Wall Street Institutional Holdings Exposed: Jane Street Bitcoin ETF Positions Slashed by 71%, JPMorgan Chase Increases Holdings by 174%

链捕手Publicado em 2026-05-15Última atualização em 2026-05-15

Resumo

Q1 2026 US institutional 13F filings reveal diverse crypto strategies amid a bearish market. Bitcoin fell ~23.8% for the quarter, with spot ETFs seeing net outflows. Key highlights: Jane Street slashed its iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) holdings by 71%, shifting focus to Ethereum ETFs (e.g., doubling iShares Ethereum Trust holdings) and adding stocks like Galaxy Digital and Riot Platforms. Conversely, JPMorgan aggressively increased Bitcoin ETF exposure, boosting IBIT by 174% and other Bitcoin funds by up to 3000%, while initiating a position in a Solana ETF and clearing its XRP ETF. Wells Fargo built Ethereum ETF positions despite sector outflows. BlackRock increased holdings in crypto-correlated stocks like MicroStrategy (MSTR) and Bitmine (BMNR). Its on-chain Bitcoin holdings grew, though its total crypto portfolio value shrank due to price declines. ARK Invest notably increased its stake in Circle (CRCL), emphasizing the stablecoin infrastructure narrative. Institutions displayed three key trends: 1) Growing interest in Ethereum as infrastructure. 2) Divergent Bitcoin strategies (long-term allocation vs. tactical trading). 3) Broader adoption of crypto-related equities. Market sentiment improved in April, with Bitcoin ETF inflows hitting a six-month high as Bitcoin recovered above $80,000. More major institutional filings are pending.

May 15th was the statutory deadline for institutional investors to file Q1 13F forms with the U.S. SEC.,As the filings are gradually made public, the cryptocurrency holdings of major Wall Street institutions are collectively unveiled.

Among them,, JPMorgan Chase defied the trend by increasing its Bitcoin ETF holdings by 174%, while Jane Street cut its IBIT holdings by 71% and shifted towards Ethereum. Wells Fargo initiated a position in Ethereum ETF against the downtrend, and despite BlackRock's on-chain portfolio shrinking by over $20 billion, it continued to buy Bitcoin.

The first quarter of this year saw a noticeable correction in the crypto market. Bitcoin posted a cumulative quarterly decline of approximately 23.8%, its worst Q1 performance since 2018. The total crypto market cap fell by 20.4%, down about 45% from its peak in October 2025. Spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded net outflows of approximately $497 million for the quarter, JPMorgan Chase analysis showed that total digital asset inflows in Q1 were only about $11 billion, roughly one-third of the same period last year, indicating a clear slowdown in market momentum.

In this market environment, institutional operations showed significant differences.

Jane Street:IBIT Holdings Down 71%, Adds Galaxy Digital

As one of Wall Street's most active proprietary trading firms, Jane Street's Q1 operations drew the most market attention.

According to its latest 13F filing, Jane Street significantly reduced its Bitcoin ETF holdings.Among them,, holdings in BlackRock iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) decreased approximately 71% quarter-over-quarter to about 5.9 million shares, valued at approximately $225 million; Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) was cut by about 60% to about 2 million shares.

On the other hand, Jane Street notably increased its allocation to Ethereum. Holdings in BlackRock iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA) nearly doubled, and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) was also significantly increased, with a combined new exposure of about $82 million.

Regarding crypto-related stocks, Galaxy Digital holdings surged from about 17,000 shares to about 1.5 million shares, Riot Platforms holdings increased from about 5 million to about 7.4 million shares, and Coinbase saw a slight increase. Its holdings in MicroStrategy (MSTR) decreased from about 968,000 shares to about 210,000 shares, a reduction of about 78%. Holdings in multiple Bitcoin mining companies also contracted simultaneously, involving IREN, Cipher Mining, TeraWulf, and Core Scientific.

It's important to note that Jane Street recorded a record $16.1 billion in trading revenue for Q1. The 13F only discloses long equity holdings at quarter-end and does not include derivatives or short positions. Bitwise analyst Jeff Park pointed out that Jane Street had previously increased its MicroStrategy holdings by over 470% in a quarter, and the reduction this quarter is more likely the unwinding of a basis trade rather than a directional bearish bet on Bitcoin.

