XPL tests $0.08 demand as bears press hard: Reversal ahead?

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-02-23Última atualização em 2026-02-23

Resumo

XPL's price has dropped over 12% in 24 hours, approaching a key demand zone at $0.08. Despite a 38% surge in daily trading volume, bearish pressure remains strong, as indicated by negative Bull Bear Power and increased selling activity. The Open Interest-Weighted Funding Rate has turned sharply negative to -0.0437%, reflecting extreme pessimism among futures investors and heightened short positioning. Network activity has declined significantly over two weeks, though daily transactions saw a slight uptick. A break below $0.08 could establish a new low for XPL, with current market conditions making a bullish reversal challenging.

A few weeks ago, chains associated with the stablecoin narrative were thriving but have since lost the flair. Plasma [XPL] was one of them, with their focus on stablecoin payment, which also featured Tether’s USDT.

XPL lost more than 12% of its total market capitalization in only 24 hours. A spike in daily trading volume by 38% confirmed the selling pressure.

Additionally, the coin’s turnover ratio of 0.436 indicates a significant portion of the capitalization was being traded. Can bulls step in as they did previously as the price approached a key demand zone?

XPL approaches a key demand zone

XPL price extended its decline for the second consecutive day to 18% following the day’s losses.

The current bear strength, as evident from the Bull Bear Power indicator whose bars were increasing in size, was pushing price toward the $0.08 zone.

As per the Market Structure Break and OB Probability indicator, the $0.08 was a key demand zone. Initially, XPL rebounded from this zone and pushed the price above $0.10.

While a decline to the $0.08 zone could trigger bulls into buying, bear strength was still very present. In fact, it increased with each candle close, with BBP at negative 0.0148.

This value was half of what the strongest bears in February had managed.

The decline made a potential rebound at $0.08 difficult with the current conditions. Probably, pessimism among traders and low chain activity amplified the losses.

XPL perpetual Futures traders at extreme pessimism

Looking at the perpetual Futures data for XPL, traders showed pessimism. The OI-Weighted Funding Rate sharply dropped into the negative territory, hitting 0.0437%.

The data showed that the market was overly crowded on the short side, an indication of panic selling. Furthermore, these shorts were paying longs to keep their positions open as well as opening more sell orders.

This sharp decline could mean further downside risk, especially if bulls did not step in. Breaking below $0.08 would create a new low for the altcoin, surpassing the current one at $0.0709.

Activity falls sharply in two weeks

XPL’s network activity was also following the price action. Over the past two weeks, the number of transactions dropped by more than 12%, from 416.5K to 365.9K.

But from a daily perspective, transactions rose by 4.28%, while total transaction fees were up 56%. This spike in activity was probably from the traders who were selling the token.

Meanwhile, its cumulative transaction count stood at 155.76 million at a speed of 4.5 TPS. Generally, most of XPL’s metrics were weak, including its price action, which was approaching a key demand zone.


Final Summary

  • XPL loses 12% as the OI-Weighted Funding Rate turns red and activity drops sharply.
  • XPL price was approaching the demand zone at $0.08, but the bearish strength was not relenting.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the current price level that XPL is approaching, and why is it considered a key demand zone?

AXPL is approaching the $0.08 level, which is considered a key demand zone because it was the area from which the price previously rebounded and pushed above $0.10.

QWhat does the negative OI-Weighted Funding Rate for XPL perpetual futures indicate about trader sentiment?

AThe negative OI-Weighted Funding Rate of -0.0437% indicates extreme pessimism among traders, with the market being overly crowded on the short side, signaling panic selling and traders paying to keep short positions open.

QHow has XPL network activity changed over the past two weeks according to the article?

AOver the past two weeks, the number of transactions on the XPL network dropped by more than 12%, from 416.5K to 365.9K, indicating a sharp decline in activity.

QWhat does the Bull Bear Power (BBP) indicator value of -0.0148 suggest about the current market strength?

AThe Bull Bear Power (BBP) indicator value of -0.0148 shows significant bearish strength that is increasing with each candle close, making a potential rebound at the $0.08 demand zone difficult.

QWhat was the percentage change in XPL's daily trading volume, and what did this confirm?

AXPL's daily trading volume spiked by 38%, which confirmed the intense selling pressure the token was facing.

Leituras Relacionadas

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbitHá 8m

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbitHá 8m

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手Há 31m

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手Há 31m

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

A researcher discovered a critical "infinite mint" vulnerability in the Zcash cryptocurrency's Orchard protocol using Claude Opus 4.8, leading to a swift fix but also a 50% market drop, erasing billions in value. This incident highlights a new era where powerful, accessible AI models are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding software vulnerabilities. Previously, the security community feared specialized models like Claude Mythos Preview, capable of finding decades-old zero-day exploits. The Zcash case, however, involved a publicly available, general-purpose model. This shift makes advanced security auditing—and attack capabilities—accessible to far more people, not just experts. The mass democratization of vulnerability discovery brings a dual challenge: a flood of low-quality, AI-generated false reports that overwhelm maintainers, and the real, rapid uncovering of deep, dangerous bugs. Open-source projects, often understaffed and unfunded, are particularly vulnerable to this "attention DDoS." The article cites examples like curl shutting down its bug bounty program due to the unsustainable workload. Our perceived digital safety has often been luck, relying on the high cost and effort required to find deeply hidden flaws in complex systems, as seen with historical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Baron Samedit. AI changes this cost structure, effectively "mass-producing flashlights" to illuminate every corner of our codebase. While large companies operate extensive security chains involving external white-hat hackers and massive defensive operations, the global cybersecurity workforce faces a severe shortage, especially of experienced personnel capable of analyzing complex threats and coordinating fixes. The core dilemma emerges: AI makes *finding* bugs cheap and scalable, but *fixing* them remains a slow, expensive, and human-intensive process. The article concludes that AI won't destroy the internet but acts as a bright light, revealing that our digital existence is not inherently secure but is precariously maintained by ongoing human effort. The true cost in the AI era may not be discovery, but whether there will be enough people left willing and able to do the hard work of repair.

marsbitHá 1h

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

marsbitHá 1h

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

"Codex Goal Mode: How to Make AI Work Continuously Toward a Specific Goal" OpenAI's Codex "goal mode" (/goal) transforms the AI from a reactive code assistant into a proactive execution agent capable of working autonomously for hours or even days to achieve a defined objective. To maximize its effectiveness, follow these key principles: 1. **Define Clear, Verifiable Exit Criteria:** The goal prompt should be a concise, measurable success condition, not a lengthy specification. Use quantifiable metrics like "reduce build time by 30%" or "achieve 100% test parity." 2. **Provide Initial Guidance and Tools:** Direct Codex toward likely problem areas and specify available tools (e.g., browsers, testing environments) to prevent it from exploring unproductive paths. 3. **Enable Progress Measurement:** Equip Codex with ways to track advancement, such as creating comparison tools for visual tasks or evaluation sets, ensuring it can gauge its own progress. 4. **Use a Realistic Execution Environment:** For tasks like performance optimization, provide access to environments that closely mimic production (e.g., similar configs, databases) to yield valid results. 5. **Be Cautious with Visual Goals:** Avoid vague "pixel-perfect" instructions. Instead, supplement visual references with functional checklists or design system specifications to prevent Codex from obsessing over minor details. 6. **Implement Progress Tracking:** For long-running tasks, have Codex commit code to draft PRs, update progress documents, or send Slack updates to maintain visibility into its work. 7. **Review and Consolidate Results:** Once the goal is met, instruct Codex to review its work, clean up ineffective experimental code, and reflect on what strategies succeeded or failed. Ultimately, using goal mode shifts the developer's role from writing prompts to managing a persistent engineering agent—defining objectives, establishing metrics, configuring environments, and conducting final reviews.

