Why Base’s $15.2B trading boom raises questions about L2 tokens

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-02-10Última atualização em 2026-02-10

Resumo

Base is shifting its focus from creator rewards and social features to prioritize trading, as evidenced by the shutdown of its Creator Rewards program and Farcaster-powered social feed. The program, which distributed around $450,000 to 17,000 creators over seven months, is being discontinued to allow the platform to concentrate on tradable assets. This strategic pivot raises questions about the potential role of a native Base token, especially since discussions about its launch have quieted recently. The network's strong performance suggests a token may not be necessary. Over the past 30 days, Base-linked DEXs processed $15.2 billion in trading volume, with Aerodrome Finance (AERO) leading much of the activity. The network has also generated $190.6 million in cumulative fees and revenue, demonstrating its ability to monetize usage directly without relying on a token for growth. Coinbase's recent Super Bowl ad further indicates a focus on brand building and streamlined priorities. With trading volume and fees effectively serving the function a token typically would, a native Base token appears optional rather than essential.

The Base app is dropping creator rewards and moving its focus on trading, which says a lot about where Coinbase sees traction today.

But that raises an important question. What role, if any, will a native Base token play, especially since talk of launching one has gone noticeably quiet in recent months?

Putting trading first

Coinbase is shutting down the app’s Creator Rewards program and its Farcaster-powered social feed, with its focus now on tradable assets. The Creator Rewards initiative, launched in July, was designed to encourage posts and engagement by paying users for activity.

In practice, the payouts were modest. Base says around $450,000 was shared among roughly 17,000 creators over seven months, averaging about $26 per person.

Source: X

According to creator Jesse Pollak, the decision came down to focus. As the app evolved, the team realized it worked best when it did fewer things well. He stated,

“…as we’ve rolled the app out, we’ve realized we need to do less, better. and by focusing on tradable assets, that’s exactly what we can do.”

The Creator Rewards program will officially end this week, with final payouts scheduled for the 18th of February. Pollak also noted that Base App was never an ideal home for Farcaster’s social feed, and expects most users to return to Farcaster’s native app.

Importantly, the changes do not affect Base’s Creator Coins feature, which remains active.

AMBCrypto previously reported that Coinbase was considering launching a native token called BASE, and that it was likely to happen this year. However, there’s not been much talk on that front since.

Do they really need a native token, though?

For now, it looks like they don’t.

Source: DeFiLlama

Over the past 30 days, Base-linked DEXs have processed $15.2 billion in trading volume, with Aerodrome Finance [AERO] alone accounting for the bulk of that activity. That puts them ahead of many multi-chain competitors.

Source: Token Terminal

More importantly, the network is generating real money. Data per Token Terminal showed that Base has earned $190.6 million in cumulative fees and revenue to date, with steady weekly inflows.

Instead of relying on a token to bootstrap growth, Base is already monetizing usage directly.

Source: Twitter

In more recent news, this year’s Super Bowl featured just one major crypto ad, and it was from Coinbase. The streamlining of priorities makes sense as Coinbase seemingly looks to build a bigger brand.


Final Thoughts

  • Base is prioritizing trading and revenue, with volume and fees doing the work a token usually would.
  • With growth already monetized, a native Base token looks optional rather than necessary.
Next: Cardano: Why CME’s ADA futures sparked 3% drop instead of a rally
Share
  • Share
  • Tweet

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhy is Base shutting down its Creator Rewards program and social feed?

ABase is shutting down these features to focus on doing fewer things well, specifically by concentrating on tradable assets, as the team realized the app works best with a more streamlined approach.

QHow much trading volume have Base-linked DEXs processed in the past 30 days?

ABase-linked DEXs have processed $15.2 billion in trading volume over the past 30 days, with Aerodrome Finance (AERO) accounting for the bulk of that activity.

QWhat is the current status of a potential native Base token launch?

ATalk of launching a native Base token has gone noticeably quiet in recent months, and with the network already generating significant revenue through fees, a token now seems optional rather than necessary.

QHow much revenue has Base generated from fees to date?

ABase has earned $190.6 million in cumulative fees and revenue to date, according to data from Token Terminal.

QWhat does Base's shift in focus and recent performance suggest about the need for a Layer 2 native token?

ABase's strong trading volume and revenue generation demonstrate that it can monetize usage directly without relying on a native token for growth, making a token launch appear optional rather than essential.

