ZEC Price Surpasses $500 Mark: Thanks to 4.3% Daily Gain, XMR Falls Further Behind

cryptonews.ru2026-08-17 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-08-17 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The price of Zcash (ZEC) surpassed $500 on Monday, recovering from a dip below $470 on August 11th. After falling to a low of $484, ZEC surged to $518, securing a 24-hour gain of 4.3%. This made it the top-performing large-cap altcoin for the day, widening its market cap lead over Monero (XMR) to nearly $1 billion. The rally followed reflections and protocol updates shared by Josh Swihart, founder of ZODL. He emphasized the need for humble, focused leadership to achieve Zcash's potential. Technically, the team released updates (Zodl 3.9.0/3.9.1) featuring the Orchard to Ironwood migration, Slipstream sync, and refined coin voting logic. Critical fixes were made to a wallet crash bug, and progress continued on migrating from zcashd to Zallet. However, not all outlooks are positive. A commentator with AML/BSA compliance experience argued that privacy coins like ZEC and XMR have no long-term future in traditional finance. They stated that the coins' inherent privacy makes regulatory compliance—like transaction monitoring and sanctions screening—impossible for banks and exchanges, predicting they will eventually be banned due to these risks.

On Monday, the price of Zcash ($ZEC) surpassed the $500 mark, recovering from its drop on August 11th when it fell below $470. Market data shows the price of this privacy-focused cryptocurrency fell from just under $495 on Sunday afternoon to a daily low of $484. However, shortly before midnight, $ZEC recovered to $490 and remained above this level until 2:00 AM Eastern Standard Time (EST), when a sharp rally pushed it to $518.

Despite a slight pullback below the $515 mark, $ZEC maintained a 24-hour gain of 4.3%, becoming the day's top-performing high-market-cap altcoin. This rally raised the coin's market capitalization to $8.65 billion, increasing its lead over Monero ($XMR) to nearly $1 billion.

The sudden spike occurred shortly after Josh Swihart, founder of ZODL, shared his reflections alongside the latest protocol updates.

Swihart began with personal reflections on leadership, drawing on historical and mythological figures to argue that true leadership requires self-awareness and accountability. Linking this philosophy to the network's future, he urged developers to remain humble and focused:

"Zcash's time has not yet come. Achieving this goal will require strong and talented leaders ready to act at critical moments... Therefore, live and work boldly, with humility and nobility, never losing sight of our common goal."

Alongside his address, Swihart detailed key technical achievements for the week, including the release of Zodl versions 3.9.0 and 3.9.1. These updates deployed the migration from Orchard to Ironwood and the Slipstream sync mechanism into production, along with five stabilization releases. The protocol also implemented a revamped coin-owner voting logic, enhanced multi-account handling features for verification, and completed the design asset work for Q3.

Throughout the week, developers fixed a critical synchronization flaw in the Zebra backend that was causing wallet crash loops. They also advanced the migration process from zcashd to Zallet, enabling more secure key material handling, seedless wallet analysis, and address imports via the CLI. Furthermore, developers expanded the zcash_pool_migration module, adding wallet adapter options and updating the transaction scheduling mechanism.

However, not all industry observers share this optimism. Commentator AlewXRP, with 17 years of experience in Bank Secrecy Act and Anti-Money Laundering compliance, expressed a starkly opposing view, arguing that privacy coins like $ZEC and $XMR have no long-term future in the traditional financial world.

The commentator warned that the fully shielded nature of privacy transactions makes performing basic regulatory requirements—such as transaction monitoring, sanctions screening, and suspicious activity report investigations—virtually impossible for banks:

"The very nature of these coins contradicts the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA)... Exchanges and financial institutions will want nothing to do with them after the 'Transparency' Act passes, as they will be too risky and complicate BSA and AML compliance. I think privacy coins will become a great tool for bad actors... That is why, in my opinion, they will be banned."

Trend Kriptolar

İlgili Sorular

QWhat milestone did Zcash (ZEC) achieve in its price on Monday according to the article?

AAccording to the article, the price of Zcash (ZEC) exceeded the $500 mark on Monday.

QWhat was the 24-hour growth percentage for ZEC mentioned, and how did it rank among altcoins?

AThe 24-hour growth for ZEC was 4.3%, making it the most successful high-market-cap altcoin for the day.

QWhat key technical developments did Zcash founder Josh Swihart highlight during the week?

AJosh Swihart highlighted key technical achievements including the release of Zodl 3.9.0 and 3.9.1, which deployed the Orchard-to-Ironwood migration and Slipstream sync mechanism in production, alongside five stabilization releases.

QWhat major criticism did commentator AlewXRP raise regarding privacy coins like ZEC and Monero?

ACommentator AlewXRP argued that privacy coins like ZEC and Monero have no long-term future in traditional finance because their fully shielded transactions make compliance with basic regulatory requirements like transaction monitoring, sanctions screening, and investigating suspicious activity reports nearly impossible for banks.

QHow did ZEC's market cap compare to Monero's (XMR) after its price increase?

AAfter its price increase, ZEC's market cap grew to $8.65 billion, widening its lead over Monero (XMR) to almost $1 billion.

İlgili Okumalar

Google and Meta Called Out for Benchmark Gaming

Recently, analysis firm SemiAnalysis accused tech giants Google and Meta of "benchmark gaming" with their AI models Gemini 3.8 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3. The accusation stems from a dramatic performance drop between two versions of the Terminal-Bench evaluation for AI agents. On the older, public Terminal-Bench 2.1, Gemini 3.8 Flash scored 89.4, ranking second and beating GPT-6 Astra, while Muse Spark 1.3 scored 88.8. However, on the newly released, more secure Terminal-Bench 4.0, their scores plummeted to 19.1 and approximately 33.3 respectively, far behind competitors. SemiAnalysis argues this indicates "benchmark contamination," where companies train models not on the public test questions themselves, but on expensive, privately purchased training data specifically designed to mimic the benchmark's style. This has evolved into a lucrative industry, with specialized firms selling tailored training tasks for thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars. The article specifically points to Datacurve, a company that both sells expert coding data and runs its own benchmark (DeepSWE), where the accused models also performed well. Meta's Chief AI Officer, Alexandr Wang, dismissed the claims as a "silly argument," pointing out similar performance drops for other models like GPT-5.6 Sol. He stated Meta never claimed Muse Spark 1.3 was as powerful as top-tier models, only that it offered better value. The report concludes that this is the inevitable fate of all high-quality public benchmarks—they become "gamed" over time. The proposed solution of private, high-quality benchmarks comes with a significant downside: it would erode public transparency, turning open rankings into marketing tools and leaving developers without a common, fair measure to compare AI models.

marsbit3 saat önce

Google and Meta Called Out for Benchmark Gaming

marsbit3 saat önce

Crypto's Nouveau Riche Strikes Gold in the Real World: Coinbase Co-founder's Venezuelan Oil Field Adventure

Coinbase co-founder Fred Ehrsam is venturing into the oil fields of Venezuela, a surprising shift for a prominent figure in the digital asset space. Through his company Primavera Infinita, he recently secured a production contract for the Budare-Elotes block with Venezuela's state oil firm PDVSA. This move into a politically volatile, sanction-scarred country highlights a bet on high returns from its reopening under new leadership and shifting U.S. foreign policy. Ehrsam’s investment reflects a venture capital-style appetite for risk, targeting assets deeply discounted by political uncertainty. He is not alone; smaller, politically connected U.S. firms like Aspect Holdings and Hunt Oil are also entering, while established giants like ExxonMobil remain cautious due to past expropriations. To manage the complex, capital-intensive nature of oil, Ehrsam is assembling a professional team. This trend extends beyond Ehrsam. Other crypto wealth, like BitMEX's Arthur Hayes and Tether, is diversifying into traditional hard assets—energy, metals, and agriculture—seeking physical scarcity as a long-term anchor. Tether, for instance, took a controlling stake in agricultural giant Adecoagro. These moves signify crypto capital's evolving interest: not just tokenizing real-world assets (RWA), but directly acquiring and operating them. Ultimately, Ehrsam's gamble is less on oil geology and more on the duration of Venezuela's current political window. It underscores a broader narrative where digital-era wealth seeks stability and scale in the physical world's most traditional, immovable resources.

marsbit3 saat önce

Crypto's Nouveau Riche Strikes Gold in the Real World: Coinbase Co-founder's Venezuelan Oil Field Adventure

marsbit3 saat önce

Refuting the Ethereum 'Abandoning' ETH Narrative: What Does It Really Mean to Pay Gas Without ETH?

