Sam Altman Rules Out OpenAI IPO in 2026

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-09-13Востаннє оновлено о 2026-09-13

Анотація

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has stated that the company will not conduct an initial public offering (IPO) in 2026, deeming the current time an "unfortunate moment" due to AI safety concerns. He clarified there is no pressure to list and the company will reconsider when both the business and public context are ready. Altman also mentioned internal discussions about pausing model development at certain capability milestones to allow more time for safety work, suggesting that leading AI companies might agree on coordinated steps to slow development and mitigate risks. He linked this potential for mission-aligned decisions to OpenAI's unique corporate structure, which balances non-profit and for-profit arms. Reports indicate OpenAI confidentially filed for a possible IPO with the SEC in June, with speculation of a potential delay to 2027 and a valuation that could reach $1 trillion.

OpenAI will not go public in 2026, stated the company's CEO Sam Altman in an interview with Fortune. In his opinion, now is an "unfortunate moment" for an IPO due to AI safety concerns.

When asked if this meant postponing the stock listing by a year, he responded:

"I would say not 2026. Yes, we have a lot of work ahead, for example, to meet safety and alignment requirements, and to understand how the industry and governments can cooperate."

According to Altman, OpenAI is not under pressure regarding the listing and will return to it when both the business and the public context are ready.

He also said that OpenAI has discussed possible pauses in model development when reaching new capability levels to gain additional time for safety work. Altman suggested that leading AI companies might agree on joint steps to slow down development and reduce risks.

The CEO of OpenAI linked the possibility of such decisions to the company's corporate structure, which is divided between non-profit and for-profit parts. He emphasized that this model allows taking steps that are not always beneficial for business and shareholders but align with the mission.

In June, OpenAI confidentially submitted a Form S-1 filing to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for a potential IPO. The New York Times reported a possible postponement of the stock listing to 2027. According to the publication, as well as Reuters, the potential valuation of the company could reach $1 trillion.

Recall that a U.S. Senate subcommittee began an investigation into OpenAI's actions following the July incident with Hugging Face.

Пов'язані питання

QWhy did Sam Altman rule out an IPO for OpenAI in 2026?

ASam Altman stated that it was an 'unfortunate moment' for an IPO due to concerns about AI safety, and the company needs to focus on meeting safety and alignment requirements.

QWhat corporate structure of OpenAI allows it to take actions not always beneficial to business, according to Altman?

AAccording to Altman, OpenAI's corporate structure, which is split between a non-profit and a for-profit part, allows it to take steps aligned with its mission, even if they are not always profitable for the business or shareholders.

QWhat was the reported potential valuation of OpenAI for a possible IPO, according to Reuters and The New York Times?

AAccording to Reuters and The New York Times, OpenAI's potential valuation for a possible IPO could reach $1 trillion.

QWhat did Sam Altman say regarding leading AI companies potentially slowing down development?

ASam Altman suggested that leading AI companies could agree on joint steps to slow down development in order to reduce risks, and OpenAI has discussed pausing model development at new capability levels to allow more time for safety work.

QWhat recent event prompted a US Senate subcommittee to initiate a review of OpenAI's actions?

AA US Senate subcommittee initiated a review of OpenAI's actions following a July incident involving Hugging Face.

Пов'язані матеріали

BTC Daily Adjustment in Progress, HYPE Nears Short-term Directional Decision | Invited Analysis

This weekly analysis examines the recent price action of Bitcoin (BTC) and HYPE, focusing on key technical developments and outlining potential trading strategies. **Bitcoin (BTC) Analysis:** * **Market Trend Assessment:** The analysis applies a "52-week moving average confirmation method" to assess the broader trend. While BTC's weekly closing price has broken above this key average, the moving average itself remains in a downtrend, and a proper pullback confirmation is still lacking. The conclusion is that the rally from the July 1st low is still classified as a technical rebound, not yet confirming a new bull market. * **Daily Chart Structure:** The report argues that the five-wave rally (a-e) from the July low likely concluded at the September 21st high. The recent breakdown below the key support of $82,500, followed by a weak-volume rebound, supports this view. If the e-wave is complete, a larger corrective decline (potentially in three sub-waves) is anticipated. The first leg of this correction is underway, with an initial target around $78,000. * **Weekly Outlook & Strategy:** * **Outlook:** The focus is on the downside targets from the September 21st high. Key resistance is seen at $85,500 and the $87,500-$90,000 zone. Support levels are identified at $80,500-$82,500, $75,000-$78,000, and $69,100-$70,500. * **Strategy:** The medium-term posture is neutral/cautious, recommending watching for a potential pullback to a "channel" for confirmation. For short-term traders, two scenarios are outlined: (A) Selling into strength near the $85,500-$87,500 resistance if bearish signals appear, or (B) Selling a confirmed breakdown below the $80,500-$82,500 support zone. A 30% position size with strict stop-loss management is advised. **HYPE Analysis:** * **Daily Chart Structure:** HYPE broke below the lower boundary of its two-month ascending channel on October 8th. Price is currently in a "pullback confirmation" phase, testing this breached support-turned-resistance. A failure to reclaim this level would signal weakness and open the path towards the $75-$77 support area. The longer-term uptrend line, however, remains intact. * **Weekly Outlook & Strategy:** * **Outlook:** The critical watchpoint is the outcome of the current test of the former channel support. Resistance levels are noted at $88-$90, $94, and $102. Key support zones are $80-$82 and $75-$77. * **Strategy:** Two bullish scenarios are proposed for short-term trades: (1) A light long position if price convincingly reclaims and holds above the former channel support, or (2) A light long position if price falls to the $75-$77 support area and shows signs of stabilization. A 30% position size with strict stop-loss discipline is emphasized. **Risk Management Reminder:** The article includes a standard trailing stop-loss protocol (moving stop to breakeven at +1% profit, then locking in profits progressively). It strongly cautions that all analysis is for informational purposes only, not investment advice, and strategies must be adapted to changing market conditions.

marsbit57 хв тому

BTC Daily Adjustment in Progress, HYPE Nears Short-term Directional Decision | Invited Analysis

marsbit57 хв тому

U.S. Defense Procurement Seeks to Exclude Chinese PCBs, Stirring Domestic Disputes Among American Companies

A U.S. defense procurement rule set to take effect in January 2027, which aims to exclude printed circuit boards (PCBs) from China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea, has sparked debate within the American industry. While the policy, stemming from the 2021 National Defense Authorization Act, is intended to bolster U.S. domestic manufacturing and supply chain security, it faces conflicting pressures. The U.S. PCB industry association (PCBAA) urges swift implementation to redirect defense contracts to local manufacturers. In contrast, technology industry groups like the Information Technology Industry Council (ITI) seek a longer transition period, citing high costs and complexities for companies needing to establish new, certified supply lines and production facilities. The rule's direct impact on China's vast PCB industry is estimated to be minimal, affecting less than 1% of its total demand. However, it highlights a broader U.S. strategy to revive advanced electronics manufacturing through defense contracts, tax credits, and subsidies. Despite these efforts, rebuilding a competitive domestic PCB industry faces significant hurdles, including multi-year factory construction timelines, reliance on overseas materials and equipment, and the challenge of achieving commercial scale without sufficient non-defense orders. Notably, even U.S. defense contractors like TTM continue to expand production capacity in China to leverage its mature, cost-effective supply chain. Meanwhile, China's PCB sector is transitioning from scale to technological sophistication, making significant inroads in high-end areas like AI servers and advanced packaging. Leading Chinese firms are achieving breakthroughs in materials and complex multi-layer board production, supported by a deep industrial ecosystem of suppliers, manufacturers, and end-client collaboration. This entrenched system of scale, iterative development, and integrated supply chains represents a competitive advantage that U.S. policy alone cannot quickly replicate. The core challenge for the U.S. is not merely redirecting orders but rebuilding the comprehensive manufacturing capabilities and commercial viability that have shifted overseas.

marsbit58 хв тому

U.S. Defense Procurement Seeks to Exclude Chinese PCBs, Stirring Domestic Disputes Among American Companies

marsbit58 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片