Uncovering the "Research God" Behind Citrini: Consistently Top-Ranked on Substack, One Report Evaporated Trillions from the U.S. Stock Market

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2026-06-18Última atualização em 2026-06-18

Resumo

"Citrini Research, an independent investment research firm led by founder James van Geelen, has gained significant influence, consistently ranking #1 in Substack's finance category with nearly 250,000 subscribers. Despite a non-financial background with dual degrees in biology and psychology from UCLA and experience as an emergency medical technician, Geelen founded Citrini after selling a healthcare startup. The firm is known for its 'second-order thinking' approach, focusing on long-term macro trends like AI, geopolitics, and energy. A February report titled 'The 2028 Global Intelligence Crisis,' co-authored with former traditional finance analyst Alap Shah, triggered a sell-off in U.S. software stocks, significantly impacting markets and wiping hundreds of billions in market value. Citrini's research has also covered field reports from conflict zones like the Strait of Hormuz and insights into semiconductor supply chains. The firm completed a $5.05 million seed round in late 2025. Its investment philosophy emphasizes narrative-driven analysis and actionable insights, positioning itself as a bridge highlighting the growing intersection of crypto platforms and traditional finance."

Original|Odaily Planet Daily(@OdailyChina)

Author|Wenser(@wenser2010 )

In this bull run of the U.S. stock market, apart from the "White-Haired Stock God" Serenity who is active in the public discourse as an individual, another independent research firm named Citrini has also garnered significant attention—consistently ranking first in the finance category on Substack, with nearly 250,000 subscribers.

In February of this year, Citrini's report "The 2028 Global Intelligence Crisis" once triggered a "sell-off in U.S. software stocks" and intensified panic psychology around Silicon Valley's unemployment wave. In April, the "Strait of Hormuz Research Report" written on-site by Citrini analyst Analyst#3 sparked strong reactions from the public, peeling back the layers of mystery shrouding the reality of this critical conflict point with first-hand experiences. Most recently, Citrini's semiconductor analyst Jukan accurately highlighted the importance of the copper foil industry within the AI and semiconductor sectors, driving a new wave of investment enthusiasm.

Standing behind this research firm, however, is a founder without a formal finance background: James van Geelen. Holding a dual degree in Biology and Psychology from UCLA, he has worked as an EMT, founded a healthcare company, and entered the investment world mid-career, now referred to as the "Research God." This issue of Odaily Planet Daily will uncover James's legendary cross-industry journey.

Citrini Founder: A Narrative Master Under "Second-Order Thinking"

Mentioning Citrini, people in the crypto space might have first noticed this research account perhaps due to a post he made in May this year, just before Cerebras (CBRS) went public, mentioning "fund managers conducting price discovery in advance on Trade.xyz (on the Hyperliquid ecosystem)." This tweet was later reposted and confirmed by Trade.xyz founder Shokun.

Citrini: The "Traditional Financial Circle Whistleblower" for Hyperliquid and Trade.xyz

It's no exaggeration to say that as a research account that once published the hot topic "2028 Global Intelligence Crisis," Citrini's radiating influence on the traditional financial circle is evident.

Its high affirmation of the Hyperliquid ecosystem and Trade.xyz's role in pre-market stock pricing has also genuinely brought crypto market RWA platforms, pre-market stock contract platforms, and on-chain stock trading platforms into more people's view, to some extent fueling this year's "U.S. stock RWA asset frenzy."

In a sense, Citrini can be considered a bellwether sending "warning signals" to the traditional financial circle—using accurate information to warn traditional financial markets that previously unnoticed crypto players are setting their sights on the "big cake" of traditional finance like barbarians.

Behind Citrini is a founder who believes in "second-order thinking" and "long-termism"—James van Geelen.

