Wintermute: The Four-Year Cycle is Dead, How Will Crypto Break Through in 2026?

marsbitPublicado em 2026-01-20Última atualização em 2026-01-20

Resumo

The traditional four-year crypto cycle, once considered a market "iron law," is now obsolete, according to a 2025 annual report from market maker Wintermute. The market logic has shifted from "seasonal rotation" to "liquidity lock-up." 2025 did not bring the anticipated broad rally but instead showed extreme polarization: BTC and ETH gained institutional legitimacy through ETFs, while altcoins saw significantly reduced momentum and shorter lifespans. OTC data indicates that the historical wealth flow—from Bitcoin to Ethereum, then to blue chips, and finally to altcoins—has weakened substantially. ETFs and Digital Asset Trusts (DATs) act as "walled gardens," providing sustained demand for large-cap assets but failing to naturally circulate liquidity to the broader market. Altcoin rallies in 2025 lasted an average of just 20 days, down from 60 days in 2024, reflecting a highly concentrated market. Wintermute outlines three potential catalysts to break this stagnation in 2026: 1. **Expanding Institutional Mandates**: Broader institutional adoption beyond current large-cap assets, as seen with early ETF filings for Solana (SOL) and XRP. 2. **The Wealth Effect**: A strong rally in BTC or ETH could generate spillover demand for altcoins, similar to 2024. 3. **Rotation from Equities**: Retail attention shifting back from equity markets (e.g., AI, rare earths, quantum computing) to crypto, though this is the least likely scenario. The future of the market depends on...

The once-considered "iron law" of the four-year halving cycle in the crypto market is facing unprecedented challenges. Top market maker Wintermute pointed out in its latest 2025 annual report that the traditional cycle narrative has become obsolete, and market logic has shifted from "seasonal rotation" to "liquidity lock-up."

2025 did not bring the widespread euphoria as expected; instead, it exhibited extreme emotional polarization: on one hand, BTC and ETH entered the institutional hall of fame with the support of ETFs, while on the other hand, the explosive power of altcoins significantly diminished, and their lifecycles shortened.

Facing 2026, can the crypto market break the current存量困局 (stock dilemma)? Wintermute has outlined three core variables to打破现状 (break the status quo).

Main Text:

2025 did not bring the anticipated broad-based rally, but this may be regarded by future generations as the beginning of cryptocurrency's transition from a speculative tool to a mature asset class.

The traditional four-year cycle is becoming outdated. Market performance is no longer dominated by self-fulfilling timed narratives but depends on the flow of liquidity and the concentration of investor attention.

What Changed in 2025?

Historically, crypto-native wealth manifested as a fungible pool of capital. Profits from Bitcoin would spill over into Ethereum (ETH), then flow to blue-chip assets, and finally reach altcoins.

Wintermute's over-the-counter (OTC) flow data indicates that this传导机制 (transmission mechanism) significantly weakened in 2025.

Spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and digital asset trusts (DATs) evolved into "walled gardens." They provided sustained demand for large-cap assets but did not naturally rotate funds into the broader market.

With retail interest being drawn to the stock market, 2025 became a year of extreme polarization.

The average duration of altcoin rallies in 2025 was 20 days, far below the 60 days seen in 2024.

A handful of mainstream assets absorbed the vast majority of new funds, while the broader market struggled.

Three Paths for 2026

For market participation to extend beyond mainstream assets and expand further, at least one of the following three things needs to happen:

1. Expanding Institutional Mandates

Currently, most of the new liquidity remains confined to institutional channels. A full market recovery requires institutional investors to broaden the range of assets they can invest in.

Early signs have already emerged through ETF applications for Solana (SOL) and XRP.

2. The Wealth Effect from Mainstream Assets

A strong rebound in Bitcoin or Ethereum could generate a wealth effect, spilling over into the broader market, similar to what happened in 2024.

However, there remains uncertainty about how much capital will ultimately flow back into digital assets.

3. Rotation from Equities

Retail investor attention could rotate back from the stock market (such as AI, rare earths, quantum computing, etc.) to cryptocurrencies, bringing fresh capital inflows and stablecoin minting.

Although this is the least likely scenario, it would significantly expand market participation.

The future outcome will depend on whether the aforementioned catalysts can effectively diffuse liquidity beyond a few large-cap assets or whether this concentration trend will persist.

Understanding where capital flows and what structural changes are needed will determine which strategies will work in 2026.

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to Wintermute's 2025 report, what is replacing the traditional four-year cycle narrative in the crypto market?

AThe market logic has shifted from 'seasonal rotation' to 'liquidity lock-up', where performance is now dictated by the flow of liquidity and the concentration of investor attention rather than self-fulfilling, timed narratives.

QWhat does Wintermute identify as a key factor causing the extreme polarization in the crypto market in 2025?

AThe introduction of spot ETFs and Digital Asset Trusts (DATs) acted as 'walled gardens', providing sustained demand for large-cap assets like BTC and ETH but not naturally rotating capital into the broader market, while retail interest was drawn to the stock market.

QWhat was the average duration of an altcoin rally in 2025, as cited by Wintermute?

AThe average duration of an altcoin rally in 2025 was 20 days, which is significantly lower than the 60-day average seen in 2024.

QWhat are the three potential catalysts Wintermute outlines for breaking the current market stagnation and expanding participation beyond large-cap assets in 2026?

AThe three catalysts are: 1. Expanding Institutional Mandates, where institutions invest in a wider range of assets. 2. The Wealth Effect from a strong Bitcoin or Ethereum rally spilling over. 3. A Rotation from Equities, where retail attention shifts back from the stock market to crypto.

QWhat early sign does Wintermute point to regarding the potential expansion of institutional investment mandates?

AWintermute points to the ETF applications for Solana (SOL) and XRP as early signs that institutional investors might be expanding the range of assets they are willing to invest in.

Leituras Relacionadas

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbitHá 29m

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbitHá 29m

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbitHá 37m

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbitHá 37m

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight NewsHá 41m

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight NewsHá 41m

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbitHá 49m

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbitHá 49m

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbitHá 57m

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbitHá 57m

Trading

Spot
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow