When Tether No Longer Clings to the Dollar...

比推Publicado em 2025-12-09Última atualização em 2025-12-09

Resumo

Tether, the issuer of the world's largest stablecoin USDT, is shifting its reserve strategy in anticipation of lower interest rates. While its business model thrived during high-rate periods—earning billions from U.S. Treasury holdings—future Fed rate cuts could reduce its interest income significantly. To adapt, Tether has diversified into gold (over 100 tons) and Bitcoin (over 90,000 BTC), which together make up 12-13% of its reserves. These assets historically perform well in low-rate, high-liquidity environments, potentially offsetting lost Treasury yield. However, rating agencies like S&P have expressed concern, downgrading Tether’s stability rating due to increased exposure to volatile assets like Bitcoin and reduced transparency. The key challenge remains maintaining USDT’s dollar peg while navigating this new macroeconomic phase.

Author: Prathik Desai

Original Title: Gold, Bills, Thrills

Compiled and Edited by: BitpushNews


When I think of stablecoins, I often see them merely as a bridge between the US dollar and the blockchain, nothing more. They can be powerful infrastructure components, silently supporting the operation of on-chain products in ways that are often easily overlooked.

As a business model, stablecoin issuers have direct revenue, which is tied to the interest rates published by the US Federal Reserve. The higher the interest rates, the more income the US Treasury bonds backing their stablecoin circulation bring to the issuers.

However, in recent years, the world's largest stablecoin issuer by circulation has adjusted its reserve strategy to better adapt to the macroeconomic environment.

In this quantitative analysis, I will explore why and how Tether (Tether) is partially replacing its massive interest-earning engine with gold and Bitcoin to cope with the upcoming shift in the interest rate cycle.

Let's begin.

The US Treasury Machine

A glance at Tether's US Treasury reserves reveals how it became a profit machine during periods of high interest rates.

Over the past few years, USDT holders earned 0%, while Tether earned about 5% on approximately $1 trillion in US Treasury bonds.

Even with average interest rates relatively low for most of 2025, around 4.25%, as of September 30, 2025, Tether reported a net profit of over $10 billion for the year. In contrast, the second-largest stablecoin issuer, Circle, reported a net loss of $202 million for the same period.

For most of the past three years, Tether's business model perfectly aligned with the macroeconomic backdrop. The Federal Reserve maintained interest rates between 4.5% and 5.5%, and Tether held over $1 trillion in US bonds, with each percentage point of yield bringing in approximately $1 billion in annual revenue.

While most cryptocurrency companies struggled with operational losses, Tether accumulated tens of billions in surplus simply by going long on short-term government debt.

But what happens when the interest rate cycle turns, and rate cuts are expected in the coming years?

The Interest Rate Cycle Problem

CME FedWatch data shows that by December 2026, there is over a 75% probability that the federal funds rate will drop from the current 3.75-4% range to between 2.75-3% and 3.25-3.50%. This is already a significant drop from the 5% level that Tether relied on for profits in 2024.

Lower interest rates could compress the interest income Tether earns from its US Treasury holdings.

A one-percentage-point drop in overall US economic liquidity could reduce Tether's annual income by at least $15 billion. This exceeds 10% of its annualized net profit for 2025.

So, how will Tether protect its profitability in this world? After Jerome Powell's term ends in 2026, a new Fed Chair is more likely to follow the expectations of US President Donald Trump for more significant and faster rate cuts.

It is at this point that Tether's reserve strategy diverges most significantly from any other stablecoin issuer.

Diversification Strategy

Between September 2021 and October 2022, Tether reduced its reliance on commercial paper (unsecured short-term debt instruments issued by large corporations) by over 99%. From over $30 billion in September 2021, it was cut to almost zero.

It replaced these assets with US-backed Treasury bonds to increase transparency for investors.

During the same period, Tether's US Treasury reserves grew from less than $25 billion to $40 billion.

Between Q3 2023 and Q3 2025, the composition of Tether's reserve assets changed, incorporating asset classes rarely seen on the balance sheets of other stablecoin issuers.

As of September 2025, Tether had accumulated approximately over 100 tons of gold, valued at around $13 billion. It also held over 90,000 BTC, worth nearly $10 billion. Together, these account for about 12-13% of its reserves.

In contrast, its competitor Circle held only 74 Bitcoin, worth about $8 million.

Why the Shift Now?

The increase in gold and Bitcoin allocations coincided with the period when the forward rate curve no longer predicted rate hikes.

In response to rising inflation, interest rates jumped from less than 1% to over 5% between May 2022 and August 2023. During this time, maximizing income by investing in US Treasuries made economic sense. But once interest rates peaked in 2023 and no further hikes were expected, Tether saw it as the right moment to start preparing for the turn in the interest rate cycle.

Why Choose Gold and Bitcoin When Yields Fall?

Gold tends to perform well when US Treasury yields fall. This is driven by expectations of rising inflation and the reduced opportunity cost of holding gold instead of low-yielding US Treasuries.

We saw this happen this year; when the Fed cut rates by 50 basis points, gold prices rose over 30% between August and November.

Even during the COVID-19 pandemic, when the Fed cut rates by 1.5 percentage points to inject liquidity into the economy, gold prices rose 40% in the subsequent five months.

Bitcoin has recently exhibited similar macro behavior. As monetary policy eases and liquidity expands, Bitcoin typically reacts like a high-beta asset.

Therefore, while a high-interest-rate environment allows for income through US Treasuries, allocating to Bitcoin and gold can provide potential upside in a low-interest-rate environment.

This allows Tether to book unrealized gains and even realize some profits by selling gold or Bitcoin from its vault, particularly during phases when interest rates are low and income is squeezed.

However, not everyone approves of the increased exposure to gold and Bitcoin on Tether's balance sheet.

The Peg Problem

Although US Treasuries still account for 63% of Tether's reserves, the increased exposure to riskier assets like Bitcoin and unsecured loans has raised concerns among rating agencies.

Two weeks ago, S&P Global Ratings reassessed Tether's ability to maintain the USDT peg to the US dollar from Tier 4 (Constrained) to Tier 5 (Weak). It noted the increased exposure to corporate bonds, precious metals, Bitcoin, and secured loans in its reserves.

The agency pointed out that these assets account for almost 24% of the total reserves. More troubling for the agency is that, although US Treasuries still back most of the reserves, the USDT issuer provides limited transparency and disclosure regarding the composition of these riskier asset classes.

Furthermore, there are concerns about undermining the peg of the USDT token to the US dollar.

S&P stated in its report: "Bitcoin now accounts for about 5.6% of USDT's circulation, exceeding the 3.9% over-collateralization margin, indicating that the reserves can no longer fully absorb the impact of its value decline. Therefore, a decline in Bitcoin's value combined with a decline in the value of other high-risk assets could reduce reserve coverage and lead to USDT being undercollateralized."

On one hand, Tether's shift in reserve strategy seems a reasonable measure to cope with the upcoming low-interest-rate environment. When rate cuts come—and they will—this $13 billion profit engine will struggle to sustain itself. The upside potential of the held gold and Bitcoin could help offset some of the income loss.

On the other hand, this shift has also rightly made rating agencies nervous. The primary task of a stablecoin issuer is to protect its peg to the underlying currency (in this case, the US dollar). Everything else, including the revenue it generates, its reserve diversification strategy, and the unrealized gains it can obtain, becomes secondary. If the peg fails, the business collapses.

When circulating tokens are backed by volatile assets, the risk profile of the peg changes. A sufficiently large impairment of Bitcoin—which we have been experiencing over the past two months—would not necessarily break the USDT peg but would narrow the buffer between the two.

Tether's story will unfold with the upcoming monetary policy easing. This week's rate cut decision will be the first indicator to measure this stablecoin giant's ability to defend its peg and signal its future trajectory.

Let's wait and see.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original article link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7594373

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhy has Tether started diversifying its reserves to include assets like gold and Bitcoin?

ATether is diversifying its reserves to prepare for the upcoming shift in the interest rate cycle. As the Federal Reserve is expected to lower interest rates, the yield on U.S. Treasuries will decrease, compressing Tether's interest income. Gold and Bitcoin have historically performed well in low-rate environments, offering potential upside to offset this income loss.

QWhat is the current composition of Tether's reserves, and how does it differ from its competitor Circle?

AAs of September 2025, Tether's reserves consist of approximately 63% U.S. Treasuries, over 100 tons of gold (worth ~$13B), and over 90,000 BTC (worth ~$10B). In contrast, its competitor Circle holds only 74 Bitcoin, worth $8 million, showing a vastly different and more conservative strategy.