Title: Refuting the "Ethereum Abandoning ETH" Argument: What Does Paying Gas Without ETH Really Mean? The debate sparked by Vitalik Buterin's discussion of EIP-8141 (Frame Transactions), which suggests users could pay transaction fees without holding ETH, has led to extreme claims that ETH will lose its value. However, this perspective misunderstands the proposal. Currently, an Ethereum user initiating a transaction must also pay the network's Gas fee in ETH. EIP-8141 aims to decouple these actions. It allows a transaction to be split into separate "frames." A user could sign a transaction to, for example, send USDC, while a separate Paymaster account pays the required ETH Gas fee on their behalf. The user would then settle the cost with the Paymaster using USDC or another token. From the user's perspective, they pay in a stablecoin without interacting with ETH. Crucially, from the Ethereum protocol's perspective, the Gas is still paid in ETH; only the settlement layer between the user and Paymaster changes. This concept isn't entirely new; ERC-4337's Account Abstraction already allows similar Gas sponsorship. EIP-8141 seeks to integrate this capability more natively. The core goal is to drastically improve user experience by abstracting away the complexity of Gas, similar to how one pays with a credit card abroad without handling the local currency. It also enables atomic operations, like bundling token approval with a swap, which would revert together if the swap fails. Regarding ETH's value, the argument that "no ETH is needed" is incorrect. While users may not hold ETH, Paymasters and services must still acquire and spend ETH to pay network fees on the backend. The demand for ETH shifts from being distributed across millions of user wallets to being concentrated in the balances of these service providers. The key variable is whether this improved usability attracts significant new users and increases overall network activity. If it does, total ETH burned in fees could rise substantially. If it doesn't, the change merely reshuffles who holds the ETH needed for Gas. In summary, EIP-8141 aims to lower the entry barrier by hiding Gas complexity, betting that this will drive broader adoption and increase the fundamental utility—and thus demand—for the Ethereum network and ETH itself.

marsbit3 saat önce

Refuting the Ethereum 'Abandoning' ETH Narrative: What Does It Really Mean to Pay Gas Without ETH?

marsbit3 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Popüler Makaleler

GAIN Nasıl Satın Alınır

HTX.com’a hoş geldiniz! GriffinAI (GAIN) satın alma işlemlerini basit ve kullanışlı bir hâle getirdik. Adım adım açıkladığımız rehberimizi takip ederek kripto yolculuğunuza başlayın. 1. Adım: HTX Hesabınızı OluşturunHTX'te ücretsiz bir hesap açmak için e-posta adresinizi veya telefon numaranızı kullanın. Sorunsuzca kaydolun ve tüm özelliklerin kilidini açın. Hesabımı Aç2. Adım: Kripto Satın Al Bölümüne Gidin ve Ödeme Yönteminizi SeçinKredi/Banka Kartı: Visa veya Mastercard'ınızı kullanarak anında GriffinAI (GAIN) satın alın.Bakiye: Sorunsuz bir şekilde işlem yapmak için HTX hesap bakiyenizdeki fonları kullanın.Üçüncü Taraflar: Kullanımı kolaylaştırmak için Google Pay ve Apple Pay gibi popüler ödeme yöntemlerini ekledik.P2P: HTX'teki diğer kullanıcılarla doğrudan işlem yapın.Borsa Dışı (OTC): Yatırımcılar için kişiye özel hizmetler ve rekabetçi döviz kurları sunuyoruz.3. Adım: GriffinAI (GAIN) Varlıklarınızı SaklayınGriffinAI (GAIN) satın aldıktan sonra HTX hesabınızda saklayın. Alternatif olarak, blok zinciri transferi yoluyla başka bir yere gönderebilir veya diğer kripto para birimlerini takas etmek için kullanabilirsiniz.4. Adım: GriffinAI (GAIN) Varlıklarınızla İşlem YapınHTX'in spot piyasasında GriffinAI (GAIN) ile kolayca işlemler yapın.Hesabınıza erişin, işlem çiftinizi seçin, işlemlerinizi gerçekleştirin ve gerçek zamanlı olarak izleyin. Hem yeni başlayanlar hem de deneyimli yatırımcılar için kullanıcı dostu bir deneyim sunuyoruz.

861 Toplam GörüntülenmeYayınlanma 2025.09.24Güncellenme 2026.06.02

GAIN Nasıl Satın Alınır

Tartışmalar

HTX Topluluğuna hoş geldiniz. Burada, en son platform gelişmeleri hakkında bilgi sahibi olabilir ve profesyonel piyasa görüşlerine erişebilirsiniz. Kullanıcıların GAIN (GAIN) fiyatı hakkındaki görüşleri aşağıda sunulmaktadır.

活动图片