MYX defies market weakness with a strong rally: But THIS concern remains

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-02-02Обновлено 2026-02-02

Введение

MYX Finance (MYX) demonstrated significant strength against the broader crypto market, rallying 10.7% in 24 hours with a 40% surge in trading volume, while Bitcoin and altcoins declined. The token broke above a key supply zone around $3.7-$4.0, confirming a bullish structure shift. Despite low average volume, recent buying interest has been concentrated on weekends. MYX is currently trading within a range of $4.58 to $7.30, with the 50-day moving average providing support at $4.63. While short-term momentum is strong, a retracement to the $4.58-$4.62 liquidity zone is possible. Traders are advised to consider entries near $4.9-$5.1 on any pullback, targeting the range high of $7.3.

MYX Finance [MYX] showed relative strength against the market. It has rallied 10.7% in the past 24 hours, with a nearly 40% increase in daily trading volume.

Meanwhile, Bitcoin [BTC] was down 2.29%, and the altcoin market has shed 2.97%.

The 1-day chart showed a bullish structure shift in December. MYX buyers followed this up with a bullish continuation, pushing prices back above the $3.7-$4.0 supply zone that had held them back since October 2025.

The 20 and 50-period moving averages captured the strong uptrend of MYX in recent weeks. Over the weekend, MYX had defended the 50 DMA and bounced higher.

The OBV did not see much movement, since the trading volume has been consistently below average recently, apart from occasional spikes in activity.

Interestingly, since mid-November, these individual volume surges occurred on weekends or on a Monday.

A range formation (purple) between $4.58 and $7.30 has been in place since the first week of January.

The 50DMA at $4.63 had confluence with the range lows during the most recent retest, helping explain the MYX price bounce.

What is expected next?

The liquidation map highlighted greater long leverage, especially around $4.58-$4.62. It is possible that MYX would drop once again to revisit this liquidity cluster.

To the north, the short liquidation leverage was also sizeable, up to $6.45.

Traders’ call to action – Buy the retracement

The 1-hour chart showed a bullish structure and strong upward momentum. Lower timeframe traders can wait for a sizeable retracement to buy. Ideally, the $4.9-$5.1 can give long traders an entry.

As the liquidation chart showed, a retest of $4.58 is also a possibility.t

Final Thoughts

Myx Finance token showed relative strength against the wider market over the past 24 hours and is up nearly 23% from the $4.63 local low.
While the short-term upward momentum is strong, the longer timeframe chart showed a range formation, with the upper range extreme at $7.3.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was the price performance of MYX Finance (MYX) in the past 24 hours compared to the broader market?

AMYX Finance showed relative strength, rallying 10.7% in the past 24 hours, while Bitcoin (BTC) was down 2.29% and the altcoin market shed 2.97%.

QWhat key supply zone did MYX buyers manage to push the price above, and since when had it been a resistance?

AMYX buyers pushed the price back above the $3.7-$4.0 supply zone, which had acted as resistance since October 2025.

QAccording to the liquidation map, what is a possible price target for a retracement to the downside?

AThe liquidation map highlighted a significant cluster of long liquidations around $4.58-$4.62, making a retest of the $4.58 range low a distinct possibility.

QWhat trading strategy does the article suggest for lower timeframe traders based on the 1-hour chart?

AThe article suggests that lower timeframe traders can wait for a sizeable retracement to buy, with an ideal entry zone between $4.9 and $5.1.

QWhat is the upper extreme of the range formation that has been in place since the first week of January?

AThe range formation has an upper extreme at $7.30, with the lower boundary at $4.58.

Похожее

Behind Musk and Huang Jen-hsun's 'AI Factories', an Unseen Battle for Freshwater Has Begun

Behind the "AI factories" of Elon Musk and Jensen Huang lies a hidden battle for a critical resource: fresh water. As AI models like ChatGPT and Claude process billions of prompts daily, they consume vast amounts of water for cooling. By 2030, global AI infrastructure is projected to use 9.3 trillion liters annually—enough to meet the basic needs of 1.3 billion people. This "water grab" stems from the massive heat generated by high-powered GPUs. Over 70% of data centers use evaporative cooling systems, where water absorbs heat and evaporates into the atmosphere, depleting local groundwater. Training models like GPT-4 can consume over 600 million liters of water. Tech giants like Google and Microsoft report skyrocketing water usage, sparking conflicts with local communities over resources. A flashpoint occurred in Memphis, Tennessee, where Musk's xAI built the Colossus supercomputer. It draws nearly 3.8 million liters of drinking water daily from local aquifers, leading to public outrage and legal action. In response, xAI is building an $80 million water recycling plant to use treated wastewater instead. Facing pressure, companies like Microsoft promote "waterless" closed-loop cooling systems. However, these systems increase electricity consumption by 20-30%, shifting the water burden to power plants, which require immense cooling water themselves—a case of indirect water footprint transfer. For China's AI industry, this crisis offers a strategic warning and opportunity. Instead of replicating the West's resource-intensive model, China can leverage its "East Data, West Computing" policy to locate data centers in cooler, water-rich regions like Guizhou. Furthermore, developing lightweight edge computing for smart homes and embodied AI robots can drastically reduce the need for constant cloud queries, cutting both water and energy consumption at the source. The freshwater war underscores a fundamental question: Will AI be a tool for human advancement or a silicon-based monster competing for our planet's last drops of clean water? The answer is becoming clearer as the water vapor rises.

marsbit23 мин. назад

Behind Musk and Huang Jen-hsun's 'AI Factories', an Unseen Battle for Freshwater Has Begun

marsbit23 мин. назад

AGI is Just One Step Away

The article discusses Anthropic's release of the Fable 5 model, a heavily restricted version of its powerful Mythos model. Initially unveiled in April, Mythos reportedly identified over 10,000 high-risk vulnerabilities for 50 enterprise clients, causing significant concern. Due to its dangerous capabilities in areas like autonomous cyber-attacks and biochemical weapons design guidance (classified as CB-1 level), the unaltered Mythos 5 remains limited to about 200 vetted entities like government agencies. Fable 5, released with a safety classifier, demonstrates extraordinary performance, leading benchmarks in coding (SWE-Bench Pro), software engineering, and research. It exhibits true "long-horizon agency," autonomously planning and executing complex, multi-step tasks like migrating 50 million lines of code in a day, moving beyond simple question-answering. The article positions Fable 5 at OpenAI's Level 3 ("Agent") and progressing toward Level 4 ("Innovator"), suggesting AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) is within reach, potentially 18-24 months away. To mitigate risks, Anthropic implemented a two-layer safety "cage": a silent routing system that redirects dangerous queries to a weaker model, and a mandatory 30-day data retention policy for all Mythos traffic to detect patterns of malicious use. Despite its high cost ($10/$50 per million input/output tokens), the model targets the enterprise market, where its unparalleled productivity and defensive capabilities against AI-powered cyber threats justify the premium. This signals a market maturation where top-tier AI becomes a strategic, high-value tool for businesses, potentially widening the gap with consumer-focused models and accelerating the rise of "one-person companies" while disrupting labor markets.

marsbit35 мин. назад

marsbit35 мин. назад

Restoring Crypto Privacy: ZCASH (ZEC) Makes A Move After 50% Crash

Following a severe price crash of over 50% triggered by the discovery of a critical counterfeiting vulnerability in its Orchard privacy pool, Zcash (ZEC) is taking steps to restore confidence. The bug, found by a security researcher using AI, could have allowed undetected creation of fake ZEC tokens. Developers from the Zcash Open Development Lab (ZODL) and others quickly patched the flaw, helping the price rebound over 70%. However, Orchard's privacy features make it impossible to verify if any counterfeit tokens were actually created before the fix. To address this, key ecosystem groups including Shielded Labs and The Zcash Foundation have proposed a new system called Ironwood. Its primary goal is to restore users' ability to independently verify Zcash's total circulating supply. Once activated, node operators could confirm the supply hasn't been tampered with. The Ironwood proposal would also block any new coin minting in the Orchard pool and restrict fund movement through a controlled mechanism. This system could provide evidence on whether the vulnerability was ever exploited. If no excess ZEC attempts to leave the pool, it suggests no counterfeiting occurred. Any attempted exit of fake coins would be blocked and destroyed, publicly revealing any attack while protecting the legitimate supply.

bitcoinist44 мин. назад

Restoring Crypto Privacy: ZCASH (ZEC) Makes A Move After 50% Crash

bitcoinist44 мин. назад

Solana Real-World Assets Gain Momentum With Significant Spike In Transfer Activity

Solana's price has declined recently, breaking key support levels. However, the network's activity, especially in the Real-World Assets (RWA) sector, shows strong momentum. The ecosystem recorded its largest daily transfer volume ever, surpassing $1.49 billion—a more than 2x increase, led significantly by preSPAX. This signals growing adoption of tokenized assets on Solana. Analyst Zensei highlights Solana as the leading platform for spot trading, noting the SOL/USDC pair's 24-hour volume of over $4.9 billion far exceeds other major markets. Another analyst, Crypto Patel, points out that SOL is trading within a key Fibonacci Retracement Zone, similar to a past pattern that preceded a major rally. While an "Altcoin Season" is seen as necessary for a potential push toward $1,000, the current accumulation zone is between $40 and $60.

bitcoinist1 ч. назад

Solana Real-World Assets Gain Momentum With Significant Spike In Transfer Activity

bitcoinist1 ч. назад

AI Investors' 2026 Anxiety: When Models Devour Everything, What Moat Is Left for Startups?

In 2026, a wave of investor anxiety questions the defensibility of AI startups as models improve, fearing that most companies are just "thin wrappers" destined to be absorbed by foundation models or chipmakers. The author argues against this despair, positing that true moats lie not in benchmark performance but in areas models cannot easily reach. The logic of despair is that if models excel at all measurable tasks, only compute and cutting-edge model weights hold lasting value. However, the essay contends that the most valuable work is inherently "untrainable." Benchmarks measure what can be measured and thus optimized for, but real-world correctness often resides in private, complex systems. Examples include legacy codebases, intricate legal transactions, or hospital workflows. This kind of correctness is proprietary, costly to establish, and cannot be validated quickly—it requires time and trust within an organization. As models commodify visible, measurable tasks from both above (labs absorbing scaffolding) and below (saturation by cheaper models), value shifts to "untrainable ground." This encompasses work where correctness is a private truth, locked behind integration barriers, licenses, liability frameworks, and entrenched user habits. Trust and adoption are slow, human-centric processes that smarter models cannot accelerate. Successful companies defend their position by embedding deeply into client operations, owning the definition of "good" within a specific domain (e.g., Harvey in law, OpenEvidence in medicine), and pricing on outcomes rather than tokens. While labs compete fiercely, they are incentivized to keep the application layer vibrant. The future belongs not to those competing on generic benchmarks but to those navigating unscoreable terrain, doing the "unsexy work" of translation between models and messy human realities. The most cited benchmark scores are thus maps of territory about to become worthless, signaling who will lose the right to define what counts as good.

marsbit2 ч. назад

AI Investors' 2026 Anxiety: When Models Devour Everything, What Moat Is Left for Startups?