U.S. Stock Market Trend: Nasdaq Plunges 3.5% Intraday Before a Remarkable Recovery, All Eyes on CPI Tomorrow

marsbitPublicado em 2026-06-10Última atualização em 2026-06-10

Resumo

"US Stock Market Trends: Nasdaq Plunges 3.5% Before Dramatic Recovery, Eyes on Tomorrow's CPI" On Tuesday, US markets experienced a wild swing. The Nasdaq initially surged nearly 0.7% before plummeting to a 3.5% intraday loss following a post by Donald Trump on Truth Social. He stated that Iran had shot down a US Apache helicopter in the Strait of Hormuz and that the US "must...respond." The index, however, staged a remarkable recovery in the final two hours, closing down only 0.97%, as subsequent remarks from Trump and Vice President Vance suggested a potential Iran deal within days. The S&P 500 fell 0.26%, while the Dow Jones gained 0.17%, supported by its non-tech components. This incident marked the first loss of a US military asset since tensions with Iran escalated in late February. Despite the event, crude oil prices fell sharply (WTI -3.93%) due to expectations of a near-term deal, OPEC+ plans to increase output, and fears that strong jobs data could lead to Fed rate hikes. Market attention is now laser-focused on the May CPI data release Wednesday morning. This report is seen as critical evidence for whether hot job growth is fueling inflation and will heavily influence expectations for the Federal Reserve's upcoming meeting. A hotter-than-expected reading could trigger further sell-offs, particularly in tech, while a cooler print could spark a significant rebound. The article notes a clear sector rotation, with money flowing out of tech (Nasdaq down over 5% in a...

Author: Tide Research

On Tuesday, Wall Street witnessed a thriller of "kill first, rescue later."

The morning session progressed calmly, with the Nasdaq once gaining nearly 0.7%, and chip stocks continuing their rebound from Monday. In the afternoon, Trump posted on Truth Social that Iran had shot down a U.S. Apache helicopter over the Strait of Hormuz. Both pilots were safely rescued, but the U.S. "must respond to this attack."

The Nasdaq instantly plunged, falling as much as -3.5% at its intraday low.

Over the following two hours, the market gradually climbed back as Trump provided follow-up statements like "negotiations are still ongoing" and "a deal could be reached within two or three days," eventually paring losses. The Nasdaq closed down 0.97% at 25,678.82 points, and the Nasdaq 100 fell 1.12%. The S&P 500 dropped 0.26% to 7,386.65 points. The Dow Jones, supported by its non-tech components, bucked the trend to close up 0.17% (+86 points) at 50,872.11 points.

From -3.5% to -0.97%, the Nasdaq recovered over 70% of its intraday decline in the two hours before the close. This strength of recovery sends two signals: first, bears are hesitant to aggressively increase positions on the eve of CPI; second, the market still holds a firm belief that the "Iran issue will eventually be resolved," it's just a matter of time.

Helicopter Incident: The First Time U.S. Military Assets Were Hit

This is the first time since the U.S.-Iran conflict erupted at the end of February that the U.S. side has lost an Apache helicopter. Although there were no casualties, "hitting U.S. military assets" itself crosses a psychological line. Trump used the phrase "must respond," some of his toughest rhetoric on the Iran issue.

CNN reported that a U.S. military unmanned vessel rescued the two pilots. Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi later responded on X: "Foreign military forces approaching our territory always face the risk of their own human error, accidents, or being caught in crossfire." The subtext is clear: no admission of actively shooting it down, but no denial either.

Vice President Vance stated in a CBS interview that a deal is "very close," but "there's still some work to do." After attending the NBA Finals (Spurs vs. Knicks), Trump told reporters that a final deal might be reached "within two or three days," and the Strait of Hormuz would reopen "immediately" after the agreement is signed. He also emphasized that the U.S. blockade of Iranian ports would not be lifted before a deal is reached.

The reason the market could digest this bombshell intraday is that from March to June, investors have been repeatedly taught a lesson over 100 days regarding the Middle East situation: every escalation is followed by a de-escalation; behind every missile launch, there's a tweet saying "negotiations are still ongoing." This is a form of "war fatigue"—not fatigue with the war itself, but fatigue with the market being repeatedly held hostage by it.

Sector Divergence: Tech Takes Another Hit, Dow Holds Steady

Among the S&P's 11 sectors, only Technology (-2%) and Energy closed in the red. The other 9 sectors all closed higher. The Dow's non-tech components held the line.

This has been a persistent pattern over the past week: the Dow is stable, the Nasdaq is crumbling. From June 4th (Thursday) to June 9th (Tuesday), the Nasdaq has accumulated a loss of over 5%, while the Dow has fallen less than 1.5%. The trend of funds flowing continuously from AI chips to defensive sectors like healthcare, finance, and consumer staples shows no signs of slowing down.

Nvidia slipped 0.22%, Micron fell 1.41%. Following last Friday's trillion-dollar chip massacre, chip stocks have neither seen a panic-driven secondary sell-off nor a convincing V-shaped rebound; they are simply consolidating at low levels. Institutions are waiting for one thing: tomorrow's CPI.

Crude Oil: Helicopter Shot Down, Yet Oil Prices Fell

The most counter-intuitive market move on Tuesday happened in the oil market.

