When Tether No Longer Clings to the Dollar...

比推Publicado em 2025-12-09Última atualização em 2025-12-09

Resumo

Tether, the issuer of the world's largest stablecoin USDT, is shifting its reserve strategy in anticipation of lower interest rates. While its business model thrived during high-rate periods—earning billions from U.S. Treasury holdings—future Fed rate cuts could reduce its interest income significantly. To adapt, Tether has diversified into gold (over 100 tons) and Bitcoin (over 90,000 BTC), which together make up 12-13% of its reserves. These assets historically perform well in low-rate, high-liquidity environments, potentially offsetting lost Treasury yield. However, rating agencies like S&P have expressed concern, downgrading Tether’s stability rating due to increased exposure to volatile assets like Bitcoin and reduced transparency. The key challenge remains maintaining USDT’s dollar peg while navigating this new macroeconomic phase.

Author: Prathik Desai

Original Title: Gold, Bills, Thrills

Compiled and Edited by: BitpushNews


When I think of stablecoins, I often see them merely as a bridge between the US dollar and the blockchain, nothing more. They can be powerful infrastructure components, silently supporting the operation of on-chain products in ways that are often easily overlooked.

As a business model, stablecoin issuers have direct revenue, which is tied to the interest rates published by the US Federal Reserve. The higher the interest rates, the more income the US Treasury bonds backing their stablecoin circulation bring to the issuers.

However, in recent years, the world's largest stablecoin issuer by circulation has adjusted its reserve strategy to better adapt to the macroeconomic environment.

In this quantitative analysis, I will explore why and how Tether (Tether) is partially replacing its massive interest-earning engine with gold and Bitcoin to cope with the upcoming shift in the interest rate cycle.

Let's begin.

The US Treasury Machine

A glance at Tether's US Treasury reserves reveals how it became a profit machine during periods of high interest rates.

Over the past few years, USDT holders earned 0%, while Tether earned about 5% on approximately $1 trillion in US Treasury bonds.

Even with average interest rates relatively low for most of 2025, around 4.25%, as of September 30, 2025, Tether reported a net profit of over $10 billion for the year. In contrast, the second-largest stablecoin issuer, Circle, reported a net loss of $202 million for the same period.

For most of the past three years, Tether's business model perfectly aligned with the macroeconomic backdrop. The Federal Reserve maintained interest rates between 4.5% and 5.5%, and Tether held over $1 trillion in US bonds, with each percentage point of yield bringing in approximately $1 billion in annual revenue.

While most cryptocurrency companies struggled with operational losses, Tether accumulated tens of billions in surplus simply by going long on short-term government debt.

But what happens when the interest rate cycle turns, and rate cuts are expected in the coming years?

The Interest Rate Cycle Problem

CME FedWatch data shows that by December 2026, there is over a 75% probability that the federal funds rate will drop from the current 3.75-4% range to between 2.75-3% and 3.25-3.50%. This is already a significant drop from the 5% level that Tether relied on for profits in 2024.

Lower interest rates could compress the interest income Tether earns from its US Treasury holdings.

A one-percentage-point drop in overall US economic liquidity could reduce Tether's annual income by at least $15 billion. This exceeds 10% of its annualized net profit for 2025.

So, how will Tether protect its profitability in this world? After Jerome Powell's term ends in 2026, a new Fed Chair is more likely to follow the expectations of US President Donald Trump for more significant and faster rate cuts.

It is at this point that Tether's reserve strategy diverges most significantly from any other stablecoin issuer.

Diversification Strategy

Between September 2021 and October 2022, Tether reduced its reliance on commercial paper (unsecured short-term debt instruments issued by large corporations) by over 99%. From over $30 billion in September 2021, it was cut to almost zero.

It replaced these assets with US-backed Treasury bonds to increase transparency for investors.

During the same period, Tether's US Treasury reserves grew from less than $25 billion to $40 billion.

Between Q3 2023 and Q3 2025, the composition of Tether's reserve assets changed, incorporating asset classes rarely seen on the balance sheets of other stablecoin issuers.

As of September 2025, Tether had accumulated approximately over 100 tons of gold, valued at around $13 billion. It also held over 90,000 BTC, worth nearly $10 billion. Together, these account for about 12-13% of its reserves.

In contrast, its competitor Circle held only 74 Bitcoin, worth about $8 million.

Why the Shift Now?

The increase in gold and Bitcoin allocations coincided with the period when the forward rate curve no longer predicted rate hikes.

In response to rising inflation, interest rates jumped from less than 1% to over 5% between May 2022 and August 2023. During this time, maximizing income by investing in US Treasuries made economic sense. But once interest rates peaked in 2023 and no further hikes were expected, Tether saw it as the right moment to start preparing for the turn in the interest rate cycle.

Why Choose Gold and Bitcoin When Yields Fall?

