Same Election Question, Two Different Odds: Predictions.io Launches Free Cross-Venue Comparison Tools

TheNewsCrypto2026-08-28 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-08-28 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Prediction market platform Predictions.io has launched free tools to compare prices and fees across different venues, highlighting significant price discrepancies for identical political questions. In August 2026, record market volumes coincided with increased regulatory scrutiny. Predictions.io's analysis of over 9,700 markets from Kalshi, Polymarket, and Manifold found that identically worded questions, such as "Blue tsunami in 2026?", traded with price gaps as wide as 8.5 percentage points between platforms. The company argues that the spread between venues provides crucial information often missed when citing a single price. Its new tools include a fee calculator to compare costs across platforms and an odds converter. Predictions.io is a data aggregator and does not operate its own markets.

Washington, United States, August 28th, 2026, Chainwire

As prediction-market volume hits record highs and regulators circle, identically worded midterm questions are trading several points apart depending on the venue. Predictions.io now tracks 9,700+ markets across Kalshi, Polymarket and Manifold in one place – with free fee and odds calculators so traders can see what a price actually costs them.

Prediction markets have never been bigger, or more contested. Kalshi, Polymarket and Polymarket US together posted a record $50.59 billion in combined volume in July, with Kalshi accounting for roughly 74.5% of the total. In the same month, New York City opened a probe into both leading venues, a Washington judge ordered Kalshi to halt most wagers in the state, and the CFTC began an internal review of so-called “mention markets.”

Amid that scrutiny, a simpler question has gone largely unexamined: when two venues list the same question, do they agree on the answer?

Often, they do not. On identically worded midterm markets tracked by Predictions.io, “Blue tsunami in 2026?” was priced at 44.5% on Polymarket and 36.0% on Kalshi. “Blue wave in 2026?” showed 82.5% against 74.0%. Both gaps are 8.5 percentage points — on questions whose wording is identical on the two venues. Across a sample of directly comparable binary markets live on more than one venue, the median gap was more than four points, and nearly half of the pairs differed by five points or more. (Prices as of 05:08 UTC on 28 August 2026; both venues’ live prices are shown side by side on Predictions.io.)

Those gaps matter to anyone quoting a single number. A market priced at 44.5% on one venue and 36.0% on another does not have one “market-implied probability” – it has two, and which one gets cited is arbitrary unless the reader is told both.

“A single venue’s price is a data point. The spread between venues is the information. When the two biggest markets in the world disagree by seven points on the same sentence, that disagreement is the story – and nobody who runs one of those markets is in a position to report it.” said spokesperson of Predictions.io

Predictions.io aggregates markets from Kalshi, Polymarket and Manifold, matching equivalent questions across venues so the same event can be compared directly. The platform currently tracks more than 9,700 event pages across 23 categories including US politics, economics, crypto, sport and geopolitics.

Alongside the comparison pages, Predictions.io publishes two free tools:

● Fee Calculator — enter any trade and see the fee, total outlay and effective all-in price on each venue, including Kalshi’s 0.07 × P × (1−P) taker formula and maker discount against Polymarket’s zero-fee standard markets.

https://predictions.io/tools/fee-calculator

● Odds Converter — convert American, decimal and fractional odds into implied probability and prediction-market prices, and see the vig-free line.

https://predictions.io/tools/odds-converter

A direct venue comparison is available at https://predictions.io/compare/polymarket-vs-kalshi, and live midterms markets at https://predictions.io/lobby/us-politics.

Predictions.io operates no market and takes no position in any contract. It is a data and comparison service, not an exchange, broker or investment adviser.

About Predictions.io

Predictions.io is an independent aggregator of prediction markets, bringing prices from Kalshi, Polymarket and Manifold into a single view so the same question can be compared across venues. It publishes free tools for traders and journalists, including a cross-venue fee calculator and odds converter.

Users can learn more about Predictions.io here: https://predictions.io/

Predictions.io socials: https://bio.site/predictions.io

Contact

Spokesperson
Predictions.io
support@predictions.io

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the primary function of Predictions.io according to the article?

APredictions.io is an independent aggregator and comparison service for prediction markets. It tracks over 9,700 markets from Kalshi, Polymarket, and Manifold, matching equivalent questions across these venues to allow direct price comparison. It does not operate its own market.

QWhat significant price discrepancy between venues is highlighted in the article for the 'Blue tsunami in 2026?' market?

AFor the identically worded 'Blue tsunami in 2026?' market, the price was 44.5% on Polymarket and 36.0% on Kalshi, a gap of 8.5 percentage points.

QWhat two free tools does Predictions.io publish to assist traders and journalists?

APredictions.io publishes a Fee Calculator (to see fees and effective prices on each venue) and an Odds Converter (to convert between odds formats, implied probability, and market prices).

QWhat regulatory and legal challenges were mentioned regarding prediction markets in July 2026?

AIn July 2026, New York City opened a probe into leading venues, a Washington judge ordered Kalshi to halt most wagers in the state, and the CFTC began an internal review of 'mention markets.'

QWhat was the combined trading volume for Kalshi, Polymarket, and Polymarket US in July, and which platform dominated?

AThe combined volume for Kalshi, Polymarket, and Polymarket US in July was a record $50.59 billion. Kalshi accounted for roughly 74.5% of that total volume.

İlgili Okumalar

DATA Network joins Sui and Walrus to scale the supply chain for AI training data

The DATA Network, which operates the Trace onchain registry for rights-cleared AI training data with over 250 million verifiable receipts, is joining the Sui blockchain ecosystem and adopting Walrus as its default storage layer. This integration addresses a critical need for the next generation of AI models, which require real-world, consented data with clear provenance due to regulatory requirements and legal challenges. The open internet has been largely exhausted as a data source. Trace registers the origin and usage rights of data from contributors—such as personal dashcam footage or medical notes—and handles payments to them, processing over 3 million receipts daily. Sui's object-centric model allows datasets and their licenses to be managed onchain, with fast, parallel transaction processing. Walrus provides efficient, secure storage for large files, ensuring data is only accessible to licensed buyers. By integrating with Walrus, Trace will be able to store an immutable, encrypted copy of the original data file itself, strengthening provenance guarantees. As part of the migration, the DATA Network will be upgraded to run natively as a protocol on Sui, and its independent chain will be retired. The $DATA token will transition to the Sui protocol on a one-to-one basis. Sui Foundation is making a $30 million strategic investment in the DATA Network, becoming its largest institutional stakeholder. Leaders from Mysten Labs (original contributor to Sui), PIP Labs, and DATA Foundation highlighted that the combination provides a comprehensive solution for storing, licensing, and paying for the high-quality, consented data essential for advancing AI, with the scale and integrity proofs the industry demands.

TheNewsCrypto32 dk önce

DATA Network joins Sui and Walrus to scale the supply chain for AI training data

TheNewsCrypto32 dk önce

ICP Cloud Engine Heats Up: "20% of Revenue Used for Burn", How Far is it From Token Revaluation?

The ICP community is discussing Cloud Engines, a product enabling enterprises to run private subnets on the Internet Computer. It is linked to the "Mission 70" deflationary plan, where node providers allocate 20% of Cloud Engines revenue to buy and burn ICP tokens, aiming to reduce ICP's inflation rate from 9.72% to 2.92%. This narrative connects enterprise adoption to token scarcity and potential price appreciation for ICP, which is down 99.6% from its peak. Cloud Engines functions as a "custom data center," offering businesses dedicated, sovereign infrastructure without vendor lock-in, using the same underlying protocol as the public ICP network. Key selling points include data sovereignty and hardware choice. However, critical features like SEV-encrypted nodes (for enhanced security) and operator-controlled upgrades are still on the roadmap, not yet live. Early adopters include Pakistan's national cloud engine and a UNDP pilot. The "Mission 70" goal relies on two pillars: supply-side reductions (like cutting node rewards) and demand-side increases in token burns from Cloud Engines revenue. While supply-side changes can be enacted via governance, the demand-side depends entirely on market adoption. Current daily burn rates are far below the levels needed to achieve the 26% deflation target attributed to increased burns. Analysts remain cautious, viewing the 20% burn mechanism as a forward-looking narrative. The product is in early access, and significant, scalable enterprise adoption is unproven. Near-term price catalysts are more likely to come from implementable supply-side governance proposals. The Cloud Engines story represents a longer-term bet on ICP capturing a segment of the enterprise cloud market, with token revaluation contingent on the product generating substantial, quantifiable burn data.