Logically, the downing of a U.S. military helicopter should have caused oil prices to surge. However, WTI crude plummeted 3.93% to $87.73/barrel, and Brent fell 1.3% to $93.02/barrel. The reason was three simultaneous bearish factors: Trump and Vance's "deal is at hand" remarks suppressed the war premium; OPEC+ approved a further production increase of 188,000 barrels per day for July; and after last week's strong non-farm payrolls report, the market began to worry that Fed rate hikes would curb demand.

WTI falling below $90 is a psychological threshold. The last time it was at this level was after the initial ceasefire in mid-April. If CPI data shows inflation cooling due to the drop in oil prices, it would provide the Fed with the perfect excuse to pause rate hikes.

Gold continued to be under pressure, hovering around $4,300, a two-month low. A strong dollar and rate hike expectations both suppressed safe-haven buying for the precious metal. Silver rose slightly by 0.81% to $68.90, finding some support from industrial demand.

Bitcoin fell to around $62,500, down 27% year-to-date for 2026, having halved from its all-time high. Spot BTC ETFs have seen net outflows for four consecutive weeks, with a cumulative withdrawal of $5.4 billion over the past four weeks. Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) plunged 24.29% last week, its worst weekly performance since the FTX crash in November 2022, showing that even the staunchest bulls in the crypto space are bleeding.

Looking Ahead: CPI Day, June's Most Important 8:30 AM

Tomorrow (Wednesday) at 8:30 AM ET, the May CPI data will be released.

The weight of this data point goes beyond being just a monthly economic indicator. It is the key evidence the market will use to answer all the following questions:

Has last week's overheated jobs number of 172K translated into price pressures? How deeply has the Middle East war-driven oil price increase penetrated into core inflation? At the Fed's June 16-17 meeting, will they maintain a wait-and-see stance or clearly turn hawkish?

The market is currently pricing in a 70% probability of a rate hike in December. If CPI exceeds expectations to the upside, this probability could surge towards 90%, putting the Nasdaq under renewed selling pressure. If CPI surprisingly cools, especially core CPI, it would become the strongest catalyst for chip stocks to bottom out, potentially triggering a fierce technical rebound from short covering.

Oracle's earnings are also due after Wednesday's close. As a key player in AI cloud infrastructure, it holds over $500 billion in remaining performance obligations (RPO), and the market needs to see these contracts translating into real revenue. Thursday brings a triple whammy: PPI, the ECB interest rate decision, and the OPEC monthly report.

Larger IPO events are also approaching. SpaceX is expected to price on June 11th and list on the Nasdaq on June 12th (ticker SPCX), with a valuation range of $1.75 trillion to $2 trillion. The FIFA World Cup kicks off in the U.S. on June 11th.

But all of this comes after tomorrow's 8:30 AM.

Over the past six trading sessions, the Nasdaq has fallen 5.2% from its all-time high of 27,094 points to 25,679 points. The VIX has surged from 16 to 19. The chip sector has evaporated over $1 trillion in value. The Middle East ceasefire exists in name only. Bitcoin has halved. This is a market under comprehensive pressure.

Against this backdrop, a CPI reading below 4% would be a shot in the arm; a reading above 4.5% might mean last week's sell-off was just an appetizer.

At least for today, one thing is clear: oil prices falling below $90 indicate the market is pricing in peace. But whether peace actually arrives depends on whether the Iranian deal, claimed to be "reached within two or three days," is yet another empty promise or the real thing this time.

It's been a hundred days. The market is no longer willing to guess. It just wants to see results.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat caused the sharp intraday drop and subsequent partial recovery of the Nasdaq Composite on Tuesday?

AThe sharp intraday drop was triggered by former President Trump's post on Truth Social stating that Iran shot down a U.S. Apache helicopter in the Strait of Hormuz and that the U.S. 'must respond.' The subsequent partial recovery occurred over the next two hours as Trump and Vice President Vance made follow-up statements suggesting a deal with Iran was very close and could be reached in a couple of days, easing market fears.

QWhat is the market's primary focus after the trading session described, and why is it so critical?

AThe market's primary immediate focus is the release of the May CPI data. It is critical because it will serve as key evidence for whether strong recent job growth has fueled inflation, how deeply Middle East conflict-driven oil prices have impacted core inflation, and whether the Fed will maintain its wait-and-see stance or turn more hawkish at its upcoming meeting.

QWhy did oil prices fall despite the reported downing of a U.S. military helicopter in a key region?

AOil prices fell due to three concurrent bearish factors: 1) Statements from Trump and Vance suggesting an Iran deal was imminent, which reduced the geopolitical risk premium. 2) OPEC+'s approval to increase production by 188,000 barrels per day in July. 3) Market concerns that strong recent non-farm payroll data could lead to Fed rate hikes, which would dampen demand.

QHow have different market sectors, specifically the Dow Jones and Nasdaq, performed over the past week according to the article?

AOver the past week, there has been a clear divergence: the Nasdaq Composite has fallen more than 5% while the Dow Jones Industrial Average has declined less than 1.5%. Funds have been consistently flowing out of tech/AI chip stocks and into defensive sectors like healthcare, finance, and consumer staples, supporting the Dow.

QWhat major event is scheduled for June 12th according to the article, and why is it significant?

ASpaceX (ticker SPCX) is scheduled to go public on the Nasdaq on June 12th. It is significant because its estimated valuation range is between $1.75 trillion and $2 trillion, making it one of the largest IPOs ever.

Leituras Relacionadas

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbitHá 29m

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbitHá 29m

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbitHá 44m

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbitHá 44m

Trading

Spot
活动图片