Grayscale: "If the Proposals Are Adopted, the Prices of These Two Altcoins Could Rise"

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-08-14Востаннє оновлено о 2026-08-14

Анотація

Grayscale's Head of Research, Zach Pandl, stated that proposed changes to the tokenomics of Ethereum ($ETH) and Solana ($SOL) could significantly slow their supply growth rates, potentially boosting prices. The discussed code modifications aim to reduce the annual inflation of ETH and SOL tokens. Slower supply growth could decrease the number of new tokens entering the market, increasing scarcity. Grayscale estimates that if implemented, Ethereum's annual supply inflation could fall to about 0.4% by late 2031—close to Bitcoin's rate—while Solana's could drop to roughly 1.1%. For context, this compares to gold's ~1.8% annual supply growth and the US CPI inflation of ~3.3%. While the proposals are still under community discussion and not finalized, Pandl noted that Solana's changes appear to have broader support and a higher likelihood of adoption. However, lower token inflation might also reduce staking rewards, as a significant portion comes from new token issuance. Pandl concluded that the reduced supply could increase scarcity and upward price pressure, particularly benefiting investors holding non-staked tokens.

Zach Pandl, Head of Research at Grayscale, stated that if the proposed tokenomics changes being discussed within the Ethereum ($ETH) and Solana ($SOL) communities are implemented, the supply growth rates of both crypto assets could slow significantly, which could potentially have a favorable impact on prices.

According to Pandl, the code changes under consideration for the Ethereum and Solana ecosystems are aimed at reducing the annual token inflation rates of $ETH and $SOL. All else being equal, slowing supply growth could reduce the number of new tokens entering the market, leading to increased scarcity of existing assets.

According to Grayscale's estimates, if these rules are enacted, the annual supply inflation of Ethereum could fall to approximately 0.4% by the end of 2031. This figure is close to Bitcoin's supply growth rate. Solana's annual supply inflation is projected to decline to around 1.1%.

For comparison, Grayscale noted that the annual supply increase of gold is approximately 1.8 percent, while U.S. Consumer Price Index inflation is approximately 3.3 percent.

The proposed changes for Ethereum and Solana are still under discussion within their communities and have not yet been finalized. Pandl stated that the proposals for Solana appear to have received broader approval and therefore have a relatively higher probability of being implemented.

However, reducing token inflation could also lead to a decrease in rewards for investors engaged in staking. This is because a significant portion of staking revenue for $ETH and $SOL comes from the issuance of new tokens.

Pandl noted that the slowdown in supply growth could lead to increased scarcity, exerting upward pressure on the prices of $ETH and $SOL, and that investors holding non-staked tokens, in particular, could benefit.

*This is not investment advice.

end-content

Пов'язані питання

QAccording to Grayscale's research head, what could be the potential impact on the prices of Ethereum ($ETH) and Solana ($SOL) if certain tokenomic changes are implemented?

AIf the discussed tokenomic changes in the Ethereum and Solana ecosystems are implemented, the supply growth rates of both crypto assets could slow significantly. This would potentially lead to a supply shortage of the existing tokens, exerting upward pressure on the prices of $ETH and $SOL.

QWhat specific annual supply inflation rates does Grayscale estimate for Ethereum and Solana by the end of 2031 if the proposed rules are enacted?

AGrayscale estimates that if the rules are enacted, Ethereum's annual supply inflation could decrease to approximately 0.4% by the end of 2031. For Solana, the annual supply inflation is projected to fall to around 1.1%.

QWhat comparison did Grayscale make regarding the projected supply inflation of Ethereum and Solana versus traditional assets?

AGrayscale compared the projected supply inflation rates to traditional assets. They noted that Ethereum's projected 0.4% rate is close to Bitcoin's supply growth rate. For context, the annual supply increase of gold is approximately 1.8%, and the U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation is around 3.3%.

QWhat potential downside does the article mention regarding the reduction of token inflation for $ETH and $SOL?

AThe article mentions that reducing token inflation could lead to lower rewards for investors who participate in staking. This is because a significant portion of the staking yield for $ETH and $SOL comes from the issuance of new tokens.

QWhich of the two proposed changes (Ethereum's or Solana's) is stated to have a relatively higher chance of being implemented, and why?

AThe proposed changes for Solana are stated to have a relatively higher chance of being implemented. According to Zach Pandl, the proposals for Solana appear to have received broader acceptance within its community.

