Why XRP Investors Could Be Facing Serious Risks

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-02-17Última atualização em 2026-02-17

Resumo

Crypto analyst CryptoSensei warns that XRP investors face significant risks due to banks stalling the CLARITY Act, a crypto bill that could greatly benefit XRP and the market. Banks are proposing a ban on stablecoin yields, delaying progress. While a compromise is expected, it may harm retail investors. Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse supports the bill despite its flaws, emphasizing the need for regulatory clarity. He predicts the bill has an 80% chance of becoming law by April. XRP price is currently around $1.48.

Crypto pundit CryptoSensei has warned that XRP investors are in danger as the banks continue to hold the CLARITY Act “hostage.” He explained that the passage of the crypto bill could provide a major boost to XRP and the broader crypto market, but warned that banks will likely continue to stall as much as possible.

Why XRP Investors Are At Risk

In an X post, CryptoSensei stated that XRP holders are at risk because the bank is likely to stall the progress of the CLARITY Act as much as possible before it is forced to proceed. The crypto pundit believes the White House will eventually get banks to reach a compromise on the crypto bill, but warned that such a compromise could hurt investors.

Banks are currently proposing a complete ban on the distribution of stablecoin yields to users, a move that is stalling the CLARITY Act’s progress as crypto leaders push back on this proposal. The passage of the crypto bill could be a major positive for XRP, as it stands out as one of the crypto assets most likely to benefit from regulatory clarity.

Crypto Sensei stated that he is not too excited about a potential compromise on the CLARITY Act because retail XRP holders and other crypto holders could end up bearing the consequences. However, the pundit remains confident that if the crypto bill passes with favorable terms for the crypto industry, a market boom is likely.

Crypto Sensei said that he is hopeful but a little discouraged about the way the bank has acted differently. He remarked that the banks could have negotiated these terms during the passage of the GENIUS Act rather than holding the CLARITY Act hostage now.

Ripple CEO Advocates For The CLARITY Act Passage

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has advocated for the passage of the CLARITY Act despite concerns over the ban on stablecoin yields. He acknowledged that the crypto bill isn’t perfect and that there are aspects he doesn’t like. However, Garlinghouse believes that these imperfections shouldn’t stall progress.

He also mentioned how Ripple has been a big advocate of the CLARITY Act because of the XRP lawsuit against the SEC. He noted that the token gained clarity from the lawsuit after the Judge ruled that the token isn’t a security.

However, Garlinghouse still believes that it is important for the broader crypto market to have clarity since Ripple’s fortunes kind of hinge on how well the industry performs. The Ripple CEO predicts that the crypto bill will be 80% close to getting signed into law by April.

At the time of writing, the XRP price is trading at around $1.48, up in the last 24 hours, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

XRP trading at $1.47 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to CryptoSensei, why are XRP investors facing serious risks?

ABecause banks are likely to stall the progress of the CLARITY Act as much as possible, and any potential compromise on the bill could hurt retail XRP holders.

QWhat specific banking measure is currently stalling the CLARITY Act's progress?

ABanks are proposing a complete ban on the distribution of stablecoin yields to users, which is causing a stalemate as crypto leaders push back.

QWhat is Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse's stance on the CLARITY Act despite its imperfections?

AHe advocates for its passage, believing that its imperfections shouldn't stall progress, and he is a big advocate because of the regulatory clarity it could provide for the crypto industry.

QHow did the XRP token gain clarity regarding its legal status?

AIt gained clarity from the XRP lawsuit against the SEC after a Judge ruled that the token is not a security.

QWhat positive outcome does CryptoSensei predict if the crypto bill passes with favorable terms?

AHe remains confident that a market boom is likely for the crypto industry if the bill passes with favorable terms.

Leituras Relacionadas

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbitHá 1h

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbitHá 1h

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbitHá 1h

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbitHá 1h

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbitHá 2h

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbitHá 2h

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbitHá 2h

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片