Hassett: Setting a Six-Month Interest Rate Roadmap 'Irresponsible', Praises Powell's Leadership

marsbitОпубликовано 2025-12-09Обновлено 2025-12-09

Введение

White House National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett emphasized that pre-setting a six-month interest rate path would be "irresponsible," advocating instead for data-dependent monetary policy. In a CNBC interview, he praised Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s leadership in building consensus within the FOMC ahead of an expected rate cut. Hassett avoided specifying the number of rate cuts needed, underscoring the importance of flexibility over rigid forward guidance. He also expressed optimism about AI-driven positive supply shocks, similar to the 1990s tech boom, which could allow the economy to run hotter without inflation. Hassett noted improved bond market conditions and downward trends in Treasury yields, reflecting uncertainty around the Fed’s upcoming decision. His comments highlight the need for adaptive, data-driven policymaking in a complex economic environment.

Kevin Hassett, head of the White House National Economic Council, recently shared important views on the Federal Reserve's interest rate path. As a top contender widely seen as the most likely successor to Powell, Hassett clearly stated that pre-setting interest rate targets for the next six months is an irresponsible act, emphasizing the importance of monetary policy decisions strictly following economic data trends.

I. Interest Rate Decisions Should Avoid Mechanical Forward Guidance

Hassett elaborated on his core stance during a Monday interview with CNBC: "The role of the Federal Reserve Chair is to closely track economic data, adjust policies accordingly, and clearly explain the reasoning behind decisions to the public.

Therefore, simply declaring 'I will follow a set plan over the next six months' is highly irresponsible." When asked how many rate cuts might be needed in 2026 to align with economic principles, Hassett avoided giving a specific number.

He stated: "I prefer not to guide market expectations by predicting the number of rate cuts. I believe the only thing policymakers need to do is closely monitor data developments." This statement reflects his policy philosophy of opposing rigid forecasts and advocating flexible responses.

II. Consensus Building and Market Expectations Under Powell's Leadership

Earlier this year, U.S. President Trump repeatedly called publicly for the Fed to cut the benchmark rate below 2%, while the target range was then between 3.75% and 4%. Currently, markets widely expect Powell and the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) to cut the benchmark rate by another 25 basis points at Wednesday's meeting.

Hassett gave a positive assessment of Powell's work. He believes Powell has "excelled at coordinating differing views within the Committee," laying the groundwork for a consensus on a rate cut this week. Hassett said: "I believe Chairman Powell agrees with me on this point—that we should probably maintain a cautious stance, closely follow the data, and further moderately cut rates." Although FOMC members seem divided on the upcoming decision, Hassett noted that Powell has successfully guided policymakers to align "around" the expectations reflected in futures markets.

As of Monday, futures market data showed a nearly 100% probability of a 25 basis point cut on Wednesday.

III. AI's Supply Shock and New Dynamics in the Bond Market

The White House economic chief reiterated his optimistic view on investments in artificial intelligence. He believes AI investment could replicate the positive supply shock brought by the computer boom of the 1990s, creating policy space for the Fed to "let the economy run hotter."

Hassett analyzed: "If we can recreate the scenario of the 90s, achieving both falling inflation and economic growth driven by a positive supply shock, then the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield has ample room to fall." He also noted that the bond market has "significantly improved" compared to the beginning of the year. He specifically mentioned that Treasury yields have shown a downward trend since early 2025.

Hassett added: "Yields are currently in a state of slight fluctuation, which I think partly reflects market uncertainty about the Fed's specific actions and policy signals at this meeting."

IV. The Era of Data-Driven Decision-Making

Hassett's comments highlight the necessity of data-driven monetary policy in the current global economic environment. By avoiding rigid forward guidance, the Fed can maintain policy flexibility to better respond to changing economic conditions. This cautious approach not only helps stabilize market expectations but also leaves necessary policy space to address potential economic risks.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat did Kevin Hassett say about setting a six-month interest rate roadmap for the Fed?

AKevin Hassett stated that setting a predetermined interest rate roadmap for the next six months would be 'irresponsible' and emphasized that monetary policy decisions should be strictly data-dependent.

QHow did Hassett evaluate Jerome Powell's leadership at the Federal Reserve?

AHassett praised Powell's leadership, noting that he has done a 'great job' building consensus within the committee and aligning policymakers around market expectations.

QWhat is the market expectation for the Fed's interest rate decision at the upcoming FOMC meeting?

AThe market expects the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) to cut the benchmark interest rate by 25 basis points at the upcoming meeting, with futures markets pricing in a nearly 100% probability of such a move.

QHow does Hassett view the potential impact of AI investment on the economy and monetary policy?

AHassett believes that investment in AI could create a positive supply shock similar to the 1990s computer boom, which would allow the Fed to let the economy 'run hotter' and create room for lower 10-year Treasury yields.

QWhat approach does Hassett advocate for making monetary policy decisions?

AHassett advocates for a data-driven approach, avoiding rigid forward guidance and instead making policy adjustments based on close monitoring of economic data.

Похожее

Crypto Financing and Token Issuance: From Fundraising Recovery to Regulatory Rebalancing

Cryptocurrency financing and token issuance are experiencing a resurgence, driven by clearer regulatory frameworks and increased institutional participation. However, regional regulatory disparities and market deleveraging continue to impact the pace and structure of token launches. Key trends include a shift from speculative, high-risk investments toward longer-term capital deployment in areas like payments, stablecoins, cross-chain infrastructure, and identity verification. Regulatory clarity in the U.S. and parts of Europe has enabled traditional financial entities to engage with compliant crypto products, such as regulated exchanges offering custody-enhanced digital asset products. Despite this progress, regulatory fragmentation remains. Some jurisdictions impose strict requirements on stablecoins and tokenized assets, including asset proof, auditing, and issuance qualifications, while others restrict tokenized financial activities entirely. This inconsistency complicates cross-border issuance strategies. Recent large-scale mergers and acquisitions have boosted industry confidence by integrating resources within token ecosystems. However, this consolidation may marginalize smaller independent projects, increasing their fundraising challenges. Token issuance practices are evolving in two parallel directions: increased compliance efforts (e.g., KYC/AML, transparency in fundraising, market-making arrangements) and more phased, targeted distribution strategies—such as prioritizing institutional investors before public sales—to reduce volatility and avoid the pump-and-dump patterns seen in early ICOs. Risks remain, including high volatility, cross-border regulatory conflicts, and governance vulnerabilities. Transparency—through on-chain asset proof, liquidity disclosures, third-party audits, and verifiable token economic models—is becoming critical for trust. Some exchanges and funds are also exploring compliant issuance services and custody solutions to meet institutional demand. The sector is transitioning from narrative-driven growth to a structured, compliance-oriented, and use-case-focused phase. While continued regulatory maturation may provide a more stable foundation for token offerings, geopolitical tensions or major project failures could lead to renewed market adjustments. Projects are advised to prioritize compliance, transparency, and sustainable business models, while investors should focus on tokens backed by real demand rather than speculative narratives.

cointelegraph_中文12 мин. назад

Crypto Financing and Token Issuance: From Fundraising Recovery to Regulatory Rebalancing

cointelegraph_中文12 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片