MegaETH Closes Mega Mafia Accelerator as Successful Projects Migrate to Competing Blockchains

TheNewsCrypto2026-07-17 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-07-17 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

MegaETH has shut down its flagship startup incubator, Mega Mafia, after two years. The program supported 20 early-stage projects, which collectively raised $80 million in venture capital. However, without taking equity, MegaETH saw little long-term value return as incubated founders prioritized their own roadmaps. Most successful projects migrated to competing blockchains like Base and Monad, or built their own chains, while two ceased operations. Following the launch of its native MEGA token, MegaETH is shifting strategy. It will now focus on directly funding and developing its own native consumer applications, called OMEGA apps, designed to leverage its high-speed execution. This move to first-party development aims to strengthen the core ecosystem, foster direct user connections, and keep economic activity, supported by a stablecoin-based system, within the MegaETH platform.

Blockchain scaling network MegaETH recently shut down its flagship Mega Mafia incubator program. The team made this tough decision after two years of operations. During this period, the program supported twenty early-stage startup teams. These incubated companies collectively raised eighty million dollars from prominent venture capital firms.

However, MegaETH did not take equity or ownership stakes in these projects. The core developers originally expected these founders to remain loyal to the network. The core team hoped that shared values would secure long-term commitment without formal contracts. However, the realities of the competitive crypto market quickly proved that assumption wrong. Founders naturally prioritized their own product roadmaps over ecosystem alignment.

Developers moved these successful apps to rival blockchain networks. For instance, Global Token Exchange decided to construct its sovereign chain. The Noise team moved the social attention market to Coinbase’s Base, while the HelloTrade team migrated the app to the Monad blockchain. Cap, the stablecoin issuer, went for a multi-chain approach. In addition, two out of five incubated apps ceased to operate. Not much value flowed back into MegaETH as a result.

Transitioning to First-Party Apps

Such an abrupt change in the structure took place immediately after an important network milestone. On April 30, MegaETH created its native token MEGA. This was done in response to the achievement of performance milestones by ten ecosystem apps.

Moving forward, the MegaETH platform will directly finance its own native consumer applications. These native products will be known as OMEGA applications, developed exclusively to leverage MegaETH’s very fast real-time execution capabilities. This is an audacious move that demonstrates faith in proprietary development in the Web3 ecosystem.

MegaETH Strengthens Developer-Led Ecosystem

As a result of this switch, the core team will be able to establish personal connections with the users of their platform. No longer will there be a need to depend on external startups to boost transaction volume. This switch puts more accountability on the developers for product performance.

The platform will also continue to implement its stablecoin-based economic system. Net income from USD stablecoins will be used to continuously purchase back the MEGA tokens. It is hoped that the new approach of first-party development will help keep the economic activity within the core ecosystem.

Highlighted Crypto News:
UK Jails Fake Police Crypto Gang as Authorities Tighten Digital Asset Rules

TagsBlockchainCryptocurrencyMafiaMEGA TokenMegaETHStablecoinUSD

İlgili Sorular

QWhat was the primary reason MegaETH shut down its Mega Mafia incubator program?

AMegaETH shut down the Mega Mafia incubator program because the successful projects it supported migrated to competing blockchain networks or created their own sovereign chains, failing to bring sustained value back to the MegaETH ecosystem.

QHow many startup teams did the Mega Mafia program support, and how much funding did they collectively raise?

AThe Mega Mafia incubator program supported twenty early-stage startup teams, which collectively raised eighty million dollars from prominent venture capital firms.

QWhat is the new strategy MegaETH is adopting after closing the incubator program?

AMegaETH's new strategy is to transition to developing its own first-party applications, called OMEGA applications. These will be native consumer apps built exclusively to leverage MegaETH's real-time execution capabilities.

QWhat happened to the incubated projects after the Mega Mafia program? Name two specific examples.

AMany incubated projects moved to competing blockchains. For example, the Noise team moved its social attention market to Coinbase's Base, and the HelloTrade team migrated its app to the Monad blockchain.

QHow does MegaETH plan to maintain economic activity within its core ecosystem going forward?

AMegaETH plans to maintain economic activity within its core ecosystem by developing its own first-party applications and by using the net income from USD stablecoins in its economic system to continuously purchase back the native MEGA tokens.

İlgili Okumalar

Upbit is Anxious: A Hasty Counterattack Aimed at Regaining Stablecoin Market Share

Title: Upbit's Rushed Counterattack to Reclaim Stablecoin Market Share Facing a dramatic shift in South Korea's stablecoin market, leading exchange Upbit launched a promotional campaign from July 26 to August 9, waiving the 0.05% trading fee for stablecoins paired with the Korean Won (KRW) and rapidly listing new stablecoins like RLUSD and USDG. This move is a direct response to its plummeting market share in this sector. Historically a duopoly with Bithumb, the market has been reshaped since October 2025 when Coinone permanently removed fees for USDC trading. By June 2026, Coinone led with 34.8% of stablecoin volume, followed by Bithumb (31.1%) and Upbit (30.1%). This contrasts sharply with the overall crypto market, where Upbit commands 60%. The data shows stablecoin demand is highly sensitive to fees, as users primarily buy them to transfer capital overseas for derivatives trading or forex arbitrage. South Korean exchanges have seen a net outflow of stablecoins for 18 consecutive months, totaling approximately 14.9 trillion KRW, underscoring their role as a cross-border capital conduit. Upbit's limited-time promotion initially boosted its daily stablecoin volume by 162%, but the surge was almost entirely in USDT (98.1% of volume). The newly listed stablecoins saw negligible, fleeting interest. Furthermore, the promotional effect quickly waned in the second week, with volume dropping 33% on weekdays. A concurrent weakening of the KRW also contributed to the trading spike, independent of the fee waiver. The analysis suggests that once the promotion ends, Upbit is unlikely to retain its temporary gains unless it matches Coinone's permanent zero-fee policy, forcing a choice between market share and fee revenue. Upbit's strategic push may be less about immediate profit and more about preparing for future regulatory shifts. With South Korea's *Digital Asset Basic Act* on the horizon, which will regulate KRW-backed stablecoins, and following Dunamu's (Upbit's parent) integration into Naver Financial to build a payment ecosystem, securing a dominant position in the dollar stablecoin distribution channel holds long-term strategic value. However, potential regulatory conflicts could prevent Upbit from listing a future Naver-issued KRW stablecoin, making the current fight for dollar stablecoin flow even more critical.

marsbit1 saat önce

Upbit is Anxious: A Hasty Counterattack Aimed at Regaining Stablecoin Market Share

marsbit1 saat önce

Michael Saylor Compares Bitcoin and Gold!

Michael Saylor, founder of MicroStrategy, argues that Bitcoin fundamentally changes how wealth is stored and transferred by transforming digital scarcity into economic value. He describes Bitcoin as the first digital monetary network, combining computers, digital networks, and cryptography. It digitizes monetary assets, allowing their supply to be controlled by public protocols rather than institutions, thus converting economic value into information transmissible over global networks. Comparing Bitcoin to gold, Saylor states that while increasing Bitcoin's supply is harder, its integration with software and transfer is easier. He highlights Bitcoin's proof-of-work mechanism, which ties it to the physical world by consuming real energy to secure the ledger, making past transactions immutable. This creates a shared security system involving miners, energy companies, and investors. Saylor suggests "digital monetary energy" is a more accurate term than "digital gold." He emphasizes that the Bitcoin network is an adaptive ecosystem of miners, nodes, developers, and users. Its core design is intentionally simple, focused on maintaining a secure ledger for scarce digital assets, with complex functionalities built in higher-layer applications. This architecture allows Bitcoin to serve as a foundation for transmitting value and fostering innovation in payments and financial services. Saylor notes Bitcoin's deeper impact lies in creating digital sovereignty, where private keys give individuals permissionless control over their economic power, with ownership verified mathematically, not by institutions. He concludes that while gold's physical scarcity makes it money, Bitcoin's digital scarcity does the same, characterizing Bitcoin as the monetary energy of the digital age.

cryptonews.ru2 saat önce

Michael Saylor Compares Bitcoin and Gold!

cryptonews.ru2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片