Gold tends to perform well when US Treasury yields fall. This is driven by expectations of rising inflation and the reduced opportunity cost of holding gold instead of low-yielding US Treasuries.

We saw this happen this year; when the Fed cut rates by 50 basis points, gold prices rose over 30% between August and November.

Even during the COVID-19 pandemic, when the Fed cut rates by 1.5 percentage points to inject liquidity into the economy, gold prices rose 40% in the subsequent five months.

Bitcoin has recently exhibited similar macro behavior. As monetary policy eases and liquidity expands, Bitcoin typically reacts like a high-beta asset.

Therefore, while a high-interest-rate environment allows for income through US Treasuries, allocating to Bitcoin and gold can provide potential upside in a low-interest-rate environment.

This allows Tether to book unrealized gains and even realize some profits by selling gold or Bitcoin from its vault, particularly during phases when interest rates are low and income is squeezed.

However, not everyone approves of the increased exposure to gold and Bitcoin on Tether's balance sheet.

The Peg Problem

Although US Treasuries still account for 63% of Tether's reserves, the increased exposure to riskier assets like Bitcoin and unsecured loans has raised concerns among rating agencies.

Two weeks ago, S&P Global Ratings reassessed Tether's ability to maintain the USDT peg to the US dollar from Tier 4 (Constrained) to Tier 5 (Weak). It noted the increased exposure to corporate bonds, precious metals, Bitcoin, and secured loans in its reserves.

The agency pointed out that these assets account for almost 24% of the total reserves. More troubling for the agency is that, although US Treasuries still back most of the reserves, the USDT issuer provides limited transparency and disclosure regarding the composition of these riskier asset classes.

Furthermore, there are concerns about undermining the peg of the USDT token to the US dollar.

S&P stated in its report: "Bitcoin now accounts for about 5.6% of USDT's circulation, exceeding the 3.9% over-collateralization margin, indicating that the reserves can no longer fully absorb the impact of its value decline. Therefore, a decline in Bitcoin's value combined with a decline in the value of other high-risk assets could reduce reserve coverage and lead to USDT being undercollateralized."

On one hand, Tether's shift in reserve strategy seems a reasonable measure to cope with the upcoming low-interest-rate environment. When rate cuts come—and they will—this $13 billion profit engine will struggle to sustain itself. The upside potential of the held gold and Bitcoin could help offset some of the income loss.

On the other hand, this shift has also rightly made rating agencies nervous. The primary task of a stablecoin issuer is to protect its peg to the underlying currency (in this case, the US dollar). Everything else, including the revenue it generates, its reserve diversification strategy, and the unrealized gains it can obtain, becomes secondary. If the peg fails, the business collapses.

When circulating tokens are backed by volatile assets, the risk profile of the peg changes. A sufficiently large impairment of Bitcoin—which we have been experiencing over the past two months—would not necessarily break the USDT peg but would narrow the buffer between the two.

Tether's story will unfold with the upcoming monetary policy easing. This week's rate cut decision will be the first indicator to measure this stablecoin giant's ability to defend its peg and signal its future trajectory.

Let's wait and see.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original article link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7594373

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhy has Tether started diversifying its reserves to include assets like gold and Bitcoin?

ATether is diversifying its reserves to prepare for the upcoming shift in the interest rate cycle. As the Federal Reserve is expected to lower interest rates, the yield on U.S. Treasuries will decrease, compressing Tether's interest income. Gold and Bitcoin have historically performed well in low-rate environments, offering potential upside to offset this income loss.

QWhat is the current composition of Tether's reserves, and how does it differ from its competitor Circle?

AAs of September 2025, Tether's reserves consist of approximately 63% U.S. Treasuries, over 100 tons of gold (worth ~$13B), and over 90,000 BTC (worth ~$10B). In contrast, its competitor Circle holds only 74 Bitcoin, worth $8 million, showing a vastly different and more conservative strategy.

QWhat concerns have rating agencies like S&P Global raised about Tether's new reserve strategy?

AS&P Global Ratings downgraded its assessment of Tether's ability to maintain the USDT peg from 'constrained' to 'weak.' The agency is concerned about the increased exposure to higher-risk asset classes like corporate bonds, precious metals, Bitcoin, and secured loans, which now make up nearly 24% of its reserves. It also cited limited transparency and the risk that a drop in Bitcoin's value could reduce reserve coverage and lead to USDT being undercollateralized.

QHow did Tether's business model perform during the period of high interest rates?

ADuring the high-interest-rate period, Tether's business model was extremely profitable. It held over $1 trillion in U.S. Treasuries and earned a yield of around 5%. Even with lower average rates of about 4.25% for much of 2025, Tether reported a net profit exceeding $10 billion for the first nine months of the year, far outperforming competitors like Circle, which reported a net loss.

QHow do gold and Bitcoin typically behave in a low interest rate environment, and why is this beneficial for Tether?

AGold tends to perform well when U.S. Treasury yields fall, as it is driven by expectations of rising inflation and a lower opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets. Bitcoin often acts as a high-beta asset, reacting positively to expansionary monetary policy and increased liquidity. This potential for price appreciation allows Tether to book unrealized gains or realize profits by selling these assets, helping to offset the squeezed income from lower-yielding Treasuries.

Leituras Relacionadas

Li Fei-Fei's Latest Long-Form Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Call Themselves World Models, We Need a Taxonomy

In a new article, Dr. Fei-Fei Li addresses the widespread and often inconsistent use of the term "world model" in AI. She proposes a clear, functional taxonomy rooted in the classic Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) loop (agent → action → state → observation → agent). According to this framework, current systems called "world models" are different projections of this loop, categorized by their primary output: 1. **Renderers**: Output observations (pixels). Their goal is visual fidelity for human consumption (e.g., video generation models like Sora). They are the most commercially mature but are limited by a focus on appearance over physical accuracy. 2. **Simulators**: Output states (geometric, physical, dynamic representations). They provide a structurally accurate world for both human professionals (e.g., architects) and computational agents (e.g., robots for training). Li argues simulators are the crucial, underappreciated bridge, as they can underpin both rendering and planning. 3. **Planners**: Output actions. Given an observation and a goal, they decide what an agent should do next (e.g., robotic action models). This area is highly promising but remains the least mature for real-world deployment. Li highlights a key trend: the boundaries between these three categories are beginning to blur, as they all rely on a shared underlying understanding of geometry, physics, and dynamics. The logical endpoint is a unified world foundation model capable of switching between rendering, simulation, and planning based on downstream needs. This convergence, she concludes, is central to advancing spatial intelligence—enabling machines not just to talk about the world, but to truly understand, imagine, and interact with it.

marsbitHá 41m

Li Fei-Fei's Latest Long-Form Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Call Themselves World Models, We Need a Taxonomy

marsbitHá 41m

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

A Forbes feature delves into the state of stablecoin-based cross-border payments, noting rapid growth but a key shortfall: while faster and more accessible, they are not yet cheaper. At a recent industry conference in Mexico City, optimism about technology, regulation, and volume was tempered by discussions with practitioners. The core issue is liquidity. Traditional FX brokers charge 60-70 basis points, and stablecoins promise to slash this to 2-5 basis points. However, this theoretical cost advantage cannot be realized until deep liquidity pools are established at scale, requiring significant institutional capital inflow. A major adoption barrier is trust. Businesses often rely on long-standing relationships with traditional brokers, valuing reliability over marginal cost savings. This shift will be gradual. Furthermore, successful companies in the space are not positioning themselves as replacements for legacy systems like SWIFT, but as complements. They leverage stablecoins for speed while using traditional rails for their standardization and reliability in ensuring accurate payment details—a critical factor for supplier payments to avoid customs issues. Companies like Caliza, experiencing high monthly growth, exemplify this hybrid approach. The industry anticipates consolidation, as long-term viability will depend on securing the essential trifecta: proper licensing, robust fiat on/off-ramps, and deep liquidity. Without these, firms risk being mere intermediaries rather than building sustainable businesses.

marsbitHá 42m

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

marsbitHá 42m

Li Feifei's Latest Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Claim to Have 'World Models,' We Need a Taxonomy

"World Model" has become a widely used yet ambiguous term in AI. Drawing from the classic POMDP framework (agent → action → state → observation), this article proposes a functional taxonomy to clarify the concept. It identifies three distinct types, categorized by their output in the perception-action loop: 1. **Renderers**: Output visual observations (pixels). These models, like advanced video generators, prioritize visual fidelity but often lack underlying physical accuracy. 2. **Simulators**: Output the state of the world (geometry, physics, dynamics). They provide a structurally accurate representation for professionals (e.g., architects) and serve as training environments for robots and AI agents. 3. **Planners**: Output actions. Given an observation and a goal, they determine what an agent should do next, closing the perception-action loop (e.g., vision-language-action models). While renderers are currently the most commercially mature and planners are the most aspirational, the article argues that **simulators are the crucial, underappreciated hub**. By working at the level of geometry and physics, a simulator can project upwards to create visuals for humans and downwards to predict action consequences for agents. The future lies in the convergence of these three functions. Emerging research and products, like World Labs' Marble model which outputs both visual splats and physical collision meshes, are beginning to blur these boundaries. The logical endpoint is a unified world foundation model capable of rendering, simulating, and planning based on a shared understanding of spatial and temporal structures—ultimately enabling machines to understand, imagine, and interact with the physical world.

链捕手Há 53m

Li Feifei's Latest Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Claim to Have 'World Models,' We Need a Taxonomy

链捕手Há 53m

Trading

Spot
活动图片