XRP Ledger Holds 63% of Tokenised US Treasury Supply

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-02-17Última atualização em 2026-02-17

Resumo

The XRP Ledger (XRPL) currently holds 63% of the total tokenized US Treasury supply, with an issuance volume of 54.41 million, surpassing networks like Ethereum. Despite this dominance in issuance, transfer activity on XRPL remains minimal, with monthly TBILL transfers amounting to only $200—just 0.003% of the activity seen on other major blockchains. This highlights a significant imbalance between issuance and usage. Recent developments, including collaborations with Aviva Investors and OpenEden, aim to boost real-world asset tokenization on XRPL. The coming months are seen as critical for assessing XRPL's performance in the tokenized treasury market.

The XRP Ledger now shelters two-thirds of overall tokenised US Treasury bills. As per the recent reports, the XRP-associated blockchain platform owns around 63% of the overall treasury token supply.

The data unveils that the XRPL is heading the tokenised US Treasury bills, holding around 63% of the overall supply. This milestone is significant to note, as XRP Ledger’s treasury token issuance volume has attained 54.41 million, crossing prominent networks such as Ethereum.

Regardless of this issuance dominance, the transfer activity on the XRP Ledger is minimal when contrasted with different blockchain giants. The monthly TBILL transfer volume on XRPL attains just $200 as per the reports, at the time when Ethereum and other chains run millions of transactions.

This shows that just a marginal 0.003% activity occurs on the XRP Ledger. This imbalance highlights a prominent challenge facing XRPL. However, the platform controls the overall TBILL issuance; the treasury tokens on XRPL are hardly used.

However, some blockchains are being used as main issuance platforms; others, however, serve as the main channel for trading. It is noteworthy that this comes closely following Binance’s listing of XRPL’s RLUSD stablecoin. As per the reports, the crypto exchange publicised the listing on February 12.

What Does The Latest Report Say?

It is noteworthy that two prominent developments underscore the growth of XRPL’s tokenised treasuries. These advancements comprise Aviva Investors’ large-scale fund tokenisation and OpenEden’s TBILL token.

As per the latest report, Aviva investors collaborated with Ripple to explore tokenisation funds on XRPL. Doppler Finance publicised a collaboration with OpenEden to open up more yield opportunities for XRP and rLUSD holders on the XRP Ledger.

By amalgamating OpenEden’s tokenised real-world asset infrastructure into Doppler’s yield protocol, the platform has prominently impacted the growth of tokenised treasuries on the chain.

As per the industry experts, the upcoming one to three months are crucial to look after, as these months will indicate how XRPL performs in the tokenised treasury market.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Shiba Inu Tokens Left Unburned, SHIB Price Sees Daily Drops After Weekly Gains

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat percentage of the overall tokenised US Treasury supply does the XRP Ledger hold?

AThe XRP Ledger holds 63% of the overall tokenised US Treasury supply.

QHow does the monthly transfer volume of TBILL on XRPL compare to other blockchains like Ethereum?

AThe monthly TBILL transfer volume on XRPL is minimal, reaching only about $200, while blockchains like Ethereum process millions of dollars in transactions.

QWhat two recent developments are highlighted as key to the growth of XRPL's tokenised treasuries?

AThe two key developments are Aviva Investors' large-scale fund tokenisation in collaboration with Ripple, and OpenEden's TBILL token in collaboration with Doppler Finance.

QWhat recent listing by Binance is mentioned in relation to the XRP Ledger?

ABinance recently listed XRPL's RLUSD stablecoin, with the announcement made on February 12.

QWhat does the minimal transfer activity on XRPL indicate despite its high issuance volume?

AThe minimal transfer activity, which is only about 0.003%, indicates that while XRPL controls most of the TBILL issuance, the treasury tokens on its platform are hardly being used for transactions.

Leituras Relacionadas

Behind Musk and Huang Jen-hsun's 'AI Factories', an Unseen Battle for Freshwater Has Begun

Behind the "AI factories" of Elon Musk and Jensen Huang lies a hidden battle for a critical resource: fresh water. As AI models like ChatGPT and Claude process billions of prompts daily, they consume vast amounts of water for cooling. By 2030, global AI infrastructure is projected to use 9.3 trillion liters annually—enough to meet the basic needs of 1.3 billion people. This "water grab" stems from the massive heat generated by high-powered GPUs. Over 70% of data centers use evaporative cooling systems, where water absorbs heat and evaporates into the atmosphere, depleting local groundwater. Training models like GPT-4 can consume over 600 million liters of water. Tech giants like Google and Microsoft report skyrocketing water usage, sparking conflicts with local communities over resources. A flashpoint occurred in Memphis, Tennessee, where Musk's xAI built the Colossus supercomputer. It draws nearly 3.8 million liters of drinking water daily from local aquifers, leading to public outrage and legal action. In response, xAI is building an $80 million water recycling plant to use treated wastewater instead. Facing pressure, companies like Microsoft promote "waterless" closed-loop cooling systems. However, these systems increase electricity consumption by 20-30%, shifting the water burden to power plants, which require immense cooling water themselves—a case of indirect water footprint transfer. For China's AI industry, this crisis offers a strategic warning and opportunity. Instead of replicating the West's resource-intensive model, China can leverage its "East Data, West Computing" policy to locate data centers in cooler, water-rich regions like Guizhou. Furthermore, developing lightweight edge computing for smart homes and embodied AI robots can drastically reduce the need for constant cloud queries, cutting both water and energy consumption at the source. The freshwater war underscores a fundamental question: Will AI be a tool for human advancement or a silicon-based monster competing for our planet's last drops of clean water? The answer is becoming clearer as the water vapor rises.

marsbitHá 19m

Behind Musk and Huang Jen-hsun's 'AI Factories', an Unseen Battle for Freshwater Has Begun

marsbitHá 19m

AGI is Just One Step Away

The article discusses Anthropic's release of the Fable 5 model, a heavily restricted version of its powerful Mythos model. Initially unveiled in April, Mythos reportedly identified over 10,000 high-risk vulnerabilities for 50 enterprise clients, causing significant concern. Due to its dangerous capabilities in areas like autonomous cyber-attacks and biochemical weapons design guidance (classified as CB-1 level), the unaltered Mythos 5 remains limited to about 200 vetted entities like government agencies. Fable 5, released with a safety classifier, demonstrates extraordinary performance, leading benchmarks in coding (SWE-Bench Pro), software engineering, and research. It exhibits true "long-horizon agency," autonomously planning and executing complex, multi-step tasks like migrating 50 million lines of code in a day, moving beyond simple question-answering. The article positions Fable 5 at OpenAI's Level 3 ("Agent") and progressing toward Level 4 ("Innovator"), suggesting AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) is within reach, potentially 18-24 months away. To mitigate risks, Anthropic implemented a two-layer safety "cage": a silent routing system that redirects dangerous queries to a weaker model, and a mandatory 30-day data retention policy for all Mythos traffic to detect patterns of malicious use. Despite its high cost ($10/$50 per million input/output tokens), the model targets the enterprise market, where its unparalleled productivity and defensive capabilities against AI-powered cyber threats justify the premium. This signals a market maturation where top-tier AI becomes a strategic, high-value tool for businesses, potentially widening the gap with consumer-focused models and accelerating the rise of "one-person companies" while disrupting labor markets.

marsbitHá 31m

marsbitHá 31m

Restoring Crypto Privacy: ZCASH (ZEC) Makes A Move After 50% Crash

Following a severe price crash of over 50% triggered by the discovery of a critical counterfeiting vulnerability in its Orchard privacy pool, Zcash (ZEC) is taking steps to restore confidence. The bug, found by a security researcher using AI, could have allowed undetected creation of fake ZEC tokens. Developers from the Zcash Open Development Lab (ZODL) and others quickly patched the flaw, helping the price rebound over 70%. However, Orchard's privacy features make it impossible to verify if any counterfeit tokens were actually created before the fix. To address this, key ecosystem groups including Shielded Labs and The Zcash Foundation have proposed a new system called Ironwood. Its primary goal is to restore users' ability to independently verify Zcash's total circulating supply. Once activated, node operators could confirm the supply hasn't been tampered with. The Ironwood proposal would also block any new coin minting in the Orchard pool and restrict fund movement through a controlled mechanism. This system could provide evidence on whether the vulnerability was ever exploited. If no excess ZEC attempts to leave the pool, it suggests no counterfeiting occurred. Any attempted exit of fake coins would be blocked and destroyed, publicly revealing any attack while protecting the legitimate supply.

bitcoinistHá 40m

Restoring Crypto Privacy: ZCASH (ZEC) Makes A Move After 50% Crash

bitcoinistHá 40m

Solana Real-World Assets Gain Momentum With Significant Spike In Transfer Activity

Solana's price has declined recently, breaking key support levels. However, the network's activity, especially in the Real-World Assets (RWA) sector, shows strong momentum. The ecosystem recorded its largest daily transfer volume ever, surpassing $1.49 billion—a more than 2x increase, led significantly by preSPAX. This signals growing adoption of tokenized assets on Solana. Analyst Zensei highlights Solana as the leading platform for spot trading, noting the SOL/USDC pair's 24-hour volume of over $4.9 billion far exceeds other major markets. Another analyst, Crypto Patel, points out that SOL is trading within a key Fibonacci Retracement Zone, similar to a past pattern that preceded a major rally. While an "Altcoin Season" is seen as necessary for a potential push toward $1,000, the current accumulation zone is between $40 and $60.

bitcoinistHá 1h

Solana Real-World Assets Gain Momentum With Significant Spike In Transfer Activity

bitcoinistHá 1h

AI Investors' 2026 Anxiety: When Models Devour Everything, What Moat Is Left for Startups?

In 2026, a wave of investor anxiety questions the defensibility of AI startups as models improve, fearing that most companies are just "thin wrappers" destined to be absorbed by foundation models or chipmakers. The author argues against this despair, positing that true moats lie not in benchmark performance but in areas models cannot easily reach. The logic of despair is that if models excel at all measurable tasks, only compute and cutting-edge model weights hold lasting value. However, the essay contends that the most valuable work is inherently "untrainable." Benchmarks measure what can be measured and thus optimized for, but real-world correctness often resides in private, complex systems. Examples include legacy codebases, intricate legal transactions, or hospital workflows. This kind of correctness is proprietary, costly to establish, and cannot be validated quickly—it requires time and trust within an organization. As models commodify visible, measurable tasks from both above (labs absorbing scaffolding) and below (saturation by cheaper models), value shifts to "untrainable ground." This encompasses work where correctness is a private truth, locked behind integration barriers, licenses, liability frameworks, and entrenched user habits. Trust and adoption are slow, human-centric processes that smarter models cannot accelerate. Successful companies defend their position by embedding deeply into client operations, owning the definition of "good" within a specific domain (e.g., Harvey in law, OpenEvidence in medicine), and pricing on outcomes rather than tokens. While labs compete fiercely, they are incentivized to keep the application layer vibrant. The future belongs not to those competing on generic benchmarks but to those navigating unscoreable terrain, doing the "unsexy work" of translation between models and messy human realities. The most cited benchmark scores are thus maps of territory about to become worthless, signaling who will lose the right to define what counts as good.

marsbitHá 2h

AI Investors' 2026 Anxiety: When Models Devour Everything, What Moat Is Left for Startups?