Multiple Labels: Dual Degrees in Biology & Psychology, Medical Emergency Practitioner, "AI Panic Whistleblower"

Thirty-three-year-old James van Geelen (hereinafter referred to as Geelen) perhaps never imagined that a single "hot post about AI" could trigger the rapid evaporation of hundreds of billions of dollars in market value from the U.S. stock market; earlier, his professional resume wasn't even remotely related to AI.

Public information shows that Geelen graduated from the prestigious U.S. university UCLA, earning dual degrees in Biology and Psychology during his studies; he also worked as an Emergency Medical Technician and Paramedic in downtown Los Angeles. His elite education and medical emergency background forged his character—pursuing efficiency and excelling at planning. As he himself says, "If you don't have a plan, you're going to have a bad time." Additionally, he claims to be a "genius musician," though without any notable works to show for it.

According to Geelen's original plan, he should have become a doctor saving lives, but by a twist of fate, he instead embarked on an entrepreneurial path: first founding a healthcare company and selling it to a private equity fund, thereby successfully breaking free from the "prestigious school-job-professional manager" cycle; then founding the current Citrini.

Another noteworthy point, as he personally mentioned in a 2023 Odd Lots podcast, is that he also co-founded one of Connecticut's earliest medical marijuana dispensaries. From this perspective, he is far from the "proper doctor" perceived by ordinary people as following a set routine or even being stubborn.

In 2018, after securing some startup capital, Geelen began his personal investment career under the name Citrinitas Capital, capturing early opportunities in areas like AI (e.g., NVIDIA) and GLP-1 weight-loss drugs (e.g., Ozempic/Wegovy).

In 2023, Geelen formally founded Citrini Research, dedicated to "cross-asset, multi-dimensional thinking for investment analysis," providing in-depth reports on thematic stock investing and global macro trading. It rapidly grew to become a top creator in the finance field on the Substack platform. (Odaily Planet Daily Note: It operates on both individual and institutional subscription models.)

On May 31, 2023, the model investment portfolio Citrindex, based on personal research, was officially launched with an annual subscription fee of $1250. According to statistics, this investment portfolio has achieved cumulative returns exceeding 200%, often outperforming the S&P 500 on a monthly basis.

In March 2024, he boldly predicted Trump would win the election; in July 2025, amid the turmoil surrounding former Fed Chair Powell's departure, he loudly advised his over 50,000 subscribers to "buy two-year U.S. Treasuries and short ten-year U.S. Treasuries" to hedge policy risks.

In December 2025, according to PitchBook information, Citrini completed approximately $5.05 million in seed funding, with only about 10 employees, and the company remains privately held.

Then, in February of this year, he co-authored with traditional finance veteran Alap Shah the report that shook the U.S. stock market: "The 2028 Global Intelligence Crisis." Although he repeatedly emphasized the report was merely a "thought experiment," a scenario assumption rather than predictive analysis, the phenomena it mentioned—such as "large-scale white-collar unemployment, declining consumer spending, economic contraction (Ghost GDP)"—still sparked panic and concern in the capital market, leading to sharp declines in delivery, payment, and software stocks. Among them, IBM's stock price on February 23 recorded its largest single-day drop since 2025; American Express and Blackstone Group both fell over 8%, the entire software stock sector dropped nearly 5%, and stocks like DoorDash, Uber, Mastercard, Visa, Capital One, and Apollo Global Management Inc. once fell by 3%. Multiple U.S. stock sectors were swept into the selling wave, with the Dow Jones index at one point falling over 800 points. Alap Shah later publicly stated that his investment stance was "talking bearish but going long," meaning shorting companies they believed would be disrupted by AI while holding semiconductor tech stocks benefiting from AI.

It's no exaggeration to say that Citrini's one report directly caused the U.S. stock market to "bleed profusely" at one point, evaporating hundreds of billions of dollars in market value overnight, prompting follow-up reports from overseas media like Bloomberg and The Wall Street Journal.