Leituras Relacionadas

Gary Yang: Agent Economy and AI Submicroeconomics

**Title:** Agent Economy and AI Sub-Microeconomics - Gary Yang **Summary:** Following the AI singularity, the pace of evolution has accelerated rapidly, creating new generational disparities in technological advancement globally. While many regions are still grappling with single-agent bottlenecks, Silicon Valley has moved ahead into the next dimension: the Agent Economy and A2A ecosystems. The article outlines six key areas of this emerging paradigm: 1. **AI Payment Competition & H2A Bottlenecks:** A fierce battle for AI Agent payment protocol standards is underway (e.g., MPP, x402). However, most current efforts remain Human-to-Agent (H2A), essentially grafting AI onto traditional human-centric commerce, which creates a non-AI-native bottleneck. The true potential lies in Agent-to-Agent (A2A) autonomous economies. 2. **Agent Economy & the Inevitable A2A Trend:** The Agent Economy is defined by autonomous AI Agents creating, exchanging, and capitalizing value as independent economic actors. The A2A ecosystem describes their interactions. This represents the next major investment frontier, akin to the early days of e-commerce or DeFi, but with faster iteration and an AI-native, efficiency-first perspective that often diverges from human needs. 3. **AI Protocol vs. Crypto Protocol:** AI Protocols are the foundational rules for Agent interaction in an open network (communication, discovery, collaboration), akin to the governance and economic laws of the AI world. Currently, they focus on communication and weak boundaries, unlike Crypto Protocols which emphasize asset rights and clear ownership. While they appear different due to political-economic factors and legacy system constraints, their eventual convergence into a unified Digital Protocol system is seen as inevitable, driven by first principles. 4. **AI Agent Sub-Microeconomics & Biological Analogy:** AI Agent economics differ fundamentally from human economics: higher frequency/lower value transactions, energy/value direct correlation, efficiency-driven (not emotional) decisions, task-oriented (not consumption-oriented) behavior, and near-zero organizational/communication costs. A powerful analogy frames the Agent economy as a biological system: the LLM is the nucleus, the Agent harness is the cytoplasm, the Agent itself is a cell, its communication protocol is the cell membrane, and external tools (Skills, Prompts) are the extracellular environment. 5. **The Inevitability of AIFi & FinChip:** AIFi (AI Finance) represents the financial system where AI-native value within the Agent economy is tokenized and exchanged. Unlike TradFi/DeFi where value resides *in* finance, in AIFi, value originates *in* AI, and finance becomes its form. This shift is enabled by Agents taking over value discovery. FinChip (Financial Chip) is introduced as a key infrastructure—a fusion of AI autonomy and crypto smart contracts—forming intelligent financial assets to power the future A2A economy. 6. **AI-Native as a Paradigm Shift:** Adopting AI is not akin to "Internet+". It requires AI-Native thinking—designing systems based on first principles, the shortest energy-value path, and maximum efficiency. This abstract, counter-intuitive logic poses a significant, ongoing challenge for all practitioners, as effective, generalized upgrade methodologies will be slow to emerge in this rapidly evolving landscape.

链捕手Há 5m

Gary Yang: Agent Economy and AI Submicroeconomics

链捕手Há 5m

From 'The Big Short' to San Francisco: The Revelry and Dizziness Within the AI Bubble

From "The Big Short" to San Francisco: The Frenzy and Dizziness in the AI Bubble The article captures the intense, frenetic atmosphere in San Francisco, the epicenter of the current AI boom. Drawing a parallel to the "smell of money" from *The Big Short*, the author observes a city gripped by a singular status game centered entirely on AI and technology. This manifests in a palpable, caffeine-fueled anxiety ("people are shaking"), rampant comparison using vanity metrics like funding rounds, and pervasive "Big Bubble Behavior." The piece explores the city's stark contrasts: its dystopian streets versus beautiful vistas, and the disconnect between the doomsday concerns of some AI researchers and the optimistic, growth-focused "GTM" teams. It critiques the obsession with "math genius" founders as the new ticket to outsized returns, akin to scouting sports prodigies. Referencing economic historian Carlota Perez's "frenzy phase" and Karl Polanyi's "double movement," the author frames the boom as a period where financial speculation detaches from fundamentals, with society potentially becoming subordinate to a new economic force driven by "geniuses in data centers." Ultimately, while acknowledging the unprecedented wealth creation and party-like energy, the article concludes with cautionary advice: when the music is playing, you should dance, but don't get drunk. The core reminder is to stay grounded, avoid distorted judgment, and maintain perspective amidst the euphoria.

marsbitHá 7m

From 'The Big Short' to San Francisco: The Revelry and Dizziness Within the AI Bubble

marsbitHá 7m

Is AI Creating a New Class of 'Information Poor'?

