Why Doesn't Stripe, Valued at $160 Billion, Go Public?

比推Publicado em 2026-03-10Última atualização em 2026-03-10

Resumo

Stripe, valued at $159 billion, and Plaid, valued at $8 billion, recently conducted tender offers, reflecting a structural shift in how companies access capital and provide liquidity. This trend allows firms to bypass traditional IPOs, avoiding dilution and regulatory burdens. The private secondary market reached $240 billion in 2025, surpassing global IPO proceeds. Companies now wait an average of 16 years to go public, and private market assets have doubled to $22 trillion over 12 years. New infrastructure layers like Forge and EquityZen facilitate secondary trading, while platforms like Robinhood’s Ventures Fund I are opening private markets to retail investors. However, risks include structural complexity, valuation opacity, and counterparty risks. Despite a 2025 IPO rebound, many companies trade below their offering prices, making tender offers an attractive alternative amid geopolitical and macroeconomic uncertainty.

Author: Michiel Milanovic

Original Title: What does Stripe at $160B mean for traditional IPOs?

Compiled and Edited by: BitpushNews


In the past two weeks, payments giant Stripe announced a tender offer valuing the company at up to $159 billion;

Meanwhile, fintech infrastructure provider Plaid also completed a tender offer valued at $8 billion;

A few days later, Robinhood's Ventures Fund I listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), allowing retail investors direct access to a basket of private company equities;

These events are interconnected, reflecting a structural shift in how companies access capital, provide liquidity, and ultimately consider going public.

Why is that?

Let's start with Plaid.

Founded in 2013, the company acts as an infrastructure layer connecting consumers' bank accounts to financial apps like Venmo, Robinhood, and Chime. Apps pay Plaid to allow users to seamlessly connect banks, verify credentials, and share account information. This is particularly valuable in the US, where regulations do not mandate banks to share information with third parties (unlike the UK's Open Banking and the EU's PSD2).

In fact, it's reported that half of all Americans have indirectly used Plaid's services through various financial apps. The company's valuation peaked at $13.4 billion in 2021, and it was once planned to be acquired by Visa for $5.3 billion, but regulators ultimately blocked the deal. After being repriced at $6.1 billion in April 2025, its latest $8 billion tender offer reflects renewed momentum. Its revenue is expected to reach $430 million in 2025, with 20% of its new customers now being AI companies.

Meanwhile, Stripe is a payments giant founded in 2010 by brothers John Collison and Patrick Collison.

Leveraging a decade of exponential growth in e-commerce, the company recently reported impressive 2025 performance. Total payment volume reached $1.9 trillion, a 34% year-over-year increase, equivalent to roughly 1.6% of global GDP. While revenue is undisclosed, sources estimate at least $5 billion in revenue for 2024. Today, Stripe's revenue suite alone (including Stripe Billing, Invoicing, Tax, etc.) is on track to achieve $1 billion in annual recurring revenue (ARR).

Beyond payments, Stripe is actively building around cryptocurrency and Agentic Commerce, seeing them as catalysts for online consumption. It acquired stablecoin platform Bridge for $1.1 billion, bought wallet infrastructure provider Privy, and is building Tempo—an L1 blockchain focused on payments, currently being tested by Visa, Nubank, and Klarna. Its latest $159 billion tender offer price represents a 74% increase from last year.

ARK Invest Big Ideas 2026

A tender offer is a secondary transaction that allows new or existing investors to buy shares directly from employees and early shareholders. It provides liquidity without diluting the company's equity or incurring the regulatory and structural burdens of an IPO.

Stripe and Plaid are part of a larger trend: companies successfully bypassing public markets in favor of private transactions.

It's reported that Anthropic is exploring a tender offer valuing it over $350 billion, while Revolut recently completed an employee share sale at a $75 billion valuation.

In 2025, private secondary market transaction volume soared to $240 billion, up from $162 billion in 2024. In comparison, global capital raised through traditional IPOs was about $140 billion.

