UK Lawmakers Push to Ban Crypto Donations Over Transparency and Foreign Influence Risks

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-01-12Última atualização em 2026-01-12

Resumo

A group of seven senior UK Labour MPs is urging Prime Minister to ban cryptocurrency donations to political parties, citing three major risks: a lack of transparency that hides donor identities, the potential for foreign interference, and the ability to bypass donation limits by splitting payments. Although the government acknowledges these dangers, it considers an immediate ban too complex to implement and may not include it in the upcoming election bill. The issue gained urgency after Reform UK became the first party to accept crypto donations, including a large fiat donation from a crypto investor, raising concerns about crypto wealth influencing politics. The push for a ban is growing to protect trust in elections and uphold financial rules.

A group of seven senior Labour MPs is asking Prime Minister Keir Starmer to ban cryptocurrency donations to political parties and wants this ban to be included in the UK election bill that is expected to be introduced ahead of the local elections in 2026. They are arguing that the crypto donations are a serious risk to democracy.

Three Risks Driving Calls to Ban Crypto Political Donations

The MPs say that the crypto donations create three major problems.

  1. Lack of transparency: Cryptocurrency can hide the sender of the money, and it would be very hard to find out who is donating to the politicians.
  2. Foreign Interference risk: Elections could be influenced by hidden donors, including foreign actors and illegal sources, without voters or regulators being able to see it, which breaks the normal political finance rules.
  3. Easy to escape from the donation limits – Crypto can be split into many small payments that fall below disclosure thresholds.

The UK Government acknowledges the risks but officially says that the full ban may be too complex to implement immediately. As a result, the ban may not be included in the upcoming elections bill. So even though the ministers and MPs accept the danger, they are moving slowly.

The debate is heating up now because Reform UK became the first UK political party to accept crypto donations. Things become more serious when it is revealed that Reform UK received a 9 million GBP donation from a crypto investor in traditional fiat currency, not crypto. This made lawmakers worry that crypto wealth is entering politics.

The major reason for this debate is not about crypto technology but about building trust in the election. These lawmakers could fear that the crypto could undermine the political and financial rules, and voters won’t know who is backing political parties. That’s why Labour MPs are calling for a complete ban, and the support for the ban is growing beyond the Labour MPs.

Highlighted Crypto News:

‌U.S. SEC Delays on Canary PENGU and T. Rowe Price Crypto ETFs, Opens Grayscale Options Comments

TagsCryptoUK

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhy are UK lawmakers pushing to ban cryptocurrency donations to political parties?

AUK lawmakers are pushing to ban crypto donations due to three major risks: a lack of transparency that hides the sender's identity, the potential for foreign interference in elections, and the ability to easily circumvent donation limits by splitting payments.

QWhich UK political party was the first to accept cryptocurrency donations, escalating the debate?

AReform UK became the first UK political party to accept cryptocurrency donations, which intensified the debate around political finance and transparency.

QWhat is the UK Government's official stance on implementing a full ban on crypto donations?

AThe UK Government acknowledges the risks but has stated that a full ban may be too complex to implement immediately, so it may not be included in the upcoming elections bill.

QWhat specific risks do the Labour MPs associate with crypto donations regarding election integrity?

AThe Labour MPs associate crypto donations with risks to election integrity, including hidden foreign actors influencing elections, breaking political finance rules, and voters being unable to know who is backing political parties.

QBeyond the Labour MPs, how is the support for the ban on crypto donations described?

ASupport for the ban on crypto donations is described as growing beyond the Labour MPs, indicating broader concern about the risks to democracy and political finance transparency.

Leituras Relacionadas

MoonPay Launches PayBox

MoonPay, a developer of payment solutions for crypto and traditional currencies, has launched PayBox, a new type of payment wallet that enables AI assistants in Claude and ChatGPT to conduct transactions. Users can manage digital assets and pay for online services directly within chat interfaces. Upon user request, the AI can perform actions such as purchasing PYUSD, swapping tokens, cross-chain transfers, depositing funds into DeFi protocols, and booking flights. All transactions require user confirmation via an access key before execution. PayBox supports Solana and EVM-based blockchains like Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Polygon, Hyperliquid, Tempo, and Robinhood Chain, with plans to add more networks. It can store both crypto wallets and payment cards. Security is provided via MPC (Multi-Party Computation) technology and secure execution environments, ensuring no single entity—including MoonPay or the AI assistant—has full access to user funds. The wallet offers two permission modes: "Always Ask," requiring manual approval for each transaction, and "Standalone," where the AI can operate autonomously within user-set limits. Permissions can be modified or revoked at any time. PayBox is built on technology from Sodot, a secure crypto wallet solutions provider acquired by MoonPay earlier this year. This infrastructure reportedly secures over $50 billion in digital assets across more than 10 million wallets.

cryptonews.ruHá 11m

MoonPay Launches PayBox

cryptonews.ruHá 11m

Now the Greatest Regret Is to My Family: Crypto Experts Took a Stumble in the Stock Market

