U.S. Law Enforcement Organization Takes 'Neutral' Position on CLARITY Act

cryptonews.ruPublicado em 2026-09-04Última atualização em 2026-09-04

Resumo

The U.S. National Sheriffs' Association (NSA) has dropped its opposition to the pending crypto market structure bill, the Clarity Act, shifting its official stance to "neutral." In a letter to Senate leaders, the NSA stated that significant legislative and stakeholder work has addressed many legal and enforcement concerns, and it will now allow the legislative process to proceed. The NSA had previously opposed provisions that exempt crypto mixers from certain registration requirements, arguing they could hinder law enforcement's ability to trace illicit transactions and recover funds for victims. The Clarity Act, passed by the House in July 2025, has faced hurdles in the Senate despite committee approvals in 2026. Concerns remain over stablecoin yields, tokenized equities, and potential conflicts of interest involving former President Trump and his family. A procedural vote is scheduled for September 15. Meanwhile, U.S. regulators like the SEC and CFTC have indicated they will step in to regulate cryptocurrencies if Congress fails to pass the market structure legislation.

The National Sheriffs' Association (NSA) has dropped its opposition to the cryptocurrency market structure bill, which is scheduled for a vote later this month after the U.S. Senate returns to work.

In a letter sent on Thursday to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, the American law enforcement organization stated it was changing its position on the Clarity Act for Digital Assets (CLARITY) to 'neutral.' The NSA cited 'significant work done by Congress, the administration, and stakeholders to address the numerous legal, regulatory, and enforcement-related issues' associated with the consideration of the bill.

'At this time, we believe the most prudent course is to step back and allow the legislative process to run its course to shape a clear, effective, and much-needed regulatory framework,' said NSA President Troy Wellman and CEO & Executive Director Justin Smith.

Previously, the NSA had opposed provisions of the CLARITY Act, expressing 'serious concerns' about amendments that exempt crypto mixers from many registration requirements. According to the organization, this provision could '[undermine] law enforcement's ability to track transactions and digital assets, and return funds to victims.'

'The CLARITY Act protects the crypto industry, not society,' Sheriff Jim Skinner stated in an NSA video in July.

Related Reading: Rushing a Vote on CLARITY Could Set Legislation Back, Warns Galego

The CLARITY Act, passed by the U.S. House of Representatives in July 2025, has faced several hurdles since being sent to the Senate for consideration. Although the Senate Agriculture and Banking Committees approved their versions of the bill in 2026, many interest groups and lawmakers continue to express concerns about certain aspects of the legislation, including stablecoin rewards, tokenized stocks, and potential conflicts of interest related to President Donald Trump and his family.

Before the August recess, Thune introduced a motion for a procedural vote on the bill on September 15th, after senators return from work periods in their states.

Will U.S. Regulators Proceed Without CLARITY?

In August, Trump appeared together with the heads of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and several digital asset companies to advocate for the passage of the CLARITY Act. SEC Chairman Paul Atkins and CFTC Chairman Michael Selig—both appointed by Trump—made it clear that their agencies would take on the task of regulating cryptocurrencies if Congress failed to pass market structure legislation.

Magazine: Token buybacks are heating up. But are they good for crypto projects?

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the title of the article in English?

AThe title in English is 'American Law Enforcement Organization Takes 'Neutral' Stance on CLARITY Act'.

QWhich organization changed its position on the CLARITY Act and to what stance?

AThe National Sheriffs' Association (NSA) changed its position on the CLARITY Act from opposition to a 'neutral' stance.

QWhat specific concern did the NSA previously have about the CLARITY Act?

AThe NSA previously opposed provisions that would exempt cryptocurrency mixers from many registration requirements, fearing it would weaken law enforcement's ability to track transactions, trace digital assets, and recover victims' money.

QWhat is the next procedural step for the CLARITY Act in the Senate according to the article?

AAccording to the article, Senate Majority Leader John Thune has scheduled a procedural vote on the bill for September 15th, after senators return from working periods in their states.

QWhat did U.S. regulatory agency heads indicate they would do if Congress fails to pass a market structure law?

AHeads of the SEC and CFTC, both appointed by President Trump, indicated that their agencies would proceed with regulating cryptocurrencies if Congress fails to pass a market structure law like the CLARITY Act.

Leituras Relacionadas

ICP Cloud Engine Heats Up: "20% of Revenue Used for Burn", How Far is it From Token Revaluation?

The ICP community is discussing Cloud Engines, a product enabling enterprises to run private subnets on the Internet Computer. It is linked to the "Mission 70" deflationary plan, where node providers allocate 20% of Cloud Engines revenue to buy and burn ICP tokens, aiming to reduce ICP's inflation rate from 9.72% to 2.92%. This narrative connects enterprise adoption to token scarcity and potential price appreciation for ICP, which is down 99.6% from its peak. Cloud Engines functions as a "custom data center," offering businesses dedicated, sovereign infrastructure without vendor lock-in, using the same underlying protocol as the public ICP network. Key selling points include data sovereignty and hardware choice. However, critical features like SEV-encrypted nodes (for enhanced security) and operator-controlled upgrades are still on the roadmap, not yet live. Early adopters include Pakistan's national cloud engine and a UNDP pilot. The "Mission 70" goal relies on two pillars: supply-side reductions (like cutting node rewards) and demand-side increases in token burns from Cloud Engines revenue. While supply-side changes can be enacted via governance, the demand-side depends entirely on market adoption. Current daily burn rates are far below the levels needed to achieve the 26% deflation target attributed to increased burns. Analysts remain cautious, viewing the 20% burn mechanism as a forward-looking narrative. The product is in early access, and significant, scalable enterprise adoption is unproven. Near-term price catalysts are more likely to come from implementable supply-side governance proposals. The Cloud Engines story represents a longer-term bet on ICP capturing a segment of the enterprise cloud market, with token revaluation contingent on the product generating substantial, quantifiable burn data.

marsbitHá 2m

ICP Cloud Engine Heats Up: "20% of Revenue Used for Burn", How Far is it From Token Revaluation?

marsbitHá 2m

Bank of America's Hartnett: Interest Rate Hikes Become the Biggest Positive, Bond-Ending Bubble Logic Is Spreading

In a recent note, Bank of America strategist Michael Hartnett argues that aggressive central bank tightening, including a potential Fed hike in October, could paradoxically be the most bullish near-term catalyst for risk assets. His core thesis is "the bond bubble is bursting." While stocks remain resilient due to strong US data, solid earnings expectations, and robust AI-related capital expenditure plans, bonds are already showing severe stress, with government bonds down 4.4% year-to-date. The logic is that a proactive Fed hike could help anchor runaway long-end yields (the 10-year recently touched 5.36%), preventing a disorderly surge toward 6%. Without such action, the pressure from rising term premiums could continue unabated. The damage from higher rates is already visible in the most rate-sensitive areas: South Korean retail brokers, French government bonds (with the France-Germany spread hitting 140 bps, reminiscent of the 2012 crisis), and CCC-rated credit. Hartnett highlights that the $8 trillion in money market funds is unlikely to flow into equities without a clear shift to monetary easing. Furthermore, the upcoming US midterm elections pose a key risk; a Democratic sweep (currently a 64% probability) could trigger a >10% equity sell-off due to fears of higher taxes and regulation. Near-term strategy involves positioning for a peak in yields (e.g., long 30-year Treasuries) and risk contraction ahead of the elections, while maintaining exposure to commodities and EM assets. Key levels to watch include 10-year yields at 6%, the France-Germany spread at 150 bps, and a Bull & Bear Indicator below 8 for a potential risk rebound.

marsbitHá 6m

Bank of America's Hartnett: Interest Rate Hikes Become the Biggest Positive, Bond-Ending Bubble Logic Is Spreading

marsbitHá 6m

ETF Watch: ETH Outflows for Nine Consecutive Days, SOL Ends Fourteen-Week Inflow Streak, Combined Weekly Outflows from Three Major Spot ETFs Total Approximately $1.25 Billion

U.S. spot cryptocurrency ETFs saw significant outflows last week. According to The Block citing SoSoValue data, spot Ethereum (ETH) ETFs experienced net outflows of $542.1 million, marking their worst week since January and continuing a nine-day streak of withdrawals. Spot Solana (SOL) ETFs ended a record 14-week inflow streak with a weekly net outflow of $24.8 million. Combined with Bitcoin (BTC) ETF redemptions, the three major categories saw approximately $1.25 billion in total outflows for the week. BlackRock's iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA) led the Ethereum outflows, accounting for $477 million or roughly 88% of the category's total. The largest Solana ETF, Bitwise's BSOL, saw its largest weekly outflow on record at $20.9 million. Bitcoin ETFs saw net outflows of $681.1 million, ending a three-week inflow streak. This shift indicates a broad cooling of investor sentiment through the ETF channel, moving from a pattern of "BTC inflows and SOL gains" to simultaneous withdrawals across major digital asset funds.

marsbitHá 7m

ETF Watch: ETH Outflows for Nine Consecutive Days, SOL Ends Fourteen-Week Inflow Streak, Combined Weekly Outflows from Three Major Spot ETFs Total Approximately $1.25 Billion

marsbitHá 7m

Silicon Valley AI Status: Whoever Has the Compute is the Boss

The Silicon Valley AI Power Crunch: Compute is King Silicon Valley's race for AI dominance has devolved into a desperate scramble for computing power. The situation has become so extreme that even top executives are resorting to unusual measures. Anthropic's CEO Dario Amodei was reportedly turned down by Meta's Mark Zuckerberg when seeking additional GPU resources, leading to a deal where SpaceX acts as a broker, reselling Nvidia GPUs to Anthropic. This venture reportedly generated $2.561 billion in quarterly AI revenue for SpaceX. The shortage is reshaping the industry's dynamics, creating a new "compute economy" where GPU access is the ultimate currency. This scarcity is causing internal strife at major firms and altering competitive landscapes. A high-profile example is Noam Shazeer, a key AI scientist whom Google re-hired for $2.7 billion, only for him to leave for OpenAI reportedly due to insufficient compute resources for his team. Similar frustrations over resource allocation have been cited within Google and DeepMind. For AI startups, the challenge is existential. Cloud providers are now demanding multi-year contracts with large upfront payments, making flexible, on-demand access nearly impossible. This has spurred innovative workarounds, including a new market for "global compute prospecting"—companies scavenging for underutilized server capacity worldwide—and venture capital firms like Y Combinator and Radical Ventures directly acquiring and allocating GPU clusters for their portfolio companies. The root causes are complex: explosive growth in AI model complexity and the shift from simple chatbots to persistent "Agent" systems dramatically increase compute demands. While tech giants are building new data centers, supply cannot keep pace with immediate needs. Rental prices for critical chips like the Nvidia H100 have surged nearly 40% in months. The consequence is a consolidation of power. Compute access is becoming the definitive barrier to entry, significantly strengthening large companies with their own infrastructure and creating a lucrative "picks and shovels" market for those who control the hardware supply. In today's Silicon Valley, compute isn't just a resource—it's the foundation of survival and competitive advantage.

marsbitHá 32m

Silicon Valley AI Status: Whoever Has the Compute is the Boss

marsbitHá 32m

Even Losing Money Requires Waiting in Line, How Far Can PaperTrade's 1000x Leverage Experiment Go?

PaperTrade, a synthetic perpetual contract platform built on HyperEVM, launched on October 10th. Its defining feature is offering up to 1000x leverage and rewarding users with its native token, PAPER, for trading losses or liquidations—a mechanism dubbed "losing money to mine." This sparked initial frenzy, with users queuing to execute trades and generate losses for PAPER rewards. Within 24 hours, nominal trading volume exceeded $678 billion. The platform operates without traditional order books; users trade directly against a shared USDC liquidity pool. Profits are paid from this pool, but if insufficient funds exist, payments queue on a first-in, first-out basis. PAPER has zero initial supply, minted solely from qualifying user losses, and can be staked for a share of protocol revenue. However, controversies emerged quickly. Smaller orders faced longer execution queues compared to larger ones. More critically, PaperTrade's reliance on Hyperliquid's mid-price for asset pricing made it vulnerable to market manipulation. Reports indicated that actors potentially moved prices on Hyperliquid to profit from large, highly leveraged positions on PaperTrade. The team acknowledged this as a known risk, exacerbated by high initial position limits, and has since tightened limits to reduce the attack surface. After the initial surge, open interest and margin deposited have significantly declined. The platform's long-term viability hinges on whether the value and revenue share from PAPER can justify the initial "loss-mining" strategy for users, moving beyond speculative hype to sustainable returns.

marsbitHá 1h

Even Losing Money Requires Waiting in Line, How Far Can PaperTrade's 1000x Leverage Experiment Go?