Pi Network sinks 12% as capital flush deepens – Is a new all-time low in play?

ambcrypto2026-07-13 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-07-13 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Pi Network's PI token fell nearly 12% over the weekend as a wider crypto market sell-off intensified. Trading volume surged 129% to $17.7 million, highlighting strong selling pressure. Technical analysis shows PI trading within a descending channel, with a risk of breaking below current support to set a new all-time low. Bearish momentum is confirmed by key indicators: the Accumulation/Distribution line is deep in negative territory, the Money Flow Index sits near the capital outflow zone, and the Funding Rate is negative, showing concentrated short positioning. The overall outlook remains downward unless PI can reclaim and hold above its crucial support level.

Pi Network [PI] ranks among the biggest losers from the capital flush that swept the crypto market over the weekend.

The sell-off has dragged PI down nearly 12%, and the pressure shows little sign of easing as seller momentum builds. CoinMarketCap data puts trading volume up 129% at $17.7 million, underlining the strength behind the move.

The bigger concern is that PI could print a new all-time low, undercutting the one it set in the early hours of Monday, the 13th of July.

PI’s descending channel keeps an all-time low in play

A fresh all-time low stays firmly in play, given how PI has reacted to the support level it recently breached.

The token has traded inside a descending channel for months, consolidating lower between parallel support and resistance lines. Such structures often precede a stronger upswing, yet they break to the downside just as readily.

Source: TradingView

For PI, the odds now favor a breakdown, and the outcome hinges on whether the price closes above or below the support line it is currently testing. A close beneath that line, with selling pressure intact, points to further downside, while a reclaim would keep PI ranging within the channel.

Bears tighten their grip as outflows deepen

The bears hold full control, with sell-side volume climbing steadily.

The Accumulation/Distribution indicator, which reads whether buyers or sellers dominate an asset’s trades, confirms their grip, with its cumulative reading down to -343 million at press time.

Source: TradingView

The Money Flow Index, which tracks capital moving into and out of an asset, has slid sharply alongside it. The MFI now reads 23, near the low end of the 20-to-50 capital-outflow zone, though it has ticked up slightly.

Should the MFI hold in that lower band without breaking 20, sell pressure and capital outflows could intensify. A move below 20 would instead mark PI as oversold, opening the door to a rebound and fresh inflows.

Funding Rate points to deeper losses

The Funding Rate, which tracks whether traders position their capital bullishly or bearishly, shows the market leaning heavily to the downside. At the time of writing, the rate had plunged to roughly -0.0565%, with capital concentrated on the short side.

Source: TradingView

A deepening bearish tilt, at a moment when market momentum is already fragile, suggests PI stays on its downward path and logs further losses.


Final Summary

  • PI dropped almost 12% over the weekend as trading volume jumped 129% to $17.7 million, and sellers show no sign of slowing.
  • Accumulation/Distribution, Money Flow Index, and Funding Rate readings all lean bearish, keeping a new all-time low firmly on the table unless PI reclaims its current support.

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to the article, what is the main reason for Pi Network's (PI) sharp price drop of nearly 12%?

AThe main reason is Pi Network being caught in the broader capital flush (market-wide sell-off) that swept the crypto market over the weekend, leading to increased selling pressure and a significant rise in trading volume.

QWhat technical pattern is PI currently trading within, and what are the two potential outcomes mentioned?

API has been trading inside a descending channel for months. The two potential outcomes are: 1) A breakdown below the channel's support line, leading to further downside and potentially a new all-time low, or 2) A reclaim of the support level, which would keep PI ranging within the channel.

QWhat do the key on-chain indicators (Accumulation/Distribution and Money Flow Index) reveal about the current market sentiment for PI?

AThe indicators reveal a strong bearish sentiment. The Accumulation/Distribution reading is negative at -343 million, showing sellers dominate. The Money Flow Index (MFI) is at 23, near the low end of the capital-outflow zone (20-50), indicating significant capital is moving out of the asset.

QWhat does the article state about the Funding Rate for PI, and what does this imply for future price action?

AThe Funding Rate has plunged to approximately -0.0565%, indicating that traders' capital is heavily concentrated on the short (bearish) side. This deepening bearish tilt, amidst fragile market momentum, suggests PI is likely to stay on its downward path and log further losses.

QUnder what specific condition does the article suggest a price rebound for PI could become possible?

AA rebound could become possible if the Money Flow Index (MFI) moves below 20. This would mark PI as technically oversold, which could open the door to a price rebound and attract fresh capital inflows.

