All Four Tech Giants Cry Expensive at the Same Time, Why Does the AI Memory Shortage Continue to Benefit Micron?

Опубліковано о 2026-09-04Востаннє оновлено о 2026-09-04

Анотація

Apple, Tesla, Amazon, and Nvidia recently highlighted memory price increases and supply tightness in unison during their earnings calls. Micron thus stands at the benefiting end of the AI capital expenditure chain, but high prices are also eroding customer margins and cash flow; the sustainability of demand, capacity realization, and the risks of a cycle reversal still require simultaneous observation.

The latest earnings season revealed a common thread: management at Apple, Tesla, Amazon, and Nvidia are all discussing memory prices and supply, not just models or GPUs. HBM, DRAM, and NAND, once seen as cyclical commodities, have now become critical components limiting the expansion of AI devices and data centers. For Micron, the cost pressure on its customers corresponds to its opportunity for pricing power.

Four Tech CEOs Send the Same Signal

Apple's former CEO Tim Cook stated that the company paid more for memory in the March quarter than in the December quarter, saw a significant increase again in the June quarter, and expects to pay an even higher premium in the September quarter. He described this memory cycle as a "once-in-a-hundred-years flood," with Apple partially offsetting costs by raising prices on Macs and iPads.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk specifically thanked Micron for providing Tesla with considerable allocations and relatively reasonable terms despite "fairly crazy" memory prices. Buyers complain about prices while scrambling for allocations, reflecting that companies are worried not just about cost, but also about impacting deliveries if they can't secure enough product.

Cloud Providers Boost Budgets but Still Can't Fill Demand

Amazon increased its full-year capital expenditure budget from about $200 billion to $220 billion, with management citing memory price increases as a major reason for the upward revision. Even with an extra $20 billion, the company expects it will still not build sufficient computing capacity to meet demand this year, and shortages may persist until 2027.

This indicates that AI capital expenditure has not yet receded due to component price hikes. As long as customers would rather bear higher costs than delay server construction, memory prices will remain supported. However, the greater the investment, the higher the customer's requirements for project returns and cash flow will be.

Nvidia Locks in Memory with Long-Term Commitments

Nvidia disclosed that it has secured $279 billion in supply and capacity commitments through fiscal 2032, with $267 billion of that corresponding to the next two and a half years, primarily related to memory procurement. Such large-scale long-term arrangements indicate that the bottleneck for AI chip shipments is not only in advanced manufacturing processes but also requires planning for supporting memory years in advance.

The article also points out that HBM supply is already sold out through next year. Long-term contracts and advance volume locking help Micron reduce demand volatility in traditional memory cycles, plan capital investments, and increase the proportion of high-value products in its revenue.

Buyers' Profits Under Pressure, Sellers Gain Pricing Power

Rising memory prices are impacting the gross margins and free cash flow of large tech companies. Apple is buffering the pressure with terminal price increases, Nvidia hinted that its gross margin might move from the mid-70% range to the low-70% range, while Amazon and Tesla need to invest more cash to expand infrastructure or purchase chips.

On one side of the ledger are pressured device and cloud service providers, and on the other side are suppliers like Micron. The global DRAM market has only a few major players, and supply expansion takes time, making pricing power easier to form during shortage phases. As long as AI server demand continues, Micron is no longer just waiting for PC and smartphone upgrade cycles.

High Boom Doesn't Mean Stock Price Only Goes Up

At the time of the article's publication, Micron traded around $958.16, up 0.22% for the day. The author believes that the forward P/E ratios for Micron and SanDisk are around 6 to 7 times, but this assessment is based on the premise that peak profits can be sustained. If customers cut capital expenditures or supply expands faster than demand, profit expectations could still be revised downward.

Investors should watch HBM order locks, traditional DRAM and NAND prices, and customer capital expenditures. The $950 to $960 range provided in the article is an observation zone, below $918 is a risk line, and above $1020 requires stronger order or earnings signals. The super cycle is still on, but cyclical stocks remain sensitive to changes in expectations.