On April 6 this year, Citrini team "Analyst #3" (code name Analyst#3) personally went to the critical flashpoint in the U.S.-Iran conflict—the Strait of Hormuz—for research, disclosing many little-known first-hand observations. They revealed the specific operational mode of Iran's "toll station" set up in the strait and presented a series of counter-intuitive conclusions, such as: Regardless of how the situation develops, shipping volume through the strait will gradually increase; Iran does not wish to close the Strait of Hormuz. First, strait shipping volume will continue to rise. Second, a diplomatic-style "toll station," surprisingly, the passage order in the strait is actually very regulated. Third, the paradoxical nature of escalation; even if ground operations commence, shipping volume through the strait may still continue to increase. Fourth, a restructuring of the landscape, not a winner-takes-all showdown. This conflict is not a simple "two-sided confrontation" but a multi-party game. Geographical disputes within great power competition are also key subjects within Citrini's "research range."

When asked why he named the company "citrinitas," Geelen replied: "The naming inspiration comes from the financial titan George Soros's book 'The Alchemy of Finance.' This is actually a stage in alchemy, but what most people don't know is that in this transitional stage, lead begins to transform into gold but hasn't completely become gold yet." This is also his favorite time to "make a difference"—seeing the birth of "gold" before others notice the change in lead.

Investment Style: Second-Order Thinking, Narrative-Driven, Reverse Scenario Analysis

As for Citrini's investment style, thanks to its cross-industry experience and multiple labels, it highly advocates "second-order thinking."

As Geelen himself says: "Most investors only focus on the ball itself, but I focus more on where the ball is going to bounce next."

Judging from Citrini's past content and public information, this research firm focuses on long-term "super trends," such as AI, robotics, energy demand, fiscal policy, geopolitics, modern warfare, etc. Additionally, the institution is committed to providing actionable "bundled investment references" and tactical macro trade ideas, with analysis leaning towards long-term structural changes rather than short-term trading. In its Substack homepage bio, we can see its emphasis on practicality, stating: "You (the reader) won't have to ask 'what's the trade?' anymore."

Furthermore, Citrini often uses "scenario assumptions" to help readers understand second-/third-order effects. Geelen once mentioned: "Don't just think about what you think will happen. Instead, think about things that are bound to happen. How will the market's reaction change the reality? What secondary effects will there be? What are the obstacles to keeping a certain trend going? And where will capital flow to overcome these obstacles?" Previously, he boldly bought overnight funding rate call options during the Silicon Valley Bank collapse in March 2023, easily reaping nearly 50x returns; last December, before the U.S. launched military action in Venezuela, he shared insights on investment opportunities in Venezuelan sovereign bonds.

This year, Citrini has successively absorbed several independent analysts, including macro analyst Nick Reece, South Korean semiconductor industry analyst @jukan05, and AI chip industry analyst @zephyr_z9, to some extent filling gaps in understanding industry details, technical processes, and sector trend changes.Currently, the research institution still maintains a founder-driven + anonymous elite team collaboration production model.

Criptomoedas em alta

Perguntas relacionadas

QWho is the founder of Citrini Research and what is his academic background?

AThe founder of Citrini Research is James van Geelen. He holds dual degrees in Biology and Psychology from UCLA.

QWhat major event in February was triggered by a Citrini report, and what was its impact on the stock market?

AIn February, Citrini's report titled 'The 2028 Global Intelligence Crisis' triggered a panic-driven sell-off in U.S. software stocks. It led to massive market losses, including IBM's worst single-day drop in 2025, significant declines for companies like American Express and Blackstone, a nearly 5% drop in the software sector, and a temporary evaporation of hundreds of billions of dollars in market value.

QHow did Citrini contribute to the visibility of platforms like Trade.xyz in the traditional finance sector?

ACitrini highlighted how fund managers were using platforms like Trade.xyz on the Hyperliquid ecosystem for price discovery ahead of stock listings, such as before Cerebras (CBRS) went public. This acknowledgment brought crypto-based RWA platforms, pre-market trading platforms, and on-chain stock trading into the view of traditional finance circles.

QWhat is the origin of the name 'Citrini', and what does it symbolize according to the founder?

AThe name 'Citrini' (from Citrinitas) is inspired by George Soros's book 'The Alchemy of Finance'. It refers to a stage in alchemy where lead begins to transform into gold but has not fully completed the process. James van Geelen sees it as representing the moment of potential and transition that he seeks to identify in markets before others do.

QWhat is James van Geelen's core investment philosophy, often described as 'second-order thinking'?

AJames van Geelen's core investment philosophy is 'second-order thinking'. This means looking beyond the immediate event or trend (the 'ball') to anticipate its subsequent effects and consequences ('where the ball will bounce next'). It involves considering long-term structural changes, secondary impacts, and how market reactions will alter reality.

Leituras Relacionadas

From Gold to Bitcoin: Fixed Supply + Institutional Frenzy, Might It Repeat the 'Explosive' Price Trend?

"From Gold to Bitcoin: Fixed Supply and Institutional Frenzy May Lead to 'Explosive' Price Rally Analysts suggest Bitcoin's price action could mirror gold's over the past two decades, following the launch of spot Bitcoin ETFs. Gold ETFs, introduced in 2004, drove gold's price surge to a current market cap near $28 trillion. Both gold and Bitcoin are non-yielding stores of value, with prices driven purely by investor sentiment rather than cash flows or credit. Gold ETFs experienced dramatic cycles: explosive growth, painful drawdowns, and slow recoveries, with each cycle reaching higher peaks. Bitcoin ETFs, approved in early 2024, saw rapid institutional adoption but are now facing similar volatility. Recent warnings highlight the risk of significant ETF outflows disrupting the current rebound. BlackRock's IBIT, a leading Bitcoin ETF, has sold nearly 100,000 BTC to meet redemptions while still holding over 733,000. The core parallel is fixed supply: when demand surges, prices explode, but demand is often volatile and wave-like, not steady. Institutional interest, through ETFs and corporate adoption, remains a key support pillar, helping to cushion sell-offs. If Bitcoin captures even a fraction of gold's role as a store of value, its upside potential is immense, though the path will be marked by high volatility. For investors, focusing on long-term trends and managing risk is crucial as this 'price explosion' narrative unfolds."

Foresight NewsHá 2m

From Gold to Bitcoin: Fixed Supply + Institutional Frenzy, Might It Repeat the 'Explosive' Price Trend?

Foresight NewsHá 2m

Why Is AI Agent Shopping Hard to Popularize?

The article argues that the popular narrative of "AI agent shopping" – equipping AI with a wallet to autonomously handle purchases – is fundamentally flawed and oversimplifies the complexity of shopping. It deconstructs shopping into two core actions: **information retrieval** (standardized, easily automated) and **value judgment** (deeply subjective and human-centric). The narrative mistakenly assumes AI can fully handle both. Value judgment itself has two layers: **evaluation** (assessing options against criteria) and **demand definition** (setting the criteria, weights, and values). The latter is inherently human and dynamic, as preferences are not fixed but constructed during the decision-making process ("constructive preferences"). The real dividing line for automation is not product standardization, but whether the **act of choosing** itself holds experiential value. For mundane purchases (e.g., printer paper), full AI delegation works. For experiential goods (e.g., wine, furniture), the joy of selection is core to consumption, so AI should act as an assistant that narrows options, leaving the final choice to humans. The "AI wallet" concept confuses three separate elements: decision-making, execution, and fund custody. Current payment industry solutions (e.g., from Stripe, Mastercard, Google, Visa) show that limited, scoped payment authorization tokens are sufficient for most consumer scenarios, not full fund custody. The true use case for autonomous AI wallets is in **B2B procurement** and **machine-to-machine (M2M) settlements** for standardized, high-frequency, low-value transactions. The real bottlenecks for AI shopping are not payment technology, but **1) the lack of trusted data sources** (e.g., fake reviews, counterfeit goods) and **2) the impossibility of automating human demand definition**. The conclusion is that the focus should be on safely automating the assessment and filtering process while reserving for humans the rights to define their criteria and enjoy the final act of choice. For experiential goods, the platform's competitive advantage shifts to providing a superior selection experience.

