Web3 Security Stack Highlights Threat from Malicious NPM Package

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-03-10Última atualização em 2026-03-10

Resumo

Web3 Antivirus has identified a malicious NPM package disguised as an OpenClaw installer that deploys a Remote Access Trojan (RAT) targeting macOS users. The package, once installed, launches a fake CLI installer and prompts for the Keychain password. If provided, it steals sensitive data including seed phrases, browser credentials, wallet information, and SSH keys, sending them to the attacker’s server. Previously, Web3 Antivirus warned about legitimate Chrome extensions—QuickLens and ShotBird—that turned malicious after ownership transfers. These were used to inject malicious scripts and steal user data, including exchange session details and wallet credentials. Looking ahead to 2026, key Web3 security threats include smart contract exploits (due to logic errors and access control issues), phishing, social engineering, wallet drainers, and oracle manipulation. The primary goals of these attacks are data theft and fund draining.

Web3 Antivirus, or Web3 security stack, has highlighted a threat from a malicious NPM package. It earlier flagged a threat from a legitimate Chrome extension. Notably, smart contract exploits and phishing & social engineering are some of the top Web3 security threats to lookout for in 2026.

Web3 Security Issue Flagged

Web3 Antivirus has published a post on X to inform the community that a malicious NPM package was caught deploying a RAT. It was disguised as an OpenClaw installer with the primary objective of stealing macOS credentials. Web3 Antivirus has further briefed the community about how the act was being carried out.

The package launches a fake CLI installer after it is installed normally. Once launched, it seeks macOS Keychain password. It is recommended not to do so because once shared, the malware can extract several pieces of information. This includes seed phrases, browser credentials, crypto wallet data, and SSH & cloud keys.

All the pieces find their way to the attacker’s server. Web3, with this, is seeing different types of threats for users worldwide.

Previously Flagged Threat

Web3 Antivirus previously flagged a threat from a legitimate Chrome extension. It warned that it was turning malicious after the ownership was transferred. This allows attackers to inject codes into web pages and steal the data of a user. The update, according to Web3 security stack, removed security headers and fingerprints before pulling malicious scripts from a remote server.

For the crypto community, such an act can turn into a theft for exchange sessions, compromised wallets, browser credentials, and seed phrase phishing.

It has named two extensions: QuickLens and ShotBird, adding that they have 7,000 and 800 users, respectively.

Top Web3 Security Threats in 2026

Some of the top Web3 security threats in 2026 are smart contract exploits and phishing & social engineering. The former largely pertains to vulnerabilities in code. This refers to infusing logic errors, input validation issues, and access control failures.

The latter, as the name suggests, involves making fake calls or impersonating partners to attack users and developers – even founders on some occasions.

Others on the list are wallet drainers, private key manipulation, and price oracle manipulation. The end goal of malicious actors is to steal data and drain funds or negatively impact the system.

Some of the common vulnerabilities are access control failures, logic errors, and unsigned API queries.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Nasdaq Collaboration Targets Pan-European Tokenized Securities Trading and Settlement

TagsWeb3

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat type of malicious software was the NPM package caught deploying, and what was its primary objective?

AThe malicious NPM package was caught deploying a RAT (Remote Access Trojan). Its primary objective was to steal macOS credentials.

QWhat specific user information can the malware extract after obtaining the macOS Keychain password?

AThe malware can extract seed phrases, browser credentials, crypto wallet data, and SSH & cloud keys.

QWhat previously flagged threat did Web3 Antivirus warn about involving a legitimate Chrome extension?

AWeb3 Antivirus warned about a legitimate Chrome extension that turned malicious after ownership was transferred, allowing attackers to inject code into web pages and steal user data.

QWhat are two of the top Web3 security threats highlighted for 2026?

ATwo of the top Web3 security threats for 2026 are smart contract exploits and phishing & social engineering.

QWhat are the names of the two malicious Chrome extensions mentioned, and how many users do they have respectively?

AThe two malicious Chrome extensions are named QuickLens and ShotBird, with 7,000 and 800 users respectively.

Leituras Relacionadas

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: Losses Mount Due to Vulnerable Seed Generation A critical vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets has led to a continued wave of fund thefts. According to Galaxy Research, the total stolen has reached 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $88.6 million) from 4,585 addresses, a significant increase from the initial 594.5 BTC reported on July 30, 2026. Most of the stolen funds remain on the attackers' addresses. The issue is not with the current firmware, which Coinkite has updated, but with seed phrases generated on vulnerable devices between March 2021 and the release of fixed firmware versions. Due to a programmer error, devices switched from using a hardware random number generator to the software-based Yasmarang generator, which was initialized with publicly accessible data like the chip's serial number. This made the seed phrases predictable through offline brute-force attacks, meaning wallets remain at risk until funds are moved to a new wallet generated with the patched firmware. Affected devices include Mk2/Mk3 with firmware 4.0.1–4.1.9 (and up to 5.0.3), Mk4/Mk5 up to version 5.6.0, and Q models up to 1.5.0Q. The only exceptions are seeds created with a high-entropy method like at least 50 independent dice rolls or a strong unique BIP-39 passphrase. All other owners must generate a new seed on the fixed firmware and transfer their assets. A case highlighting the human impact involves a 39-year-old long-term investor who lost 2 BTC (approx. $130,000) in minutes. He had accumulated the Bitcoin over eight years through physical labor, viewing it as a financial lifeline and a retirement plan in a country suffering from hyperinflation. His story underscores that even conservative "buy and hold in cold storage" strategies can be compromised by such underlying technical flaws. From a technical perspective, this incident echoes historical failures where weak random number generators undermined cryptographic security, challenging the assumption that offline storage is automatically foolproof.

cryptonews.ruHá 3h

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

cryptonews.ruHá 3h

Trading

Spot
活动图片