American Financial Giant Fidelity Says It's Too Early to Declare Bitcoin Bear Market Over! Details Here

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-09-04Востаннє оновлено о 2026-09-04

Анотація

In its Q4 crypto market outlook report, Fidelity Digital Assets stated it remains unclear whether Bitcoin's bear market has concluded. While acknowledging a recent price rebound, the firm emphasized that more data is needed to confirm if a definitive market bottom has formed. Fidelity noted some investors are focused on whether a final low will occur in November, aligning with Bitcoin's historical four-year cycle theory. However, the report cautioned there is no guarantee past price patterns will repeat identically. The analysis presented possibilities that Bitcoin's bottom may have been in July, but also that a new low could form in November or later. Therefore, Fidelity advises against interpreting current conditions as a confirmed shift to a bull market. Positively, the firm highlighted indicators suggesting a bottom may be approaching. These include Bitcoin's price surging over 25% in a single week in late August, signaling strong recovery potential, and continued expansion in blockchain activity, which combined with price strength supports the bottoming thesis. Ultimately, Fidelity concludes it is still too early to definitively declare the bear market over.

In its cryptocurrency market outlook report for the fourth quarter, Fidelity Digital Assets stated that it remains unclear whether the Bitcoin bear market has ended. Despite the recent recovery, the company indicated that more data is needed to confirm whether a new market bottom has been formed.

According to Fidelity's assessment, some investors are focused on whether the final bear market bottom will occur in November, in line with Bitcoin's four-year market cycle theory. However, the company emphasized that there is no guarantee that price movements observed in past cycles will repeat in the same manner in the future.

The report also suggested the possibility that Bitcoin may have reached its low in July. However, it was also noted that BTC could form a new low in November or later. Therefore, Fidelity argued that current market conditions should not be interpreted as a definitive transition to a bull market.

Nevertheless, the company pointed to some positive indicators suggesting the Bitcoin market is approaching a bottom. The fact that Bitcoin's price surged over 25% in just one week at the end of August was cited as one significant event indicating a strong market recovery.

Fidelity also noted that the ongoing expansion of blockchain activity is a positive signal for the Bitcoin market. The combination of increased on-chain activity and a strong price recovery supports the view that the market may be nearing its bottom.

However, Fidelity maintains that it is still too early to definitively declare the end of the bear market.

*This is not investment advice.

end-content

Пов'язані питання

QAccording to Fidelity Digital Assets' Q4 report, what is their main stance on whether the Bitcoin bear market has ended?

AFidelity states that it is still too early to definitively declare the end of the Bitcoin bear market. They believe more data is needed to confirm if a new market bottom has been formed, despite the recent recovery.

QWhat two contrasting possibilities for Bitcoin's price bottom does the Fidelity report mention?

AThe report mentions the possibility that Bitcoin might have already bottomed in July. Conversely, it also notes that Bitcoin could form a new price low in November or later.

QWhat positive market indicators does Fidelity point to that suggest a Bitcoin bottom might be approaching?

AFidelity points to two key positive indicators: 1) Bitcoin's price rising over 25% in a single week in late August, signaling strong market recovery. 2) The continued expansion of blockchain activity, which is a positive signal when combined with the price recovery.

QWhat does Fidelity caution investors about regarding Bitcoin's historical four-year market cycle theory?

AFidelity cautions that there is no guarantee the price movements observed in past market cycles will repeat in the same way in the future, even though some investors are focused on a potential final bear market bottom in November based on this theory.

QHow should current market conditions be interpreted according to Fidelity's report?

AAccording to the report, current market conditions should not be interpreted as a definitive transition to a bull market. The firm maintains a cautious stance, awaiting more conclusive data.

Пов'язані матеріали

How to Understand the CFTC's Regulation of Prediction Markets?

On October 9, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) released two conflicting documents concerning event contracts in prediction markets. A proposal seeks to classify contracts on sports, politics, and other events as "swaps" under CFTC jurisdiction, while a separate interim rule explicitly excludes licensed sports betting and casino games from the swap definition. This creates a regulatory split where bets on the same NFL game could be regulated as state-level gambling if placed at a Las Vegas sportsbook, but as a federally regulated swap if traded on a CFTC-registered exchange like Kalshi. CFTC Chairman Michael Selig argues these event contracts are commodity derivatives for hedging, speculation, and price discovery. However, the move faces legal challenges. The NFL and 39 states oppose the CFTC's stance, arguing these contracts create new gambling risks rather than hedging existing ones. Federal appeals courts are divided: the Third Circuit ruled such contracts are swaps, while the Sixth and Ninth Circuits concluded they are not. This circuit split has prompted New Jersey to petition the Supreme Court for review. The proposed rules are not yet in effect, pending publication and a comment period. The ultimate outcome hinges on court decisions and the future composition of the CFTC commission. The core conflict remains whether event contracts on prediction markets fall under federal derivatives regulation or state gambling laws.

marsbit12 хв тому

How to Understand the CFTC's Regulation of Prediction Markets?

marsbit12 хв тому

BTC Daily Adjustment in Progress, HYPE Nears Short-term Directional Decision | Invited Analysis

This weekly analysis examines the recent price action of Bitcoin (BTC) and HYPE, focusing on key technical developments and outlining potential trading strategies. **Bitcoin (BTC) Analysis:** * **Market Trend Assessment:** The analysis applies a "52-week moving average confirmation method" to assess the broader trend. While BTC's weekly closing price has broken above this key average, the moving average itself remains in a downtrend, and a proper pullback confirmation is still lacking. The conclusion is that the rally from the July 1st low is still classified as a technical rebound, not yet confirming a new bull market. * **Daily Chart Structure:** The report argues that the five-wave rally (a-e) from the July low likely concluded at the September 21st high. The recent breakdown below the key support of $82,500, followed by a weak-volume rebound, supports this view. If the e-wave is complete, a larger corrective decline (potentially in three sub-waves) is anticipated. The first leg of this correction is underway, with an initial target around $78,000. * **Weekly Outlook & Strategy:** * **Outlook:** The focus is on the downside targets from the September 21st high. Key resistance is seen at $85,500 and the $87,500-$90,000 zone. Support levels are identified at $80,500-$82,500, $75,000-$78,000, and $69,100-$70,500. * **Strategy:** The medium-term posture is neutral/cautious, recommending watching for a potential pullback to a "channel" for confirmation. For short-term traders, two scenarios are outlined: (A) Selling into strength near the $85,500-$87,500 resistance if bearish signals appear, or (B) Selling a confirmed breakdown below the $80,500-$82,500 support zone. A 30% position size with strict stop-loss management is advised. **HYPE Analysis:** * **Daily Chart Structure:** HYPE broke below the lower boundary of its two-month ascending channel on October 8th. Price is currently in a "pullback confirmation" phase, testing this breached support-turned-resistance. A failure to reclaim this level would signal weakness and open the path towards the $75-$77 support area. The longer-term uptrend line, however, remains intact. * **Weekly Outlook & Strategy:** * **Outlook:** The critical watchpoint is the outcome of the current test of the former channel support. Resistance levels are noted at $88-$90, $94, and $102. Key support zones are $80-$82 and $75-$77. * **Strategy:** Two bullish scenarios are proposed for short-term trades: (1) A light long position if price convincingly reclaims and holds above the former channel support, or (2) A light long position if price falls to the $75-$77 support area and shows signs of stabilization. A 30% position size with strict stop-loss discipline is emphasized. **Risk Management Reminder:** The article includes a standard trailing stop-loss protocol (moving stop to breakeven at +1% profit, then locking in profits progressively). It strongly cautions that all analysis is for informational purposes only, not investment advice, and strategies must be adapted to changing market conditions.

marsbit1 год тому

BTC Daily Adjustment in Progress, HYPE Nears Short-term Directional Decision | Invited Analysis

marsbit1 год тому

U.S. Defense Procurement Seeks to Exclude Chinese PCBs, Stirring Domestic Disputes Among American Companies

A U.S. defense procurement rule set to take effect in January 2027, which aims to exclude printed circuit boards (PCBs) from China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea, has sparked debate within the American industry. While the policy, stemming from the 2021 National Defense Authorization Act, is intended to bolster U.S. domestic manufacturing and supply chain security, it faces conflicting pressures. The U.S. PCB industry association (PCBAA) urges swift implementation to redirect defense contracts to local manufacturers. In contrast, technology industry groups like the Information Technology Industry Council (ITI) seek a longer transition period, citing high costs and complexities for companies needing to establish new, certified supply lines and production facilities. The rule's direct impact on China's vast PCB industry is estimated to be minimal, affecting less than 1% of its total demand. However, it highlights a broader U.S. strategy to revive advanced electronics manufacturing through defense contracts, tax credits, and subsidies. Despite these efforts, rebuilding a competitive domestic PCB industry faces significant hurdles, including multi-year factory construction timelines, reliance on overseas materials and equipment, and the challenge of achieving commercial scale without sufficient non-defense orders. Notably, even U.S. defense contractors like TTM continue to expand production capacity in China to leverage its mature, cost-effective supply chain. Meanwhile, China's PCB sector is transitioning from scale to technological sophistication, making significant inroads in high-end areas like AI servers and advanced packaging. Leading Chinese firms are achieving breakthroughs in materials and complex multi-layer board production, supported by a deep industrial ecosystem of suppliers, manufacturers, and end-client collaboration. This entrenched system of scale, iterative development, and integrated supply chains represents a competitive advantage that U.S. policy alone cannot quickly replicate. The core challenge for the U.S. is not merely redirecting orders but rebuilding the comprehensive manufacturing capabilities and commercial viability that have shifted overseas.

marsbit1 год тому

U.S. Defense Procurement Seeks to Exclude Chinese PCBs, Stirring Domestic Disputes Among American Companies

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片