marsbitHá 2h

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artigos em Destaque

O que é PLASMA

Plasma: Uma Solução de Ponta para a Escalabilidade da Blockchain Introdução ao Plasma À medida que o panorama das criptomoedas evolui, também aumenta a necessidade de uma maior eficiência nas redes blockchain. O Plasma, uma solução de escalabilidade de Camada 2, surge como um jogador pioneiro neste domínio, particularmente no campo do desenvolvimento Web3. Ao deslocar estrategicamente uma parte substancial das tarefas da cadeia principal para uma série de cadeias menores, o Plasma promete aumentar significativamente a escalabilidade e o desempenho do Ethereum — uma plataforma de blockchain amplamente utilizada na vanguarda das aplicações descentralizadas. O que é o Plasma? O Plasma é uma solução inovadora de escalabilidade off-chain particularmente desenhada para a blockchain Ethereum. Foi apresentado em agosto de 2017 por Vitalik Buterin, co-fundador do Ethereum, e Joseph Poon, um proeminente defensor de soluções de escalabilidade como a Lightning Network. O Plasma serve como uma estrutura que permite a criação de aplicações escaláveis, estabelecendo uma estrutura hierárquica de cadeias filhas acima da cadeia principal do Ethereum. No seu núcleo, o Plasma permite o desenvolvimento de cadeias laterais potencialmente infinitas que podem operar de forma independente, enquanto ainda dependem da rede Ethereum para segurança e consenso. Esta arquitetura é suportada por contratos inteligentes e Árvores de Merkle, que gerenciam eficientemente transações e armazenamento de dados. Objetivos Principais do Plasma O objetivo primário do Plasma é aumentar o throughput da rede Ethereum. Ao desviar um volume substancial de transações da congestionada cadeia principal, a arquitetura do Plasma oferece velocidades de transação mais altas, processamento de dados mais eficiente e custos de transação mais baixos. Isto é particularmente vital numa era em que a demanda por aplicações descentralizadas — especialmente nas áreas das finanças, jogos e gestão da cadeia de abastecimento — está a atingir níveis sem precedentes. Criadores do Plasma O Plasma é obra de duas figuras renomadas na comunidade blockchain: Vitalik Buterin e Joseph Poon. Buterin é celebrado principalmente por co-fundar o Ethereum e por expandir os limites do que a tecnologia blockchain pode alcançar. Poon, por outro lado, é conhecido por defender soluções escaláveis, que permitem transações mais rápidas e custo-efetivas nas redes blockchain. A colaboração deles na estrutura do Plasma contribuiu amplamente para a sua natureza inovadora, combinando perceções técnicas avançadas com aplicações práticas. Investidores do Plasma Embora as fundações ou organizações específicas que apoiam o Plasma permaneçam não reveladas, o projeto atraiu o interesse de várias figuras proeminentes e intervenientes no espaço blockchain e criptomoeda. Com o seu potencial para melhorar a escalabilidade dentro do Ethereum, chamou a atenção de várias entidades que visam expandir os limites da tecnologia blockchain. Como Funciona o Plasma? A funcionalidade única do Plasma deve-se à sua estrutura arquitetónica que depende das cadeias filhas e da sua interação com a rede principal do Ethereum. Abaixo estão alguns fatores chave que contribuem para a abordagem inovadora do Plasma: Cadeias Filhas: O Plasma estabelece numerosas cadeias filhas que podem executar transações independentemente da cadeia principal do Ethereum. Cada cadeia filha opera como um contrato inteligente separado com características únicas, permitindo que os desenvolvedores criem soluções personalizadas com base nas suas necessidades específicas. Contratos Inteligentes e Árvores de Merkle: A estrutura utiliza contratos inteligentes, que são acordos autoexecutáveis com condições pré-definidas, juntamente com Árvores de Merkle que permitem a verificação eficiente de dados. Esta tecnologia permite que o Plasma alcance tanto alta escalabilidade quanto segurança. Compressão de Transações: Ao agrupar transações nas cadeias filhas, o Plasma reduz a carga de dados na rede Ethereum. Isto significa que menos transações precisam ser registadas na cadeia principal — libertando espaço e reduzindo a congestão. Segurança Aumentada: Apesar de estar off-chain, o Plasma aproveita as medidas de segurança da rede principal do Ethereum, garantindo que todas as transações nas cadeias filhas mantenham um alto nível de integridade e segurança. Linha do Tempo do Plasma Compreender o desenvolvimento do Plasma envolve traçar os seus marcos significativos: Agosto de 2017: O Plasma foi apresentado pela primeira vez por Vitalik Buterin e Joseph Poon como uma solução escalável para enfrentar os desafios de desempenho do Ethereum. 