U.S. Treasury Sanctions UK Crypto Exchanges for Iran Sanctions Evasion

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-01-31Última atualização em 2026-01-31

Resumo

The U.S. Treasury, through OFAC, has sanctioned two UK-based crypto exchanges, Zedcex and Zedxion, for allegedly enabling Iran to evade international financial sanctions. This marks the first time OFAC has targeted crypto exchanges for supporting Iran’s financial activities. The exchanges reportedly provided services to sanctioned Iranian entities, facilitating over $389 million in transactions and helping obscure fund flows using digital assets. Seven Iranian individuals, including businessman Babak Zanjani, were also designated. OFAC emphasized that digital assets do not exempt entities from sanctions enforcement and warned crypto platforms to strengthen compliance measures to avoid facilitating illicit finance.

The U.S. Treasury has sanctioned two crypto exchanges in the UK, Zedcex and Zedxion, for allegedly assisting Iran in evading U.S. and international financial sanctions. The sanctions were issued by OFAC, or the Office of Foreign Assets Control, at the U.S. Treasury. This is the first time that OFAC has sanctioned crypto exchanges for their role in Iran’s financial sector.

According to the U.S. Treasury, the two crypto exchanges provided users with access to financial services that supported Iranian individuals and entities who are subject to U.S. sanctions. OFAC further stated that the two crypto exchanges facilitated sanctioned persons in moving their funds through the international financial system using digital assets.

Targeted Individuals and Groups

In addition to the transactions, OFAC designated seven Iranian individuals to the blocklist. Also sanctioned was Babak Zanjani, an Iranian businessman with a past financial conviction record, who was reportedly freed for the sole purpose of facilitating funds for the regime.

According to Treasury officials, the group utilized cryptocurrency infrastructure to obscure the flow of funds and evade traditional banking controls. Blockchain analysis related to the designation reveals that wallet addresses associated with these entities facilitated over $389 million in transactions.

The Treasury emphasized that the use of digital assets does not provide a shield from sanctions enforcement and that crypto-related activities are still subject to US laws and regulations.

Implications for Crypto Compliance

OFAC emphasized that these sanctions are a strong statement about the enforcement of sanctions in the face of evolving financial technology. OFAC warned that crypto platforms that do not follow proper compliance procedures may be facilitating illicit finance and could be subject to enforcement action if they knowingly facilitate sanctioned jurisdictions or persons. The sanctions require U.S. persons to freeze all property and interests in property of the named entities and to prohibit all transactions involving them.

However, Treasury officials emphasized that all exchanges must have strong compliance programs regardless of their base. The actions against Zedcex and Zedxion indicate toughening of U.S. enforcement of evasion facilitated by crypto related to Iran. OFAC’s designation of the exchanges and the individuals involved in the transfer of illicit funds indicates that the digital asset industry is bound by U.S. sanctions laws.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Banking and Crypto Leaders Clash Over CLARITY Act Ahead of White House Policy Talks

TagsCrypto ExchangeIranIran GovernmentOFAC

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhich UK crypto exchanges were sanctioned by the U.S. Treasury for Iran sanctions evasion?

AZedcex and Zedxion.

QWhich U.S. government agency issued the sanctions against the crypto exchanges?

AThe Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) at the U.S. Treasury.

QWhat was the total value of transactions facilitated by the wallet addresses associated with the sanctioned entities, according to blockchain analysis?

AOver $389 million.

QBesides the crypto exchanges, how many Iranian individuals were designated to the blocklist by OFAC?

ASeven.

QWhat key message did OFAC emphasize regarding digital assets and sanctions enforcement?

AThe use of digital assets does not provide a shield from sanctions enforcement, and crypto-related activities are still subject to U.S. laws and regulations.

Leituras Relacionadas

Zcash Suffers Historic Collapse As Billions Vanish From Market Value

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, suffered a historic collapse in price, losing over 50% of its value in 24 hours and erasing billions from its market cap. The dramatic sell-off was triggered by the disclosure of a major vulnerability in the Zcash Orchard privacy pool that had remained undetected since May 2022. A security researcher, using AI, developed a proof-of-concept to generate counterfeit ZEC. While the bug was patched by June 2, Zcash's privacy design makes it impossible to verify if any fake coins were minted before the fix, fueling market panic and uncertainty. This event highlights the trade-off between privacy and transparency. In response, Shielded Labs is exploring a network upgrade to allow supply verification. Despite the crisis, proponents argue that the discovery by world-class security researchers demonstrates the network's commitment to proactive hardening and resilience.

bitcoinistHá 26m

Zcash Suffers Historic Collapse As Billions Vanish From Market Value

bitcoinistHá 26m

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

**Title: Has the "Digital Gold" Narrative for Bitcoin Failed?** The article argues that Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative remains valid despite a recent sharp price decline (from a peak near $126k in Oct 2025 to briefly under $61k in Feb 2026). It presents a long-term investment framework based on three core points: **1. Viewing Bitcoin as an Asset:** Bitcoin is presented as a superior potential store of value compared to gold. Key arguments are its absolute scarcity (21 million cap), superior portability, and transparent auditability via its public ledger. While acknowledging its current use in early, volatile stages (~3-4% global adoption), the author draws parallels to the early, disruptive phases of the internet and e-commerce. **2. Understanding the Recent Downturn:** The current ~50% correction is framed as a predictable, consensus-driven cycle following its post-halving peak (the 2024 halving preceded the Oct 2025 high). A crucial factor is a historic "changing of hands": the influx of new institutional buyers via ETFs allowed early, low-cost holders (miners, OG believers) to take profits. The author notes that while severe, Bitcoin's historical drawdowns (e.g., 93% in 2011, 77% in 2021-22) have been progressively smaller, suggesting maturing holder structure and decreasing volatility over time. **3. The Long-Term Perspective:** The long-term thesis hinges on Bitcoin capturing a portion of gold's market value. With Bitcoin's market cap at ~$1.4 trillion (at $70k) versus gold's ~$20 trillion, significant upside potential exists if the "digital gold" narrative is partially realized. However, the author strongly cautions that short-term risks remain, the bottom is unpredictable, and high volatility is inherent. The real risk is not Bitcoin failing but poor personal position management (over-leverage, wrong capital) and a lack of deep understanding, which can force investors out during severe downturns. The conclusion uses Amazon's 95% crash post-2000 dot-com bubble and subsequent 42x recovery as an analogy. The ultimate question is not if Bitcoin's price will rise, but if an investor's strategy and conviction can withstand the volatility to see the long-term play out. The recent divergence (gold up, Bitcoin down) is posed not as a narrative failure, but as potential evidence of this ongoing, painful transition from a speculative asset to a mainstream allocation.

marsbitHá 52m

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

marsbitHá 52m

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

The article discusses Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative, its recent price drop, and long-term outlook through the perspective of "Jason". It argues the narrative is not a failure but that Bitcoin represents a superior, new asset class due to its fixed supply (21 million), portability, and auditability. The piece compares its current ~3-4% global adoption rate to early internet/e-commerce, suggesting significant growth potential. Regarding the 2025-2026 price decline (from ~$126k to briefly under $61k), the author views it as a predictable, consensus-driven sell-off within Bitcoin's ~4-year cycle post-halving, exacerbated by a major "handover" from early, low-cost holders to new institutional buyers via ETFs. A key observation is that historical peak-to-trough drawdowns have lessened over time (e.g., 93% in 2011 to ~50% in 2026), indicating maturing volatility as holder structure changes. For the long term, the author uses a simple framework: Bitcoin's total market cap (~$1.4T at $70k) is only about 7% of gold's (~$20T). Even capturing 30-50% of gold's value would imply substantial upside. However, the article strongly cautions against viewing this as investment advice, emphasizing extreme volatility and the critical importance of risk management, position sizing, and deep fundamental understanding to survive severe drawdowns. It concludes by drawing a parallel to Amazon's 95% crash in 2000 and subsequent 42x recovery, stressing that the key is surviving market cycles to realize long-term potential.

链捕手Há 1h

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

链捕手Há 1h

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

"From Code to Cognition: The Evolution of Robot Brains" The journey of robotic intelligence has shifted dramatically from manually coded systems to AI-driven brains. For decades, robots relied on layered software stacks—perception, state estimation, planning, control—each handcrafted. While predictable, they lacked adaptability. The 2010s saw deep learning revolutionize perception (e.g., object detection) and control (via reinforcement learning), but learned skills remained narrow. The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) marked a turning point. LLMs acted as high-level planners, interpreting natural language instructions and generating sequences of actions for traditional robotic systems to execute. However, true integration came with Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, which fused vision, language, and motion prediction into a single network. Pioneered by models like RT-2 and open-source projects like OpenVLA, VLAs enable robots to reason and act directly from visual input and commands. The most advanced humanoid robots now employ a "dual-brain" architecture: a slow-thinking, large VLA (System 2) for reasoning and planning, and a fast-reacting, small network (System 1) for high-frequency motion control, sometimes with an even lower-level System 0 for balance. This split balances cognition with the physics of real-time movement. Computation is split between onboard hardware (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson) for safety-critical control loops and cloud/edge servers for non-critical tasks like learning and interfaces. A crucial driver is the open-source ecosystem—models like GR00T and OpenVLA allow startups to build upon pre-trained brains and fine-tune them with their own data, accelerating development. Despite progress, current systems struggle with recovery from errors, sample inefficiency, and long-horizon tasks. This has spurred the rise of **World Models**—neural networks that predict the consequences of actions. By simulating possible futures before acting (like NVIDIA Cosmos or Meta V-JEPA), robots can plan, recover, and generalize better. This represents the next frontier: shifting intelligence from learned reactions to an internal model of physics and cause-and-effect. The field is rapidly evolving. While not yet at its "ChatGPT moment," the convergence of cheaper hardware, scalable simulation, and world models points toward robots that are increasingly capable, adaptive, and useful. The question is shifting from "what can robots do?" to "what *should* they do?"

marsbitHá 1h

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

marsbitHá 1h

AI Bubble Is Bursting

The AI Bubble is Bursting: A Necessary Purge on the Path to Ubiquitous Intelligence Market volatility has reignited debates about an AI bubble, with figures like Ray Dalio pointing to high valuations. However, this parallels the dot-com bubble, which, despite its crash, laid the physical infrastructure for today's internet era. The current AI investment frenzy, with tech giants planning trillions in infrastructure spending far outstripping current AI application revenues, appears similarly imbalanced. This 'bubble' is seen as an inevitable phase for a disruptive technology, paying the "innovation tax." Critically, AI inference costs have plummeted over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence nearly free at the margin. This hasn't reduced spending but has instead unlocked massive new demand, as seen in enterprise AI cloud expenditure tripling. This follows the Jevons Paradox: efficiency gains lead to greater total consumption. The market is now entering a cleansing phase, weeding out speculative ventures lacking real moats. The deeper shift is a move from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to value creation in operational expenditure (OpEx) through AI applications that solve real industry problems. While infrastructure valuations are high, rapid earnings growth from widespread AI adoption across sectors—from manufacturing and finance to law and healthcare—may digest these valuations over time. Ultimately, this creative destruction will leave behind robust infrastructure and optimized models, cheaply powering an AI-augmented future for all industries, much as the internet became indispensable after its own bubble burst. The core productive potential remains undiminished.

链捕手Há 1h

AI Bubble Is Bursting

链捕手Há 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow