World Gold Council Proposes “Gold as a Service” Framework Impacting Tokenized Gold Market

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-03-20Última atualização em 2026-03-20

Resumo

The World Gold Council has introduced a "Gold as a Service" framework aimed at modernizing the global tokenized gold infrastructure. This system connects physical gold custody with digital issuance, enabling more efficient creation of gold-backed products. It is structured around three core components: physical custody, digital issuance, and synchronization systems that link assets to blockchain records. The framework is expected to impact major market players like Tether Gold (XAUT) and Paxos Gold (PAXG), which currently dominate the tokenized gold sector but operate on fragmented systems. By introducing standardized processes for custody, compliance, and redemption, the initiative seeks to unify the market, improve regulatory alignment, and reduce operational costs. This development is seen as a significant step in merging traditional gold markets with blockchain technology, potentially driving greater adoption among institutional investors and fintech companies. The Council emphasized that the framework is designed to foster future growth rather than target existing issuers.

The World Gold Council created a “Gold as a Service” framework to help modernize tokenized gold infrastructure worldwide. It does this by connecting physical gold custody and digital issuance systems, allowing companies to issue gold-backed products more efficiently. It is built on three levels of physical custody, digital issuance, and synchronization systems that connect assets and blockchain records.

Source: World Gold Council

The World Gold Council CEO, David Tait, said, “Financial services are undergoing a rapid and pervasive digital transformation.” He further added that shared infrastructure would help in improving accessibility, tradability, and integration of gold in modern financial systems worldwide.

Impact on Tether Gold and Paxos Gold Market Leaders

Currently, Tether Gold (XAUT) and Paxos Gold (PAXG) currently dominate the overall tokenized gold market. Also, they collectively command a large market share in the overall market worldwide. Both of these operate on different systems for custody, audit, and redemption, and this is causing fragmentation in the overall digital gold market worldwide.

The new framework also outlines a set of standardized processes that include custody coordination, compliance checks, and redemption systems that are to be followed on all platforms globally. Such a framework would ensure that all platforms are aligned in terms of regulatory compliance. It has been noted that such a platform can enable hundreds of new issuances to happen in a more efficient manner.

The Potential and Development Mark

The platform can potentially lead to lower operational costs as well as better integration between tokenized gold assets on various blockchain platforms globally. This can further increase adoption rates among institutional investors as well as fintech companies that are entering the tokenized commodity space. Officials emphasized that the platform focuses on enabling growth. Rather than targeting existing issuers in the space.

The development marks a significant convergence between traditional gold markets and blockchain technology as the adoption of digital assets continues to gain momentum globally. Analysts noted that tokenized gold can act as a major growth driver in traditional gold markets globally.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Ondo Finance Expands Tokenized Securities Offering With BlackRock IBIT and Galaxy Digital

TagsBlockchainCryptocurrencyDigital assetsGoldservice

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main purpose of the 'Gold as a Service' framework proposed by the World Gold Council?

AThe main purpose is to modernize tokenized gold infrastructure worldwide by connecting physical gold custody and digital issuance systems, allowing companies to issue gold-backed products more efficiently.

QWhich two products currently dominate the tokenized gold market according to the article?

ATether Gold (XAUT) and Paxos Gold (PAXG) currently dominate the tokenized gold market.

QWhat are the three levels that the 'Gold as a Service' framework is built upon?

AIt is built on three levels: physical custody, digital issuance, and synchronization systems that connect assets and blockchain records.

QWhat benefits does the World Gold Council CEO believe shared infrastructure will bring to gold?

ADavid Tait believes shared infrastructure will help improve accessibility, tradability, and integration of gold in modern financial systems worldwide.

QHow can the new framework potentially impact operational costs and adoption rates?

AThe framework can lead to lower operational costs and better integration, which can further increase adoption rates among institutional investors and fintech companies entering the tokenized commodity space.

