X Allows Paid Crypto Promotions but Restricts Ads in EU and UK

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-03-02Última atualização em 2026-03-02

Resumo

X has updated its advertising policy to allow paid crypto promotions through its official partnership programs, requiring clear labeling for transparency. However, the platform maintains restrictions on non-partnership crypto ads to prevent spam and misleading content. This move aligns X with other social networks that permit regulated crypto advertising, emphasizing compliance with legal and platform standards. Industry analysts believe this could boost visibility for legitimate crypto projects and influence marketing strategies, though regulatory compliance remains crucial. The policy does not permit unsolicited promotions, balancing openness with controls.

The announcement came from the social media site itself, saying they updated the advertising rules to include branded content for crypto. This only applies if the accounts are in official paid partnership programs. Creators get to share promo posts about crypto products, but they have to label them clearly as paid. It seems like they are trying to make things more transparent that way.

Still, X is keeping restrictions on the regular kind of crypto advertising that is not tied to partnerships or does not have proper disclosures. They want to stop spam and misleading stuff from reaching users. The change happened after hearing from advertisers and people in the industry who wanted better guidelines for marketing digital assets.

Crypto companies often turn to platforms like this to get their name out there and build awareness with more people. By allowing these paid promotions, X is catching up with other social networks that already allow regulated crypto ads. They stressed that everything has to follow the laws and the platform’s own standards, plus there are safety steps to avoid fraud or deception.

Analysts are saying this could help legitimate crypto projects get more visibility through sponsorships. Some investors feel it supports wider adoption, like opening up new ways to market. But it is not a total free-for-all, since unsolicited promotions are still limited.

Marketing Impact and Industry Response

On the marketing side, people in the industry think this might change how companies spend their budgets on digital stuff. Brands could start seeing X as a spot for campaigns aimed at tech people or crypto fans. It might lead to more organized team-ups between crypto firms and influencers.

The regulatory stuff will probably stay a big deal, especially with different rules in places. Companies will need to keep checks in place to ensure content complies with legal and platform rules. As these partnerships grow, there could be more watching of how things engage and how brands are seen. This policy could spark new ideas in advertising for crypto and regular social sites. Some parts get a bit messy when thinking about how it all connects.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Senate Democrats Urge Federal Review of Binance Compliance Controls

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main change X announced regarding crypto advertising?

AX updated its advertising rules to allow branded content for crypto, but only for accounts in official paid partnership programs, and these promotions must be clearly labeled as paid.

QWhy is X keeping restrictions on some types of crypto advertising?

AX is maintaining restrictions on crypto ads not tied to partnerships or lacking proper disclosures to prevent spam and misleading content from reaching users.

QHow did this policy change come about according to the article?

AThe change was implemented after X received feedback from advertisers and industry participants who wanted better guidelines for marketing digital assets.

QWhat potential benefit for legitimate crypto projects does this new policy offer?

AAnalysts say the policy could help legitimate crypto projects gain more visibility through sponsorships and open up new marketing avenues, supporting wider adoption.

QWhat is a key concern that companies will need to manage under this new advertising policy?

ACompanies will need to ensure their content complies with varying legal regulations and the platform's own standards, implementing checks to avoid fraud and deception.

Leituras Relacionadas

Hands-on with Hunyuan Hy3 Preview: Tencent's AI, Finally Competitive?

Tencent's Hunyuan AI team has released its latest language model, Hy3 preview, marking a significant step forward for the company's AI capabilities. With 295B total parameters and support for 256K context length, the model employs a mixture-of-experts architecture. It shows improvements in complex logic, instruction following, contextual learning, code generation, and agent task execution. In testing, Hy3 preview demonstrated strong performance in multi-step logical reasoning but showed occasional instability in identifying traps in trick questions. It performed well in extracting key information from disordered meeting transcripts and accurately followed new linguistic rules. As an AI agent, it successfully built functional applications like a Snake game and generated data analysis dashboards, though it sometimes fell short in fully completing complex open-ended tasks. In natural language use, it produced coherent and stylistically appropriate narratives with reduced “AI-like” tone. Priced competitively, Hy3 preview is already integrated into Tencent’s key products, including Tencent Cloud and WorkBuddy. While not leading in every benchmark, it represents a solid, practical model that signals Tencent’s renewed momentum in AI development.

marsbitHá 38m

Hands-on with Hunyuan Hy3 Preview: Tencent's AI, Finally Competitive?

marsbitHá 38m

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

A sophisticated crypto laundering operation was executed following the $292 million hack of Kelp DAO on April 18. The attack, attributed to the North Korean Lazarus group, began with anonymous infrastructure preparation using Tornado Cash to fund wallets untraceably. The hacker exploited a vulnerability in Kelp’s cross-chain bridge, stealing 116,500 rsETH. To avoid crashing the market, the attacker used Aave and Compound as laundering tools—depositing the stolen rsETH as collateral to borrow $190 million in clean, liquid ETH. This move triggered a bank run on Aave, causing an $8 billion drop in TVL. After consolidating funds, the attacker fragmented them across hundreds of wallets to evade detection. A major breakpoint was THORChain, where over $460 million in volume—30 times its usual activity—was processed in 24 hours, converting ETH into Bitcoin. This shift to Bitcoin’s UTXO model exponentially increased tracing complexity by shattering funds into countless untraceable fragments. The final destination was Tron-based USDT, the primary channel for illicit crypto flows. From there, funds were cashed out via OTC brokers in China and Southeast Asia, using unlicensed underground banks and UnionPay networks outside Western sanctions scope. Ultimately, the laundered money supports North Korea’s weapons programs, which rely heavily on crypto hacking for foreign currency. The incident underscores structural challenges in DeFi: its openness, composability, and lack of central control make such laundering not just possible, but inherently difficult to prevent.

marsbitHá 43m

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

marsbitHá 43m

Behind DeepSeek V4's Stunning Debut: Silicon Valley Is 'Building Walls,' China Is 'Paving Roads'

China's AI landscape is witnessing a strategic divergence from Silicon Valley’s closed-source competition to a collaborative open-source ecosystem. On April 24, DeepSeek released V4, a top-ranked open-source model on Hugging Face, featuring breakthroughs like million-token context length with minimal KV cache and native support for domestic chips like Huawei’s Ascend. Similarly, Kimi’s K2.6, released days earlier, also adopted open-source principles. Unlike U.S. giants such as OpenAI and Anthropic—locked in revenue disputes and tactical product clashes—Chinese firms embrace shared innovation. DeepSeek and Kimi openly build on each other’s advances, like the MLA architecture and Muon optimizer, avoiding redundant R&D and driving down costs. DeepSeek V4 focused on pushing base model capabilities, while Kimi specialized in Agent-based applications. Although U.S. firms lead in revenue and valuation, China’s open-source models achieve comparable performance at a fraction of the cost (e.g., DeepSeek V3 trained for $5.58M vs. GPT-5’s $500M+). With token usage growing exponentially, China’s collaborative model promises scalable, affordable AI built on domestic hardware, shaping a more accessible path to AGI.

marsbitHá 52m

Behind DeepSeek V4's Stunning Debut: Silicon Valley Is 'Building Walls,' China Is 'Paving Roads'

marsbitHá 52m

OpenClaw vs. Hermes: Which One Is Right for You?

Two leading AI agent projects, OpenClaw and Hermes, represent a fundamental divergence in design philosophy rather than just a feature competition. OpenClaw, a GitHub phenomenon, prioritizes user control and customization, offering a powerful, flexible platform for building and orchestrating agents. It boasts a massive ecosystem with over 44,000 skills, extensive model flexibility (supporting Anthropic, OpenAI, and others), and deep integrations across multiple messaging platforms. In contrast, Hermes Agent, developed by Nous Research, champions automation and efficiency. It is designed for lower cost and a lower barrier to entry, learning and improving automatically from user workflows. It runs tasks in isolated environments for security and offers significantly lower token costs out-of-the-box. The choice between them mirrors historical tech divides like Windows vs. Mac. OpenClaw is for users who want maximum control, customization, and don't mind a complex setup. Hermes is the smarter default for those seeking an affordable, easy-to-use agent that learns autonomously. The real competition is not about which is better, but which philosophy—a programmable personal OS or a self-evolving work proxy—better suits the user's needs for control, cost, and ease of use.

marsbitHá 1h

OpenClaw vs. Hermes: Which One Is Right for You?

marsbitHá 1h

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

In a span of four days, Amazon announced an additional $25 billion investment, and Google pledged up to $40 billion—both direct competitors pouring over $65 billion into the same AI startup, Anthropic. Rather than a typical venture capital move, this signals the latest escalation in the cloud wars. The core of the deal is not equity but compute pre-orders: Anthropic must spend the majority of these funds on AWS and Google Cloud services and chips, effectively locking in massive future compute consumption. This reflects a shift in cloud market dynamics—enterprises now choose cloud providers based on which hosts the best AI models, not just price or stability. With OpenAI deeply tied to Microsoft, Anthropic’s Claude has become the only viable strategic asset for Google and Amazon to remain competitive. Anthropic’s annualized revenue has surged to $30 billion, and it is expanding into verticals like biotech, positioning itself as a cross-industry AI infrastructure layer. However, this funding comes with constraints: Anthropic’s independence is challenged as it balances two rival investors, its safety-first narrative faces pressure from regulatory scrutiny, and its path to IPO introduces new financial pressures. Globally, this accelerates a "tri-polar" closed-loop structure in AI infrastructure, with Microsoft-OpenAI, Google-Anthropic, and Amazon-Anthropic forming exclusive model-cloud alliances. In contrast, China’s landscape differs—investments like Alibaba and Tencent backing open-source model firm DeepSeek reflect a more decoupled approach, though closed-source models from major cloud providers still dominate. The $65 billion bet is ultimately about securing a seat at the table in an AI-defined future—where missing the model layer means losing the cloud war.

marsbitHá 6h

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality