X Considers Paying Creators with USDC, Circle's Stock Closes Up Over 7%

Publicado em 2026-08-21Última atualização em 2026-08-21

Resumo

Social platform X is discussing paying content creators with stablecoins such as USDC, with related negotiations still underway and no formal partnership yet established. This news brings stablecoins into the global content revenue-sharing scene, and once again puts the potential of Circle's payment network into the market spotlight.

Summary

Social platform X is discussing using stablecoins like USDC to pay content creators. Related negotiations are ongoing, and no formal partnership has been established yet. The news brings stablecoins into the global content monetization scene and once again puts the potential of Circle's payment network in the market spotlight.

Stablecoins are moving closer to a more mainstream use case. Citing sources familiar with the matter, CoinDesk reported that social platform X is exploring the use of stablecoins to pay influential users and content providers, with options under discussion including USDC issued by Circle.

On the day the report was published, Circle Internet Group's stock closed at $84.24, up 7.19%. X's potential adoption provides a clear new catalyst for the market: if stablecoins enter the creator revenue-sharing system, the use cases for USDC would expand from crypto trading and corporate settlements to everyday payments on a global social platform.

However, CoinDesk also made it clear that the related negotiations are still in progress. X did not respond to requests for comment, and there has been no announcement regarding partners, launch dates, or which stablecoin(s) will ultimately be adopted. Attributing the entire day's gains to this news is not rigorous, but it does explain why Circle received extra attention that day.

Creator Payments Naturally Involve Cross-Border Challenges

X's potential recipients are distributed across different countries and regions. Traditional cross-border payments often involve bank working hours, local payment channels, and currency conversion. For smaller amounts, fees and settlement times are particularly noticeable. Dollar-pegged stablecoins can be transferred around the clock and do not require building separate bank interfaces for each market.

The total market capitalization of global stablecoins has already exceeded $300 billion, and they are no longer just serving crypto trading. Businesses moving funds between subsidiaries and small merchants collecting cross-border payments have begun using similar tools. Musk's SpaceX already uses stablecoins to collect cross-border payments from some Starlink customers in emerging markets. For X, this path is not entirely unfamiliar.

In March of this year, X hired Benji Taylor, who previously led design for the Base network under Coinbase, as its Head of Design. His responsibilities also relate to xAI and SpaceX. With his background in wallets and decentralized finance products, this provides a more concrete personnel clue regarding X's exploration of stablecoin payments.

What USDC Is Vying for Is the Distribution Gateway

X is adjusting its creator incentive mechanisms, gradually replacing the original revenue-sharing program with the "Original Content Rewards Program." The new program emphasizes original viewpoints, professional content, reporting, and commentary. If stablecoins are integrated, they would likely first handle such frequent, cross-regional reward payments.

For Circle, the value is not just a single payment processing fee. A platform with a global creator base would lead many people to hold, exchange, or transfer USDC for the first time due to receiving payments. As user numbers and capital flows increase, USDC's usability across wallets, trading platforms, and merchant terminals also becomes easier to expand—this is precisely the network effect that stablecoin issuers have been competing for.

What can be confirmed for now is still just "under discussion." X might ultimately choose USDC, test multiple stablecoins simultaneously, or the negotiations might lead nowhere. Therefore, this report brings more about adoption expectations rather than realized revenue. The rise in Circle's stock price that day indicates the market is willing to trade on this possibility first. Whether the trend continues will depend on whether X announces partnership details and the actual scale of payments.

Leituras Relacionadas

JPMorgan Research Report Analysis: Moderna's INT Trial Meets Endpoints, but Market Already Priced In

On August 19, J.P. Morgan (JPM) published a research report analyzing Moderna's recent Phase III trial success for its Individualized Neoantigen Therapy (INT), developed in partnership with Merck, in adjuvant melanoma. The trial met its primary endpoint of significantly improved recurrence-free survival and the key secondary endpoint of distant metastasis-free survival. While JPM acknowledged the strong clinical value of these results, particularly the prevention of distant metastasis, the bank stated that this success was widely anticipated, with an 85% prior probability of success, and is already reflected in Moderna's current market valuation. Following the announcement, Moderna's stock rose in pre-market trading. However, JPM maintained its Underweight rating and $40 price target, implying approximately 36% downside from the current price of ~$63. The core rationale is that the success in adjuvant melanoma, a relatively small market in immuno-oncology, is fully priced in. Moderna's future valuation hinges entirely on INT's ability to demonstrate similar efficacy across broader cancer indications. JPM's valuation model incorporates only a modest risk-adjusted value (~$3/share) for the melanoma approval. Approximately $15/share of its target price is attributed to INT's potential in other cancer types. The report identifies upcoming data readouts in non-melanoma cancers (e.g., lung, head & neck, renal) as the critical variable that will determine the platform's ultimate value. Upside risks include better-than-expected data in these new indications, while downside risks involve clinical failures, regulatory delays, or commercial underperformance. In conclusion, JPM views the pre-market stock move as driven by short covering and trading sentiment rather than a fundamental re-rating. The bank remains bearish, arguing that Moderna must now prove INT's efficacy as a platform technology beyond melanoma to justify its current market cap.

marsbitHá 20m

JPMorgan Research Report Analysis: Moderna's INT Trial Meets Endpoints, but Market Already Priced In

marsbitHá 20m

Treasury Department Directly Intervenes to Suppress Long-Term Interest Rates

The article discusses the U.S. Treasury's recent direct intervention to suppress long-term bond yields through buyback operations. While distinct from traditional Yield Curve Control (YCC), this move is interpreted as direct government intervention in its own financing costs. The author emphasizes the short-term tactical nature of this action and contrasts it with the Federal Reserve's upcoming, potentially divergent, policy stance at Jackson Hole. The core issue is framed as a long-term U.S. strategic dilemma: managing high deficit levels. The analysis argues that deficit reduction cannot realistically come from spending cuts or traditional industries, but must rely on achieving higher economic growth driven by technological breakthroughs. Current monetary tightening, while possibly curbing yields and inflation in the short term, is seen as potentially counterproductive to this necessary long-term investment in technology and supply chain resilience. The piece draws historical parallels, placing the current intervention between the 2000-2002 Treasury buybacks (for liquidity) and larger-scale Fed-led "Operation Twist" maneuvers. The effectiveness of the Treasury's action is deemed limited without Federal Reserve cooperation, which would signify a more significant policy shift. Ultimately, the author views such technical, bureaucratic interventions as treating symptoms rather than the underlying disease of the U.S. economy's structural challenges and "K-shaped" divergence. The conclusion suggests that sustained yield suppression by the Fed, combined with specific geopolitical outcomes, could serve as a catalyst for a more profound discussion on broader U.S. and dollar trajectory.

marsbitHá 21m

Treasury Department Directly Intervenes to Suppress Long-Term Interest Rates

marsbitHá 21m

Trading

Spot
活动图片