As private capital markets boom, the pace of companies entering public markets has slowed. Companies now wait an average of 16 years to go public, 33% longer than a decade ago. Over the past 12 years, total private market assets have more than doubled to $22 trillion. Some of the world's most valuable companies, including SpaceX and OpenAI, remain private, with valuations that rival or exceed those of large public companies.

This has led to two key market developments:

First, the birth of new capital market infrastructure layers. We recently analyzed the rise of platforms like Forge and EquityZen, which facilitate secondary trading of private company shares. Charles Schwab acquired Forge for $660 million in November, while Morgan Stanley acquired EquityZen in October (amount undisclosed).

Second, the opening of private markets to retail investors. Robinhood's newly formed Ventures Fund I listed on the NYSE last Friday, raising $658 million and holding shares in large private companies like Ramp, Stripe, and Revolut. This isn't the first; Destiny Tech100 listed in March 2024, offering a portfolio of 100 VC-backed companies, including SpaceX and OpenAI. But Robinhood can distribute directly to its 28 million users, and as with its performance in public stocks, it has a proven track record of popularizing asset classes historically reserved for institutional investors.

Beyond this, the Trump administration signed an executive order last summer paving the way for $8.7 trillion in 401(k) retirement accounts to invest in alternative assets like cryptocurrency and private markets.

We see these as major catalysts for further growth, but they also expose some hidden risks.

One is the structural complexity behind purchasing private stock. Brokers often bundle these shares into their own special purpose vehicles (SPVs) and charge fees, and these SPVs sometimes hold positions in other vehicles. These overlapping counterparty risks and fees can obscure what assets investors actually own. The next macroeconomic downturn will be accompanied by the unraveling of SPV positions and ensuing litigation.

Then there's the issue of valuation transparency. Valuations of private companies are often anchored to the most recent funding round, which might only happen once or twice a year. This limits price discovery and creates a gap between the reported net asset value (NAV) and the price public markets are willing to pay.

The Financial Times recently reported that Robinhood's Ventures Fund I fell 11% on its first day of trading. Meanwhile, Destiny Tech 100 once traded at nearly 20 times its NAV. This unpredictability is not ideal for retirement savings accounts.

Meanwhile, regulators are beginning to push reforms to make public markets more attractive. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce expressed concerns about private markets in a February speech: the pressure for companies to go public has diminished, but private markets lack equivalent price discovery mechanisms, accessibility, and liquidity.

SEC Chairman Paul Atkins recently proposed a three-pillar plan to "make IPOs great again" (his words) by easing disclosure requirements and reforming securities litigation. Whether these reforms will be implemented remains to be seen.

Private transactions aside, IPOs did see a significant rebound in 2025. Eleven venture-backed fintech companies, including Circle and Klarna, went public, with more on the way. Kraken and Bitgo have filed confidentially, while companies like Ramp and Gusto are preparing by cleaning up cap tables, hiring new CFOs, or engaging investment banks. F-Prime estimates the total market capitalization of fintech could grow from $947 billion to $1.2 trillion.

Whether these companies get their desired price is another matter. By year-end, only 2 of the 11 companies were trading above their IPO price. Chime was privately valued at $25 billion but went public at $13.5 billion. Klarna went public at $17.3 billion but ended the year at $10.9 billion.

With heightened geopolitical tensions and an uncertain macroeconomic outlook, companies still on the sidelines may find that the tender offer playbook is the path of least resistance. For now, at least, liquidity in private markets remains sufficient to absorb the supply of these unicorns.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7618554

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is a tender offer and why are companies like Stripe and Plaid choosing this method over a traditional IPO?

AA tender offer is a secondary transaction that allows new or existing investors to buy shares directly from employees and early shareholders. It provides liquidity without diluting the company's equity and avoids the regulatory and structural burdens of an IPO. Companies like Stripe and Plaid are choosing this method because it allows them to access capital and provide liquidity while remaining private, bypassing the complexities and scrutiny of public markets.