AI is generating a new kind of "information poverty." The core issue isn't that AI denies answers to the poor; it's that it provides abundant, cheap, and plausible-sounding answers to everyone. This availability shifts the true scarcity from obtaining answers to possessing the **judgment to evaluate them** and the access to turn them into real-world opportunities. New information poverty thus describes those who have AI tools and outputs, but lack the complementary skills, authorization, and contextual experience to critically assess and act on them. Research reveals a multi-layered divide: access to AI is stratified by income and platform design (e.g., premium vs. free, embedded tools). In workplaces, usage heavily favors higher-paid, more experienced, or formally trained employees, with AI often automating entry-level tasks that were traditional stepping stones. Crucially, the heaviest users are often mid-career professionals whose existing expertise allows them to effectively judge and leverage AI outputs, while novices risk over-relying on them without building judgment. While controlled experiments show AI can significantly boost low-skilled workers' performance, real-world adoption and benefit are constrained by unequal social and organizational structures. Historically, general-purpose technologies first reward those with existing complementary capital. AI, by affecting judgment-based work, may accelerate and deepen this initial inequality gap, even if it narrows over decades. The danger lies in the illusion of competence it creates, potentially stunting the very critical thinking needed in an era where judgment is paramount.

marsbitHá 40m

Is AI Creating a New Class of 'Information Poor'?

marsbitHá 40m

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

On June 5th, South Korea's stock market experienced a sharp decline, with major chipmakers like Samsung and SK Hynix dropping nearly 10%. Amidst the turmoil, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang's visit to Seoul played a dramatic role in boosting market sentiment. Following a dinner meeting with SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won and SK Hynix CEO Kwak Noh-Jung, Huang confirmed that NVIDIA's new Vera CPU will utilize SK Hynix DRAM. The companies announced a multi-year technical partnership to co-develop next-generation memory for NVIDIA's AI infrastructure, covering products from data centers to personal AI and robotics. This collaboration extends beyond memory supply. SK Hynix is integrating NVIDIA's AI and Omniverse platform into its own semiconductor design and manufacturing processes, including computational lithography and creating digital twins of its fabrication plants for autonomous operation. While strengthening ties with SK Hynix, NVIDIA is diversifying its supply chain for the upcoming HBM4 memory, with Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron all certified as suppliers for its Vera Rubin platform. Despite this, Huang warned that the global chip shortage, driven by relentless demand from AI factory construction, is expected to persist for several years across the entire supply chain. His visit underscores NVIDIA's systematic effort to deepen integration with South Korea's broader tech industry.

marsbitHá 1h

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

marsbitHá 1h

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

The Nasdaq plunged 4.18% on June 5, 2026, its worst single-day drop in over a year, as a much stronger-than-expected US jobs report triggered fears of economic overheating and delayed Federal Reserve interest rate cuts. The selloff, centered on high-valuation tech and AI stocks like Nvidia and Broadcom, spread across major indices. The article examines whether this signals a market top. The strong May non-farm payrolls data, nearly double expectations, pushed bond yields higher, directly hurting rate-sensitive tech stocks. This exposed vulnerabilities in the crowded AI trade, where valuations had soared on narratives of infinite growth, despite emerging signs of slowing order momentum and corporate AI monetization challenges. Prior to the drop, market indicators flashed warning signs: historically high valuations (e.g., Shiller CAPE ratio near 39.5), extreme bullish sentiment, and high levels of leverage. Technical charts showed key support levels being breached. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears, citing risks of "stagflation" and AI bubble comparisons to the dot-com era, warn of a potential significant correction. Bulls view the drop as a healthy correction within a bull market, underpinned by a strong economy and expected corporate earnings growth of around 7% in 2026. The immediate future hinges on upcoming key events: the May CPI inflation data and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will critically shape market expectations for the Fed's rate path. The article concludes that conditions for a major market top are aligning, marking a fragile transition from narrative-driven gains to a phase demanding validation from macroeconomic data and corporate fundamentals. Caution is advised.

marsbitHá 1h

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片