JPMorgan Chase:Significantly Increases Bitcoin ETF, Exits XRP ETF

In contrast to Jane Street is JPMorgan Chase. The bank continued to accumulate during a period when Bitcoin prices fell below $80,000, increasing its IBIT holdings from about 3 million shares to about 8.3 million shares, a rise of about 174%, adding approximately $162 million in market value.

Additionally,, the bank's holdings inBitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB) increased by about 900%, Fidelity FBTC by about 450%, and the Bitcoin futures-tracking ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) by over 3000%.

Regarding other crypto assets, JPMorgan Chase initiated a position in the Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL), buying about 47,500 shares, and increased its holdings in BlackRock iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA) by about 36%. Simultaneously, the bank completely exited its position in the Bitwise XRP ETF.

At the stock level,JPMorgan Chase chose to add to its holdings in MicroStrategy, MARA Holdings, and Core Scientific, while reducing its positions in Coinbase, Galaxy Digital, and Robinhood.

Wells Fargo:Adds to Ethereum ETF Against the Trend, Nearly Exits Galaxy Digital

Wells Fargo's operations also showed significant internal differentiation.

Regarding Ethereum, its BlackRock ETHA holdings increased from about 673,000 shares to about 1.1 million shares, a gain of about 63.5%; Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW) holdings grew about 37%, with the combined portfolio valued at approximately $21.5 million. This increase occurred against a backdrop of Ethereum declining for two consecutive quarters (down about 28% in Q4 2025 and about 29% in Q1 2026), with spot Ethereum ETFs recording net outflows of about $769 million for the quarter.

For Bitcoin, Wells Fargo's allocation was more dispersed. It slightly reduced its IBIT holdings but increased its Bitwise Bitcoin ETF holdings by about 24% and Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust holdings by about 41%. Bitcoin ETFs remained the mainstay of its crypto exposure, with IBIT alone valued at around $250 million.

At the stock level, Wells Fargo increased its MicroStrategy holdings from about 323,000 shares to about 726,000 shares, a rise of about 125%, adding approximately $41.6 million in exposure. During the same period, its Galaxy Digital holdings plummeted from about 2.5 million shares to about 78,600 shares, a drop of about 97%, reducing exposure by about $54.7 million.

BlackRock: Increases Holdings in MicroStrategy and Bitmine, Continues On-Chain Bitcoin Purchases

As the world's largest asset manager, BlackRock's Q1 13F filing shows it holds a certain scale of crypto-related stocks.

Among them,, Coinbase (COIN) holdings were about 16.75 million shares, valued at approximately $2.92 billion, a slight reduction of about 333,000 shares from the previous quarter; Circle (CRCL) holdings were about 5.06 million shares, valued at about $483 million, a decrease of about 615,000 shares.

MicroStrategy (MSTR) holdings increased to about 17.75 million shares, valued at $2.22 billion, with an addition of about 3.147 million shares; Ethereum treasury company Bitmine (BMNR) holdings increased to about 11.08 million shares, valued at $219 million, with an addition of about 2.029 million shares.

The combined market value of these four holdings is about $5.8 billion. Although this represents a small portion of its total holdings of approximately $5.72 trillion, the simultaneous increase in MicroStrategy and Bitmine shows BlackRock maintains recognition for both the Bitcoin and Ethereum treasury narratives.

Regarding on-chain data, during Q1, BlackRock's Bitcoin holdings increased from about 770,000 to about 785,000 coins, a net purchase of about 15,000 coins. However, impacted by the price decline, the market value decreased from about $68 billion to about $51.8 billion. Ethereum holdings decreased from about 3.47 million to about 3.06 million coins, a net outflow of about 410,000 coins. The overall crypto portfolio value shrank by about $20.4 billion, primarily driven by price declines.

Additionally,, IBIT's Q1 average daily trading volume exceeded $3.2 billion, with net inflows recorded on 48 out of the 62 trading days in the quarter. On January 27th, a single-day inflow of about $1.3 billion set a record. However, changes in on-chain holdings essentially reflect client fund flows in and out through the ETF, not BlackRock's own directional bets.

