Citadel Called on SEC to Oversee Part of Prediction Markets

cryptonews.ru2026-09-11 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-09-11 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Citadel Securities has called on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to regulate certain types of prediction markets. The firm argues that contracts allowing bets on the performance outcomes of public companies should be overseen by the SEC, not launched via a simpler CFTC process. Citadel warns that these instruments, where payouts are tied to companies meeting specific targets, pose risks of insider trading and should not bypass securities regulations.

Citadel Securities stated that bets on the results of public companies on prediction markets should fall under SEC supervision. The issue pertains to contracts whose payouts depend on a company achieving specific metrics. The market maker pointed out the risk of insider trading and opposed the launch of such instruments via CFTC's simplified procedures that bypass securities requirements.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat has Citadel Securities called for regarding prediction markets related to public companies?

ACitadel Securities has called for the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to oversee bets on the results of public companies in prediction markets.

QWhat specific type of contracts does the article mention as needing oversight?

AThe article mentions contracts where payouts depend on a company achieving specific performance metrics.

QWhat key risk did Citadel Securities highlight regarding these prediction market contracts?

ACitadel Securities highlighted the risk of insider trading as a key concern.

QWhich regulatory body is currently being bypassed through a simplified procedure, according to Citadel's argument?

AAccording to Citadel, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is being used through a simplified procedure to bypass the requirements applicable to securities.

QWhat is Citadel Securities' overall stance on the launch of these financial instruments via the simplified CFTC process?

ACitadel Securities is opposed to the launch of these instruments via the simplified CFTC process, arguing they should be subject to securities regulations.

İlgili Okumalar

The "Number Game" Behind Trillion-Dollar Valuations: OpenAI and Anthropic's Revenue Can't Be Compared Directly

"Valuation Game in Trillions: The 'Digital Metrics Play' Behind OpenAI and Anthropic's Incomparable Revenues" Investors face significant uncertainty as core financial metrics from the two AI giants, OpenAI and Anthropic, cannot be compared directly due to differing accounting methods. OpenAI projects its annualized revenue run rate (ARR) to reach or exceed $70 billion by year-end, while Anthropic announced in July that its ARR had hit $65 billion. However, a key discrepancy renders these figures incomparable: Anthropic records the total sales value generated through cloud partners like Amazon as revenue, whereas OpenAI only counts its net share from partners like Microsoft. This reporting difference has tangible market impact. A recent tech stock downturn was partly attributed to investor attempts to adjust OpenAI's numbers for a direct comparison, leading to lower estimates and concerns about its growth pace. Currently, OpenAI's ARR is reportedly around $50 billion, with expectations to approach $70 billion by December. The issue highlights broader concerns about ARR as a non-standardized, often manipulated metric used to showcase growth and justify high private valuations. It is calculated by extrapolating short-term performance or summing contract values, offering companies considerable discretion. A significant gap exists between ARR and actual recognized annual revenue: OpenAI expects 2026 revenue of roughly $35 billion (half its year-end ARR projection), and internal documents show Anthropic's 2025 revenue was about $4.6 billion against a published ARR exceeding $9 billion. Experts warn that the opacity surrounding these key players creates a "black box" effect, complicating investment decisions and amplifying market volatility. As their performance is a bellwether for the AI investment narrative, any signs of slowing sales growth could ripple through the broader market, affecting chipmakers and other beneficiaries of the AI boom. The reliance on ARR sidesteps a fundamental question: the scale of real sales needed to justify trillion-dollar valuations and cover massive expenditures. The situation may improve with greater transparency, particularly if Anthropic proceeds with its anticipated Wall Street debut, which would subject the company to standardized GAAP financial reporting.

marsbit45 dk önce

The "Number Game" Behind Trillion-Dollar Valuations: OpenAI and Anthropic's Revenue Can't Be Compared Directly

marsbit45 dk önce

Ethereum schedules Glamsterdam upgrade on Sepolia for Oct. 6

Ethereum's next major upgrade, Glamsterdam, is scheduled to activate on the Sepolia testnet on October 6. Node operators must update their execution and consensus layer clients beforehand. Key features include enshrined proposer-builder separation to reduce reliance on external middleware, block-level access lists, and changes to gas pricing to better reflect data costs, which may require adjustments for some contracts. Dates for deployment on the Holesky testnet and mainnet are not yet set. The following upgrade, Hegotá, is targeted for 2027 and may be the last "normal" fork before development shifts toward advanced technologies like recursive STARKs and quantum-safe cryptography.