QHow has the private market's growth impacted the timeline for companies to go public?

AThe growth of private markets has significantly extended the average time companies wait before going public. Currently, companies wait an average of 16 years to IPO, which is 33% longer than a decade ago. This is due to the abundance of private capital, which allows companies to stay private longer and achieve valuations that rival or exceed those of large public companies.

QWhat are some of the risks associated with retail investors gaining access to private company stocks through vehicles like Robinhood's Ventures Fund I?

ARisks include structural complexity, as brokers often bundle these stocks into special purpose vehicles (SPVs) that may hold positions in other instruments, creating overlapping counterparty risks and fees that obscure what investors actually own. There is also a lack of valuation transparency, as private company valuations are based on infrequent funding rounds, limiting price discovery and creating a gap between reported NAV and what public markets are willing to pay.

QWhat recent regulatory changes have made alternative assets like private market investments more accessible to retail investors?

ALast summer, the Trump administration signed an executive order that paved the way for 401(k) retirement accounts, which hold $8.7 trillion in assets, to invest in alternative assets like cryptocurrencies and private markets. This change has significantly increased retail investor access to these previously institution-only asset classes.

QDespite the rise of tender offers, did the IPO market see a resurgence in 2025, and what was the performance of these newly public companies?

AYes, the IPO market significantly rebounded in 2025, with 11 venture-backed fintech companies going public, including Circle and Klarna. However, by the end of the year, only 2 of these 11 companies were trading above their IPO price. Many companies, such as Chime and Klarna, went public at valuations significantly lower than their previous private valuations.

Leituras Relacionadas

Should You Buy SpaceX Stock at $1.7 Trillion? Here's What the Market Is Worried About

SpaceX is preparing for a massive IPO aiming to raise around $75 billion at a valuation of approximately $1.75 trillion. While its achievements in reusable rockets and the profitable Starlink satellite internet service are clear, the market is concerned about the aggressive valuation. Key issues include: the current $1.75 trillion valuation, which is about 94 times 2025 revenue, seems to price in not just existing businesses but also unproven future ventures like AI infrastructure and orbital data centers. Financially, while Starlink is profitable, the AI division, bolstered by the acquisition of xAI, is incurring massive losses and consuming the majority of capital expenditures. This acquisition also introduced complex related-party financing arrangements and debt onto SpaceX's balance sheet. Furthermore, corporate governance poses a challenge. SpaceX's dual-class share structure ensures founder Elon Musk retains absolute control, limiting ordinary shareholders' influence over high-risk, long-term strategic decisions. The future success of ambitious projects like the Starship rocket—critical for lowering costs and enabling new services—remains a significant variable for the valuation. In summary, the market's apprehension (FUD) centers not on doubting SpaceX's past technological triumphs but on questioning how much premium public investors should pay for a future that combines proven profits with highly speculative and capital-intensive new ventures, all under a governance structure that offers limited shareholder oversight.

marsbitHá 41m

Should You Buy SpaceX Stock at $1.7 Trillion? Here's What the Market Is Worried About