Пов'язані матеріали

BTC Daily Adjustment in Progress, HYPE Nears Short-term Directional Decision | Invited Analysis

This weekly analysis examines the recent price action of Bitcoin (BTC) and HYPE, focusing on key technical developments and outlining potential trading strategies. **Bitcoin (BTC) Analysis:** * **Market Trend Assessment:** The analysis applies a "52-week moving average confirmation method" to assess the broader trend. While BTC's weekly closing price has broken above this key average, the moving average itself remains in a downtrend, and a proper pullback confirmation is still lacking. The conclusion is that the rally from the July 1st low is still classified as a technical rebound, not yet confirming a new bull market. * **Daily Chart Structure:** The report argues that the five-wave rally (a-e) from the July low likely concluded at the September 21st high. The recent breakdown below the key support of $82,500, followed by a weak-volume rebound, supports this view. If the e-wave is complete, a larger corrective decline (potentially in three sub-waves) is anticipated. The first leg of this correction is underway, with an initial target around $78,000. * **Weekly Outlook & Strategy:** * **Outlook:** The focus is on the downside targets from the September 21st high. Key resistance is seen at $85,500 and the $87,500-$90,000 zone. Support levels are identified at $80,500-$82,500, $75,000-$78,000, and $69,100-$70,500. * **Strategy:** The medium-term posture is neutral/cautious, recommending watching for a potential pullback to a "channel" for confirmation. For short-term traders, two scenarios are outlined: (A) Selling into strength near the $85,500-$87,500 resistance if bearish signals appear, or (B) Selling a confirmed breakdown below the $80,500-$82,500 support zone. A 30% position size with strict stop-loss management is advised. **HYPE Analysis:** * **Daily Chart Structure:** HYPE broke below the lower boundary of its two-month ascending channel on October 8th. Price is currently in a "pullback confirmation" phase, testing this breached support-turned-resistance. A failure to reclaim this level would signal weakness and open the path towards the $75-$77 support area. The longer-term uptrend line, however, remains intact. * **Weekly Outlook & Strategy:** * **Outlook:** The critical watchpoint is the outcome of the current test of the former channel support. Resistance levels are noted at $88-$90, $94, and $102. Key support zones are $80-$82 and $75-$77. * **Strategy:** Two bullish scenarios are proposed for short-term trades: (1) A light long position if price convincingly reclaims and holds above the former channel support, or (2) A light long position if price falls to the $75-$77 support area and shows signs of stabilization. A 30% position size with strict stop-loss discipline is emphasized. **Risk Management Reminder:** The article includes a standard trailing stop-loss protocol (moving stop to breakeven at +1% profit, then locking in profits progressively). It strongly cautions that all analysis is for informational purposes only, not investment advice, and strategies must be adapted to changing market conditions.

marsbit1 год тому

BTC Daily Adjustment in Progress, HYPE Nears Short-term Directional Decision | Invited Analysis

marsbit1 год тому

U.S. Defense Procurement Seeks to Exclude Chinese PCBs, Stirring Domestic Disputes Among American Companies

A U.S. defense procurement rule set to take effect in January 2027, which aims to exclude printed circuit boards (PCBs) from China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea, has sparked debate within the American industry. While the policy, stemming from the 2021 National Defense Authorization Act, is intended to bolster U.S. domestic manufacturing and supply chain security, it faces conflicting pressures. The U.S. PCB industry association (PCBAA) urges swift implementation to redirect defense contracts to local manufacturers. In contrast, technology industry groups like the Information Technology Industry Council (ITI) seek a longer transition period, citing high costs and complexities for companies needing to establish new, certified supply lines and production facilities. The rule's direct impact on China's vast PCB industry is estimated to be minimal, affecting less than 1% of its total demand. However, it highlights a broader U.S. strategy to revive advanced electronics manufacturing through defense contracts, tax credits, and subsidies. Despite these efforts, rebuilding a competitive domestic PCB industry faces significant hurdles, including multi-year factory construction timelines, reliance on overseas materials and equipment, and the challenge of achieving commercial scale without sufficient non-defense orders. Notably, even U.S. defense contractors like TTM continue to expand production capacity in China to leverage its mature, cost-effective supply chain. Meanwhile, China's PCB sector is transitioning from scale to technological sophistication, making significant inroads in high-end areas like AI servers and advanced packaging. Leading Chinese firms are achieving breakthroughs in materials and complex multi-layer board production, supported by a deep industrial ecosystem of suppliers, manufacturers, and end-client collaboration. This entrenched system of scale, iterative development, and integrated supply chains represents a competitive advantage that U.S. policy alone cannot quickly replicate. The core challenge for the U.S. is not merely redirecting orders but rebuilding the comprehensive manufacturing capabilities and commercial viability that have shifted overseas.

marsbit1 год тому

U.S. Defense Procurement Seeks to Exclude Chinese PCBs, Stirring Domestic Disputes Among American Companies

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片