Weekly Token Unlocks: BGB Unlocks Tokens Worth Approximately $510 Million

marsbitPublicado em 2026-01-25Última atualização em 2026-01-25

Resumo

This week's major token unlocks feature significant releases from several projects, led by Bitget Token (BGB). A total of 140 million BGB tokens (Bitget Exchange's official token), valued at approximately $510 million, are scheduled for unlock. Additionally, EigenLayer will unlock 36.82 million tokens (worth ~$12.33 million). This protocol, built on Ethereum, introduces restaking, a new primitive in cryptoeconomic security that allows staked ETH to secure other applications on its network. Humanity Protocol has two separate unlocks: 105 million tokens (~$17.48 million) and 88.91 million tokens (~$11.38 million). The project is an anti-Sybil blockchain network providing a unique human identity verification mechanism, giving users full ownership of their data and identity. Release curves for each token unlock are provided in the accompanying charts.

Bitget Token

Project Twitter: https://x.com/bitget

Project Website: /

This Unlock Amount: 140 million tokens

This Unlock Value: Approximately $510 million

Official token of the Bitget exchange.

Specific release curve is as follows:

EigenLayer

Project Twitter: https://x.com/eigenlayer

Project Website: https://www.eigenlayer.xyz/

This Unlock Amount: 36.82 million tokens

This Unlock Value: Approximately $12.33 million

EigenLayer is a protocol built on Ethereum that introduces the concept of restaking, a new primitive in cryptoeconomic security. This primitive allows for the restaking of ETH at the consensus layer. Users who stake ETH can opt into EigenLayer smart contracts to restake their ETH and extend cryptoeconomic security to other applications on the network.

Specific release curve is as follows:

Humanity

Project Twitter: https://x.com/Humanityprot/

Project Website: https://www.humanity.org/

This Unlock Amount: 105 million tokens

This Unlock Value: Approximately $17.48 million

Humanity Protocol is a Sybil-resistant blockchain network that provides developers with a unique human identity verification mechanism and gives users complete ownership of their data and identity.

Specific release curve is as follows:

Humanity

Project Twitter: https://x.com/Humanityprot/

Project Website: https://www.humanity.org/

This Unlock Amount: 88.91 million tokens

This Unlock Value: Approximately $11.38 million

Humanity Protocol is a Sybil-resistant blockchain network that provides developers with a unique human identity verification mechanism and gives users complete ownership of their data and identity.

Specific release curve is as follows:

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the total value of BGB tokens being unlocked this week?

AApproximately $510 million worth of BGB tokens are being unlocked this week.

QHow many EIGEN tokens are scheduled for unlock from EigenLayer this week?

A36.82 million EIGEN tokens are scheduled for unlock.

QWhat is the primary function of the EigenLayer protocol?

AEigenLayer is a protocol built on Ethereum that introduces restaking, a new primitive in cryptoeconomic security, allowing staked ETH to be restaked to extend cryptoeconomic security to other applications on the network.

QWhat is the core purpose of Humanity Protocol?

AHumanity Protocol is an anti-Sybil blockchain network that provides developers with a unique human identity verification mechanism and gives users complete ownership of their data and identity.

QWhat is the combined total number of HUMANITY tokens being unlocked across the two unlocks mentioned?

AThe combined total is 194.91 million HUMANITY tokens (105 million + 88.91 million).

Leituras Relacionadas

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

**Summary: A Conversation with Jia Hang on Two Decades of China's Payment Globalization** Jia Hang, a veteran with over twenty years in payments, reflects on China's attempts to build a global payment network through three key phases: UnionPay (card networks), Alipay+ (digital wallets), and now, stablecoins. His journey began at UnionPay International, aiming to establish China's card network abroad. While successful in following Chinese tourists ("where Chinese go, UnionPay goes"), it struggled to achieve true global scale. The core lesson: card networks like Visa/Mastercard's unassailable advantage isn't just technical standards, but their deeply entrenched **governance and profit-sharing models** that create powerful network effects. Competing as the "same species" is nearly impossible. At Ant Group, he led Alipay+, a strategy to bypass card networks by interconnecting local e-wallets worldwide. While innovative, it faced a similar ceiling. Mobile QR payments and card swipes were essentially **the same species competing for the same pie**, lacking a disruptive value proposition for users or a sustainable new incentive model to replace the card networks' established flywheel. Today, at Singapore's DCS, Jia focuses on stablecoin-based payments. He argues stablecoins represent a fundamental shift. They are not competing with Visa for consumer payments but challenging the **traditional banking and account system for value movement**. Products like "U Cards" (stablecoin-linked payment cards) are transitional, leveraging existing card networks for acceptance while building new rails. The real potential lies in stablecoins enabling seamless, low-cost global value transfer, potentially reorganizing the financial infrastructure around **accounts rather than cards**. Jia believes stablecoin adoption for local retail payments, cross-border transactions, and as high-yield savings vehicles is becoming irreversible. This could gradually reduce reliance on traditional fiat channels, especially in regions with weak currencies or capital controls. The quest for the "next global payment network" continues, now centered on whether stablecoins can successfully bridge Web2 and Web3, establish new governance, and create compelling user value beyond mere cost reduction.

marsbitHá 6m

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

marsbitHá 6m

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

Circle's stock price has plunged approximately 76% from its 2023 peak, reflecting a major market revaluation. Despite this, Circle President Heath Tarbert emphasized the company's focus on long-term execution and its dominant position with USDC's $73 billion circulation across 34 blockchains. The competitive landscape is intensifying. A new consortium-backed stablecoin, Open USD, is attempting to challenge incumbents by sharing reserve yields with partners. More significantly, Visa's new stablecoin platform, initially supporting Open USD while also being compatible with USDC, could erode Circle's network effects. In response, Circle is expanding into real-world payments through partnerships like the one with Japan's JCB. Separately, Tether (USDT) faces a two-year compliance window under new U.S. regulations, requiring it to adjust its reserve composition away from assets like Bitcoin and loans towards cash and U.S. Treasuries. Meanwhile, in Hong Kong, Standard Chartered-backed fintech firm Dian Dian is poised to launch a licensed HKD-pegged stablecoin (HKDAP), moving the industry into a phase where the real test is integrating licensed stablecoins into actual payment flows and corporate treasury systems. The sharp decline in Circle's stock underscores a broader shift: the stablecoin market is moving from a winner-takes-all dynamic to a multi-player competitive arena where execution, compliance, and real-world utility are becoming paramount.

marsbitHá 6m

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

marsbitHá 6m

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight NewsHá 16m

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight NewsHá 16m

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbitHá 33m

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbitHá 33m

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手Há 45m

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

链捕手Há 45m

Trading

Spot
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow