Trade War 2.0: Trump Demands Fed Lower Rate Under Threat of Embargo

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-09-06Востаннє оновлено о 2026-09-06

Анотація

Former President Donald Trump has threatened to impose a trade embargo on countries with which the U.S. runs a trade deficit unless the Federal Reserve cuts interest rates. He made the demand in a Truth Social post on September 4, 2026, and later reiterated it at the White House, stating the U.S. is not obligated to trade with countries that contribute to long-term deficits. He named Canada, Mexico, and the EU as potential targets, claiming he could act with "one stroke of the pen." This stance is supported by a February 2026 Supreme Court ruling which, while limiting tariff powers, affirmed the president's authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to block imports/exports during a declared national emergency—a state first declared for trade deficits in April 2025. In July 2026, the U.S. trade deficit hit $88.6 billion, a 16-month high, with major contributors being Mexico ($27.5B), Vietnam ($23.3B), Taiwan (~$18-20.7B), China ($15.2B), Germany (~$5.6-6.3B), and Ireland (~$3.9B). Trump argued strong August job growth (162,000 jobs added) justifies having the world's lowest interest rates. An AI analysis draws a historical parallel to President Nixon pressuring the Fed in 1971, which preceded high inflation and a severe early-1980s recession, raising concerns that current pressure could lead to similar long-term inflationary consequences.

Trump has demanded that the Federal Reserve lower interest rates, threatening to halt trade with countries with which Washington has a trade deficit. He published the corresponding post on his social network Truth Social on September 4, 2026.

In the message, Trump declared he was ready to stop trading with debtor countries if the rate is not lowered, calling such a move "better than tariffs." He also cited a U.S. Supreme Court ruling on a tariff case, which, in his words, confirmed the president's authority to take such measures. Separately, Trump stated that the U.S. should have the lowest rate in the world, citing strong employment data as an argument — the economy added 162,000 jobs in August.

That same day, speaking in the Oval Office of the White House, the president reiterated his position: the U.S. is not obligated to trade with countries where deficits have accumulated over the years, and halting such trade, in his opinion, would automatically eliminate the imbalance. Trump mentioned Canada, Mexico, and the European Union, noting he could impose an embargo "with the stroke of a pen."

Trade Deficit Hits 16-Month High

According to data from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis and the U.S. Census Bureau, the overall U.S. trade deficit in goods and services reached $88.6 billion in July 2026 — the highest level in the last 16 months. Several countries were the main contributors to the imbalance.

  • Mexico — $27.5 billion
  • Vietnam — $23.3 billion
  • Taiwan — approximately $18–20.7 billion
  • China — $15.2 billion
  • Germany — approximately $5.6–6.3 billion
  • Ireland — approximately $3.9 billion

The agencies publish the full country-by-country statistics separately.

What Powers is Trump Citing

The president's statements are based on a U.S. Supreme Court ruling from February 20, 2026, in the case *Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump* and related lawsuits. The court ruled 6-3 that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not grant the president the authority to impose tariffs. However, the text of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. § 1702) directly empowers the head of state to prevent or prohibit imports and exports, and regulate related transactions under a declared state of emergency — it is this provision, not tariff authority, that Trump is now relying on.

A national emergency concerning trade deficits was declared back in April 2025 and extended in March 2026. Presidents have previously used IEEPA to impose embargoes — notably against Iran, North Korea, and specific goods from Russia. In addition to IEEPA, the head of state has other tools for restricting trade — Sections 232, 301, and 122 of relevant legislation. Formally, the Constitution grants Congress the power to regulate foreign trade, but it has delegated broad authority to the president in case of emergencies.

AI Opinion

From the perspective of machine data analysis, the demand to lower the rate under threat of trade restrictions finds a direct historical parallel. The end of 1971 provides a similar example: President Richard Nixon systematically pressured Fed Chairman Arthur Burns to ease policy ahead of the 1972 election. The outcome of that episode was inflation, which, according to a *Journal of Economic Perspectives* study, reached 9.6% in 1973 and required the painful 1980–82 recession to tame. The macroeconomic link here is obvious: attempts to ensure cheap money for short-term economic growth often translate into a long-term inflationary bill. The question arises whether the current confrontation with the Fed will repeat the same scenario a decade later.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat specific action did Donald Trump threaten to take if the Federal Reserve did not lower interest rates?

AHe threatened to stop trading with countries with which the US has a trade deficit.

QAccording to the US Bureau of Economic Analysis data mentioned in the article, what was the US total trade deficit for goods and services in July 2026, and which country contributed the most to it?

AThe total trade deficit was $88.6 billion in July 2026, and Mexico contributed the most with a deficit of $27.5 billion.

QWhat Supreme Court decision from February 2026 did President Trump reference to support his authority to impose trade restrictions?

AHe referenced the Supreme Court decision in *Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump*, which held that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not grant the President the authority to impose tariffs, but affirmed presidential powers to prevent or prohibit imports/exports under a declared national emergency.

QWhat historical example from 1971 does the article's AI analysis use to illustrate the potential risk of pressuring the Federal Reserve?

AIt references President Richard Nixon pressuring Fed Chairman Arthur Burns to ease monetary policy ahead of the 1972 election, which contributed to inflation reaching 9.6% in 1973 and led to the painful recession of 1980-82.

QWhat legal mechanisms, besides the IEEPA, does the article mention as tools available to the US President for restricting trade?

AThe article mentions Sections 232, 301, and 122 of relevant legislation as other tools available to the President for restricting trade.

Пов'язані матеріали

Solana Cancels Major Shanghai Event As Attendance Surge Creates Problems

Solana's Accelerate event in Shanghai, scheduled for October 16, was abruptly postponed shortly before it began after registrations exceeded the venue's permitted capacity, according to Solana Foundation president Lily Liu. The event, called Solana Accelerate China, was intended to connect blockchain developers and businesses in the region. The postponement occurred in a country where commercial cryptocurrency activities face significant restrictions, prompting speculation about government intervention. However, organisers attributed the delay to attendance and venue compliance issues rather than a blanket ban by authorities. They noted the distinction between technical blockchain development and illegal cryptocurrency business activities, which are not necessarily treated the same under every regulatory framework. China remains an important source of software engineering talent, and international blockchain organisations continue trying to maintain relationships with developers there. No replacement date was announced at the time of postponement. For attendees who had travelled to Shanghai, the cancellation was an immediate inconvenience. For Solana, the impact is reputational and operational, as the foundation aims to show its ecosystem can develop internationally. The events illustrate how quickly such ambitions can encounter practical obstacles when regulatory expectations and a rapidly growing audience collide. Interest in Solana development may remain strong, but staging the next event will require more careful preparation.

bitcoinist7 год тому

Solana Cancels Major Shanghai Event As Attendance Surge Creates Problems

bitcoinist7 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片