Interesting Moves by Cryptocurrency Exchanges Regarding a Popular Memecoin! Upbit Delists It, Bithumb Removes It from Watch List!

cryptonews.ru2026-08-07 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-08-07 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Two major South Korean crypto exchanges, Upbit and Bithumb, have announced contrasting decisions regarding the popular Solana-based memecoin Bonk ($BONK). Upbit will delist $BONK, removing all trading pairs from its platform on September 7th at 09:00. Users must manage their transactions and asset transfers accordingly, as trading will cease. Conversely, Bithumb has taken a more positive step by removing $BONK from its watchlist, effectively ending a previous trading warning and continuing to support the token on its platform. These divergent actions highlight that crypto projects are evaluated individually by each exchange. A delisting decision from one platform does not automatically extend to others. As a leading memecoin known for high price volatility, listing and delisting decisions on major exchanges can significantly impact a token's price and trading volume. Market participants are closely watching for any further announcements from other Korean exchanges as Upbit's delisting date approaches. The article concludes by stating this is not investment advice.

Upbit and Bithumb, two leading South Korean cryptocurrency exchanges, have announced different decisions regarding the popular memecoin Bonk ($BONK). Upbit announced the termination of trading support for $BONK on its platform, while Bithumb reported removing the token from its watch list.

According to Upbit's statement, the cryptocurrency $BONK will be delisted from the exchange on September 7 at 09:00. Following this decision, users will need to follow procedures related to $BONK transactions and asset transfers. Delisting means the removal of trading pairs for this cryptocurrency from the platform, and users will no longer be able to trade this asset.

South Korean cryptocurrency exchanges regularly evaluate the digital assets they list based on certain criteria. Factors such as trading volume, liquidity, project activity, investor protection, technical developments, and market conditions can influence decisions on listing or delisting assets.

On the other hand, Bithumb has taken a more positive step regarding $BONK, in contrast to Upbit. The exchange announced the removal of $BONK from its list of companies under watch. This marks a step toward ending the previously existing trading warning for $BONK on Bithumb.

The fact that two major South Korean exchanges made different decisions regarding the same asset indicates that cryptocurrency projects are evaluated individually by exchanges. One exchange's decision to delist does not automatically mean the token will be removed from other platforms.

$BONK, as one of the leading memecoins in the Solana ecosystem, particularly attracts attention from retail investors. Since memecoins tend to exhibit high price volatility, decisions to list or delist on major exchanges can significantly impact the token's price and trading volume.

As Upbit's delisting decision on September 7 approaches, market participants are expected to closely monitor the trading status of $BONK on other South Korean exchanges and any potential new announcements. Bithumb's decision to remove $BONK from its watch list indicates that current support for trading the token on this platform remains.

*This is not investment advice.

end-content

İlgili Sorular

QWhat decision did Upbit announce regarding the memecoin $BONK?

AUpbit announced that it will delist the cryptocurrency $BONK from its exchange on September 7th at 09:00.

QHow did Bithumb's decision regarding $BONK differ from Upbit's?

ABithumb announced the removal of $BONK from its watchlist, which is a step towards ending the trading warning previously placed on the token, thus maintaining current trading support, unlike Upbit's delisting.

QWhat are some factors that South Korean crypto exchanges consider when evaluating digital assets for listing?

ASouth Korean crypto exchanges evaluate digital assets based on criteria such as trading volume, liquidity, project activity, investor protection, technical development, and market conditions.

QWhat does the differing decisions from Upbit and Bithumb on $BONK indicate about how exchanges evaluate projects?

AThe differing decisions indicate that cryptocurrency projects are evaluated individually by each exchange, and one exchange's delisting decision does not automatically mean the token will be removed from other platforms.

QWhen is the deadline for $BONK transactions on Upbit following its delisting announcement?

AAccording to the article, Upbit will delist $BONK on September 7th at 09:00. After this, users will need to follow procedures related to $BONK transactions and asset transfers.

İlgili Okumalar

Analyst: 'This Altcoin's Rise is Driven by Major Players' — It Experienced a Sudden Spike Within Hours

Crypto analyst Ali Martinez stated that the activity of large investors played a significant role in Ethereum's recent price surge. Today, Ethereum ($ETH) rose by approximately 10% in just two hours, climbing from $2,433 to $2,667. According to Martinez, the acceleration followed the release of August U.S. inflation data, which came in at 3.4% year-over-year. Blockchain data also points to increased activity from large investors in the market. Martinez noted that the number of $ETH transactions exceeding $1 million increased by roughly 14%, indicating more active participation from large players in the Ethereum market. However, data suggests Ethereum is approaching a significant resistance zone in the short term. The fact that over 10 million $ETH were previously traded in the $2,700 to $2,800 range indicates substantial selling pressure could emerge at these levels. Martinez stated that for Ethereum to start a new upward trend toward the $3,000 mark, it needs to overcome the supply barrier in the $2,700-$2,800 range with support from large cryptocurrency holders. The analyst added that the increased activity of these major holders is a positive factor, but the key area to watch in the near term remains the $2,700-$2,800 range.

cryptonews.ru18 dk önce

Analyst: 'This Altcoin's Rise is Driven by Major Players' — It Experienced a Sudden Spike Within Hours

cryptonews.ru18 dk önce

The Long-Awaited Golden Moment in the Bitcoin World Has Arrived! What's the Outcome?

The long-awaited "golden cross" pattern, a bullish technical signal, briefly materialized for Bitcoin as its 50-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA) crossed above its 200-day EMA, pushing the price to $79,837. However, the signal quickly faded as Bitcoin corrected to around $77,438, causing the 50-day EMA to fall back below the 200-day EMA. This price decline coincided with a sharp reassessment of U.S. Federal Reserve interest rate expectations following the release of stronger-than-expected U.S. core inflation data. The probability of a 25 basis point rate hike at the next Fed meeting surged, putting pressure on risk assets like Bitcoin and erasing a significant portion of its recent gains. Despite the short-lived daily golden cross, some technical indicators suggest the medium-term outlook is not entirely negative. A golden cross remains intact on the 4-hour chart, and the daily ADX indicator points to a relatively strong trend. However, the 4-hour RSI dropping to 43.3 indicates significant weakening of short-term bullish momentum.

cryptonews.ru1 saat önce

The Long-Awaited Golden Moment in the Bitcoin World Has Arrived! What's the Outcome?

cryptonews.ru1 saat önce

Trade.xyz Enters the Prediction Market: Who Has Cheaper Fees Compared to Polymarket?

Trade.xyz has launched its prediction market product, "Events," on the Hyperliquid mainnet. Its initial week saw modest activity: $180k in volume and 263 users. The platform aims to integrate prediction markets into a "universal exchange" vision alongside its existing perpetual contracts. A key focus is its fee structure compared to incumbent Polymarket. Trade.xyz uses Hyperliquid's spot trading fees: a fixed 0.07% for Takers and 0.04% for Makers, with volume-based discounts and additional reductions for HYPE token stakers. Fees are charged upon position closure or settlement. Polymarket employs a dynamic model: Makers pay no fees and receive rebates, while Taker fees vary by market category and are calculated as `C × feeRate × p × (1-p)`, where `p` is the outcome probability. This makes fees highest near 50/50 odds and lower as probability approaches 0% or 100%. In a 50% probability scenario for a $100 Taker trade, Polymarket fees (0.04%-0.07% parameter) range from $1 to $1.75, significantly higher than Trade.xyz's ~$0.07. However, for highly probable outcomes (e.g., 99%) or for Maker orders, Polymarket can be cheaper or even free (e.g., Geopolitics markets). While Trade.xyz currently lags far behind Polymarket in scale, it leverages Hyperliquid's existing liquidity and user base. Its potential lies in combining prediction markets with its proven perpetuals infrastructure, positioning it as a possible challenger in the evolving prediction market space.

marsbit1 saat önce

Trade.xyz Enters the Prediction Market: Who Has Cheaper Fees Compared to Polymarket?

marsbit1 saat önce

Bankless Swap Strategy Success Methodology: How to Screen Undervalued Tokens from VVV to Hyperliquid?

Title: Bankless on Identifying Undervalued Tokens: From VVV to Hyperliquid Summary: In a shifting crypto market, the investment focus is moving from infrastructure narratives to applications with verifiable business models and revenue. This Bankless podcast discussion with Austin Barack of Relayer Capital analyzes how tokens like Venice (VVV), Hyperliquid (HYPE), Pump.fun (PUMP), and ether.fi (ETHFI) can be evaluated based on their fundamentals. Key points include: 1) The market is shifting from chasing growth narratives to finding the intersection of growth and reasonable valuation. 2) Token value is increasingly linked to observable value flow through mechanisms like protocol revenue used for buybacks/burns (e.g., Venice, Hyperliquid). However, this is not a direct equivalent to stock dividends, as token rights are less formalized. 3) Revenue quality and sustainability matter more than just the amount. For instance, Pump.fun's low valuation reflects market skepticism about meme coin trading longevity, despite its resilient revenue over two years. 4) Market categorizations can lag behind business evolution. ether.fi is now primarily a neo-bank/payments platform, not just a restaking protocol, which may create a pricing disconnect. 5) While real revenue can provide a valuation floor and reduce correlation with crypto cycles, these tokens are not fully decoupled from broader market trends. The core argument is that the next phase of crypto valuation will be driven by applications that convert real usage into sustainable revenue and credibly share a portion of that value with token holders, moving towards an application-based economy.

marsbit1 saat önce

Bankless Swap Strategy Success Methodology: How to Screen Undervalued Tokens from VVV to Hyperliquid?

marsbit1 saat önce

Robinhood CEO Spoke Out Against Issuers' Right to Block Stock Tokenization

The CEO of Robinhood, Vlad Tenev, argues that public companies should not automatically have the right to block the tokenization of their shares if the product does not alter the issuer's rights or obligations. This statement follows criticism from AMC Entertainment's CEO regarding Robinhood's "Stock Tokens," which are linked to AMC and other companies' shares. Tenev emphasizes that while an issuer controls the rights attached to its securities, it should not control every lawful use of those shares after they are sold to investors. He outlines three principles: investor rights to freely transfer owned assets, the issuer's authority over security rights but not all derivative products, and technological neutrality—where the need for issuer consent should depend on the product's impact, not its use of blockchain. Robinhood's Stock Tokens are separate instruments backed 1:1 by underlying shares, providing economic exposure without changing the company's capitalization, shareholder rights, or official registry. Tenev believes this model allows for scaling the product across jurisdictions without needing each issuer's approval, promoting broader global access to U.S. stocks. The debate occurs amid rapid growth in the tokenized assets sector.

cryptonews.ru1 saat önce

Robinhood CEO Spoke Out Against Issuers' Right to Block Stock Tokenization

cryptonews.ru1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片