US Softening Tariff Stance, Will it Work for the Crypto Market?

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-02-20Última atualização em 2026-02-20

Resumo

The US has reduced tariffs on Indonesia from 32% to 19%, including exemptions for products like palm oil and rubber, signaling a potential softening of its tariff stance. Similar reductions have been made for other countries, including India. This policy shift may alleviate financial pressure on lower-income consumers affected by inflation, potentially allowing them to allocate more funds to the crypto market. The overall crypto market cap has increased by 1.48% to $2.33 trillion, though the article emphasizes this is not investment advice.

The US has lowered its tariffs on Indonesia. This is in line with other countries, which now have a lower rate on their exports to the US. Thereby signaling a possibility that the Trump Administration might be softening its stance when it comes to imposing high tariffs. For the crypto market, this brings up a scenario where the space sees comparatively higher allocations.

US Tariff on Indonesia

Indonesia and the US have reached a deal to bring down the tariff on the former from 32% to 19%. A lot of items have been exempt, giving them an entry with 0% rate. This includes products like palm oil, rubber, and cocoa, among others. Indonesia’s senior Economic Minister Airlangga Hartarto has called the deal a win-win, adding that it respects the sovereignty of both nations.

A fact sheet by the White House has called this a breakthrough for the country’s different sectors, namely agriculture, manufacturing, and digital. Indonesia, in response, has agreed to remove barriers on more than 99% of American exports, per the fact sheet.

Other Similar US Tariff Instances

This is not a standalone case where the US has reduced or eliminated the tariff rate for a country. India is the most recent nation which secured a deal to bring down the rate to 18% from almost 50%. All the details are likely to be published after signing the official document; however, such developments go on to show that America may be softening its stand on tariff.

The said tariff rate on Indonesia puts it together with other countries, like Cambodia, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Thailand. Vietnam is also on the list, but with a slightly higher rate of 20%. Needless to say, a lowered tariff rate is estimated to work well for crypto enthusiasts.

What’s for the Crypto Market?

A recent report underlined that lower-income consumers were struggling due to high inflation triggered by the tariff policy. A reduced rate could offer some sigh of relief, enabling them to allocate a portion of their portfolios to the crypto market. The sentiment could eventually be replicated by bigger investors upon noticing a bullish movement.

For now, the crypto market is up by 1.48% in terms of the market cap, which is $2.33 trillion. It is important to note that the content of this article is neither advice nor a recommendation. Do thorough research and risk assessment before crypto investments.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Capital Rotates From DeFi to Tokenized Real-World Assets Amid Crypto Market Pullback

TagsCrypto MarketTARIFF

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the new tariff rate the US has agreed upon with Indonesia, and what was the previous rate?

AThe US has lowered the tariff rate on Indonesia from 32% to 19%.

QAccording to the article, how could a reduced tariff rate potentially benefit the crypto market?

AA reduced tariff rate could offer relief to lower-income consumers struggling with high prices, potentially enabling them to allocate a portion of their portfolios to the crypto market. This sentiment could be replicated by larger investors if they notice a bullish movement.

QBesides Indonesia, which other countries are mentioned as having similar reduced US tariff rates?

AOther countries with similar reduced US tariff rates include Cambodia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam (with a slightly higher rate of 20%).

QWhat did Indonesia agree to do in response to the US lowering its tariffs?

AIn response, Indonesia agreed to remove barriers on more than 99% of American exports.

QWhat was the overall performance of the crypto market at the time the article was written, as measured by its market cap?

AAt the time of writing, the crypto market was up by 1.48%, with a total market capitalization of $2.33 trillion.

Leituras Relacionadas

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

On June 11, Anthropic apologized not for a model failure, but for a lack of transparency. Its new Claude Fable 5 model was found to be secretly rerouting requests from users engaged in advanced AI model development to a weaker version, Opus 4.8, without any notification. The company's response—promising future notifications for such "downgrades"—was met with user skepticism. The article argues the core issue isn't technical but commercial: Anthropic's "safety" measures are primarily a business strategy. A key feature, the "intelligent safety classifier," marketed as user protection, is described as a tool for "competitive defense" to protect Anthropic's market lead by limiting rivals' research capabilities. This covert mechanism was designed for low "false positives," precisely targeting AI researchers. Anthropic's model involves a calculated three-step process: publishing alarming security research to amplify public anxiety, offering its Fable 5 model with a "safety classifier" as a premium-priced solution, and cashing in through a planned high-value IPO. This contrasts with OpenAI's more direct "tool-and-traffic" approach. The apology, merely changing a secret downgrade to a visible one, is seen as a business "patch" rather than a principled shift. The incident risks damaging Anthropic's "safest AI" reputation among the developer community, which underpins its valuation and appeal to government and corporate clients. Ultimately, the article concludes that for Anthropic, safety is a business, and the apology is merely customer service for that business.

marsbitHá 45m

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

marsbitHá 45m

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

**Summary:** A growing "anti-college" movement is gaining traction among elite circles in Silicon Valley, challenging the traditional value of a four-year university degree. Proponents argue that college has become an expensive, slow, and increasingly irrelevant waste of time, especially in the fast-paced tech world where opportunities pass by quickly. The movement is led by figures like billionaire Peter Thiel, who criticizes universities for high costs, ideological indoctrination, and stifling true innovation. His "Thiel Fellowship" pays young people to drop out and pursue ventures. Companies like Palantir Technologies (co-founded by Thiel) fuel this trend with programs like the "Meritocracy Fellowship," which offers high school graduates paid internships as an alternative to immediate college enrollment, promising a practical "Palantir Degree." Key drivers include: 1. **Economics:** Skyrocketing student debt versus the allure of immediate, high-paying tech jobs or startup funding. 2. **Technology:** AI and online tools lowering barriers to self-education and product development, making formal instruction seem inefficient. 3. **Culture:** A backlash against perceived "woke" ideology and DEI policies in universities, coupled with a belief that these institutions suppress meritocracy and masculine drive. The movement is notably male-dominated. Critics, like economist David Deming, warn against overgeneralizing from dropout success stories (survivorship bias). He emphasizes that genuine autodidacts are rare, corporate training is narrowly focused, and the "college wage premium" remains high for most people. University liberal arts education, he argues, builds adaptable problem-solving skills and broad perspectives. The debate highlights a deeper crisis in education. The core model of the modern university appears increasingly mismatched with the speed of the information age. The movement signals a shift in the locus of learning from institutional "education" to personal, active "learning" powered by the internet and AI. Ultimately, this may not mean the end of university, but rather a painful evolution. The future likely holds more hybrid, personalized, and lifelong learning pathways. The central question becomes: in a world changing faster than any curriculum, how do we best learn?

marsbitHá 1h

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

marsbitHá 1h

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

The commercialization of generative AI is facing a critical inflection point as a potential price war looms. According to The Wall Street Journal, OpenAI is considering a significant cut to its token fees to compete with rival Anthropic, signaling a shift from a growth-at-all-costs model focused on token consumption. This move comes as both companies, reportedly losing billions on compute, prepare for IPOs, and as enterprise customers face "bill shock" from switching to usage-based token billing. Reports indicate poor ROI, with one analysis finding only 18 cents of every dollar spent on AI tokens generates user-facing value. The industry's initial phases—from flat-rate subscriptions to aggressive subsidies—have given way to a reckoning with real costs. Analysts debate the future: some predict a bifurcation between premium, high-cost models for complex tasks and cheaper alternatives for routine work, while others believe overall spending will still rise as agentic AI increases tokens per task. Notably, Chinese model DeepSeek's low-cost API is gaining traction with U.S. enterprises, adding competitive pressure. The core challenge is redefining value beyond token volume ("tokenmaxxing") toward measurable productivity ("valuemaxxing"), as the entire AI value chain, from cloud providers to chipmakers, feels the ripple effects of unsustainable pricing.

marsbitHá 1h

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片