ARK Invest:Heavy Allocation to Circle Bets on Stablecoin Sector

Cathie Wood's ARK Invest, as the issuer of the ARKB spot Bitcoin ETF, its 13F discloses the crypto-related stocks held by its active funds. The filing shows ARK increased its holdings in Circle (CRCL), Robinhood (HOOD), Bullish (BLSH), and Bitmine (BMNR) in Q1, while slightly reducing its Coinbase (COIN) holdings.

In terms of timing, ARK bought about $72 million worth of crypto-related stocks across its ARKF, ARKK, and ARKW funds around February when Bitcoin fell to near $75,000, continuing its consistent strategy of buying on dips.

Among them, ARK's bet on Circle (CRCL) was clearly increased, with holdings rising to about 4.509 million shares, increasing its weight in the portfolio from 2.18% to 3.34%. ARK continued accumulatingCRCL in Q2.

Circle's recently released Q1 earnings showed revenue growth of 20% year-over-year, USDC circulation rising to $77 billion, and transaction volume increasing 263% year-over-year, further validating ARK's bet on the stablecoin sector.

Other Institutions' Actions

Other institutions also had notable moves. Asset manager WisdomTree launched a tokenized money market fund this quarter, driving net inflows of $98 million into digital assets in Q1. As of the end of March, its digital asset AUM rose to a record $867 million.

Grayscale completed rebalancing of its funds. Its DeFi Fund added the Ethena token (ENA) with a 13.59% weighting while removing Aerodrome Finance. In its Smart Contract Platform Ex-Ethereum Fund, Ethereum's weighting increased to 30.14%, once again surpassing Solana's 29.69%.

Chinese asset manager Dan Bin's Oriental Harbor disclosed in its latest 13F that it increased its CRCL holdings by 31,700 shares, valued at approximately $3.02 million.

Although Morgan Stanley's Q1 13F has not yet been disclosed, its Bitcoin ETF (MSBT, fee 0.14%), launched on April 8th, has accumulated net inflows of $193.6 million since inception, with net assets reaching $239.6 million. In its first month, it recorded net inflows for 17 trading days and neutral flows for 5 days, with no single-day net outflows.

Three Signals from Institutional Crypto Allocation

Reviewing these operations reveals three noteworthy trends.

First, institutional interest in allocating to Ethereum is increasing. Jane Street, Wells Fargo, and JPMorgan Chase all increased their Ethereum ETF exposure in Q1, precisely during a period of general market outflows. This reflects some institutions beginning to view it as infrastructure for long-term positioning.

Second, the divergence in views on Bitcoin stems more from strategic differences than judgment disagreements. JPMorgan's systematic accumulation at low levels is typical of a long-term allocation path. Jane Street's significant reduction, combined with its record quarterly revenue, is closer to an adjustment in trading strategy.

Third, crypto-related stocks are becoming an unavoidable allocation option for institutions. With companies like Circle, Coinbase, and MicroStrategy going public or continuing to expand, such stocks have evolved from peripheral targets to core holdings for some institutions. ARK ranks Circle as its sixth-largest holding in ARKK. Oriental Harbor quickly established a position in Circle after its IPO. Circle is up over 50% year-to-date, and the stablecoin infrastructure logic behind it is gaining increasing institutional recognition.

In terms of specific target selection, differentiation is also evident. Galaxy Digital was the stock with the most institutional divergence this quarter—Wells Fargo nearly exited, reducing by about 97%; JPMorgan Chase also reduced its position; but Jane Street increased its holdings from about 17,000 shares to about 1.5 million shares, essentially building a position from scratch. Meanwhile, multiple institutions chose to increase their MicroStrategy holdings, using it as a stock proxy for Bitcoin.

Now, Q2 is also more than half over, and those institutions that consistently added at low levels in Q1 are beginning to see their decisions validated.

