US Bitcoin miners cut output during Winter Storm Fern as network hashrate dips

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-01-26Última atualização em 2026-01-26

Resumo

US Bitcoin mining companies, including CleanSpark, Riot Platforms, Marathon Digital, and Iris Energy, significantly reduced their daily bitcoin production during Winter Storm Fern. The extreme weather strained regional power grids, prompting miners enrolled in demand-response programs to temporarily scale back operations to prioritize residential and critical infrastructure electricity needs. On-chain data confirmed synchronized output declines, with hashrate dropping from over 1 trillion to around 760 billion. The Bitcoin network’s difficulty adjustment mechanism absorbed the temporary reduction in mining activity without affecting security or block production. The curtailments highlight the industry’s role in supporting grid stability during periods of stress.

Several major US Bitcoin mining companies sharply reduced daily production as Winter Storm Fern swept across large parts of the country. The storm placed pressure on regional power grids and prompting energy-intensive operators to curtail load.

The winter storm forced grid operators to prioritise residential and critical infrastructure demand.

In response, Bitcoin miners participating in demand-response programmes temporarily scaled back operations, according to on-chain production data.

Bitcoin mining rate declines

Figures compiled from CryptoQuant show a marked decline in daily bitcoin output across several publicly listed miners.

CleanSpark’s production fell from roughly 22 bitcoin per day to around 12. Riot Platforms saw output drop from about 16 bitcoin to just 3.

Marathon Digital recorded a sharper swing, from approximately 45 bitcoin to 7, while Iris Energy declined from around 18 to 6.

The reductions were abrupt and broadly synchronised, suggesting deliberate curtailments rather than operational failures or changes in mining economics.

US-based miners, particularly those operating in deregulated power markets such as Texas, commonly agree to reduce electricity consumption during periods of grid stress in exchange for financial incentives or longer-term power cost advantages.

Bitcoin hashrate data confirms temporary curtailment

An analysis of network-level data supports this interpretation.

Bitcoin’s hashrate dipped noticeably during the same period as the production declines before beginning to recover. This indicates that multiple miners simultaneously reduced their activity.

CryptoQuant data showed that the hashrate fell from over 1 trillion to around 760 billion, as of this writing.

While daily hashrate figures are inherently volatile, the timing and short duration of the decline closely align with the peak of the winter storm and the associated grid disruptions.

What this means for Bitcoin

Short-term hashrate fluctuations during extreme weather events are consistent with Bitcoin’s operating history and protocol design.

The network’s difficulty adjustment mechanism is designed to accommodate temporary changes in mining power, recalibrating over time to maintain stable block intervals.

In this instance, the data suggests that Bitcoin’s security and functionality were not materially affected.

Miners curtailed operations to support grid stability during Winter Storm Fern, then began restoring capacity as conditions normalised, highlighting the network’s ability to absorb short-lived external shocks.

Final Thoughts

The recent drop in miner production reflects weather-driven grid curtailments during Winter Storm Fern, not structural weakness in Bitcoin mining.
Network hashrate data shows the Bitcoin protocol absorbed the disruption without lasting impact on security or block production.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the main reason for the reduction in Bitcoin production by US miners during Winter Storm Fern?

AThe reduction was due to the winter storm placing pressure on regional power grids, prompting energy-intensive Bitcoin mining operators to curtail their electricity consumption as part of demand-response programs to support grid stability.

QWhich major Bitcoin mining companies significantly cut their daily output, and by how much?

ACleanSpark's production fell from about 22 to 12 bitcoin per day, Riot Platforms dropped from around 16 to 3, Marathon Digital declined from approximately 45 to 7, and Iris Energy reduced from about 18 to 6.

QHow did the Bitcoin network's hashrate change during the storm, according to CryptoQuant data?

AThe hashrate fell from over 1 trillion to around 760 billion, indicating a significant but temporary reduction in mining activity during the peak of the winter storm.

QWhat mechanism in the Bitcoin protocol helps accommodate temporary changes in mining power?

ABitcoin's difficulty adjustment mechanism is designed to accommodate temporary changes in mining power by recalibrating over time to maintain stable block intervals, ensuring network security and functionality are not materially affected.

QDid the temporary curtailment of mining operations during Winter Storm Fern have a lasting impact on Bitcoin's security or block production?

ANo, the data suggests that Bitcoin's security and functionality were not materially affected. The network absorbed the short-lived disruption, and miners began restoring capacity as conditions normalized.

Leituras Relacionadas

La Liga Team Bets $1 Million Against Themselves Before Match: Does Using Prediction Markets for Insurance Comply with Sports Regulations?

A Spanish La Liga club, reportedly Osasuna, purchased insurance against relegation and was linked to a transaction of over $1 million on the prediction market platform Kalshi, betting against its own victory in a crucial season-ending match. While Osasuna confirmed buying €1.2 million insurance for a potential €6 million payout in case of relegation through broker Howden, it did not confirm involvement with Kalshi. The reported trade involved intermediaries like Game Point Capital and Greenlight Commodities, with quant firm Susquehanna as the counterparty. This incident highlights the blurring line between financial hedging and gambling in prediction markets. Such markets allow trading on future event outcomes, like sports results. In the US, Kalshi operates as a regulated event contract market under the CFTC. However, Spanish authorities recently initiated penalties against Kalshi and Polymarket, considering their activities unlicensed gambling. The case raises core questions about prediction markets: who can trade, how insider information is handled, and whether participants can influence outcomes, especially in sports where results are human-driven. While leagues like La Liga and Serie A have partnered with Polymarket in North America, the regulatory clash and potential for conflicts of interest, as seen in this club's alleged transaction, present significant challenges as prediction markets evolve toward institutional risk management.

Foresight NewsHá 9m

La Liga Team Bets $1 Million Against Themselves Before Match: Does Using Prediction Markets for Insurance Comply with Sports Regulations?

Foresight NewsHá 9m

From Shouting 150 Dollars to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

How much of Arthur Hayes's market credibility remains? Recently, the "godfather of crypto perpetual swaps" and BitMEX co-founder has faced public criticism, including accusations from on-chain investigator ZachXBT about creating exit liquidity for his followers. Starting last week, Hayes executed multiple sudden sell-offs. He had repeatedly publicly predicted the HYPE token would reach $150. After a $100,000 bet defending Hyperliquid on June 1st, he announced just three days later that he had completely sold his HYPE and NEAR holdings, successfully exiting near the peak. He also sold ZEC and WLD. His sale of WLD appeared to be a classic "pump and dump" maneuver. On June 3rd, he publicly set a $10 target for WLD, causing its price to surge over 35%. By June 6th, he announced he had sold his WLD, citing "anomalous" SpaceX pre-IPO price action, which triggered a sharp price drop. On June 9th, Hayes published a lengthy article explaining his actions, citing factors like rising energy costs and a potential AI bubble burst. Consequently, his family office, Maelstrom, now holds positions in US energy producers and only core crypto assets BTC and ETH, having sold AI-related stocks and non-core cryptocurrencies. This pattern is not new. In 2025, he similarly touted HYPE before selling it at what turned out to be a cycle peak, only to repurchase it at the next cycle's low. Similar scenarios played out with tokens like ETHFI and ENA. Long-term observers have developed a strategy: ignore Hayes's public statements but closely monitor his on-chain actions—be cautious following his buys, but decisively follow his sells. If he continues these tactics, especially as seen with the WLD case, his market credibility risks being permanently damaged. As Hayes himself admitted in his latest article, "I remain an unapologetic gambler."

marsbitHá 27m

From Shouting 150 Dollars to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

marsbitHá 27m

From Calling for $150 to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

Arthur Hayes, co-founder of BitMEX and a prominent crypto figure, is facing scrutiny over his market credibility. Recent on-chain data and public criticism, notably from detective ZachXBT, question whether he uses his influence to create exit liquidity for his followers. Hayes has executed several abrupt sell-offs, including publicly advocating for HYPE to reach $150 before completely selling his holdings just three days later, after which the price dropped sharply. He similarly promoted WLD with a $10 target, only to sell his entire position three days afterward, citing vague concerns about SpaceX's pre-IPO activity and causing a significant price decline. Hayes justifies these moves with detailed macroeconomic analyses, such as a recent essay citing energy costs and AI market risks, explaining his shift into energy stocks and core cryptocurrencies BTC and ETH. However, his pattern of bullish public statements followed by unannounced sell-offs—previously seen with tokens like ETHFI and ENA—has led many investors to adopt a strategy of ignoring his commentary but closely monitoring his on-chain actions for sell signals. Analysts warn that this "cry wolf" pattern risks eroding his market trust, with Hayes himself admitting in a recent article, "I remain an unapologetic gambler."

Odaily星球日报Há 31m

From Calling for $150 to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

Odaily星球日报Há 31m

Fundraising is Like a Strange Dance: The 'Absurd Drama' of Silicon Valley Founders' Capital Raises

The article details a series of absurd and revealing anecdotes shared by Silicon Valley founders about their venture capital fundraising experiences, sparked by Greg Isenberg's story of pitching to a sleeping a16z partner. Founders describe surreal pitch meetings: one faced a barefoot, peanut-eating investor who offered triple the requested amount after 30 seconds; another performed a pitch in a VC's parked car; a founder discovered his audience understood no English beyond "yes." These stories highlight the often irrational and performative nature of fundraising. Beyond the absurdity, darker power imbalances are exposed. Stories include investors suggesting founders fire co-founders for their equity, blatant market misjudgments, disrespectful behavior from LPs, and discriminatory remarks. A debate also emerges around "Sequoia's" practice of splitting a round into two valuations. However, the thread isn't solely critical. Positive counter-narratives celebrate supportive VCs who offered crucial advice during crises, respected founders' timelines, and showed simple gestures of respect—like a partner personally fetching coffee before a major pitch. Ultimately, the collective sharing acts as a pressure release, illustrating that fundraising is a complex dance of power, trust, and sometimes sheer theater. It underscores that beyond capital, mutual respect and integrity remain the most enduring foundations of the founder-investor relationship.

marsbitHá 41m

Fundraising is Like a Strange Dance: The 'Absurd Drama' of Silicon Valley Founders' Capital Raises

marsbitHá 41m

Taiwanese Nodes on the AI Industry Chain: 9 Taiwanese Stock Picks Favored by 'New Stock God' Serenity

Investment analyst Serenity has spotlighted 9 Taiwanese stocks positioned within three key themes of the AI hardware supply chain: CPO (Co-packaged Optics), ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuits), and Compound Semiconductors. For the CPO theme, anchored by TSMC's COUPE platform expected to mass produce in 2026, Serenity highlighted five stocks: FOCI (fiber array unit supplier), Shunsin Technology (optical packaging & testing), Xintec (wafer-level packaging & testing), MSSCorps (inspection/measurement tools), and Nextronics (connectors & thermal modules). Regarding the ASIC theme, driven by hyperscalers' custom chips, three companies were named: Alchip (design services for AWS), Unimicron (ABF substrates for Google TPU/AWS), and MediaTek (potential collaboration on Google TPU). A singular, strong conviction pick is Win Semiconductor, a compound semiconductor foundry and leader in InP/GaAs, seen as a beneficiary in areas like laser sources for silicon photonics and LEO satellite communications. Serenity argues that current valuations are not in a bubble, geopolitical risks are overstated, and the real systemic risk lies not in cross-strait tensions but in potential future cuts to hyperscaler (Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Meta, Oracle) capital expenditure—the primary driver of the current AI infrastructure boom.

marsbitHá 1h

Taiwanese Nodes on the AI Industry Chain: 9 Taiwanese Stock Picks Favored by 'New Stock God' Serenity