Yardeni Research President Abandons ‘Overweight’ Rating on Magnificent 7 Stocks – Here Are the New Recommendations

dailyhodlPublicado em 2025-12-08Última atualização em 2025-12-08

Resumo

Yardeni Research President Ed Yardeni has abandoned his long-standing "overweight" rating on the Magnificent 7 stocks, stating they are now "somewhat overvalued." He highlights the market's extreme concentration, with tech and communication services making up 45% of the S&P 500. Yardeni believes these giants must now find sales among the other "Impressive 493" S&P companies to drive productivity. He describes a new competitive "Game of Thrones" environment where tech firms challenge each other and face threats from newcomers. Instead, Yardeni recommends investing in financials, industrials, healthcare, and overseas stocks.

The president of sell-side Wall Street firm Yardeni Research is now underweight on the Magnificent 7 stocks.

Ed Yardeni says in a new interview on CNBC that he thinks those top stocks are “somewhat overvalued.”

“We’ve got to the point where information technology and communication services in the S&P 500 now account for 45% of the S&P 500. It’s a very concentrated market capitalization. And I think if the Magnificent 7 are going to continue to succeed, then they’re going to have to find sales among the S&P 493, I call them the ‘Impressive 493,’ in order to be used for increasing productivity.”

The shift is Yardeni’s first move away from being overweight on the sector in 15 years. The Wall Street veteran says the Mag 7 is now in a “Game of Thrones”-style environment, with different tech giants competing with one another.

“They used to just kind of operate in their own moats and leave each other alone, and I think we’re now having a competitive situation, and not only that, but I think we’re going to find other start-ups to come and challenge some of their technologies.”

Yardeni recommends investing in financials, industrials, the healthcare industry and overseas stocks instead of the Mag 7.

Follow us on X, Facebook and Telegram
Don't Miss a Beat – Subscribe to get email alerts delivered directly to your inbox
Check Price Action
Surf The Daily Hodl Mix

Featured Image: Shutterstock/Naeblys/Salamahin

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhy did the president of Yardeni Research abandon the 'overweight' rating on the Magnificent 7 stocks?

AHe believes the Magnificent 7 stocks are 'somewhat overvalued' and that the market is very concentrated, with information technology and communication services accounting for 45% of the S&P 500.

QWhat does Ed Yardeni call the rest of the S&P 500 stocks outside the Magnificent 7?

AHe calls them the 'Impressive 493'.

QAccording to Yardeni, what must the Magnificent 7 do to continue succeeding?

AThey must find sales among the S&P 493 companies to be used for increasing productivity.

QHow does Yardeni describe the current competitive environment for the Magnificent 7?

AHe describes it as a 'Game of Thrones'-style environment, where tech giants are now competing with each other and facing challenges from startups, unlike before when they operated in their own moats.

QWhat sectors does Yardeni now recommend investing in instead of the Magnificent 7?

AHe recommends investing in financials, industrials, the healthcare industry, and overseas stocks.

Leituras Relacionadas

Bull vs. Bear Debate: Is the Profit Moat of Stablecoin Leader CRCL Solid?

The article presents a heated debate surrounding Circle (NYSE: CRCL), the issuer of the stablecoin USDC, focusing on the sustainability of its business model following its IPO and Q3 2025 earnings report. Key bearish points, led by figures like Jiang Zhuo'er, argue that CRCL's profits are unsustainable. They compare it to a bank reliant on an interest rate spread, which is highly vulnerable to Federal Reserve rate cuts. Critics highlight that over 60% of profits are paid to distributor Coinbase, leaving CRCL with a thin margin. They warn that competition from traditional financial giants like JPMorgan could easily disrupt its model, and that its regulatory advantage is a temporary benefit, not a permanent moat. Bullish commentators, including @BTCdayu and @qinbafrank, counter that CRCL is a long-term infrastructure play, not a simple bank. They believe current profit-sharing is a strategic cost to achieve market dominance and network effects, similar to companies like Amazon in their early days. They argue that future growth from massive USDC adoption (potentially reaching trillions) will far outweigh the impact of falling interest rates. They see compliance as a powerful, long-term moat that will eliminate smaller competitors. Additional short-term concerns include a significant sell-off pressure from the post-IPO lockup expiration and a structural barrier to USDC's use in U.S. retail payments due to its classification as a taxable asset. In summary, the debate pits short-term cyclical risks (interest rates, high costs, sell pressure) against a long-term structural opportunity (market growth, network effects, compliance as a barrier to entry). The core question remains whether CRCL's current model is a fragile interest-rate play or a foundational bet on the future of digital currency.

比推Há 29m

Bull vs. Bear Debate: Is the Profit Moat of Stablecoin Leader CRCL Solid?

比推Há 29m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片