marsbitHá 41m

Breaking the DeFi Cascading Liquidation Curse: Vitalik Proposes a New Solution

Vitalik Buterin has proposed a new DeFi design to eliminate the automatic liquidation mechanism that causes market instability during sharp downturns. The current system, used by protocols like Aave, triggers forced sales when collateral value falls below a threshold, often exacerbating price drops and creating systemic selling pressure. Buterin's alternative model is based on splitting an asset like ETH into two synthetic option-like tokens, P and N, pegged to a price index. Their combined value always equals one ETH. Instead of sudden liquidation, a position's value gradually drifts from its target peg if the market moves. Users must proactively rebalance their holdings to maintain their desired exposure, transferring the management burden from the protocol to the user or automated tools. A key advantage is the reduced reliance on real-time oracles. Pricing decisions are deferred until contract expiry, allowing for more robust, fault-tolerant oracle designs. This removes a clear liquidation threshold that speculators can target for manipulation or MEV extraction. However, significant challenges remain. Frequent rebalancing could incur high slippage and transaction costs, necessitating new liquidity provider models. The design is better suited for hedging instruments than for stablecoins requiring a rigid 1:1 peg. While not an immediate replacement for existing systems, the proposal challenges the foundational assumption that instantaneous forced liquidation is an unavoidable necessity in DeFi, opening the door for fundamentally different risk management architectures.

marsbitHá 46m

Breaking the DeFi Cascading Liquidation Curse: Vitalik Proposes a New Solution

marsbitHá 46m

The End of Single-Factor Cryptography

The article "The End of Single-Factor Crypto" posits a fundamental shift in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. It argues the era where crypto asset valuations were predominantly driven by, and correlated with, Bitcoin's price is ending. The space is bifurcating into two distinct economies: endogenous and exogenous. The endogenous economy represents traditional crypto, where token and project values are directly tied to crypto market prices. The emerging exogenous economy comprises projects and businesses that may utilize blockchain technology or tokens but derive their fundamental value from external, non-crypto factors like consumer demand, subscription revenue, or real-world utility. Examples include AI inference platforms like Venice, fintech lenders using blockchain for efficiency, and stablecoin/payment infrastructure companies acquired by giants like Mastercard and Stripe. This shift means investment analysis must change. For exogenous assets, evaluating traditional business fundamentals—such as revenue streams, unit economics, and competitive moats—becomes more critical than tracking Bitcoin charts. While endogenous assets like Bitcoin remain relevant, the growth of the exogenous category is driven by measurable demand independent of crypto price cycles, paving the way for a new, more diversified market phase. Consequently, crypto is evolving from a single-factor, reflexive asset class into a multifaceted ecosystem with varied drivers and investment theses.

marsbitHá 46m

The End of Single-Factor Cryptography

marsbitHá 46m

Morning Post | Bitmine Plans to Raise $300 Million Through Preferred Stock Issuance; Polymarket Accuses Kalshi of Commercial Espionage

ChainCatcher's Daily Crypto Brief: Key developments from the past 24 hours include significant funding moves, regulatory actions, and market predictions. Bitmine announced a $300 million preferred stock fundraising. Polymarket accused rival prediction platform Kalshi of corporate espionage, citing numerous suspicious coincidences in product launches, a claim Kalshi strongly denied. The U.S. Department of Justice, in a joint "Disruption Week" anti-fraud operation with companies like Coinbase and Meta, froze over $3.8 million in cryptocurrency linked to scams. In infrastructure news, Macau completed its integration with the multi-central bank digital currency bridge, mBridge, aiming to build efficient cross-border payment channels. Cosmos Labs acquired the block explorer Mintscan. Market-wise, Geoffrey Kendrick, Standard Chartered's Head of Digital Assets Research, stated Bitcoin is nearing a bottom around $63,000, maintaining a year-end target of $100,000. He noted stability in U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF holdings. Ahead of SpaceX's anticipated IPO, internal insiders at Rocket Lab (RKLB) sold over $18.41 million in stock. In tokenization, Goldman Sachs partnered with Apex and Archax to launch a tokenized real estate fund. The meme token tracker GMGN reported the top trending tokens: on Ethereum, HEX, SHIB, LINK, PEPE, mUSD; on Solana, TROLL, swarms, WORLDCUP, neet, Buttcoin; and on Base, PEPE, toby, ODDS, ELSA, SKI.

链捕手Há 1h

Morning Post | Bitmine Plans to Raise $300 Million Through Preferred Stock Issuance; Polymarket Accuses Kalshi of Commercial Espionage

链捕手Há 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片