Grayscale: "If the Proposals Are Adopted, the Prices of These Two Altcoins Could Rise"

cryptonews.ru2026-08-14 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-08-14 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Grayscale's Head of Research, Zach Pandl, stated that proposed changes to the tokenomics of Ethereum ($ETH) and Solana ($SOL) could significantly slow their supply growth rates, potentially boosting prices. The discussed code modifications aim to reduce the annual inflation of ETH and SOL tokens. Slower supply growth could decrease the number of new tokens entering the market, increasing scarcity. Grayscale estimates that if implemented, Ethereum's annual supply inflation could fall to about 0.4% by late 2031—close to Bitcoin's rate—while Solana's could drop to roughly 1.1%. For context, this compares to gold's ~1.8% annual supply growth and the US CPI inflation of ~3.3%. While the proposals are still under community discussion and not finalized, Pandl noted that Solana's changes appear to have broader support and a higher likelihood of adoption. However, lower token inflation might also reduce staking rewards, as a significant portion comes from new token issuance. Pandl concluded that the reduced supply could increase scarcity and upward price pressure, particularly benefiting investors holding non-staked tokens.

Zach Pandl, Head of Research at Grayscale, stated that if the proposed tokenomics changes being discussed within the Ethereum ($ETH) and Solana ($SOL) communities are implemented, the supply growth rates of both crypto assets could slow significantly, which could potentially have a favorable impact on prices.

According to Pandl, the code changes under consideration for the Ethereum and Solana ecosystems are aimed at reducing the annual token inflation rates of $ETH and $SOL. All else being equal, slowing supply growth could reduce the number of new tokens entering the market, leading to increased scarcity of existing assets.

According to Grayscale's estimates, if these rules are enacted, the annual supply inflation of Ethereum could fall to approximately 0.4% by the end of 2031. This figure is close to Bitcoin's supply growth rate. Solana's annual supply inflation is projected to decline to around 1.1%.

For comparison, Grayscale noted that the annual supply increase of gold is approximately 1.8 percent, while U.S. Consumer Price Index inflation is approximately 3.3 percent.

The proposed changes for Ethereum and Solana are still under discussion within their communities and have not yet been finalized. Pandl stated that the proposals for Solana appear to have received broader approval and therefore have a relatively higher probability of being implemented.

However, reducing token inflation could also lead to a decrease in rewards for investors engaged in staking. This is because a significant portion of staking revenue for $ETH and $SOL comes from the issuance of new tokens.

Pandl noted that the slowdown in supply growth could lead to increased scarcity, exerting upward pressure on the prices of $ETH and $SOL, and that investors holding non-staked tokens, in particular, could benefit.

*This is not investment advice.

end-content

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to Grayscale's research head, what could be the potential impact on the prices of Ethereum ($ETH) and Solana ($SOL) if certain tokenomic changes are implemented?

AIf the discussed tokenomic changes in the Ethereum and Solana ecosystems are implemented, the supply growth rates of both crypto assets could slow significantly. This would potentially lead to a supply shortage of the existing tokens, exerting upward pressure on the prices of $ETH and $SOL.

QWhat specific annual supply inflation rates does Grayscale estimate for Ethereum and Solana by the end of 2031 if the proposed rules are enacted?

AGrayscale estimates that if the rules are enacted, Ethereum's annual supply inflation could decrease to approximately 0.4% by the end of 2031. For Solana, the annual supply inflation is projected to fall to around 1.1%.

QWhat comparison did Grayscale make regarding the projected supply inflation of Ethereum and Solana versus traditional assets?

AGrayscale compared the projected supply inflation rates to traditional assets. They noted that Ethereum's projected 0.4% rate is close to Bitcoin's supply growth rate. For context, the annual supply increase of gold is approximately 1.8%, and the U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation is around 3.3%.

QWhat potential downside does the article mention regarding the reduction of token inflation for $ETH and $SOL?

AThe article mentions that reducing token inflation could lead to lower rewards for investors who participate in staking. This is because a significant portion of the staking yield for $ETH and $SOL comes from the issuance of new tokens.

QWhich of the two proposed changes (Ethereum's or Solana's) is stated to have a relatively higher chance of being implemented, and why?

AThe proposed changes for Solana are stated to have a relatively higher chance of being implemented. According to Zach Pandl, the proposals for Solana appear to have received broader acceptance within its community.

İlgili Okumalar

Viktor Pershikov compares cryptocurrency regulation in the US and Russia: market rules vs strict control

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has published proposals to regulate specific segments of the U.S. crypto market, focusing on retail trading involving leverage, margin, or financing. These proposals introduce a voluntary federal registration pathway for platforms, but lack authority to mandate registration for all exchanges without Congressional action. Expert Viktor Pershikov compares these U.S. proposals with Russia's Federal Law 282-FZ, identifying six common principles: mandatory licensed intermediaries, integration into existing regulatory frameworks, asset admission filters, retail investor protection, AML controls, and client asset safeguarding. However, he highlights five key differences: scope (U.S. focuses on leveraged/margin trading; Russia covers circulation, accounting, mining, and prohibits crypto payments), mandatory nature (U.S. is voluntary; Russia is compulsory), treatment of payments (prohibited in Russia), asset listing (platform responsibility in U.S. vs. regulator's closed list in Russia), and legal basis (extension of CFTC authority vs. a new federal law in Russia). The analysis concludes the approaches serve fundamentally different objectives. The U.S. aims to build a regulated market for high-risk trading, applying proven commodity market tools to protect clients within a specific segment. Russia seeks comprehensive state control over the entire circulation of digital currencies, preventing their use as payment and strictly limiting retail access. The U.S. views crypto as a commodity/financial instrument, while Russia treats it as a special object subject to state-controlled circulation.

cryptonews.ru21 dk önce

Viktor Pershikov compares cryptocurrency regulation in the US and Russia: market rules vs strict control

cryptonews.ru21 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片