Binance Suspends Employee Who Allegedly Used Insider Information to Promote Newly Issued Token

dailyhodl2025-12-08 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-12-08 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Binance has suspended an employee accused of using insider information to promote a newly issued token through the exchange’s official Binance Futures X account. A preliminary investigation found the employee had connections to the token, which was posted about less than a minute after its issuance. The exchange stated this was a clear abuse of position for personal gain and a violation of its policies. The employee was immediately suspended, and legal authorities were contacted. Binance also announced it will distribute a $100,000 reward among five whistleblowers who reported the incident. This follows a similar insider trading case in March, which also resulted in a whistleblower reward.

Binance has suspended an employee who allegedly used one of the exchange’s social media accounts to promote a token.

The top global crypto exchange says a preliminary investigation concluded that the employee had connections to a token that was issued on Sunday.

Less than a minute after the asset was issued, the employee allegedly posted about it on the Binance Futures’ X account.

Binance says it immediately suspended the employee and contacted legal authorities in the employee’s jurisdiction.

“These actions constitute abuse of their position for personal gain and violate our policies and code of professional conduct.”

The exchange notes it will “take appropriate legal action in accordance with applicable laws.”

The crypto firm also says that it will distribute a $100,000 reward among five whistleblowers who reported the alleged misconduct via the exchange’s official whistleblowing channel.

Binance dealt with a similar incident in March, when the firm suspended an employee who allegedly committed insider trading when working in a development role on its BNB Chain, prior to joining the Binance Wallet team.

The employee allegedly leveraged private information and purchased tokens associated with a project that was planning a token generation event. After the token generation event was announced, the employee allegedly sold a portion of the assets for a profit.

That investigation also triggered a $100,000 whistleblower reward, which was split among four people.

Follow us on X, Facebook and Telegram
Don't Miss a Beat – Subscribe to get email alerts delivered directly to your inbox
Check Price Action
Surf The Daily Hodl Mix

Generated Image: Midjourney

İlgili Okumalar

Encryption Claims Dilemma: The Reality of Rights Protection Under the Conflict of Criminal and Civil Procedures

"Encrypted Claims Dilemma: The Reality of Rights Protection Amidst Criminal-Civil Procedure Conflicts" This article examines the challenges victims face in seeking legal recourse for cryptocurrency theft or fraud in China, highlighting the tension between criminal and civil procedures. Through two representative cases, it illustrates how cross-jurisdictional complexities and regulatory ambiguities often hinder effective relief. In Case 1, a South Korean company paid 800,000 USDT to a Chinese employee of an S-based exchange for listing services, only to have the employee disappear. Despite legal efforts citing属地管辖 (territorial jurisdiction) and the property-like status of virtual assets under China’s "9.24 Notice," local police initially refused to accept the case due to the foreign elements involved. After persistent advocacy, the case was accepted but not formally立案 (registered). Case 2 involved a woman scammed out of over 3 million RMB while attempting to purchase USDT through an OTC trader for investment. While the trader was arrested, the main fraudster remained abroad. Civil action against the trader for unjust enrichment failed, as courts cited the "criminal-first" principle (刑事优先), requiring criminal resolution before civil claims can proceed. The analysis reveals that civil remedies are often impractical when criminal elements are involved: courts may transfer such cases to police, and even successful criminal convictions may not guarantee restitution if perpetrators lack assets. The author concludes that, despite guides on civil litigation, pursuing criminal avenues remains the more viable—though still fraught—path for victims seeking recovery. The piece underscores systemic hurdles, including judicial reluctance to recognize crypto-related claims and procedural barriers, urging greater clarity in legal frameworks to protect victims.

比推41 dk önce

Encryption Claims Dilemma: The Reality of Rights Protection Under the Conflict of Criminal and Civil Procedures

比推41 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片