‘Elite’ traders hunt dopamine-seeking retail on prediction markets: 10x Research

cointelegraphОпубликовано 2025-12-09Обновлено 2025-12-09

Введение

Prediction markets are becoming a new arena in crypto where elite, well-equipped traders are systematically profiting from retail participants who often treat trading like gambling, driven by dopamine and narratives rather than discipline. According to 10x Research, a small, informed minority accurately prices probabilities and hedges exposure to extract value from retail-driven longshots. Data shows that on Polymarket, only 16.7% of wallets are profitable, while 83% have lost money. Concerns about insider trading are growing, with some users showing near-perfect win rates. Additionally, a bug was discovered that double-counts trading volume on third-party dashboards, though this is due to data errors rather than illegal wash trading.

Prediction markets are emerging as a new battleground in the crypto economy, where the best-informed traders are competing against casual retail bettors for profits.

Most users are behaving more like sports bettors than disciplined traders, according to a Tuesday report from research firm 10x Research, which said they are trading “dopamine and narrative for discipline and edge.” “Accuracy and profit are driven not by the crowd, but by a tiny, informed elite who price probability, hedge exposure, and extract premium from retail-driven longshots.”

The rising liquidity and retail participation are incentivizing professional trading desks to increase their prediction market activity and capture the spread and “misinformation asymmetry” arising from this market structure, 10x added.

*Polymarket active users, weekly, Bitcoin left-hand-side price, year-to-date chart. Source: 10x Research*

Related: Bitcoin now settles Visa-scale volumes, but most is for wholesale, not coffee

The report is a concerning sign for casual traders looking to make easy money on prediction markets, as blockchain data suggests that most users lose their initial investment.

*Polymarket, positive/negative wallet balances. Source:* *Dune.com*

Only about 16.7% of wallets on Polymarket are in profit, while the remaining 83% have incurred losses, according to blockchain data from Dune.

Related: Prediction markets emerge as speculative ‘arbitrage arena’ for crypto traders

Perfect win rates fuel insider concerns

The flawless track record of some prediction market accounts is stoking concerns about possible insider trading, as certain users appear to win every time.

Polymarket user “pony-pony” boasts a 100% win rate with over $77,000 in realized profit by betting on events related to the artificial intelligence development company, OpenAI, prediction market data aggregator Polymarket Money said in a Monday X post.

Another user, “AlphaRaccoon,” also triggered insider allegations after generating over $1 million in a single day by successfully winning 22 out of 23 bets related to Google search trends.

Meanwhile, concerns are brewing over the reliability of Polymarket data on third-party data dashboards after a Paradigm researcher discovered a bug that double-counts the prediction market’s trading volume, Cointelegraph reported earlier on Tuesday.

The bug is inflating the primary volume metrics used to gauge prediction market activity, including the notional volume, which counts the number of contracts traded, and the cashflow volume, which measures the dollar value traded at the time of each trade, wrote Paradigm researcher Storm in a Tuesday X post.

However, the inflated volumes on data dashboards are due to errors in data interpretation, not wash trading, which is a deceptive and illegal practice in which entities buy and trade the same instrument to create a false impression of growing market activity.

Paradigm’s newly discovered bug was “validated” by multiple data dashboards, including AlliumLabs and DefiLlama, which are now updating their Polymarket dashboards to eliminate the double-counting error.

Magazine: Train AI agents to make better predictions... for token rewards

Похожее

Why Is It Difficult for Retail Investors to Break Free from the Loss Cycle of High-Frequency Trading?

Why Retail Traders Struggle to Escape the High-Frequency Trading Loss Cycle Retail investors often fall into a trap of continuous losses in cryptocurrency markets due to high-frequency day trading, which is structurally skewed against them. The author, sharing from personal experience, explains that frequent trading without informational advantages—such as access to real order flow, liquidity maps, or market maker positions—inevitably leads to financial ruin over time. The key insight is that winning isn’t just about making profits but about preserving them. Most successful retail traders actually succeed by trading less: catching major market moves, then stepping back to avoid giving back gains. In contrast, constant trading—often driven by overconfidence and the false belief that discipline and risk management alone can beat the market—results in consistent losses. The article compares modern day trading to a "casino disguised as a café," where inexperienced traders, especially young ones, mistake gambling for a learnable skill. They rely on superficial tools like TradingView charts without understanding that institutional traders use advanced systems like Bloomberg terminals with exclusive data. Ultimately, the author advises retail traders to reduce trading frequency, avoid day trading, and focus on long-term strategies instead of chasing quick wins. The real tragedy is not losing money but believing that high-frequency trading is a sustainable strategy rather than a form of gambling.