Summary: This article examines the significant losses recently suffered by cryptocurrency traders and influencers who ventured into the stock market, specifically by heavily investing in AI-related and semiconductor storage stocks. The narrative centers on the dramatic reversal in the Korean and US equity markets in late July, with stocks like SK Hynix and related leveraged ETFs experiencing historic plunges, erasing massive gains. The analysis highlights several key factors behind the "flip." Traders, accustomed to crypto's high volatility and frustrated by a stagnant market, chased the apparent momentum in AI-themed equities. Many made fatal mistakes: applying high-leverage strategies common in crypto (e.g., 2x ETFs, on-chain perpetual contracts) to stocks, and failing to understand the distinct rules of different stock markets (like Korean pre-market trading). This led to widespread liquidations, especially when a thin Korean pre-market trade triggered a cascading flash crash on a decentralized exchange. Post-crash reflections from prominent figures reveal deep regret and self-criticism. They acknowledge misjudging their expertise, overestimating their edge against sophisticated institutional players, and the dangers of leverage. The article concludes that while such setbacks are part of trading, surviving long-term requires recognizing one's limitations and the inherent risks of cross-market strategies.

marsbitHá 56m

Now the Greatest Regret Is to My Family: Crypto Experts Took a Stumble in the Stock Market

marsbitHá 56m

US Senate Makes Important Amendments to "Conflict of Interest" Section of Cryptocurrency Bill

The U.S. Senate has taken a key step regarding the CLARITY Act, which could shape the future of the U.S. crypto market. On July 29, Senators Tom Tillis and Ruben Gallego finalized amendments to the bill's "conflict of interest" rules, one of its most contentious aspects. The bipartisan bill aims to tighten restrictions on high-level federal officials' ties to digital assets. The new text, crafted as an alternative to a White House-endorsed ethics code, is expected to impose stricter rules limiting officials' ability to issue or directly participate in digital asset projects. However, with Congress entering an August recess and the revised text not yet reviewed by much of the Senate, the bill's timeline is uncertain. Senate Majority Leader John Thune indicated a procedural vote could occur between July 29 and August 1 but expressed doubt the full bill could pass before the break. The House-approved CLARITY Act, passed in July 2025, has been under Senate negotiation for over a year. Key goals of the CLARITY Act include clarifying jurisdictional boundaries between the SEC and CFTC, setting rules for digital commodity spot markets, and addressing topics like stablecoin yields, DeFi, and illicit financing. The stablecoin yield provisions could significantly impact U.S.-based DeFi protocols, exchanges, and issuers, affecting their global competitiveness. The outcome is being closely watched by both the U.S. and global digital asset markets.

cryptonews.ruHá 1h

US Senate Makes Important Amendments to "Conflict of Interest" Section of Cryptocurrency Bill

cryptonews.ruHá 1h

MoonPay Launches PayBox

MoonPay, a payments infrastructure company for crypto and traditional currencies, has launched PayBox, a new type of payments wallet that enables AI assistants like Claude and ChatGPT to execute transactions. Users can manage digital assets and pay for online services directly within chat interfaces. Upon request, AI can perform actions such as purchasing PYUSD, swapping tokens, cross-chain transfers, funding DeFi protocols, and booking flights. Users confirm each transaction with an access key before it is processed. PayBox initially supports Solana and EVM-based blockchains like Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Polygon, Hyperliquid, Tempo, and Robinhood Chain, with plans to add more networks. It can store both crypto wallets and payment cards. Security is provided via MPC (Multi-Party Computation) technology and secure execution environments, ensuring no single party—including MoonPay or the AI assistant—has full access to user assets. The wallet offers two permission modes: "Always Ask," requiring manual approval for each action, and "Autonomous," where AI can execute transactions within user-set limits. Permissions can be altered or revoked anytime. PayBox is built on technology from Sodot, a secure wallet solutions provider acquired by MoonPay earlier this year. This infrastructure reportedly secures over $50 billion in digital assets across more than 10 million wallets.

cryptonews.ruHá 1h

MoonPay Launches PayBox

cryptonews.ruHá 1h

Pavel Durov Designated as a Terrorist in Russia. What Does This Mean for Telegram Users?

Pavel Durov, the founder of Telegram, has been added to Russia's list of terrorists and extremists by Rosfinmonitoring, as published on July 30. The entry includes his name and date of birth. The designation follows an announcement by the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) on July 29, which charged Durov with aiding terrorist activity. The FSB alleges that a Telegram dating bot named "DaiVinchik" was used to recruit 46 individuals for attacks on police and arson, orchestrated by Ukrainian special services. The FSB also accuses Telegram's administration of failing to remove channels and bots used by Ukrainian intelligence and extremist groups. Durov is reportedly subject to an international arrest warrant. Inclusion on the Rosfinmonitoring list leads to significant restrictions: the freezing of Durov's bank accounts and assets, severe limitations on financial transactions, and a ban on election participation, media interaction, and event organization. Transfers to his accounts may be considered terrorism financing. For ordinary Russian Telegram users, purchasing Telegram Premium is not classified as financing terrorism, according to an IT expert. General use of the messenger—messaging, managing channels—does not automatically make a user a participant in extremist activity. There has been no official decision to ban Telegram itself. It is noted that French authorities are also investigating Durov over allegations of inadequate measures against criminal activity on the platform and insufficient cooperation with law enforcement. Durov denies all charges.

cryptonews.ruHá 2h

Pavel Durov Designated as a Terrorist in Russia. What Does This Mean for Telegram Users?

cryptonews.ruHá 2h

Trading

Spot
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow