7*24

Hot topic

Market

Activities

Up or Down? Put Your Market Intuition to the Test!Discuss Hot Assets , Enter the Lucky DrawHTX Refer And Earn Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson has warned that Bitcoin could eventually lose its positi

Up or Down? Put Your Market Intuition to the Test!

Discuss Hot Assets , Enter the Lucky Draw

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson has warned that Bitcoin could eventually lose its position as the world's largest cryptocurrency if it fails to adapt to quantum computing.

Speaking in an interview on The Starting Block, Hoskinson claimed that Bitcoin's biggest weakness is its limited ability to implement major protocol upgrades.

He argued that Bitcoin's governance model makes significant network changes difficult, a challenge that could become critical as quantum computing advances and threatens today's cryptographic security.

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson has warned that

Stacks [STX] crashes to $0.13 even as PoX-5 testnet goes live – Why? On the 25th of July, Stacks [$STX] experienced strong bearish pressure. After a long period of consolidation, bears finally took ov

Stacks [STX] crashes to $0.13 even as PoX-5 testnet goes live – Why?



On the 25th of July, Stacks [$STX] experienced strong bearish pressure. After a long period of consolidation, bears finally took over the market, with $STX losing the $0.16 support level.

As a result, the altcoin crashed to $0.13. $STX has not dropped to such levels since mid-2020, marking a 6-year low. As of this writing, Stacks was trading around $0.138, after dropping by 6.2% on the daily charts.

HTX  Creation Challenge — Post and Win 1,500U 💥

Stacks [STX] crashes to $0.13 even as PoX-5 testne

Chainlink's second-quarter review said more than $7 billion of token value moved onto its cross-chain infrastructure in the second quarter. CCIP handled $4.9 billion in quarterly volume, up 353% from 

Chainlink Draws $7B as Bridge Hacks Drive CCIP Migration

Up or Down? Put Your Market Intuition to the Test!HTX Refer And Earn Discuss Hot Assets , Enter the Lucky DrawLido Reports Rebasing Miscalculation Incident Affecting stETH APR Lido is currently invest

Lido Reports Rebasing Miscalculation Incident Affecting stETH APR


Lido is currently investigating a rebasing miscalculation incident that has resulted in a daily $APR of 2.04% for stETH, lower than the expected 2.15%. This issue arises from a single unaccounted validator deposit of 32 ETH, and Lido has confirmed that no funds are at risk, as detailed in their recent tweet. More information can be found in their official announcement.

What Went Down

The broader crypto market is experiencing mixed signals, but Lido’s specific incident highlights operational challenges within protocol mechanics. The miscalculation, attributed to an oversight in the accounting oracle, does not suggest any systemic risk, as confirmed by Lido’s contributors. They have reassured users that all validator balances were double-checked and verified. While the immediate $APR discrepancy may raise concerns among some stETH holders, the assurance that no funds are at risk mitigates potential panic, allowing stakeholders to remain focused on the underlying fundamentals of the protocol. The Lido team is actively working on a resolution, promising a fix in future updates.

Lido has been a significant player in the Ethereum staking ecosystem, providing liquidity through its stETH token. This miscalculation incident is not uncommon in decentralized finance, where protocol operations must rely on accurate reporting from various oracles. Past instances of similar nature have led to increased scrutiny and operational adjustments within staking protocols, influencing user trust and engagement.

Lido Reports Rebasing Miscalculation Incident Affe

HTX Creation Challenge — Post and Win 1,500U 💥Up or Down? Put Your Market Intuition to the Test!HTX Refer And Earn First Crypto Index From S&P: What It Includes, Excludes, and Why It MattersFor the fi

First Crypto Index From S&P: What It Includes, Excludes, and Why It MattersFor the first time, the S&P Pantera crypto index ranks blockchain networks based on their fundamentals.

BTC and XRP are excluded from the index because they do not generate protocol revenue. That’s a requirement of the index’s methodology.

The world’s most recognized index provider, S&P, just signalled a green flag to the crypto market through its new crypto index. It ranks blockchain networks by revenue, just like equity analysts rank listed businesses.

S&P Dow Jones Indices and Pantera Capital launched the S&P Pantera Digital Asset Index on July 20, 2026. The crypto index selects and weights its constituents based on protocol revenue. This revenue is generated from their actual economic activity rather than their market capitalization or price momentum.



First Crypto Index From S&P: What It Includes, Exc

$MET LONG SETUP WITH CLEAN STRUCTURAL SUPPORT AT CMP 🚀 Entry: CMP ⚡ Target: 0.1720, 0.1780, 0.1850 🚀 Stop Loss: 0.1590 ⚠️ 📌 $MET is holding above a key demand block that has repelled sellers twice thi

World Cup Predictions: 100,000 USDT Daily

🧠 1. $FET {future}(FETUSDT) FET — AI Narrative Loading Why it’s about to move: Tight consolidation after previous trend Volume drying up (classic breakout signal) AI narrative gaining traction again T

TOP 5 PRE-BREAKOUT COINS (SMART MONEY ZONE)

Shiba Inu jumped about 36% to $0.0000057 on Sunday and added roughly $1 billion in market value in a day. The token's market cap is near $3.4 billion on almost $380 million in daily trading volume. Up

Shiba Inu Surges 36% as South Korean Traders Fuel Upbit-Led Rally

Up or Down? Put Your Market Intuition to the Test!HTX Refer And Earn HTXCommunity4thAnniversaryWho pays for free transfers? Gasless crypto’s hidden bill Stable exempts $USDT transfers from gas. Plasma

Who pays for free transfers? Gasless crypto’s hidden bill


Stable exempts $USDT transfers from gas. Plasma ships zero-fee sends. Sui made stablecoin transfers free at the protocol level. Every coverage of every launch asks the same question in passing, someone still pays for blockspace, and then moves on. This guide stops and answers it: five funding models, their failure modes, and how to tell which one your free lunch runs on.

Table of Contents

The cost that does not go away

The five models

The card-network precedent, taken seriously

Reading a chain’s answer

Frequently Asked Questions

Crypto has finally built the thing it spent a decade promising: sending digital dollars with no fee, no gas token, no friction, just an amount and an address, like a message. Stable exempts simple $USDT transfers from gas at the protocol level. Plasma launched zero-fee $USDT sends as its headline feature. Sui made stablecoin transfers free network-wide this spring. $BNB Chain and its wallet partners rolled out fee delegation; Tron wallets hand out daily transfer subsidies by the thousand. And every article covering every launch contains the same sentence, worded almost identically each time: the important question is how this is funded, because someone still pays for blockspace.

The sentence is correct, and it is always the last sentence on the subject. This guide is what happens when it is the first. Free transfers are not a technological discovery; they are an accounting decision. Blockspace has real costs, validators run real hardware behind real stake, and a gasless design simply moves the bill from the person clicking send to someone else, chosen by the chain’s designers. There are exactly five candidates for that someone. Learning to identify which one is holding your chain’s bill, and what happens to each under stress, is the actual literacy the gasless era requires.

Who pays for free transfers? Gasless crypto’s hidd

A few months ago, Solana users were competing with higher priority fees just to get transactions included during peak activity. Now, the focus is shifting to something less visible but potentially mor

A few months ago, Solana users were competing with higher priority fees just to get transactions included during peak activity. Now, the focus is shifting to something less visible but potentially more important: the base fee.
With on-chain governance now live, Solana's community can vote on protocol upgrades, including future changes to how transaction fees are calculated.
The discussion centers on moving from today's flat per-signature base fee to a resource-based fee model, where transactions pay based on the network resources they actually consume. If adopted, this could:
Price network resources more efficiently.
Make spam more expensive.
Improve validator incentives.
Potentially increase SOL burned during periods of high activity.
This follows the approval of SIMD-0096, which now directs 100% of priority fees to validators, further reshaping Solana's fee economics.
For me, the biggest takeaway isn't just lower or higher fees—it's that fee policy has become something the community can actively govern. As governance evolves, incentive design may become just as important as transaction speed.



Solana's Next Big Upgrade May Not Be Faster—It Cou

$ETH$I have just closed my position. Let us copy the next trade together.

After six years of pie-in-the-sky fundraising, 90% of funds used to replenish cash flow: The illusion and reality of L'CI Technology's silicon carbide "industrialization"｜TMTPost Deep Dive

Allbridge Suspends Core Protocol After $1.65M Solana Flash Loan Exploit

$ETH$I have just closed my position. Let us copy the next trade together.

Tüm Yorumlar0En yeniPopüler

Trend Konular