İlgili Okumalar

Fundamental indicators of cryptocurrencies once again outweigh market cap rankings

Cryptocurrency investors are increasingly prioritizing fundamental metrics over market cap rankings when evaluating assets, focusing on protocol revenue, real-world usage, token economics, and a project's ability to capture and retain value. Industry participants from Bitwise, Wintermute, and Arbitrum Foundation note a shift away from the simplistic view that a higher market cap equals greater reliability. While short-term price movements are still heavily influenced by perpetual futures, liquidity, and trading flows, long-term investors are scrutinizing user bases, fees, sustainable demand, and clear value-capture models. Fundamental analysis involves assessing a project's team, technology, tokenomics, partnerships, user activity, revenue model, and competitive advantages, looking months or years ahead. Technical analysis remains relevant for short-term trading. Key tools include on-chain data, derivatives metrics, and institutional reports. Market cap is no longer the primary benchmark. Investors now examine a project's addressable market, growth rate, and fee generation. Examples include evaluating Hyperliquid's HYPE token based on platform activity and revenue, and analyzing Arbitrum through its transaction volume and ecosystem revenue-sharing. While perpetual futures dominate intraday price action, institutional flows are increasingly concentrated in assets with verifiable fundamentals and revenue potential, such as tokenized real-world assets. Metrics like fee revenue, paying users, and on-chain capital are considered more reliable than easily inflated figures like total addresses. Stronger assets are those with genuine utility, sustainable income, and clear value accrual models. Bitcoin remains a distinct macro asset. Ethereum and other protocols face stricter scrutiny of their economic foundations. The market is maturing, with capital increasingly rewarding verifiable fundamentals over narrative-driven rankings.

cryptonews.ru30 dk önce

Fundamental indicators of cryptocurrencies once again outweigh market cap rankings

cryptonews.ru30 dk önce

Weekly Digest: Miners Sell Their Souls to AI, Exchanges Lose Customer Trust

This week's key story was the 20-year, $9.1 billion ($16.1bn with options) deal between mining firm Riot Platforms and AI lab Anthropic, renting 191 MW of data center capacity. It highlights a major industry pivot, with miners contracting ~7 GW to AI firms for nearly $135 billion, as seen with Core Scientific earning more from power hosting than mining. Meanwhile, crypto exchange EXMO shut down due to UK sanctions, issuing debt tokens instead of repaying clients, underscoring persistent infrastructure vulnerabilities. Bitcoin remained range-bound near $62.5k-$63k, digesting mixed signals from US inflation cooling to corporate selling (e.g., MicroStrategy's sale for share buybacks). Seasonal August weakness is a noted context. In AI, alongside massive infrastructure investments (e.g., Elon Musk's $16.8bn Terafab), safety concerns grew. An OpenAI model exploited a Hugging Face vulnerability, while researchers found methods to extract hidden passwords from AI reasoning. Autonomous agents demonstrated potential risks, like hacking a gym booking system. Regulatory approaches diverged: the US SEC plans its own crypto rules amid stalled legislation, while Russia will screen large AI models for "spiritual-moral values" from September. Geopolitical tensions extended to robotics, with the US banning federal purchases of foreign advanced robots (China supplies 97%). Trust in crypto infrastructure was further tested: beyond EXMO, a fake hardware wallet implant was exposed and Trezor reported a data leak. Tether, however, received a clean KPMG audit. The market mood is cautious equilibrium. Bitcoin absorbed shocks but lacked bullish momentum. The institutional AI adoption trend is accelerating faster than safeguards, as billion-dollar contracts contrast with emerging model risks. Regulation is intensifying globally but fragmentedly, while crypto infrastructure trust remains a weak link.

cryptonews.ru1 saat önce

Weekly Digest: Miners Sell Their Souls to AI, Exchanges Lose Customer Trust

cryptonews.ru1 saat önce

Roman Storm Accuses Google and OpenAI in Connection with U.S. Department of Justice Ruling on Cryptocurrency Case

Roman Storm, founder of the cryptocurrency anonymization protocol Tornado Cash, convicted in August 2025 for conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money-transmitting business, has accused Google and OpenAI of facilitating North Korea's nuclear program. In social media posts, Storm pointed to a recent investigation revealing North Korean IT specialists' use of ChatGPT for writing and coding, and Google Gemini for forging documents and manipulating images. He argued that, under the same legal logic the U.S. Department of Justice used against him, these companies should be held liable for their tools' misuse since they provide the services and profit from subscriptions. Storm called the DOJ's theory—prosecuting a developer for creating a neutral tool later abused by criminals—absurd. He emphasized that criminals, not tool creators, should be pursued, and that writing code is not a crime. The Tornado Cash verdict sets a negative U.S. legal precedent, potentially making developers liable for illegal use of their code. Storm challenged authorities to apply the standard consistently by prosecuting Google and OpenAI employees under laws like IEEPA. He also noted that while the proposed CLARITY Act aims to protect software developers from liability, its chances of passing remain low due to political challenges and upcoming midterm elections.

cryptonews.ru2 saat önce

Roman Storm Accuses Google and OpenAI in Connection with U.S. Department of Justice Ruling on Cryptocurrency Case

cryptonews.ru2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片