U.S. Treasury Urges Congress to Allow Crypto Platforms to Freeze Suspicious Funds

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-03-09Última atualização em 2026-03-09

Resumo

The U.S. Treasury is urging Congress to pass legislation that would grant cryptocurrency platforms the legal authority to temporarily freeze funds linked to suspicious or illegal activities. This proposal, tied to the GENIUS Act, aims to address a current gap where exchanges can detect but not always legally halt such transactions. A legal framework would protect platforms from lawsuits and enable quicker action to prevent funds from being moved or laundered. While intended to improve cooperation with law enforcement, the proposal raises concerns about transparency and legal complexities, such as disclosure requirements to users and constraints due to ongoing investigations. The move reflects broader efforts to regulate digital assets amid ongoing legislative debates.

The U.S. government is asking Congress to consider a new rule that allows crypto platforms to temporarily freeze suspicious funds linked to illegal activities. This proposal comes from the U.S. Department of the Treasury, which is connected to the GENIUS Act. This act focuses on the tools to protect against financial crimes involving digital assets.

Reason behind the Treasury’s need for this law

Right now, crypto exchanges can detect suspicious transactions through blockchain tracking tools, but they do not always have a clear legal authority to freeze them. This creates problems, like if the exchanges let the transaction continue, then the funds could disappear quickly, and if the exchanges freeze the funds without legal protection, they could face lawsuits. This law creates a legal framework allowing exchanges to temporarily hold suspicious assets.

If the law receives approval, crypto exchanges could halt transfers before criminals shift their funds across multiple wallets. Supporters say this would strengthen cooperation between crypto companies and law enforcement agencies. The temporary freeze could stop money from being stolen or illegal funds from being used within minutes.

Legal experts say that the proposal raises several complicated issues. Andrew Rossow, who was a public affairs attorney, explained that the banks already have limited powers to delay suspicious transactions. Another concern involves transparency rules. If a platform freezes someone’s assets, it may have to disclose the freeze to the users. At the same time, financial reporting laws may prevent the platform from explaining the investigations.

President Donald Trump has been urging Congress to move faster on the digital assets legislation as regulators and banks argue over how the industry should be governed. This treasury proposal aims to close a major gap by giving exchanges clear authority to freeze suspicious funds.

Highlighted Crypto News:

XRP Faces Critical Test: Recovery Ahead or Extended Bear Market?

TagsBlockchainCryptoUS Treasury

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the U.S. Treasury asking Congress to allow crypto platforms to do?

AThe U.S. Treasury is asking Congress to allow crypto platforms to temporarily freeze suspicious transactions linked to illegal activities.

QWhat is the name of the act that this Treasury proposal is connected to?

AThe proposal is connected to the GENIUS Act, which focuses on tools to protect against financial crimes involving digital assets.

QWhat is the main problem the new law aims to solve for crypto exchanges?

AThe main problem is that crypto exchanges can detect suspicious transactions but currently lack clear legal authority to freeze them, which creates a risk of funds disappearing or the exchanges facing lawsuits.

QAccording to the article, what is one potential benefit if this law is approved?

AIf approved, the law would allow crypto exchanges to halt transfers before criminals can move funds across multiple wallets, potentially stopping stolen or illegal funds from being used within minutes.

QWhat is one concern that legal experts have raised about this proposal?

ALegal experts are concerned about transparency rules, as a platform that freezes assets may have to disclose the freeze to users, while financial reporting laws may simultaneously prevent it from explaining the ongoing investigations.

Leituras Relacionadas

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: Losses Mount Due to Vulnerable Seed Generation A critical vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets has led to a continued wave of fund thefts. According to Galaxy Research, the total stolen has reached 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $88.6 million) from 4,585 addresses, a significant increase from the initial 594.5 BTC reported on July 30, 2026. Most of the stolen funds remain on the attackers' addresses. The issue is not with the current firmware, which Coinkite has updated, but with seed phrases generated on vulnerable devices between March 2021 and the release of fixed firmware versions. Due to a programmer error, devices switched from using a hardware random number generator to the software-based Yasmarang generator, which was initialized with publicly accessible data like the chip's serial number. This made the seed phrases predictable through offline brute-force attacks, meaning wallets remain at risk until funds are moved to a new wallet generated with the patched firmware. Affected devices include Mk2/Mk3 with firmware 4.0.1–4.1.9 (and up to 5.0.3), Mk4/Mk5 up to version 5.6.0, and Q models up to 1.5.0Q. The only exceptions are seeds created with a high-entropy method like at least 50 independent dice rolls or a strong unique BIP-39 passphrase. All other owners must generate a new seed on the fixed firmware and transfer their assets. A case highlighting the human impact involves a 39-year-old long-term investor who lost 2 BTC (approx. $130,000) in minutes. He had accumulated the Bitcoin over eight years through physical labor, viewing it as a financial lifeline and a retirement plan in a country suffering from hyperinflation. His story underscores that even conservative "buy and hold in cold storage" strategies can be compromised by such underlying technical flaws. From a technical perspective, this incident echoes historical failures where weak random number generators undermined cryptographic security, challenging the assumption that offline storage is automatically foolproof.

cryptonews.ruHá 2h

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

cryptonews.ruHá 2h

Trading

Spot
活动图片