2018: A estrutura do Plasma foi oficialmente desenvolvida e disponibilizada no GitHub, marcando um passo crucial para a sua implementação em aplicações práticas. 2019: À medida que a conscientização sobre o Plasma cresceu, começou a atrair desenvolvedores interessados em escalar aplicações Ethereum, aumentando assim a sua adoção. 2020: O Plasma continuou a evoluir, com melhorias substanciais feitas à sua arquitetura e funcionalidade, tornando-o ainda mais apelativo para os desenvolvedores. Principais Características do Plasma O Plasma possui várias características que o tornam uma solução transformadora no espaço blockchain: Escalabilidade: Ao criar múltiplas cadeias filhas, o Plasma pode lidar com um volume maior de transações sem sobrecarregar ainda mais a cadeia principal do Ethereum. Velocidade: Cada cadeia filha pode processar transações mais rapidamente, proporcionando aos utilizadores uma melhor experiência e serviço. Custos de Transação Reduzidos: A estrutura do Plasma reduz efetivamente os custos associados às transações, minimizando o fardo na cadeia principal. Interoperabilidade: A arquitetura permite que o Plasma interaja de forma contínua com múltiplas blockchains, melhorando a funcionalidade entre redes. Segurança: Ao aproveitar a segurança da cadeia principal do Ethereum, o Plasma garante a integridade das suas operações enquanto utiliza as suas cadeias filhas. Casos de Uso para o Plasma A arquitetura inovadora do Plasma abre portas para várias aplicações práticas em diferentes setores: Finanças Descentralizadas (DeFi): O Plasma tem a capacidade de melhorar a escalabilidade e eficiência das aplicações DeFi, criando processos de negociação mais suaves e eficazes. Jogos: A estrutura facilita o desenvolvimento de experiências de jogos rápidas e custo-efetivas, tornando-a atraente para os desenvolvedores na indústria de jogos. Gestão da Cadeia de Abastecimento: Com a capacidade de arquivar processamento de transações eficiente, o Plasma pode promover o desenvolvimento de soluções descentralizadas de gestão da cadeia de abastecimento. Conclusão O Plasma está na vanguarda da tecnologia blockchain, posicionado como uma solução de escalabilidade de Camada 2 fundamental destinada a melhorar a eficiência da rede Ethereum e além. Através da sua estrutura única de cadeias filhas, contratos inteligentes e Árvores de Merkle, o Plasma oferece uma solução convincente para a crise de escalabilidade que tem afligido as redes blockchain por muito tempo. À medida que a tecnologia blockchain continua a avançar, soluções como o Plasma prometem remodelar a forma como os desenvolvedores abordam os desafios de escalabilidade, potencialmente revolucionando a forma como as aplicações descentralizadas funcionam. Os esforços contínuos dos seus criadores e o interesse de diversas partes interessadas sinalizam um futuro promissor para o Plasma enquanto procura elevar as capacidades da blockchain a novas alturas no domínio digital.

200 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2024.12.03

O que é PLASMA

Como comprar XPL

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Plasma (XPL) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Plasma (XPL) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Plasma (XPL)Depois de comprar o teu Plasma (XPL), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Plasma (XPL)Transaciona facilmente Plasma (XPL) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

256 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar XPL

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de XPL (XPL) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片