In April, Bitcoin rose approximately 11.87%, and Ethereum rose approximately 7.3%. Spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded net inflows of about $2.44 billion in April, hitting a near six-month high, with total AUM exceeding $100 billion for the first time. Among them, BlackRock's IBIT saw net inflows of about $2.013 billion for the month, and Morgan Stanley's MSBT recorded net inflows of about $194 million in its first month. Bitcoin has now reclaimed levels above $80,000, indicating some repair in market risk appetite.

At the time of writing, 13F filings from major institutions and hedge funds like Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and Millennium have not yet been released. They are expected to be disclosed in the next couple of days, at which point this picture of institutional holding differentiation will become more complete.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhich major Wall Street institutions significantly reduced their Bitcoin ETF holdings in Q1 2026, and what were the key changes?

AJane Street significantly reduced its Bitcoin ETF holdings in Q1 2026. Specifically, its position in iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) decreased by about 71% to approximately 5.9 million shares, and its Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) position was cut by about 60% to around 2 million shares.

QHow did JPMorgan Chase adjust its cryptocurrency-related ETF portfolio in the first quarter of 2026?

AJPMorgan Chase substantially increased its Bitcoin ETF holdings. It raised its position in iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) by about 174% to approximately 8.3 million shares, increased its Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB) holding by about 900%, and boosted its ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) by over 3000%. It also initiated a position in Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL) and increased its iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA) by about 36%, while completely exiting its Bitwise XRP ETF position.

QWhat trend regarding Ethereum did the Q1 13F filings reveal among some institutional investors?

AThe Q1 13F filings revealed a trend of increased institutional interest in Ethereum. Despite market outflows, institutions like Jane Street, Wells Fargo, and JPMorgan Chase increased their exposure to Ethereum ETFs. For example, Wells Fargo increased its iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA) position by about 63.5% and its Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW) by about 37%.

QWhat was notable about ARK Invest's investment strategy in crypto-related stocks during Q1 2026?

AARK Invest notably increased its focus on the stablecoin infrastructure sector by significantly boosting its stake in Circle (CRCL). Its CRCL holdings rose to approximately 4.509 million shares, making it the sixth-largest holding in its ARKK fund. ARK continued buying CRCL into Q2, betting on the growth of stablecoin infrastructure, which was validated by Circle's strong Q1 earnings report showing a 20% revenue increase and significant USDC growth.

QWhat were the three key signals or trends identified from the analysis of institutional crypto asset allocations in Q1 2026?

AThe analysis identified three key trends: 1) Growing institutional interest in Ethereum as a long-term infrastructure play, evidenced by increased ETF allocations during market weakness. 2) Divergence in Bitcoin strategies, where actions like JPMorgan's accumulation represented long-term allocation, while Jane Street's reduction likely reflected trading strategy adjustments. 3) Crypto-related equities (like Coinbase, Circle, MicroStrategy) becoming essential, non-peripheral holdings for many institutions, serving as proxy investments for underlying crypto assets.

Leituras Relacionadas

Who Funds the Agents?

**Summary: Who Funds AI Agents?** OpenAI recently shut down a feature allowing AI agents to shop for users, highlighting the challenge of creating a secure and regulated environment for agent-driven transactions. While payment infrastructure exists, a crucial governance layer—defining spending limits, fraud detection, tax handling, and return policies—is largely missing. The potential is enormous: AI agents already processed $73M across 176M transactions last year, with McKinsey forecasting this could grow to $3-5T in global consumer commerce by 2030. The core competition isn't just about processing payments, which can be very cheap (especially with crypto-based settlement), but about controlling the rules that govern agent spending. Key players like Stripe and Coinbase are racing to dominate this governance layer. Stripe's acquisition of wallet provider Privy allows it to set spending policies, identity checks, and human-in-the-loop approvals directly at the wallet level. Similarly, Coinbase's stack, including its x402 protocol and AgentKit, embeds governance rules. This vertical integration across settlement, wallet, and governance layers is becoming the dominant strategy. Control over the governance layer is where significant future value lies. If agents handle trillions in transactions, even a small fee for managing compliance, fraud prevention, and policy enforcement could generate billions in annual revenue. The companies that successfully integrate across the payment stack will capture value from idle agent balances, transaction fees, and governance services, positioning themselves as the foundational banks of the AI agent economy.