Пов'язані матеріали

Leading Stock Surges 10x, On-chain Options Could Be the New Main Theme of the Bull Market

At the Blockworks DAS conference, Hyperliquid founder Jeff and Lighter founder Vlad both announced plans to enter the on-chain options market. The entry of these two leading PerpDEXs signifies that the competition in on-chain derivatives is moving towards a complete derivatives market. <strong>On-chain options are regarded as one of the main narratives of this bull market cycle, with Derive (formerly Lyra) being a core project in this sector.</strong> ## 1. The Underlying Logic of On-Chain Options On-chain options cater to the core needs of two types of users: 1. **Leverage Traders:** Buyers' maximum loss is limited to the premium paid, unlike perpetual contracts where liquidation can occur. They can specify trading durations to go long or hedge spot positions to protect profits. 2. **Yield-Seeking Holders:** Option sellers earn premiums by writing contracts, utilizing strategies like covered calls on spot holdings to generate extra yield. Options essentially connect these two groups of participants, allowing yield to be priced according to risk. Previously, on-chain options struggled to scale due to complex interfaces and fragmented liquidity. Now, conditions on the supply side have improved. ## 2. Market Data On-chain options trading volume is rapidly increasing: monthly premium volume was around $20M+ at the beginning of the year and reached $80M+ in September. In September, industry-wide notional volume hit $4.829B (month-over-month +121.7%), with Derive's notional volume at $3.827B (+99.3%). Although competitors have captured some market share, reducing Derive's notional volume dominance from 88.1% to 79.3%, <strong>it still holds a 91.6% share by premium volume</strong>. While the overall industry expands, Derive maintains its leading position. Compared to centralized platforms, the notional volume of fully on-chain options is only about 6.8% of Deribit's, indicating immense growth potential for the sector. The DRV token has previously seen a maximum increase of over 10x, meaning the market has already priced in expectations for this sector. ## 3. Derive's Core Competitiveness Formerly known as Lyra, it has built an order book + RFQ + portfolio margin system: 1. The RFQ (Request-for-Quote) model addresses the pain point of fragmented liquidity across numerous option contracts, supporting large-volume and complex strategy trades by connecting to a network of institutional market maker quotes. 2. The on-chain perpetual futures market provides a hedging foundation for option market makers. Derive itself also offers perpetuals, and its portfolio margin system can reduce collateral requirements. The options business can additionally drive synergistic revenue growth for its perpetuals and lending services. 3. The V3 upgrade employs a <strong>"off-chain matching, on-chain settlement"</strong> architecture. It introduces new features like risk isolation, cross-asset portfolio margining, and native option strategy vaults. It can serve as underlying derivatives infrastructure, open to third-party front-end applications, catering to both retail and institutional users. ## 4. DRV Token Value Accrual Mechanism The protocol's core intellectual property belongs to the DAO. DRV serves governance, incentive, and value accrual functions, with its core mechanism being <strong>protocol revenue buybacks</strong>: - The buyback ratio was increased from 25% to 35%, and will be further raised to 50% starting October 14th, executed weekly. - As of October 6th, 87 weekly buyback rounds have been completed, cumulatively repurchasing nearly $30M worth of DRV. Increasing the buyback ratio directly raises the buyback budget by about 43%. Business growth will continue to generate consistent token buy-side pressure. ## 5. Competitive Landscape Assessment The entry of Hyperliquid and Lighter will bring competition but also helps educate the market and expand overall demand. During a phase of industry-wide volume growth, a decline in market share and an increase in absolute business scale can coexist. Derive possesses a mature quote network, risk engine, and existing option positions, resulting in high user migration costs and giving it significant first-mover advantages. The sector is still in its early stages and warrants continued attention.

20 хв тому

Leading Stock Surges 10x, On-chain Options Could Be the New Main Theme of the Bull Market

20 хв тому

All Four Major U.S. Banks Report Profits, So Why Are Bank Stocks Falling?

Despite reporting strong third-quarter earnings with all four major U.S. banks—Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, and Wells Fargo—showing year-over-year profit growth, their stock prices declined, dragging down the KBW Bank Index. The divergence stems from the market looking beyond current profits to future earnings sustainability amid a high-interest-rate environment. Bank stocks had already fallen roughly 13.6% from their August peak before the earnings reports, as rising Treasury yields pressured valuations. The results confirmed a shift within trading divisions: record equity financing revenue, particularly at Goldman Sachs, offset weaker fixed-income trading. However, this surge is linked to market volatility rather than signaling a new investment banking cycle. While consumer spending remains resilient, bank executives warned of risks from sticky inflation, high rates, and geopolitical tensions. Valuation multiples for banks remain significantly discounted compared to the broader market, reflecting expectations of "higher-for-longer" interest rates which increase discount rates and compress fair value. The key factors for a potential re-rating are the future path of interest rates and whether credit costs will rise. Upcoming reports from Bank of America and Morgan Stanley will further test if the shift from fixed income to equity revenue is an industry-wide trend. The market's focus remains firmly on the endurance of the consumer buffer and the ultimate peak in rates.

marsbit27 хв тому

All Four Major U.S. Banks Report Profits, So Why Are Bank Stocks Falling?

marsbit27 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片