比推1 мин. назад

Why Is It Difficult for Retail Investors to Break Free from the Loss Cycle of High-Frequency Trading?

比推1 мин. назад

Illegal Miners Threatened with Criminal Punishment. What to Prepare For

Russian authorities plan to introduce both administrative and criminal liability for illegal cryptocurrency mining, as announced by Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak. The government aims to regulate the digital currency market and establish penalties for mining violations. Legal experts suggest that criminal charges should be reserved for cases involving significant public danger, such as large-scale damage to energy infrastructure or threats to grid stability, rather than duplicating existing laws. They argue that administrative fines are sufficient for minor offenses like small-scale home mining. The distinction between criminal and administrative liability will likely be based on the scale of damage and the amount of illicit income generated. A previous legislative draft proposed substantial fines for unregistered mining, but it was criticized for lacking proportionality. Amendments to both the Administrative and Criminal Codes are expected by 2026 to address these issues. Despite mining being legalized in Russia in 2024, an estimated 70% of miners remain unregistered due to challenges in legalizing previously imported equipment.

RBK-crypto5 мин. назад

Illegal Miners Threatened with Criminal Punishment. What to Prepare For

RBK-crypto5 мин. назад

Malaysia’s crown prince launches ringgit stablecoin, Zetrix treasury

Malaysia's Crown Prince Ismail Ibrahim, through his telecom company Bullish Aim, has launched RMJDT, a ringgit-pegged stablecoin, under the country's regulatory sandbox. The stablecoin, issued on the Zetrix blockchain, aims to boost the ringgit's use in cross-border trade and attract foreign investment. Additionally, Bullish Aim is creating a digital asset treasury with an initial allocation of 500 million ringgit ($121.5M) in ZETRIX tokens, modeled after MicroStrategy's Bitcoin strategy. This move aligns with Malaysia's Digital Asset National Policy, despite growing market skepticism about the sustainability of digital asset treasuries.

cointelegraph29 мин. назад

Malaysia’s crown prince launches ringgit stablecoin, Zetrix treasury

cointelegraph29 мин. назад

Hong Kong launches CARF crypto tax consultation to combat evasion

Hong Kong has launched a public consultation on implementing the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) to align its crypto tax data sharing with global standards and combat cross-border tax evasion. The initiative, led by Financial Services Secretary Christopher Hui, also includes potential updates to the Common Reporting Standard (CRS). This move reinforces Hong Kong’s existing efforts in international tax cooperation, having exchanged financial account data with partner jurisdictions since 2018. CARF has seen broad global adoption, with 76 countries pledging to implement it by 2029. However, some jurisdictions like Switzerland and the U.S. are proceeding cautiously or with delays.

cointelegraph57 мин. назад

Hong Kong launches CARF crypto tax consultation to combat evasion

cointelegraph57 мин. назад

Bull vs. Bear Debate: Is Stablecoin Leader CRCL Worth Buying? Why Can't High-Growth Earnings Drive the Stock Price?

"Circle (NYSE: CRCL), the issuer of USDC, has sparked intense debate in the crypto community following its Q3 2025 earnings report. Despite reporting strong growth—revenue up 66% YoY to $740 million and net income of $214 million, driven by a 108% increase in USDC circulation—its stock price fell significantly post-earnings and remains near its IPO price of $64. The core disagreement revolves around Circle’s business model and sustainability. Critics, including Jiang Zhuorer, argue that Circle operates like a bank, earning primarily through interest on reserve assets (mainly U.S. Treasuries), but is highly vulnerable to interest rate cuts. They highlight that ~60% of revenue is paid to distributors like Coinbase, leaving thin margins that could turn negative in a low-rate environment. They also warn of competition from traditional financial giants like JPMorgan and potential policy changes. Proponents, such as BTCdayu and qinbafrank, counter that Circle is building a long-term, network-driven infrastructure play. They compare it to Amazon or JD.com, arguing that current profit-sharing is a strategic cost to achieve scale, compliance advantage, and eventual market dominance in a winner-take-all industry. They believe USDC’s合规 (compliance) edge and institutional trust will drive adoption to multi-trillion dollars, outweighing interest rate risks. Short-term concerns include significant post-IPO lockup expirations adding selling pressure, and structural barriers like U.S. tax treatment of USDC as a property (not cash), hindering retail payment adoption. The debate encapsulates a clash between cyclical concerns (rates, costs, competition) and structural optimism (scale, compliance, network effects)."

Odaily星球日报1 ч. назад

Bull vs. Bear Debate: Is Stablecoin Leader CRCL Worth Buying? Why Can't High-Growth Earnings Drive the Stock Price?

Odaily星球日报1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот

Фьючерсы