marsbitHá 9m

Who Funds the Agents?

marsbitHá 9m

A Nation Blocks Chips, a Giant Buys a Nuclear Power Plant: Why It's Time to Seriously Consider DeAI

**Title: Great Powers Blockade Chips, Giants Buy Nuclear Plants: Why It's Time to Seriously Consider DeAI** In May 2026, the US closed loopholes for Chinese firms to acquire advanced NVIDIA chips via overseas subsidiaries. That same month, Kenya halted a $1B geothermal data center project involving Microsoft, fearing its immense energy consumption. Meanwhile, Huawei announced mass production of its Ascend AI chip. These disparate events underscore a new reality: the competition for computing power ("compute") has escalated beyond the tech industry, becoming a geopolitical and infrastructural battleground. A new era of oligopoly is forming, with control over the AI stack—from GPU chips (NVIDIA) and cloud platforms (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud) to foundational models (OpenAI, Anthropic)—concentrating in a few Western "AI Octopus" corporations. This centralization creates systemic risks: pricing power and platform lock-in for users, infrastructure fragility, and a widening "compute divide" that threatens to marginalize nations without independent AI capacity. An "AI Iron Curtain" is deepening through export controls. In response, some nations like Saudi Arabia and the UAE are investing heavily to buy compute power, aiming to transition from oil to AI economies. The EU seeks to triple its compute capacity by 2030 to reduce dependency. However, the spending gap is vast, with four US tech giants alone planning ~$750B in AI capex for 2026. The race is increasingly constrained by energy, with AI tasks consuming up to 1000x more power than web searches, pushing firms to even acquire nuclear plants. This landscape is fueling interest in Decentralized AI (DeAI). It proposes a third way: using open protocols to coordinate a global network of idle GPUs, independent developers, and data centers, creating an AI infrastructure without a single controlling entity. Leveraging blockchain and cryptographic verification, DeAI aims to break market concentration, disperse energy demands, reduce geopolitical dependencies, and enhance transparency. While still nascent in performance and stability, DeAI's core promise is not immediate superiority but providing a crucial alternative architecture to resist monopoly, censorship, and centralized power. As specialized AI hardware costs fall and open-source models flourish, the window to build this foundation is open. The very existence of such competition serves as a vital check against the inevitable abuse of concentrated power.

marsbitHá 1h

A Nation Blocks Chips, a Giant Buys a Nuclear Power Plant: Why It's Time to Seriously Consider DeAI

marsbitHá 1h

Outpoll Review: A Prediction Market Platform Built for Active Traders

Outpoll Review: A Prediction Market Platform Built for Active Traders In recent years, prediction markets have grown from a niche sector to a mainstream arena, attracting billions in trading volume and institutional capital. However, the user experience and tools for traders have not kept pace. Outpoll, a new global prediction market platform, aims to fill this gap by providing enhanced trading infrastructure for active and professional traders. Built on standard prediction market principles, Outpoll allows users to trade on the outcome of specific events. It uses fully collateralized contracts with USDC settlement, charges a competitive 0.1% fee per trade, and provides clear settlement rules upfront to minimize disputes. A key focus for Outpoll is its professional-grade trading tools. The platform supports limit and market orders, as well as take-profit and stop-loss orders for open positions—features uncommon in prediction markets. For automated trading, Outpoll offers comprehensive REST and WebSocket APIs, enabling portfolio management, price arbitrage, and integration with existing tools. The platform also features a creator-led market model, where approved experts and community leaders can create and manage markets for niche topics under platform supervision. Its integrated interface combines news feeds directly with trading functions, allowing users to monitor events and manage positions seamlessly. Outpoll launched with a native Android app (available on Google Play) and plans an iOS version later this year. In summary, Outpoll distinguishes itself with trader-focused tools, practical APIs, transparent and collateralized markets, integrated news, and an expanding creator program. For active traders, its advanced order types and API access alone make it a platform worth watching. Outpoll is now globally accessible via outpoll.com and Google Play.

marsbitHá 1h

Outpoll Review: A Prediction Market Platform Built for Active Traders

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片