What should you expect from 10 February’s White House stablecoin meeting?

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-02-10Última atualização em 2026-02-10

Resumo

White House officials, Wall Street leaders, and crypto executives are meeting on 10 February to address the deadlock over the CLARITY Act, with interest-paying stablecoins being the most contentious issue. Crypto firms argue that offering yield supports innovation and user benefits, citing companies like Coinbase which earned $355 million from stablecoins in Q3 2025. Traditional banks, however, warn of a potential $6.6 trillion outflow from deposits. Another key point is the Federal Reserve’s proposed “skinny” master account system, which neither side finds satisfactory. Past policy delays and meeting cancellations have triggered sharp market declines, while agreements like the GENIUS Act spurred rallies. Currently, market sentiment is nervous, with total crypto valuation dropping 1.65% to $2.36 trillion in a day, and major cryptocurrencies like BTC and ETH facing downward pressure. Analysts see this as reducing risk rather than a full market crash. Ultimately, the conflict reflects a broader struggle over the future financial system, with markets reacting strongly to regulatory uncertainty.

Inside the White House, a high-pressure struggle is reaching a turning point as government officials, Wall Street leaders, and crypto founders meet on 10 February to resolve the long-running deadlock over the CLARITY Act.

At the center of the conflict is the issue of interest-paying stablecoins, which has become the most divisive topic in the debate.

Crypto companies argue that offering yield is a natural step towards building a modern and efficient financial system that benefits everyday users and supports innovation. For instance, companies like Coinbase, which have earned $355 million from stablecoins in Q3 2025 alone, see yield as critical to their business.

Traditional banks, however, see this as a serious threat and warn that $6.6 trillion from deposits could be drained from savings accounts.

Various other points of concern

Another major issue is the Federal Reserve’s proposed “skinny” master account system, which would give some crypto firms limited access to central bank services under strict conditions.

Crypto companies say the access is too limited to support real growth and stability. Banks, meanwhile, warn that even restricted access could open the door too quickly.

As a result, the proposal fails to satisfy either side, making compromise difficult.

Past meetings and their impact on the crypto market

History shows that policy delays have often triggered sharp market reactions. Last week itself, after the 02 February meeting, the total crypto market’s value dropped from $2.64 trillion to $2.54 trillion in a very short time.

Another major shock followed on 15 January when the Senate Banking Committee suddenly canceled its vote on the CLARITY Act.

Needless to say, the market reacted almost instantly, with crypto prices falling by about 7.5% within minutes and wiping out billions of dollars in value.

On the other hand, when lawmakers reach an agreement, the market also recovers quickly. A strong example is the GENIUS Act, signed on 18 July 2025. It sparked a bullish rally and pushed many altcoins up by nearly 12% in just one week.

Is the market on edge right now?

At present, the market is once again waiting to see what happens next. Even before the meeting concludes, stress is already visible across the crypto market.

The sentiment was well reflected by an X user who said,

Fears of a possible ban on stablecoin interest have weakened investor confidence too. As a result, the total crypto market value fell to $2.36 trillion in a single day – A decline of 1.65%.

Bitcoin [BTC] has also struggled on the charts, trading near $69,132 at press time. Ethereum [ETH] seems to be following the same trend too, dropping to around $2,040 on the back of high traders’ anxiety.

And yet, despite the recent bouts of depreciation, analysts are not calling this a major crash. Instead, they see investors actively reducing risk and shifting into a more defensive position


Final Thoughts

  • The fight over stablecoin yield is really a fight over who gets to shape the next financial system.
  • Markets are reacting not to decisions, but to uncertainty caused by repeated delays and unfinished negotiations.

Criptomoedas em alta

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main topic of the White House meeting on February 10th?

AThe main topic is to resolve the long-running deadlock over the CLARITY Act, with a central focus on the issue of interest-paying stablecoins.

QWhy do traditional banks view interest-paying stablecoins as a threat?

ATraditional banks warn that interest-paying stablecoins could drain $6.6 trillion from savings accounts, posing a serious threat to their deposit base.

QWhat was the market reaction to the Senate Banking Committee canceling its vote on the CLARITY Act on January 15th?

AThe market reacted almost instantly, with crypto prices falling by about 7.5% within minutes, wiping out billions of dollars in value.

QWhat is the Federal Reserve's proposed 'skinny' master account system?

AIt is a proposed system that would give some crypto firms limited access to central bank services, but under strict conditions that both crypto companies and traditional banks find unsatisfactory.

QHow did the market perform in the lead-up to the February 10th meeting?

AThe market was under stress, with the total crypto market value falling 1.65% to $2.36 trillion in a single day due to weakened investor confidence and fears of a possible ban on stablecoin interest.

Leituras Relacionadas

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手Há 7h

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手Há 7h

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbitHá 9h

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbitHá 9h

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手Há 10h

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手Há 10h

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbitHá 11h

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbitHá 11h

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar HOUSE

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Housecoin (HOUSE) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Housecoin (HOUSE) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Housecoin (HOUSE)Depois de comprar o teu Housecoin (HOUSE), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Housecoin (HOUSE)Transaciona facilmente Housecoin (HOUSE) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

289 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar HOUSE

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de HOUSE (HOUSE) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片