QWhat concerns have rating agencies like S&P Global raised about Tether's new reserve strategy?

AS&P Global Ratings downgraded its assessment of Tether's ability to maintain the USDT peg from 'constrained' to 'weak.' The agency is concerned about the increased exposure to higher-risk asset classes like corporate bonds, precious metals, Bitcoin, and secured loans, which now make up nearly 24% of its reserves. It also cited limited transparency and the risk that a drop in Bitcoin's value could reduce reserve coverage and lead to USDT being undercollateralized.

QHow did Tether's business model perform during the period of high interest rates?

ADuring the high-interest-rate period, Tether's business model was extremely profitable. It held over $1 trillion in U.S. Treasuries and earned a yield of around 5%. Even with lower average rates of about 4.25% for much of 2025, Tether reported a net profit exceeding $10 billion for the first nine months of the year, far outperforming competitors like Circle, which reported a net loss.

QHow do gold and Bitcoin typically behave in a low interest rate environment, and why is this beneficial for Tether?

AGold tends to perform well when U.S. Treasury yields fall, as it is driven by expectations of rising inflation and a lower opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets. Bitcoin often acts as a high-beta asset, reacting positively to expansionary monetary policy and increased liquidity. This potential for price appreciation allows Tether to book unrealized gains or realize profits by selling these assets, helping to offset the squeezed income from lower-yielding Treasuries.

Leituras Relacionadas

MiCA is coming for DeFi vaults, but regulation will be difficult

The European Commission is exploring whether to extend the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation to cover decentralized finance (DeFi) lending and borrowing, including lending vaults. These vaults, which channel billions into on-chain credit markets, present significant regulatory challenges because their decentralized structure doesn't map neatly onto existing financial frameworks. Their legal status is currently based on non-binding interpretations that they fall outside MiCA and EU fund rules. The article uses Morpho's decentralized lending protocol as an example, illustrating how responsibilities are divided among various participants (owner, curator, allocator, sentinel), making it difficult to identify a single "provider" to regulate. Experts warn that broadly categorizing "DeFi lending" could inadvertently capture vastly different structures. They argue that any regulatory approach should focus on the specific structure and control mechanisms of a vault, rather than using decentralization as a simple dividing line, and that DeFi lending may require a dedicated, carefully crafted framework distinct from traditional finance. The Commission's consultation closes on September 30, 2026. The core challenge for regulators is not just whether to regulate DeFi lending, but how to design rules that distinguish between different forms of on-chain lending and the entities that control them.

cointelegraphHá 43m

MiCA is coming for DeFi vaults, but regulation will be difficult

cointelegraphHá 43m

Grayscale Report: Financial Privacy in the AI Era, Why Zcash Should Not Be Overlooked?

Title: Grayscale Report: Financial Privacy in the AI Era – Why Zcash Should Not Be Overlooked The article argues that privacy is a fundamental, not niche, attribute of functional money. It highlights that technological shifts, like the rise of AI and stablecoins, are driving a new wave of public focus on financial privacy. Zcash, a decentralized digital currency similar to Bitcoin but with built-in privacy via zero-knowledge proofs, is positioned to address this need. Unlike transparent blockchains, Zcash offers users the option to conduct "shielded" transactions that hide sender, receiver, and amount while remaining verifiable. The report details Zcash's evolution, noting key upgrades that improved usability and security. It points to rising on-chain usage of privacy features as evidence of real demand. Currently, ZEC holds a minimal share (~0.4%) of the total crypto market cap. Grayscale suggests this reflects a market assumption that privacy is a marginal concern. The investment thesis hinges on a potential market re-evaluation: if privacy is recognized as a core monetary feature in an era of enhanced surveillance, Zcash's current valuation represents significant upside potential. Key risks discussed include regulatory challenges, historical trusted setup concerns for older pools (mitigated by newer protocols), quantum computing threats, and execution risks associated with future technical upgrades. The conclusion is that while the future scale of private digital currency is uncertain, the market currently prices in little chance of its value increasing substantially, presenting a potential opportunity for investors.

marsbitHá 2h

Grayscale Report: Financial Privacy in the AI Era, Why Zcash Should Not Be Overlooked?

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
活动图片