Leituras Relacionadas

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

A researcher discovered a critical "infinite mint" vulnerability in the Zcash cryptocurrency's Orchard protocol using Claude Opus 4.8, leading to a swift fix but also a 50% market drop, erasing billions in value. This incident highlights a new era where powerful, accessible AI models are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding software vulnerabilities. Previously, the security community feared specialized models like Claude Mythos Preview, capable of finding decades-old zero-day exploits. The Zcash case, however, involved a publicly available, general-purpose model. This shift makes advanced security auditing—and attack capabilities—accessible to far more people, not just experts. The mass democratization of vulnerability discovery brings a dual challenge: a flood of low-quality, AI-generated false reports that overwhelm maintainers, and the real, rapid uncovering of deep, dangerous bugs. Open-source projects, often understaffed and unfunded, are particularly vulnerable to this "attention DDoS." The article cites examples like curl shutting down its bug bounty program due to the unsustainable workload. Our perceived digital safety has often been luck, relying on the high cost and effort required to find deeply hidden flaws in complex systems, as seen with historical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Baron Samedit. AI changes this cost structure, effectively "mass-producing flashlights" to illuminate every corner of our codebase. While large companies operate extensive security chains involving external white-hat hackers and massive defensive operations, the global cybersecurity workforce faces a severe shortage, especially of experienced personnel capable of analyzing complex threats and coordinating fixes. The core dilemma emerges: AI makes *finding* bugs cheap and scalable, but *fixing* them remains a slow, expensive, and human-intensive process. The article concludes that AI won't destroy the internet but acts as a bright light, revealing that our digital existence is not inherently secure but is precariously maintained by ongoing human effort. The true cost in the AI era may not be discovery, but whether there will be enough people left willing and able to do the hard work of repair.

marsbitHá 4m

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

marsbitHá 4m

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

"Codex Goal Mode: How to Make AI Work Continuously Toward a Specific Goal" OpenAI's Codex "goal mode" (/goal) transforms the AI from a reactive code assistant into a proactive execution agent capable of working autonomously for hours or even days to achieve a defined objective. To maximize its effectiveness, follow these key principles: 1. **Define Clear, Verifiable Exit Criteria:** The goal prompt should be a concise, measurable success condition, not a lengthy specification. Use quantifiable metrics like "reduce build time by 30%" or "achieve 100% test parity." 2. **Provide Initial Guidance and Tools:** Direct Codex toward likely problem areas and specify available tools (e.g., browsers, testing environments) to prevent it from exploring unproductive paths. 3. **Enable Progress Measurement:** Equip Codex with ways to track advancement, such as creating comparison tools for visual tasks or evaluation sets, ensuring it can gauge its own progress. 4. **Use a Realistic Execution Environment:** For tasks like performance optimization, provide access to environments that closely mimic production (e.g., similar configs, databases) to yield valid results. 5. **Be Cautious with Visual Goals:** Avoid vague "pixel-perfect" instructions. Instead, supplement visual references with functional checklists or design system specifications to prevent Codex from obsessing over minor details. 6. **Implement Progress Tracking:** For long-running tasks, have Codex commit code to draft PRs, update progress documents, or send Slack updates to maintain visibility into its work. 7. **Review and Consolidate Results:** Once the goal is met, instruct Codex to review its work, clean up ineffective experimental code, and reflect on what strategies succeeded or failed. Ultimately, using goal mode shifts the developer's role from writing prompts to managing a persistent engineering agent—defining objectives, establishing metrics, configuring environments, and conducting final reviews.

marsbitHá 1h

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

marsbitHá 1h

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly Is This 'Slow Variable' That Vitalik Has Repeatedly Emphasized?

Recently, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," first outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's March mandate as core principles guiding its focus: Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. CROPS represents Ethereum's commitment to providing foundational capabilities for user sovereignty—enabling asset ownership, identity expression, and coordination without reliance on centralized platforms or surrendering ultimate control. This framework is gaining new urgency with the rise of AI, particularly AI agents managing digital assets and automating transactions. While AI offers convenience, it risks centralizing user data, intent, and control if dependent on opaque, centralized services. Vitalik argues for "CROPS AI"—AI that is open, privacy-preserving, secure, and capable of local execution to maintain user agency. He highlights convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layers" and "CROPS AI," such as using zero-knowledge proofs for private remote LLM calls and Ethereum RPC reads, ensuring users can access services without exposing sensitive information. Ultimately, CROPS is not just an abstract ideal but a practical guide for Ethereum's development and AI integration. It addresses the critical long-term question: as digital systems grow more powerful, how can users retain control over their privacy, assets, and autonomy? In an AI-driven era, these principles may define Ethereum's enduring value—prioritizing verifiable, secure, and user-centric design over short-term optimizations like speed and cost alone.

marsbitHá 1h

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly Is This 'Slow Variable' That Vitalik Has Repeatedly Emphasized?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片