliance-driven era, with WasabiCard building next-generation payment infrastructure. The platform asserts that as stablecoins increasingly enter cross-border payments, corporate settlements, and global commerce, the industry is shifting focus from "availability" and "growth-driven" models to long-term, compliant operation under global frameworks. Competition will center on sustainable compliance and global infrastructure capabilities. Stablecoins are evolving from on-chain assets into key payment tools in global business, with card issuance acting as critical infrastructure connecting digital assets to traditional payment networks like Visa and Mastercard. This expansion has revealed structural issues, including cross-regional issuance, BIN resource management, and insufficient AML and risk controls. In response, the industry is moving away from reliance on "grey efficiency" towards prioritizing compliance, risk management, and long-term operational stability. WasabiCard outlines its strategy: collaborating with licensed principals and local partners for localized operations, building robust KYC/AML systems, strictly separating commercial and consumer BIN usage, and enhancing global issuance, payment, and cross-border fund flow infrastructure. The goal is to build stable, scalable payment infrastructure amid evolving global regulations, shifting industry competition from scale to infrastructure capability. As stablecoins integrate further with global commerce, payment infrastructure will become a fundamental, embedded component of internet business. WasabiCard will continue to develop capabilities in global card issuance, stablecoin payments, cross-border fund flows, and API-driven financial workflows.

marsbit2 дні тому 02:16

Global Card Issuance Enters a Compliance-Driven Era: WasabiCard is Building the Next-Generation Payment Infrastructure

marsbit2 дні тому 02:16

Comics Illustration: Helping You Understand China's New Regulations on Outbound Investment

Summary: Understanding China's New Regulations on Overseas Investment The State Council has announced new regulations on overseas investment, effective July 1, 2026. The core message is not a prohibition on international investment, but a call for both companies and individuals to operate with strong regulatory awareness. Here are the key points: 1. **Scope is Broad:** The rules apply not only to companies but also to other organizations and individual residents. 2. **Definition of Investment is Wide:** It encompasses not just capital transfers but also asset contributions, obtaining equity or rights, financing, providing guarantees, and direct or indirect acquisition of rights related to overseas entities or assets. 3. **Companies Must Plan Comprehensively:** Beyond simple ownership charts, firms need clear plans covering the investing entity, required approvals or filings, fund transfer paths, and compliance with technology, data, and security reviews. 4. **Individuals Should Prioritize Compliance:** Before focusing on returns, individuals must first assess their eligibility, understand legal channels for capital outflow, know what they are acquiring, and identify responsible parties in case of issues. 5. **Penalties are Significant:** Violations can result in fines and potentially restrictions on future overseas investment activities. In essence, overseas investment remains possible, but it must be approached with regulatory compliance as a fundamental priority, not solely based on commercial opportunity. *Note: This is a general informational summary and does not constitute legal advice or investment recommendations.*

marsbit06/01 09:06

Comics Illustration: Helping You Understand China's New Regulations on Outbound Investment

marsbit06/01 09:06

How to Define "Real U.S. Stocks": Differences Between On-Chain Tokens, Price Contracts, and Direct Broker Connections

**Title:** Defining "Real US Stocks": Differences Among On-Chain Tokens, Price Contracts, and Broker-Direct Access **Summary:** In 2026, using stablecoins to purchase US stocks is mainstream, but products marketed as "buying US stocks with USDT" offer fundamentally different assets. This article analyzes three primary models. **1. Tokenized Stocks:** These are on-chain tokens representing economic exposure to underlying stocks, held by an issuer or custodian. They offer benefits like 24/7 trading and DeFi composability (e.g., use as loan collateral). However, users lack direct legal shareholder status; dividends may not be paid in cash, and voting rights are typically non-binding advisory expressions. Examples include platforms like Ondo Finance. **2. Stock Futures / Equity Perpetuals:** These are derivative contracts tracking a stock's price, allowing leveraged long/short positions 24/7, similar to crypto perpetuals. They offer high efficiency and flexibility but involve funding fees, which can be a significant long-term cost, especially during strong trends. Crucially, they confer no ownership rights (dividends, voting) to the holder. **3. Broker-Direct Model:** This model provides access to real securities via licensed broker-dealers. Stocks/ETFs are bought and held within the US clearing and custodial system (e.g., DTCC), making it the only path to genuine stock ownership. Users receive cash dividends and formal proxy voting rights (where applicable). It supports thousands of stocks and ETFs, far exceeding the coverage of the other two models. Key advantages include no funding fees, a clean cost structure for long-term holds, and the potential to transfer holdings to other brokers. Some platforms facilitate stablecoin (USDT/USDC) deposits, reducing reliance on traditional banking. A critical distinction exists *within* the broker-direct model: the underlying brokerage architecture (e.g., Fully Disclosed IB, Omnibus IB, Self-Clearing) determines how client assets are held, protected, and how safeguards like SIPC insurance are conveyed. Users should verify the specific clearing structure and regulatory compliance of any platform. In conclusion, "buying US stocks with USDT" can mean holding an on-chain economic proxy (Tokenized Stocks), trading a price derivative (Stock Futures), or owning the actual security (Broker-Direct). For users seeking full ownership rights and long-term investment, the broker-direct model is the definitive choice, though its implementation details require careful scrutiny.

marsbit06/01 04:32

How to Define "Real U.S. Stocks": Differences Between On-Chain Tokens, Price Contracts, and Direct Broker Connections

marsbit06/01 04:32

活动图片