Odds of CLARITY Act passing fall to 16% after key Democrats reject GOP's 'final' offer

cryptonews.ru2026-09-15 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-09-15 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The odds of the CLARITY Act passing this year fell sharply to 16% on Polymarket after key Senate Democrats rejected the "final" Republican proposal on cryptocurrency market regulation. Initially, traders had raised the odds to 35% on a revised GOP offer with expanded ethics provisions, but confidence waned as Democrats raised objections. Senator Mark Warner called the revised ethics language "far from sufficient," and Democrats began preparing a counter-proposal. Republicans need 60 votes to advance the bill, and a failed procedural vote on Tuesday could stall the legislation, which aims to divide oversight between the SEC and CFTC. Key Democrats, including Senators Raphael Warnock and Ruben Gallego, remained unconvinced, arguing the ethics provisions did not adequately address corruption risks. Senator Cynthia Lummis countered that Democrats had "nothing more to offer," as President Trump had agreed to significant ethics terms. Further opposition came from a coalition of 18 state attorneys general, the Indian Gaming Association—which seeks protections for tribal gaming laws—and banking groups arguing the text leaves loopholes for stablecoin rewards. Crypto industry advocates, like the Blockchain Association's Kristin Smith, urged passage for clear rules and consumer protection.

According to Polymarket, the odds of the CLARITY Act passing this year plunged again on Monday after a spike the previous day: key Democrats in the Senate reportedly said the Republican Party's final offer on the cryptocurrency bill did not convince them.

Polymarket traders initially took the recently revised Republican offer with enhanced ethics provisions as a positive signal, raising the odds to 35%. However, as doubts about the revised text grew, their confidence waned, and on Monday, the odds fell back to 16%.

U.S. Senator Mark Warner, one of the Democrats involved in the negotiations, reportedly stated that the revised ethics provision was "far from sufficient," and negotiating Democrats began preparing a counter-offer on Monday.

Republicans need 60 votes to advance the bill, and failure on Tuesday could stall the legislation, which would define how the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission divide oversight of the U.S. cryptocurrency market.

Key Democrats remain unconvinced by ethics proposal

Brendan Pedersen from Punchbowl News reported that Senator Raphael Warnock stated: Democrats should not advance legislation that does not address opportunities for corruption happening "in real-time."

Pedersen reported that Senator Ruben Gallego stated: the latest ethics proposal "falls short," and that he plans to work on a counter-proposal. Separately, Pedersen reported that staff of Senator Elizabeth Warren on the Senate Banking Committee circulated talking points stating that the proposed enforcement mechanism by state attorneys general could be overridden by White House ethics officials.

Later, Democrats sent their counter-offer to Republican negotiators, Politico reported, citing three people familiar with the situation.

Not all Democrats oppose advancing the bill for a floor vote. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand privately urged colleagues to support the procedural motion, Politico reported.

Republican Senator Cynthia Lummis stated that President Donald Trump had agreed to two substantial ethics provisions and that Democrats have "nothing more to offer."

The resistance adds to opposition from a coalition of 18 state attorneys general and heightens uncertainty about whether Republicans can gather the votes needed to advance the bill.

Banking and tribal groups challenge latest text

The National Indian Gaming Association, an organization representing tribal gaming interests, called on member tribes to pressure senators to vote against the bill, stating that the proposed DeFi changes do not address Native American concerns about prediction markets.

The association called for the inclusion of explicit language affirming that federal commodity legislation does not supersede tribal or state gaming laws, including the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.

Related: Revised CLARITY Act Targets 'Non-Decentralized' DeFi Operators

Eight banking trade groups also stated that the revised text does not close loopholes allowing the payment of rewards on stablecoins that function similarly to deposit interest. According to the groups, the proposed regulatory "circuit breaker" only activates after significant deposit outflows from community banks have already occurred.

Crypto industry representatives have urged senators to advance the bill. In a statement released Monday, Blockchain Association CEO Summer Mersinger stated that the industry had made significant concessions to help build bipartisan support and called on every senator to vote for the bill.

She argued that the bill would establish clear rules, protect consumers, and deter illegal activity, while also preventing the offshoring of crypto jobs, developers, and innovation.

Magazine: Why are the biggest AI companies suddenly calling to slow down?

end-content

İlgili Sorular

QWhat happened to the odds of the CLARITY Act passing according to Polymarket after key Democrats rejected the Republican proposal?

AThe odds of the CLARITY Act passing this year, according to Polymarket, dropped sharply again to 16% after key Democrats in the Senate stated that the Republican party's final proposal for the cryptocurrency bill did not convince them.

QWhy are key Democrats reportedly not convinced by the latest Republican proposal for the CLARITY Act?

AKey Democrats, like Senator Mark Warner, stated that the revised ethics provision in the proposal was 'far from sufficient'. Other concerns included that it didn't eliminate opportunities for real-time corruption and left an enforcement mechanism that could be overruled by White House ethics officials.

QWhat is a major procedural hurdle the CLARITY Act must overcome in the Senate?

AThe Republicans need 60 votes to advance the bill. A failure on Tuesday (referenced in the article) could stall the legislation.

QWhich two groups raised concerns about the revised text of the CLARITY Act, and what were their main objections?

A1. The Indian Gaming Association objected, stating the proposed DeFi changes did not address Native American concerns about prediction markets and called for language protecting tribal and state gambling laws. 2. Eight banking trade groups argued the text failed to close loopholes allowing stablecoin rewards that function like deposit interest, and that a proposed regulatory 'circuit breaker' would activate too late.

QWhat is the main argument made by the Blockchain Association's CEO in favor of advancing the CLARITY Act?

ASummer Mersinger argued that the industry made significant concessions to build bipartisan support, and that the bill would establish clear rules, protect consumers, deter illicit activity, and prevent the offshoring of crypto jobs, developers, and innovation.

İlgili Okumalar

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片