Visa expands stablecoin settlement pilot as Bridge targets 100-country card rollout

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-03-03Última atualização em 2026-03-03

Resumo

Visa is expanding its stablecoin settlement pilot and deepening its collaboration with Bridge, a Stripe-owned infrastructure firm. Bridge is scaling its stablecoin-linked Visa card program, aiming for a rollout in over 100 countries by the end of 2026. These cards, currently available in 18 countries, allow users to spend stablecoin balances directly at over 175 million merchant locations globally without converting to fiat. The expanded pilot, in partnership with Lead Bank, enables onchain settlement of card transactions over supported blockchain networks. Visa is evaluating greater settlement flexibility, operational efficiency gains, and the role of infrastructure providers like Bridge. The initiative remains a pilot, testing stablecoins as an optional settlement tool alongside traditional rails, reflecting growing institutional interest in blockchain-based payments.

Visa is expanding its stablecoin settlement pilot while deepening its collaboration with Bridge. The Stripe-owned infrastructure firm pushes its stablecoin-linked card program toward a planned rollout in more than 100 countries by the end of 2026.

The announcement signals a broader integration of stablecoins into Visa’s global payments network.

Stablecoin-linked cards scale globally

Bridge enables businesses and fintech developers to issue stablecoin-backed Visa cards, allowing users to spend stablecoin balances for everyday purchases anywhere Visa is accepted.

The cards are currently live in 18 countries. They are slated to expand across Europe, Asia Pacific, Africa, and the Middle East by year-end.

Transactions can be used at more than 175 million merchant locations globally, according to Visa.

Crypto platforms, including Phantom and MetaMask, are already offering the cards. It enables users to pay directly from their stablecoin balances, without converting to fiat in advance.

The expansion reflects growing demand for payment products that bridge blockchain-based assets and traditional card networks.

Onchain settlement moves forward

Alongside the geographic expansion, Visa is broadening its stablecoin settlement pilot. Through Bridge’s partnership with Lead Bank, card transactions can now be settled onchain with Visa over supported blockchain networks.

The pilot allows participating issuers and acquirers to settle obligations using stablecoins rather than exclusively relying on traditional fiat settlement rails.

Visa said the program is evaluating:

  • How stablecoin settlement can provide greater settlement optionality for issuers and program managers
  • Operational efficiency gains from onchain reconciliation and faster fund movement
  • The role of infrastructure providers, such as Bridge, in simplifying blockchain interactions for financial institutions

Cuy Sheffield, Visa’s head of crypto, said the expansion reflects growing institutional interest in blockchain-based settlement. “Visa is committed to meeting businesses where they operate, and increasingly, that’s onchain,” Sheffield said in the release.

Evaluating support for Bridge-issued assets

Visa also said it is assessing potential support for Bridge-issued assets in future payment flows. The review will focus on whether those assets can complement Visa’s existing network and introduce additional settlement pathways for partners.

Bridge CEO and cofounder Zach Abrams said the collaboration is part of a longer-term strategy to help businesses integrate stablecoins into their own financial stacks.

Still a pilot phase

Despite the expansion, the settlement initiative remains a pilot. The program is designed to test settlement flexibility and operational efficiency rather than replace traditional fiat rails.

The move underscores how major payment networks are increasingly incorporating stablecoins into existing systems as optional settlement tools.


Final Summary

  • Visa is expanding its stablecoin settlement pilot while Bridge prepares to scale stablecoin-linked cards to over 100 countries by year-end.
  • The initiative integrates stablecoins into backend settlement flows. However, it remains in pilot phase rather than a replacement for traditional rails.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main goal of the collaboration between Visa and Bridge regarding card rollout?

AThe main goal is to scale the stablecoin-linked Visa card program to over 100 countries by the end of 2026, allowing users to spend stablecoin balances for everyday purchases anywhere Visa is accepted.

QHow many countries currently have the stablecoin-backed Visa cards live, and which regions are targeted for expansion by year-end?

AThe cards are currently live in 18 countries and are slated to expand across Europe, Asia Pacific, Africa, and the Middle East by year-end.

QWhat are the key aspects Visa is evaluating in its expanded stablecoin settlement pilot?

AVisa is evaluating how stablecoin settlement can provide greater optionality for issuers, operational efficiency gains from onchain reconciliation and faster fund movement, and the role of infrastructure providers like Bridge in simplifying blockchain interactions for financial institutions.

QWhich crypto platforms are already offering the stablecoin-linked Visa cards, and what convenience do they provide to users?

ACrypto platforms including Phantom and MetaMask are already offering the cards, enabling users to pay directly from their stablecoin balances without converting to fiat in advance.

QIs Visa's stablecoin settlement initiative replacing traditional fiat settlement rails?

ANo, the initiative remains a pilot program designed to test settlement flexibility and operational efficiency rather than replace traditional fiat rails.

Leituras Relacionadas

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbitHá 15m

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbitHá 15m

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbitHá 34m

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbitHá 34m

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbitHá 43m

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbitHá 43m

Trading

Spot
活动图片