Foresight NewsHá 1h

Why Is AI Agent Shopping Hard to Popularize?

Foresight NewsHá 1h

After Nine Months of Shorting, a Full Turn to Long: Renowned Trader Opens Bitcoin Positions Around 64K, Crypto Market Long-Short Divergence Intensifies

After nine months of being short, prominent crypto trader Doctor Profit has closed all his bearish positions and started buying Bitcoin near $64,000, signaling a complete bullish reversal. He argues that structural market changes—such as impending U.S. regulation (CLARITY Act) and institutional adoption via securities tokenization—are rewriting the traditional four-year cycle script, potentially bringing the market bottom forward from the widely expected September/October timeframe. This view finds some technical support from on-chain analyst gumsays, who notes a bullish divergence on Bitcoin's weekly chart has persisted for 147 days, nearing the 161-day duration seen before the 2022 cycle low. However, cycle researcher Jake Pahor presents a counter-argument based on historical data. Analyzing patterns since 2014, he identifies three common features of past bear market bottoms: a ~12-month duration from peak to trough, a sustained period of extreme fear (with a proprietary risk score below 20), and the price falling below Bitcoin's realized price (~$53,000 currently). The current cycle, only nine months from its October 2025 peak, meets none of these conditions. The debate highlights a market torn between "front-running" a potential early bottom driven by new fundamentals and waiting for confirmation through traditional on-chain and sentiment metrics. While Doctor Profit opts for aggressive buying, Pahor maintains a disciplined, tiered accumulation strategy, continuing weekly buys at current risk levels but reserving larger orders for if more extreme fear emerges.

marsbitHá 1h

After Nine Months of Shorting, a Full Turn to Long: Renowned Trader Opens Bitcoin Positions Around 64K, Crypto Market Long-Short Divergence Intensifies

marsbitHá 1h

Senior Trader's Confession: How to Trade Market's False Expectations?

Veteran trader's case study: trading the market's "wrong expectations". This trade centered on a textbook "expectation error" after a weak CPI report. While the market initially priced in broad monetary easing (sending Nasdaq to 30,060), the crucial 30-year real yield hit a 20-year high. This signaled a fractured transmission mechanism: short-term rates eased, but long-term funding costs (vital for tech valuations) refused to fall. The trader executed five short positions on the Nasdaq (NQ) as it fell from 30,060 to 28,768. The core methodology: don't just trade the data, but analyze the market's implied causal chain and identify where it breaks. In this case, the chain was: Weak CPI → Policy Easing → Lower Long-Term Funding Costs → NQ Valuation Expansion. The break occurred between policy easing and long-term rates. The "veto variable" – long-term real yields – refused to confirm the bullish narrative. Trades were structured around "fast variables" (price) temporarily repairing while "slow variables" (funding conditions) remained broken. The article outlines a repeatable framework: 1) Map the market's implied causal chain. 2) Identify the veto variable. 3) Observe if it rejects the narrative. 4) Enter when price still follows the old script. 5) Choose the cleanest asset expression (e.g., short NQ, not broad S&P). 6) Define both invalidation and fulfillment exit conditions. The key insight: Alpha often comes not from an information edge, but from a "reaction function edge" – recognizing when the market is applying an outdated causal logic to new data. The critical question: What causal chain is the market's first reaction relying on, and is that chain still valid today?

marsbitHá 1h

Senior Trader's Confession: How to Trade Market's False Expectations?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar ONE

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Harmony (ONE) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Harmony (ONE) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Harmony (ONE)Depois de comprar o teu Harmony (ONE), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Harmony (ONE)Transaciona facilmente Harmony (ONE) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

347 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar ONE

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de ONE (ONE) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片