"Kalshi" Removes All Sports Event Options Amidst CFTC Investigation

cryptonews.ru2026-08-15 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-08-15 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

"Kalshi" has removed all of its sports-related event options amid an investigation launched by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), according to an NPR report citing anonymous sources. Federal regulators are scrutinizing "mention markets," with sources indicating these markets are potentially highly susceptible to manipulation. A court order from Washington State's King County also compels Kalshi to cease marketing or offering contracts related to sports, elections, politics, entertainment, and mentions, citing violations of gambling laws and high fraud risks. The order prohibits Kalshi from advertising such bets to Washington consumers. This follows a high-profile incident where a former Trump teleprompter operator allegedly used advance access to speeches for mention market trades. Kalshi froze approximately $90,000 of his profits and reported the activity to the CFTC. The company, which has positioned itself as a "prediction market," is facing a complex and rapidly evolving legal landscape with differing state-level rulings on its contracts.

Federal regulators have launched an investigation into prediction markets, and Kalshi removed all its sports-related offerings in the course of the probe, NPR reports, citing two informed sources who spoke anonymously as they were not authorized to speak publicly. Kalshi and the CFTC declined to comment, and the commission has not published any materials describing the review. Sports bets account for the lion's share of the billions that flow through the Kalshi platform weekly.

Under the Commodity Exchange Act, only contracts that are not susceptible to manipulation can be listed on designated contract markets, and one of NPR's sources said that prediction markets are "potentially very susceptible to manipulation, so the CFTC is carefully studying whether some of them make sense." A second source, a former Kalshi employee, told the outlet that the exchange's own lawyers share this concern, as the nature of some markets attracts people capable of influencing the outcome. According to the former employee, inside Kalshi, employees discussed the usefulness of this category, with co-founder Luana Lopes Lara defending it.

As of Friday, our analysis shows that the "Predictions" section of Kalshi lacks a sports filter altogether: the only subcategories are earnings reports, politicians, Trump, and a section dedicated to public companies. At least 216 individual contracts remain across 12 market groups: prediction markets on earnings reports for Klarna, Walmart, Target, Home Depot, John Deere, Toll Brothers, Futu, and Amer Sports are scheduled to open next week, along with a NASA press conference and a Massachusetts state Senate debate. Polymarket also offers prediction markets, but only on its overseas platform, which is not regulated by the CFTC. They are not currently available on its smaller US-based exchange.

In a Washington state court, King County Superior Court Judge John McHale in his revised injunction orders Kalshi to cease marketing, offering, or accepting contracts related to sports, elections, politics, entertainment, culture, technology and science, as well as predictions. Commodity, climate, economy, and financial markets may continue operating. The state Attorney General's office announced this ruling on Thursday, simultaneously imposing a series of restrictions based on a geographical limitation. Besides violating gambling laws, the Attorney General stated that "this type of betting carries a high risk of fraud by persons close to the source of information. Such bets are particularly unfair to consumers."

The ruling also prohibits Kalshi from advertising the specified bets to consumers in Washington state, as it was found that "Kalshi's provision, promotion, and advertising of illegal gambling activity constitutes unfair and/or deceptive acts or practices." The Attorney General's office cited a Kalshi advertisement in which one person writes to another that they "found a way to bet on the NFL, even though we live in Washington state." Furthermore, the ruling notes that Kalshi had previously positioned itself as a service allowing consumers to "bet on anything," calling its activities a "prediction market," not gambling.

This decision is based on a preliminary injunction issued by McHale in July, which found that Washington state would likely be able to prove its case, and that without intervention, "significant harm to Washington state consumers" was likely. Kalshi appealed to the Court of Appeals to stay this injunction, but the court denied the request.

A recent high-profile scandal involving prediction markets reached the White House. Gabriel Perez, a teleprompter operator for Trump, allegedly used advance access to prepared speeches to trade on prediction markets. Kalshi froze approximately $90,000 of his profits and passed information about these trades to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) after its oversight team identified them. NPR reported that traders who view prediction markets as a full-time job set up television antennas to gain fractions of a second when watching live broadcasts, and that Trump's rambling speech style causes sharp price swings as traders try to guess which topic he will turn to next.

Events in the legal arena are developing rapidly. The CFTC is attempting to defend Kalshi based on an emergency ruling in New York, and a judge in Connecticut ruled that its sports contracts were never swaps—just a few of many recent examples of diverging actions by different states.

İlgili Sorular

QWhy did Kalshi remove all its sports-related prediction markets?

AKalshi removed all its sports-related prediction markets in response to an investigation launched by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) into 'mentions' markets, amid concerns that such markets are potentially very easy to manipulate.

QWhat legal action did a Washington state court take against Kalshi?

AA Washington state court issued a revised preliminary injunction ordering Kalshi to stop marketing, offering, or accepting contracts related to sports, elections, politics, entertainment, culture, technology, science, and mentions markets. Only commodities, climate, economic, and financial markets are allowed to continue.

QWhat specific concern did the Washington Attorney General cite regarding Kalshi's markets?

AThe Washington Attorney General stated that this type of betting carries a high risk of fraud from individuals close to the information source and is particularly unfair to consumers. They also found Kalshi's provision, promotion, and advertising of illegal gambling activity to be unfair and/or deceptive acts or practices.

QHow did a recent scandal involving 'mentions' markets implicate the White House?

AGabriel Perez, an operator of former President Trump's teleprompter, allegedly used advance access to prepared speeches to trade on mentions markets. Kalshi froze approximately $90,000 of his profits and reported the trades to the CFTC after its surveillance team identified them.

QHow do traders reportedly attempt to gain an advantage on 'mentions' markets during live events?

AAccording to the article, traders who treat mentions markets as a full-time job set up TV antennas to gain fractions of a second advantage when watching live broadcasts. Former President Trump's discursive speaking style also causes sharp price fluctuations as traders try to guess which topic he will mention next.

İlgili Okumalar

Leading Stock Surges 10x, On-chain Options Could Be the New Main Theme of the Bull Market

At the Blockworks DAS conference, Hyperliquid founder Jeff and Lighter founder Vlad both announced plans to enter the on-chain options market. The entry of these two leading PerpDEXs signifies that the competition in on-chain derivatives is moving towards a complete derivatives market. <strong>On-chain options are regarded as one of the main narratives of this bull market cycle, with Derive (formerly Lyra) being a core project in this sector.</strong> ## 1. The Underlying Logic of On-Chain Options On-chain options cater to the core needs of two types of users: 1. **Leverage Traders:** Buyers' maximum loss is limited to the premium paid, unlike perpetual contracts where liquidation can occur. They can specify trading durations to go long or hedge spot positions to protect profits. 2. **Yield-Seeking Holders:** Option sellers earn premiums by writing contracts, utilizing strategies like covered calls on spot holdings to generate extra yield. Options essentially connect these two groups of participants, allowing yield to be priced according to risk. Previously, on-chain options struggled to scale due to complex interfaces and fragmented liquidity. Now, conditions on the supply side have improved. ## 2. Market Data On-chain options trading volume is rapidly increasing: monthly premium volume was around $20M+ at the beginning of the year and reached $80M+ in September. In September, industry-wide notional volume hit $4.829B (month-over-month +121.7%), with Derive's notional volume at $3.827B (+99.3%). Although competitors have captured some market share, reducing Derive's notional volume dominance from 88.1% to 79.3%, <strong>it still holds a 91.6% share by premium volume</strong>. While the overall industry expands, Derive maintains its leading position. Compared to centralized platforms, the notional volume of fully on-chain options is only about 6.8% of Deribit's, indicating immense growth potential for the sector. The DRV token has previously seen a maximum increase of over 10x, meaning the market has already priced in expectations for this sector. ## 3. Derive's Core Competitiveness Formerly known as Lyra, it has built an order book + RFQ + portfolio margin system: 1. The RFQ (Request-for-Quote) model addresses the pain point of fragmented liquidity across numerous option contracts, supporting large-volume and complex strategy trades by connecting to a network of institutional market maker quotes. 2. The on-chain perpetual futures market provides a hedging foundation for option market makers. Derive itself also offers perpetuals, and its portfolio margin system can reduce collateral requirements. The options business can additionally drive synergistic revenue growth for its perpetuals and lending services. 3. The V3 upgrade employs a <strong>"off-chain matching, on-chain settlement"</strong> architecture. It introduces new features like risk isolation, cross-asset portfolio margining, and native option strategy vaults. It can serve as underlying derivatives infrastructure, open to third-party front-end applications, catering to both retail and institutional users. ## 4. DRV Token Value Accrual Mechanism The protocol's core intellectual property belongs to the DAO. DRV serves governance, incentive, and value accrual functions, with its core mechanism being <strong>protocol revenue buybacks</strong>: - The buyback ratio was increased from 25% to 35%, and will be further raised to 50% starting October 14th, executed weekly. - As of October 6th, 87 weekly buyback rounds have been completed, cumulatively repurchasing nearly $30M worth of DRV. Increasing the buyback ratio directly raises the buyback budget by about 43%. Business growth will continue to generate consistent token buy-side pressure. ## 5. Competitive Landscape Assessment The entry of Hyperliquid and Lighter will bring competition but also helps educate the market and expand overall demand. During a phase of industry-wide volume growth, a decline in market share and an increase in absolute business scale can coexist. Derive possesses a mature quote network, risk engine, and existing option positions, resulting in high user migration costs and giving it significant first-mover advantages. The sector is still in its early stages and warrants continued attention.

31 dk önce

Leading Stock Surges 10x, On-chain Options Could Be the New Main Theme of the Bull Market

31 dk önce

All Four Major U.S. Banks Report Profits, So Why Are Bank Stocks Falling?

Despite reporting strong third-quarter earnings with all four major U.S. banks—Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, and Wells Fargo—showing year-over-year profit growth, their stock prices declined, dragging down the KBW Bank Index. The divergence stems from the market looking beyond current profits to future earnings sustainability amid a high-interest-rate environment. Bank stocks had already fallen roughly 13.6% from their August peak before the earnings reports, as rising Treasury yields pressured valuations. The results confirmed a shift within trading divisions: record equity financing revenue, particularly at Goldman Sachs, offset weaker fixed-income trading. However, this surge is linked to market volatility rather than signaling a new investment banking cycle. While consumer spending remains resilient, bank executives warned of risks from sticky inflation, high rates, and geopolitical tensions. Valuation multiples for banks remain significantly discounted compared to the broader market, reflecting expectations of "higher-for-longer" interest rates which increase discount rates and compress fair value. The key factors for a potential re-rating are the future path of interest rates and whether credit costs will rise. Upcoming reports from Bank of America and Morgan Stanley will further test if the shift from fixed income to equity revenue is an industry-wide trend. The market's focus remains firmly on the endurance of the consumer buffer and the ultimate peak in rates.

marsbit38 dk önce

All Four Major U.S. Banks Report Profits, So Why Are Bank Stocks Falling?

marsbit38 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片