marsbit52 dk önce

ICP Cloud Engine Heats Up: "20% of Revenue Used for Burn", How Far is it From Token Revaluation?

marsbit52 dk önce

Bank of America's Hartnett: Interest Rate Hikes Become the Biggest Positive, Bond-Ending Bubble Logic Is Spreading

In a recent note, Bank of America strategist Michael Hartnett argues that aggressive central bank tightening, including a potential Fed hike in October, could paradoxically be the most bullish near-term catalyst for risk assets. His core thesis is "the bond bubble is bursting." While stocks remain resilient due to strong US data, solid earnings expectations, and robust AI-related capital expenditure plans, bonds are already showing severe stress, with government bonds down 4.4% year-to-date. The logic is that a proactive Fed hike could help anchor runaway long-end yields (the 10-year recently touched 5.36%), preventing a disorderly surge toward 6%. Without such action, the pressure from rising term premiums could continue unabated. The damage from higher rates is already visible in the most rate-sensitive areas: South Korean retail brokers, French government bonds (with the France-Germany spread hitting 140 bps, reminiscent of the 2012 crisis), and CCC-rated credit. Hartnett highlights that the $8 trillion in money market funds is unlikely to flow into equities without a clear shift to monetary easing. Furthermore, the upcoming US midterm elections pose a key risk; a Democratic sweep (currently a 64% probability) could trigger a >10% equity sell-off due to fears of higher taxes and regulation. Near-term strategy involves positioning for a peak in yields (e.g., long 30-year Treasuries) and risk contraction ahead of the elections, while maintaining exposure to commodities and EM assets. Key levels to watch include 10-year yields at 6%, the France-Germany spread at 150 bps, and a Bull & Bear Indicator below 8 for a potential risk rebound.

marsbit56 dk önce

Bank of America's Hartnett: Interest Rate Hikes Become the Biggest Positive, Bond-Ending Bubble Logic Is Spreading

marsbit56 dk önce

Silicon Valley AI Status: Whoever Has the Compute is the Boss

The Silicon Valley AI Power Crunch: Compute is King Silicon Valley's race for AI dominance has devolved into a desperate scramble for computing power. The situation has become so extreme that even top executives are resorting to unusual measures. Anthropic's CEO Dario Amodei was reportedly turned down by Meta's Mark Zuckerberg when seeking additional GPU resources, leading to a deal where SpaceX acts as a broker, reselling Nvidia GPUs to Anthropic. This venture reportedly generated $2.561 billion in quarterly AI revenue for SpaceX. The shortage is reshaping the industry's dynamics, creating a new "compute economy" where GPU access is the ultimate currency. This scarcity is causing internal strife at major firms and altering competitive landscapes. A high-profile example is Noam Shazeer, a key AI scientist whom Google re-hired for $2.7 billion, only for him to leave for OpenAI reportedly due to insufficient compute resources for his team. Similar frustrations over resource allocation have been cited within Google and DeepMind. For AI startups, the challenge is existential. Cloud providers are now demanding multi-year contracts with large upfront payments, making flexible, on-demand access nearly impossible. This has spurred innovative workarounds, including a new market for "global compute prospecting"—companies scavenging for underutilized server capacity worldwide—and venture capital firms like Y Combinator and Radical Ventures directly acquiring and allocating GPU clusters for their portfolio companies. The root causes are complex: explosive growth in AI model complexity and the shift from simple chatbots to persistent "Agent" systems dramatically increase compute demands. While tech giants are building new data centers, supply cannot keep pace with immediate needs. Rental prices for critical chips like the Nvidia H100 have surged nearly 40% in months. The consequence is a consolidation of power. Compute access is becoming the definitive barrier to entry, significantly strengthening large companies with their own infrastructure and creating a lucrative "picks and shovels" market for those who control the hardware supply. In today's Silicon Valley, compute isn't just a resource—it's the foundation of survival and competitive advantage.

marsbit1 saat önce

Silicon Valley AI Status: Whoever Has the Compute is the Boss

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片