cointelegraph1 saat önce

Ethereum schedules Glamsterdam upgrade on Sepolia for Oct. 6

cointelegraph1 saat önce

AI Catastrophe to Occur Within a Year? Anthropic, OpenAI Secretly Simulate Worst-Case Scenarios

AI industry leaders, including executives from Anthropic and OpenAI, are privately simulating worst-case scenarios involving serious real-world harm caused by AI, such as large-scale cyberattacks disrupting finance, internet, and critical infrastructure. They are concerned that a major incident caused by unsafe AI could occur within the next 6-12 months, potentially triggering a public backlash and increased political pressure. In anticipation, companies are engaging with U.S. lawmakers to influence potential post-crisis regulations. Discussions around potential responses include measures like emergency "kill switches" for advanced AI, though the feasibility of such actions is debated. The push for stricter regulation faces constraints, including the deep integration of AI into the global economy and political divisions. Despite uncertainty about if or when a crisis will happen, major AI firms are actively preparing for its possible policy consequences.

marsbit1 saat önce

AI Catastrophe to Occur Within a Year? Anthropic, OpenAI Secretly Simulate Worst-Case Scenarios

marsbit1 saat önce

Latest Research Report from the Publisher of "AI Doomsday Report": Agents and RWA Reshape the Crypto Industry

The report "AI & Asset Tokenization" by Citrini Research argues that the rise of AI Agents and the tokenization of real-world assets (RWA) are converging to provide a crucial use case for blockchain technology. It posits that traditional financial systems, designed for human interaction, are ill-suited for a future where AI Agents will autonomously manage finances, seek optimal yields, and execute transactions 24/7. Blockchains, with their programmable, always-on infrastructure, are presented as the natural solution. The report highlights that while crypto initially lacked mainstream assets, this is changing rapidly with the tokenization of stocks, Treasuries, and other RWAs onto blockchains. Key recent developments include the off-platform circulation of stock tokens (e.g., via Robinhood), surging on-chain DEX activity, and evolving U.S. regulatory stances that are bringing these assets into regulated markets. The core thesis is that AI Agents need programmable finance, and tokenization brings desired assets on-chain, finally giving blockchain a clear utility. The focus for investors should shift from questioning tokenization's viability to identifying which platforms and applications will capture the revenue and profits from this growing fusion of traditional finance and crypto.

marsbit1 saat önce

Latest Research Report from the Publisher of "AI Doomsday Report": Agents and RWA Reshape the Crypto Industry

marsbit1 saat önce

The Brutal Truth of the VC Industry: Why Most Funds Haven't Returned the Principal After 9 Years?

**VC's Harsh Reality: Why Most Funds Haven't Returned Capital After 9 Years** This article uses hard data to dissect key trends in venture capital and AI spending. It reveals that large, established VC firms are heavily clustered in similar AI investments, while emerging managers are more likely to back unconventional companies. Data shows that of scored seed deals, emerging funds invested 24.7% in "outlier" startups versus only 11.5% for giant funds, largely due to specialized funds with different mandates. A critical finding from Carta data exposes that most VC funds fail to return investors' capital even after nine years. Median funds from 2017 have only returned $0.37 for every dollar invested. This creates pressure for funds nearing their lifecycle end, which can influence their advice to portfolio companies regarding exits or follow-on funding—a dynamic founders must understand. The analysis of AI spending identifies a crucial, often overlooked market: the middle layer between basic and frontier models, which accounts for ~40% of enterprise AI spend. Price wars are intense here due to lab competition, open-source models, and fine-tuning. The article advises startups to categorize AI spending into three lines—salary replacement (benchmarked against labor costs), productivity tools (evaluated by usage), and product-integrated costs (focused on margins)—to spend effectively. Finally, it highlights a decline in rigorous due diligence for deep tech (e.g., quantum computing), where large deal sizes, reliance on lead investor reputations, and herd behavior often replace independent technical validation, risking a repeat of historical investment bubbles.

marsbit1 saat önce

The Brutal Truth of the VC Industry: Why Most Funds Haven't Returned the Principal After 9 Years?

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片